Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

 It is currently 28 Jul 2016, 08:29

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# When hypnotized subjects are told that they are deaf and are

Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

Manager
Joined: 17 Jul 2008
Posts: 249
Followers: 4

Kudos [?]: 218 [4] , given: 29

When hypnotized subjects are told that they are deaf and are [#permalink]

### Show Tags

17 Jul 2008, 10:17
4
KUDOS
22
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00

Difficulty:

45% (medium)

Question Stats:

61% (02:24) correct 39% (01:42) wrong based on 1467 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

68. When hypnotized subjects are told that they are deaf and are then asked whether they can hear the hypnotist, they reply, "No." Some theorists try to explain this result by arguing that the selves of hypnotized subjects are dissociated into separate parts, and that the part that is deaf is dissociated from the part that replies.

Which of the following challenges indicates the most serious weakness in the attempted explanation described above?

(A) Why does the part that replies not answer, "Yes"? I
(B) Why are the observed facts in need of any special explanation?
(C) Why do the subjects appear to accept the hypnotist's suggestion that they are deaf?
(D) Why do hypnotized subjects all respond the same way in the situation described?
(E) Why are the separate parts of the self the same for all subjects?
[Reveal] Spoiler: OA

_________________

Please give kudos if you enjoy the explanations that I have given. Thanks

Senior Manager
Joined: 25 Nov 2006
Posts: 277
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 31 [0], given: 0

Re: When hypnotized subjects are told that they are deaf and are [#permalink]

### Show Tags

17 Jul 2008, 12:10
IMO D,

all responding the same way goes againt the fact that 'selves of hypnotized subjects are dissociated into separate parts'. Hence responses should vary per person to person cause the part that responds has no idea about the fact that the person is deaf.
And for it to say 'Yes' each time, is not in line with the above mentioned fact( to me then it seems they are then connected)
Manager
Joined: 17 Jul 2008
Posts: 249
Followers: 4

Kudos [?]: 218 [0], given: 29

Re: When hypnotized subjects are told that they are deaf and are [#permalink]

### Show Tags

17 Jul 2008, 12:48
well the answer is A but I did not understand why it is A.
_________________

Please give kudos if you enjoy the explanations that I have given. Thanks

Senior Manager
Joined: 25 Nov 2006
Posts: 277
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 31 [0], given: 0

Re: When hypnotized subjects are told that they are deaf and are [#permalink]

### Show Tags

17 Jul 2008, 12:57
Yea it is a contentious CR.

I still believe that if they are not connected, their actions will be independent of each other. The responces either being 'Yes' or a 'No' to me says somehow the responing part knows that it is a 'Yes'/'No' question. If it knows then there is a connection established right there.
Rather if the response is random, that would prove that the responding piece is independent reacting is whichever way it pleases (not bounded by a yes/no situation).
Manager
Status: Please do not forget to give kudos if you like my post
Joined: 19 Sep 2008
Posts: 128
Location: United States (CA)
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 71 [11] , given: 257

Re: When hypnotized subjects are told that they are deaf and are [#permalink]

### Show Tags

30 Sep 2013, 19:28
11
KUDOS
lets brick the argument:
Theorist: There are 2 part: Part1: Deaf and Part2: Replies

WE need to weaken Theorist.
[Deaf part cannot hear and Part that reply could]

B: Out of scope
C: strengthens
D: comparision eliminate
E: neutral

_________________

[Reveal] Spoiler:

Senior Manager
Joined: 01 Nov 2013
Posts: 355
GMAT 1: 690 Q45 V39
WE: General Management (Energy and Utilities)
Followers: 6

Kudos [?]: 112 [4] , given: 403

Re: When hypnotized subjects are told that they are deaf and are [#permalink]

### Show Tags

18 Apr 2014, 01:25
4
KUDOS
We have to weaken the argument.
Simply put, if we can establish that the two parts are connected then the whole argument will fall apart or else we need to cast doubt on the findings/conclusion.

If the subject replies YES then it means that may be the parts are connected and the subject is not hypnotized
_________________

Our greatest weakness lies in giving up. The most certain way to succeed is always to try just one more time.

I hated every minute of training, but I said, 'Don't quit. Suffer now and live the rest of your life as a champion.-Mohammad Ali

Manager
Joined: 30 May 2013
Posts: 190
Location: India
Concentration: Entrepreneurship, General Management
GPA: 3.82
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 52 [2] , given: 72

Re: When hypnotized subjects are told that they are deaf and are [#permalink]

### Show Tags

18 Apr 2014, 10:14
2
KUDOS
perfectstranger wrote:
68. When hypnotized subjects are told that they are deaf and are then asked whether they can hear the hypnotist, they reply, "No." Some theorists try to explain this result by arguing that the selves of hypnotized subjects are dissociated into separate parts, and that the part that is deaf is dissociated from the part that replies.
Which of the following challenges indicates the most serious weakness in the attempted explanation described above?
(A) Why does the part that replies not answer,
"Yes"? I
(B) Why are the observed facts in need of any
special explanation?
(C) Why do the subjects appear to accept the
hypnotist's suggestion that they are deaf? C
D) Why do hypnotized subjects all respond the
same way in the situation described?
E) Why are the separate parts of the self the same
for all subjects?

Conclusion : the part that is deaf is dissociated from the part that replies

(A) Why does the part that replies not answer,"Yes"? - Weakener - If the parts are dissociated for each other. then the part that replies is not aware of wat its saying then why should it always says "Yes"
(B) Why are the observed facts in need of any special explanation? - Irrelevant
(C) Why do the subjects appear to accept the hypnotist's suggestion that they are deaf? - - Irrelevant Not sure!!!!
(D) Why do hypnotized subjects all respond the same way in the situation described? nothing to do with the theorist views
E) Why are the separate parts of the self the same for all subjects? - Nuteral
Intern
Joined: 31 Mar 2014
Posts: 20
Concentration: Operations, General Management
Schools: IIMA (PGPX)
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 11 [0], given: 1

Re: When hypnotized subjects are told that they are deaf and are [#permalink]

### Show Tags

25 Aug 2014, 22:09
68. When hypnotized subjects are told that they are deaf and are then asked whether they can hear the hypnotist, they reply, "No." Some theorists try to explain this result by arguing that the selves of hypnotized subjects are dissociated into separate parts, and that the part that is deaf is dissociated from the part that replies.

Conclusion : selves are dissasociated. For example , subject left hand doesn't know about right hand of the subject.
Prove that still somehow there is a relation between then you will weaken the argument.

Which of the following challenges indicates the most serious weakness in the attempted explanation described above?
(A) Why does the part that replies not answer,
"Yes"? POE
(B) Why are the observed facts in need of any
special explanation?
out of scope. It has already happened and given as a premise.
(C) Why do the subjects appear to accept the
hypnotist's suggestion that they are deaf? C
OFS
D) Why do hypnotized subjects all respond the
same way in the situation described? OFS
We dont know whether all of them respond the same way. further, the focus is on why they respond than on how all respond.

E) Why are the separate parts of the self the same
for all subjects?
OFS. We are looking for correlation between dissociated parts in a single subject. How all others respond is out of scope.
Intern
Joined: 31 Jul 2014
Posts: 5
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 2 [0], given: 0

Re: When hypnotized subjects are told that they are deaf and are [#permalink]

### Show Tags

26 Aug 2014, 01:58
My approach: If the two parts are truly disassociated, then the answering part is not deaf. Hence, it should answer the question: Can you hear me? with a Yes. Hence the answer here is A.
Intern
Joined: 25 Jul 2014
Posts: 20
Concentration: Finance, General Management
GPA: 3.54
WE: Asset Management (Venture Capital)
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 20 [0], given: 52

Re: When hypnotized subjects are told that they are deaf and are [#permalink]

### Show Tags

20 Sep 2014, 11:56
Valii wrote:
My approach: If the two parts are truly disassociated, then the answering part is not deaf. Hence, it should answer the question: Can you hear me? with a Yes. Hence the answer here is A.

Still dont really get it. To me, the answer of "yes" or "no" doesn't make any difference because the subject does ANSWER. No matter the answer is correct or not, the fact that the subject does answer means he/she can hear. If would make more sense if the subject remains silence... which truly prove that he/she is deaf!
Verbal Forum Moderator
Joined: 16 Jun 2012
Posts: 1153
Location: United States
Followers: 230

Kudos [?]: 2469 [3] , given: 123

Re: When hypnotized subjects are told that they are deaf and are [#permalink]

### Show Tags

22 Sep 2014, 01:45
3
KUDOS
MulanQ wrote:
Valii wrote:
My approach: If the two parts are truly disassociated, then the answering part is not deaf. Hence, it should answer the question: Can you hear me? with a Yes. Hence the answer here is A.

Still dont really get it. To me, the answer of "yes" or "no" doesn't make any difference because the subject does ANSWER. No matter the answer is correct or not, the fact that the subject does answer means he/she can hear. If would make more sense if the subject remains silence... which truly prove that he/she is deaf!

Hello MulanQ

I understand the question's logic is quite hard to digest. The key point is that the deaf part is dissociated from the replies part. It means that no matter one can/can't hear anything, he/she always replies in a predetermined way. In this question, the deaf part means one is hypnotized to become "deaf", he/she is not a deaf person. (I think you misunderstood this point). In order to prove that the two parts is dissociated, we have to prove TWO cases, NOT only one used by the author.

If the deaf part is dissociated from the replies part, so:

Case #1: Although one can actually hear, he/she always replies "NO". --> It means the the "deaf" (or the hearing part) does not affect the reply part. (If he/she says "YES", he/she may hear something actually --> the deaf part may not dissociated from the reply part).

Case #2: Although one does NOT hear anything, he/she still replies "YES" --> It means the the "deaf" (or the hearing part) does not affect the reply part. (If he/she says "NO", he/she may not hear anything actually --> the deaf part may not dissociated from the reply part).

If the two cases above are shown properly, the argument's conclusion is correct. But if only one case is shown, case #1 in this question, we can't conclude that the deaf part is dissociated from the replies part.

A shows that the author "forgot" case #2, so the conclusion should be weaken.

Hope it helps.
_________________

Please +1 KUDO if my post helps. Thank you.

"Designing cars consumes you; it has a hold on your spirit which is incredibly powerful. It's not something you can do part time, you have do it with all your heart and soul or you're going to get it wrong."

Chris Bangle - Former BMW Chief of Design.

Manager
Joined: 20 Jan 2014
Posts: 186
Location: India
Concentration: Technology, Marketing
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 40 [0], given: 120

Re: When hypnotized subjects are told that they are deaf and are [#permalink]

### Show Tags

24 Sep 2014, 04:39
Choice A is Weakener - If the parts are dissociated for each other. then the part that replies is not aware of wat its saying then why should it always says "Yes"

Quite tricky question.
_________________

Intern
Joined: 24 Sep 2014
Posts: 1
Concentration: General Management, Economics
Schools: Booth '18 (A)
WE: Information Technology (Consulting)
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 83

Re: When hypnotized subjects are told that they are deaf and are [#permalink]

### Show Tags

09 Jul 2015, 16:14
This is a tricky question. Here is my take on why the correct answer is A:
If the part that replies says 'No' it means that this part actually heard the question, and therefore the subjects are not deaf. I think the explanation provided by the theorists is just there to confuse us. Simply put, answer choice A is basically saying: If you replied 'No' that means you heard the question and that means you are not deaf, so you should have replied 'Yes'. The explanation offered by the theorists is based on the assumption that test subjects are deaf (which as I stated, isn't the case since they heard the question in the first place). Anyway, that was my understanding.
Manager
Joined: 16 Dec 2013
Posts: 52
Location: United States
GPA: 3.7
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 9 [0], given: 38

Re: When hypnotized subjects are told that they are deaf and are [#permalink]

### Show Tags

09 Apr 2016, 00:03
I don't really understand the difference b/w option a and d. It appears both of them are implying the same.
Re: When hypnotized subjects are told that they are deaf and are   [#permalink] 09 Apr 2016, 00:03
Similar topics Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
3 When hypnotized subjects are told that they are deaf 5 10 Jan 2016, 11:05
3 When hypnotized subjects are told that they are deaf and are 3 24 Aug 2012, 03:14
6 When hypnotized subjects are told that they are deaf and are 6 11 Apr 2011, 19:06
18 When hypnotized subjects are told that they are deaf and are 21 05 Oct 2010, 09:44
When hypnotized subjects are told that they are deaf and are 7 11 Oct 2006, 08:32
Display posts from previous: Sort by