|
Author |
Message |
|
TAGS:
|
|
|
Director
Joined: 29 Aug 2005
Posts: 891
Followers: 6
Kudos [?]:
87
[1] , given: 7
|
When integer m is divided by 13, the quotient is q and the r [#permalink]
06 Apr 2009, 13:08
1
This post received KUDOS
Question Stats:
60% (02:07) correct
39% (01:30) wrong based on 5 sessions
When integer m is divided by 13, the quotient is q and the remainder is 2. When m is divided by 17, the remainder is also 2. What is the remainder when q is divided by 17? A. 0 B. 2 C. 4 D. 9 E. 13
Last edited by Bunuel on 29 Jan 2013, 04:16, edited 1 time in total.
Renamed the topic and added OA.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior Manager
Joined: 01 Mar 2009
Posts: 375
Location: PDX
Followers: 5
Kudos [?]:
53
[0], given: 24
|
So q is 17 because if m = 13q + 2 and m is also 17(z)+2 So when 17 is divided by 17 the remainder is 0. -pradeep
_________________
In the land of the night, the chariot of the sun is drawn by the grateful dead
|
|
|
|
|
|
GMAT Instructor
Joined: 24 Jun 2008
Posts: 973
Location: Toronto
Followers: 168
Kudos [?]:
443
[2] , given: 3
|
2
This post received KUDOS
botirvoy wrote: When integer m is divided by 13, the quotient is q and the remainder is 2. When m is divided by 17, the remainder is also 2. What is the remainder when q is divided by 17?
A. 0 B. 2 C. 4 D. 9 E. 13
Detailed explanations please. From the definition of quotients and remainders, we have: m = 13q + 2 m = 17a + 2 (note that the quotient is different in the second case). So we have 13q + 2 = 17a + 2 13q = 17a and since this equation involves only integers, the primes that divide the right side must divide the left, and vice versa. That is, q must be divisible by 17, and a must be divisible by 13. If q is divisible by 17, the remainder is zero when you divide q by 17. Of course, if you can see that q = 17 is one possible value for q here, you can use that to get the answer of zero quickly as well.
_________________
Nov 2011: After years of development, I am now making my advanced Quant books and high-level problem sets available for sale. Contact me at ianstewartgmat at gmail.com for details.
Private GMAT Tutor based in Toronto
|
|
|
|
|
|
Manager
Joined: 02 Mar 2009
Posts: 139
Followers: 1
Kudos [?]:
24
[0], given: 0
|
Got 0 as well but am I right in thinking that 0 is another possible value of q?
|
|
|
|
|
|
GMAT Instructor
Joined: 24 Jun 2008
Posts: 973
Location: Toronto
Followers: 168
Kudos [?]:
443
[0], given: 3
|
shkusira wrote: Got 0 as well but am I right in thinking that 0 is another possible value of q? Yes, perfectly correct - and that makes the question quite easy!
_________________
Nov 2011: After years of development, I am now making my advanced Quant books and high-level problem sets available for sale. Contact me at ianstewartgmat at gmail.com for details.
Private GMAT Tutor based in Toronto
|
|
|
|
|
|
Director
Joined: 23 May 2008
Posts: 842
Followers: 3
Kudos [?]:
19
[0], given: 0
|
m-13q=2 m-17s=2
13q=17s
r=0
A
|
|
|
|
|
|
Manager
Joined: 14 Nov 2008
Posts: 201
Schools: Stanford...Wait, I will come!!!
Followers: 2
Kudos [?]:
17
[0], given: 3
|
IanStewart wrote: shkusira wrote: Got 0 as well but am I right in thinking that 0 is another possible value of q? Yes, perfectly correct - and that makes the question quite easy! Thanks. Just to add, if q=0, it is divisible by 17.. and hence would not leave any remainder.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intern
Joined: 10 May 2010
Posts: 1
Followers: 0
Kudos [?]:
0
[0], given: 0
|
We can solve this using a simple equation and deriving the values:- m = 13q + 2 - 1 m = 17p + 2 - 2
=> 13q + = 17p + 2 => 13q = 17p => q = 17p/3 Here, 17p is equal to (m-2) from eqn 2. Therefore, q = (m-2)/3
Now substituting the values in eqn 1:- => m = 13(m-2)/3 + 2 From here, m = 2.
Now using M, the value of Q can be derived from eqn 1. => 2 = 13q + 2 => q = 0
Now if we divide Q by any number henceforth, the remainder would always be 0.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Manager
Joined: 05 Feb 2007
Posts: 141
Followers: 1
Kudos [?]:
7
[0], given: 7
|
So, I understand how to get to here
m=(13q)+2 m=(17x)+2
13q=17x
But, once I reduce the equation to 13q=17x, I am unable to make any deductions...can someone provide a clear explanation on how to use algebra to derive the values when we still have variables?
|
|
|
|
|
|
VP
Status: There is always something new !!
Affiliations: PMI,QAI Global,eXampleCG
Joined: 08 May 2009
Posts: 1400
Followers: 8
Kudos [?]:
84
[0], given: 10
|
13q = 17p lcm = 13 * 17. thus q = 17. hence remainder = 0
_________________
Visit -- http://www.sustainable-sphere.com/ Promote Green Business,Sustainable Living and Green Earth !!
|
|
|
|
|
|
GMAT Instructor
Joined: 24 Jun 2008
Posts: 973
Location: Toronto
Followers: 168
Kudos [?]:
443
[1] , given: 3
|
1
This post received KUDOS
amit2k9 wrote: 13q = 17p lcm = 13 * 17.
thus q = 17.
hence remainder = 0 Careful here; if 13q = 17p, all you can say is that q is a multiple of 17, and that p is a multiple of 13. There is no way to find the actual value of q or p, and you certainly cannot be sure that q=17. It could be that q=34 and p=26, for example. In general, if you see an equation like 13q = 17p, and if q and p are integers, then 13q and 17p are *the same number*. So they must have the same divisors. Since 17 is a divisor of 17p, it must be a divisor of 13q, so q must be divisible by 17. Alternatively you can rewrite the equation as p = 13q/17, and since p is an integer, 13q/17 must be an integer, from which again we have that 13q is divisible by 17, so q is divisible by 17.
_________________
Nov 2011: After years of development, I am now making my advanced Quant books and high-level problem sets available for sale. Contact me at ianstewartgmat at gmail.com for details.
Private GMAT Tutor based in Toronto
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intern
Joined: 18 Dec 2012
Posts: 2
Followers: 0
Kudos [?]:
0
[0], given: 25
|
Can't I just say q=0, so (1) m=13q+2 => m=13*0+2 <=> m=2 (2) m=17k+2 => 2=17k+2 <=> k=0 --> 0 divided by 17 will obviously result in a reminder of 0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Similar topics |
Author |
Replies |
Last post |
|
Similar Topics:
|
|
|
|
When N is divided by 13, the remainder is 2 and the quotient
|
pb_india |
2 |
09 May 2005, 05:49 |
|
|
|
When the positive integer x is divided by 11, the quotient
|
u2lover |
5 |
08 Aug 2006, 18:47 |
|
|
|
When the positive integer x is divided by 11, the quotient
|
Dek |
7 |
31 May 2007, 05:19 |
|
|
|
When the integer n is divided by 17, the quotient is x and
|
yogachgolf |
3 |
04 Dec 2007, 20:27 |
|
1
|
|
When Q is divided by W, the quotient is R and the remainder
|
madzstar |
3 |
07 May 2013, 13:57 |
|
|
|
|
|
|