Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

It appears that you are browsing the GMAT Club forum unregistered!

Signing up is free, quick, and confidential.
Join other 500,000 members and get the full benefits of GMAT Club

Registration gives you:

Tests

Take 11 tests and quizzes from GMAT Club and leading GMAT prep companies such as Manhattan GMAT,
Knewton, and others. All are free for GMAT Club members.

Applicant Stats

View detailed applicant stats such as GPA, GMAT score, work experience, location, application
status, and more

Books/Downloads

Download thousands of study notes,
question collections, GMAT Club’s
Grammar and Math books.
All are free!

Thank you for using the timer!
We noticed you are actually not timing your practice. Click the START button first next time you use the timer.
There are many benefits to timing your practice, including:

87% (02:14) correct
13% (01:26) wrong based on 1241 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

When Leo imported a certain item, he paid a 7 percent import tax on the portion of the total value of the item in excess of $1,000. If the amount of the import tax that Leo paid was $87.50, what was the total value of the item?

When Leo imported a certain item, he paid a 7 percent import tax on the portion of the total value of the item in excess of $1,000. If the amount of the import tax that Leo paid was $87.50, what was the total value of the item?

Let the value of the item be \($x\), then \(0.07(x-1,000)=87.5\) --> \(x-1,000=1,250\) --> \(x=2,250\).

Answer: C.

Else, you could backsolve: If the value of the item is $2,000 the tax is \((2,000-1,000)*0.07=70\), so the value must be more than $2,000. Eliminate A and B. If the value of the item is $2,400 the tax is \((2,400-1,000)*0.07=98\), so the value must be less than $2,400. Eliminate D and E.

When Leo imported a certain item, he paid a 7 percent import tax on the portion of the total value of the item in excess of $1,000. If the amount of the import tax that Leo paid was $87.50, what was the total value of the item?

Let the value of the item be \($x\), then \(0.07(x-1,000)=87.5\) --> \(x-1,000=1,250\) --> \(x=2,250\).

Answer: C.

Else, you could backsolve: If the value of the item is $2,000 the tax is \((2,000-1,000)*0.07=70\), so the value must be more than $2,000. Eliminate A and B. If the value of the item is $2,400 the tax is \((2,400-1,000)*0.07=98\), so the value must be less than $2,400. Eliminate D and E.

Re: When Leo imported a certain item, he paid a 7 percent import [#permalink]

Show Tags

18 Dec 2013, 09:21

Bunuel wrote:

SOLUTION

When Leo imported a certain item, he paid a 7 percent import tax on the portion of the total value of the item in excess of $1,000. If the amount of the import tax that Leo paid was $87.50, what was the total value of the item?

Let the value of the item be \($x\), then \(0.07(x-1,000)=87.5\) --> \(x-1,000=1,250\) --> \(x=2,250\).

Answer: C.

Else, you could backsolve: If the value of the item is $2,000 the tax is \((2,000-1,000)*0.07=70\), so the value must be more than $2,000. Eliminate A and B. If the value of the item is $2,400 the tax is \((2,400-1,000)*0.07=98\), so the value must be less than $2,400. Eliminate D and E.

Only answer choice C is left.

Do you have tips or a guide on how to most efficiently divide with non-integers in the denominator? I have seen two PS questions where they want us to divide some integer value with a non-integer (0.8 and now 0.07), and I do not really know how to properly approach the division.

When Leo imported a certain item, he paid a 7 percent import tax on the portion of the total value of the item in excess of $1,000. If the amount of the import tax that Leo paid was $87.50, what was the total value of the item?

Let the value of the item be \($x\), then \(0.07(x-1,000)=87.5\) --> \(x-1,000=1,250\) --> \(x=2,250\).

Answer: C.

Else, you could backsolve: If the value of the item is $2,000 the tax is \((2,000-1,000)*0.07=70\), so the value must be more than $2,000. Eliminate A and B. If the value of the item is $2,400 the tax is \((2,400-1,000)*0.07=98\), so the value must be less than $2,400. Eliminate D and E.

Only answer choice C is left.

Do you have tips or a guide on how to most efficiently divide with non-integers in the denominator? I have seen two PS questions where they want us to divide some integer value with a non-integer (0.8 and now 0.07), and I do not really know how to properly approach the division.

Re: When Leo imported a certain item, he paid a 7 percent import [#permalink]

Show Tags

19 Dec 2013, 02:27

1

This post received KUDOS

Since we know Leo pays 7% of the amount that is in excess of $1000 We can assume 'x' to be the excess amount. Then 7 percent of x = 87.50 => x = 1250. Hence total value = 1000 + 1250 = 2250. Hence (C)

Re: When Leo imported a certain item, he paid a 7 percent import [#permalink]

Show Tags

09 Sep 2014, 21:38

Bunuel wrote:

When Leo imported a certain item, he paid a 7 percent import tax on the portion of the total value of the item in excess of $1,000. If the amount of the import tax that Leo paid was $87.50, what was the total value of the item?

Re: When Leo imported a certain item, he paid a 7 percent import [#permalink]

Show Tags

09 Sep 2014, 22:03

luckyme17187 wrote:

Bunuel wrote:

When Leo imported a certain item, he paid a 7 percent import tax on the portion of the total value of the item in excess of $1,000. If the amount of the import tax that Leo paid was $87.50, what was the total value of the item?

When Leo imported a certain item, he paid a 7 percent import [#permalink]

Show Tags

11 May 2016, 06:18

Usually I do it the following way. If we are told that 7% of the excess amount is 87.5 then we can find the value of one 1%, i.e. 87.5/7=12.5. From this we can derive the full value of the excess amount: 12.5*100=1250=excess amount. 1000+1250
_________________

Re: When Leo imported a certain item, he paid a 7 percent import [#permalink]

Show Tags

11 May 2016, 06:27

1

This post received KUDOS

Bunuel wrote:

When Leo imported a certain item, he paid a 7 percent import tax on the portion of the total value of the item in excess of $1,000. If the amount of the import tax that Leo paid was $87.50, what was the total value of the item?

Although this problem seems challenging it is actually a simple word translation.

We know that when Leo imports a certain item he pays a 7% import tax on the portion of the total value IN EXCESS OF $1,000. “In excess of” is the key phrase here, and it means that Leo does not pay any tax on his items until he hits $1,000. The best way to complete this problem is to set up an equation.

First, let’s say that T = total value of the item, and, therefore, (T – 1000) is the portion that is taxable.

Next, we can create an equation to determine T:

87.5 = 0.07(T – 1,000)

87.5 = 0.07T – 70

157.5 = 0.07T

157.5/0.07 = T

15,750/7 = T

T = 2,250

Answer C.
_________________

Jeffrey Miller Scott Woodbury-Stewart Founder and CEO

Re: When Leo imported a certain item, he paid a 7 percent import [#permalink]

Show Tags

05 Jul 2016, 00:45

Bunuel wrote:

When Leo imported a certain item, he paid a 7 percent import tax on the portion of the total value of the item in excess of $1,000. If the amount of the import tax that Leo paid was $87.50, what was the total value of the item?

When Leo imported a certain item, he paid a 7 percent import tax on the portion of the total value of the item in excess of $1,000. If the amount of the import tax that Leo paid was $87.50, what was the total value of the item?

Happy New Year everyone! Before I get started on this post, and well, restarted on this blog in general, I wanted to mention something. For the past several months...

It’s quickly approaching two years since I last wrote anything on this blog. A lot has happened since then. When I last posted, I had just gotten back from...

Happy 2017! Here is another update, 7 months later. With this pace I might add only one more post before the end of the GSB! However, I promised that...

The words of John O’Donohue ring in my head every time I reflect on the transformative, euphoric, life-changing, demanding, emotional, and great year that 2016 was! The fourth to...