|
Author |
Message |
|
TAGS:
|
|
|
Senior Manager
Joined: 07 Jan 2008
Posts: 418
Followers: 2
Kudos [?]:
46
[0], given: 0
|
When people evade income taxes by not declaring taxable [#permalink]
12 May 2008, 02:53
Question Stats:
0% (00:00) correct
100% (02:16) wrong based on 0 sessions
When people evade income taxes by not declaring taxable income, a vicious cycle results. Tax evasion forces lawmakers to raise income tax rates, which causes the tax burden on nonevading taxpayers to become heavier. This, in turn, encourages even more taxpayers to evade income taxes by hiding taxable income. The vicious cycle described above could not result unless which of the following were true? (A) An increase in tax rates tends to function as an incentive for taxpayers to try to increase their pretax incomes. (B) Some methods for detecting tax evaders, and thus recovering some tax revenue lost through evasion, bring in more than they cost, but their success rate varies from years to year. (C) When lawmakers establish income tax rates in order to generate a certain level of revenue, they do not allow adequately for revenue that will be lost through evasion. (D) No one who routinely hides some taxable income can be induced by a lowering of tax rates to stop hiding such income unless fines for evaders are raised at the same time. (E) Taxpayers do not differ from each other with respect to the rate of taxation that will cause them to evade taxes.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Manager
Joined: 13 Apr 2008
Posts: 66
Followers: 1
Kudos [?]:
3
[0], given: 0
|
Re: CR: EVADING TAXPAYERS VS. LAWMAKERS [#permalink]
12 May 2008, 03:37
lexis wrote: When people evade income taxes by not declaring taxable income, a vicious cycle results. Tax evasion forces lawmakers to raise income tax rates, which causes the tax burden on nonevading taxpayers to become heavier. This, in turn, encourages even more taxpayers to evade income taxes by hiding taxable income. The vicious cycle described above could not result unless which of the following were true? (A) An increase in tax rates tends to function as an incentive for taxpayers to try to increase their pretax incomes. (B) Some methods for detecting tax evaders, and thus recovering some tax revenue lost through evasion, bring in more than they cost, but their success rate varies from years to year. (C) When lawmakers establish income tax rates in order to generate a certain level of revenue, they do not allow adequately for revenue that will be lost through evasion.
IF IRS does not consider this point the viscious cycle will happen. Hence its C. (D) No one who routinely hides some taxable income can be induced by a lowering of tax rates to stop hiding such income unless fines for evaders are raised at the same time. (E) Taxpayers do not differ from each other with respect to the rate of taxation that will cause them to evade taxes.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Manager
Joined: 28 Apr 2008
Posts: 133
Followers: 2
Kudos [?]:
9
[0], given: 0
|
Re: CR: EVADING TAXPAYERS VS. LAWMAKERS [#permalink]
13 May 2008, 06:03
Cycle : Tax Evasion -> Taxes are raised -> Burden on nonevading tax payers -> more taxpayers evade taxes. How can we break this cycle. Either by ensuring that there is absolutely no Tax Evasion by tax payers, or some way for lawmakers to not raise taxes at all despite evasion. lexis wrote: When people evade income taxes by not declaring taxable income, a vicious cycle results. Tax evasion forces lawmakers to raise income tax rates, which causes the tax burden on nonevading taxpayers to become heavier. This, in turn, encourages even more taxpayers to evade income taxes by hiding taxable income. The vicious cycle described above could not result unless which of the following were true?
(A) An increase in tax rates tends to function as an incentive for taxpayers to try to increase their pretax incomes. >> This does not break the chain in any way.
(B) Some methods for detecting tax evaders, and thus recovering some tax revenue lost through evasion, bring in more than they cost, but their success rate varies from years to year. >> This can potentially reduce the tax evasion, but not sufficient for law makers to Not raise taxes or avoid evasion completely.
(C) When lawmakers establish income tax rates in order to generate a certain level of revenue, they do not allow adequately for revenue that will be lost through evasion. >> If they establish rates in such a way that their revenues are met despite evasion, they are likely to not raise taxes which is what we were looking for to break the cycle.
(D) No one who routinely hides some taxable income can be induced by a lowering of tax rates to stop hiding such income unless fines for evaders are raised at the same time. >> If fines are raised potentiall evasion can be reduced, but we dont know if it can be eliminated 100%.
(E) Taxpayers do not differ from each other with respect to the rate of taxation that will cause them to evade taxes. >> Even if taxpayers differ, ie. people with higher rates evade more often than people with lower rates. We still cant break the cycle.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior Manager
Joined: 27 Jun 2012
Posts: 413
Followers: 23
Kudos [?]:
193
[0], given: 171
|
Re: When people evade income taxes by not declaring taxable [#permalink]
19 Jan 2013, 02:46
Question: The vicious cycle described above could not result unless which of the following were true? The question is twisted in interesting way with double negations. Note the use of "could not" along with "Unless"="IF..NOT" or "Except-IF". You can simplify the question to: Reworded Question: The vicious cycle described above could result if which of the following were true? Hence you need to eliminate the choices which "breaks" the vicious cycle and choose the choice that does not [break the cycle]. (C) When lawmakers establish income tax rates in order to generate a certain level of revenue, they do not allow adequately for revenue that will be lost through evasion. -- This is the correct answer choice! This situation will ensure that the vicious cycle is continued.Hence choice(C) is the answer.
_________________
Thanks, PraPon
VOTE: vote-best-gmat-practice-tests-excluding-gmatprep-144859.html Tough RCs: Passage1 | Passage2 | Passage3 | Passage4 | Passage5 | Passage6 | Passage7
|
|
|
|
|
|
Manager
Joined: 04 Jan 2013
Posts: 83
Followers: 0
Kudos [?]:
3
[0], given: 1
|
Re: CR: EVADING TAXPAYERS VS. LAWMAKERS [#permalink]
19 Jan 2013, 10:04
yavasani wrote: Cycle : Tax Evasion -> Taxes are raised -> Burden on nonevading tax payers -> more taxpayers evade taxes. How can we break this cycle. Either by ensuring that there is absolutely no Tax Evasion by tax payers, or some way for lawmakers to not raise taxes at all despite evasion. lexis wrote: When people evade income taxes by not declaring taxable income, a vicious cycle results. Tax evasion forces lawmakers to raise income tax rates, which causes the tax burden on nonevading taxpayers to become heavier. This, in turn, encourages even more taxpayers to evade income taxes by hiding taxable income. The vicious cycle described above could not result unless which of the following were true?
(A) An increase in tax rates tends to function as an incentive for taxpayers to try to increase their pretax incomes. >> This does not break the chain in any way.
(B) Some methods for detecting tax evaders, and thus recovering some tax revenue lost through evasion, bring in more than they cost, but their success rate varies from years to year. >> This can potentially reduce the tax evasion, but not sufficient for law makers to Not raise taxes or avoid evasion completely.
(C) When lawmakers establish income tax rates in order to generate a certain level of revenue, they do not allow adequately for revenue that will be lost through evasion. >> If they establish rates in such a way that their revenues are met despite evasion, they are likely to not raise taxes which is what we were looking for to break the cycle.
(D) No one who routinely hides some taxable income can be induced by a lowering of tax rates to stop hiding such income unless fines for evaders are raised at the same time. >> If fines are raised potentiall evasion can be reduced, but we dont know if it can be eliminated 100%.
(E) Taxpayers do not differ from each other with respect to the rate of taxation that will cause them to evade taxes. >> Even if taxpayers differ, ie. people with higher rates evade more often than people with lower rates. We still cant break the cycle.
thumbs up for nice explaination! ;-D Posted from my mobile device
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Re: CR: EVADING TAXPAYERS VS. LAWMAKERS
[#permalink]
19 Jan 2013, 10:04
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Moderators:
metallicafan, rajeevrks27, souvik101990, PTK, MacFauz, noboru, kissthegmat, carcass, willigetmylifeback, mikemcgarry, doe007, Vercules, Legendaddy, tuanquang269, RaviChandra, Marcab, Narenn
|