Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 24 Oct 2014, 19:56

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

When politicians resort to personal attacks, many

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:
1 KUDOS received
Retired Moderator
User avatar
Joined: 01 Oct 2009
Posts: 486
Location: Bangalore,India
WE 1: 4yrs in IT Industry
Followers: 22

Kudos [?]: 112 [1] , given: 338

When politicians resort to personal attacks, many [#permalink] New post 13 May 2010, 06:30
1
This post received
KUDOS
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

25% (02:19) correct 75% (01:18) wrong based on 38 sessions
When politicians resort to personal attacks, many editorialists criticize these attacks but most voters pay them scant attention. Everyone knows such attacks will end after election day, and politicians can be excused for mudslinging. Political commentators, however, cannot be. Political commentators should be engaged in sustained and serious debate about ideas and policies. In such a context personal attacks on opponents serve not to beat those opponents but to cut off the debate.

Which of the following most accurately states the main point of the argument?

(A) Personal attacks on opponents serve a useful purpose for politicians.
(B) Political commentators should not resort to personal attacks on their opponents.
(C) Editorialists are right to criticize politicians who resort to personal attacks on their opponents.
(D) The purpose of serious debate about ideas and policies is to counteract the effect of personal attacks by politicians.
(E) Voters should be concerned about the personal attacks politicians make on each other.
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 01 Feb 2010
Posts: 268
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 35 [0], given: 2

Re: politicians personal attacks [#permalink] New post 13 May 2010, 07:42
RaviChandra wrote:
When politicians resort to personal attacks, many editorialists criticize these attacks but most voters pay them scant attention. Everyone knows such attacks will end after election day, and politicians can be excused for mudslinging. Political commentators, however, cannot be. Political commentators should be engaged in sustained and serious debate about ideas and policies. In such a context personal attacks on opponents serve not to beat those opponents but to cut off the debate.

Which of the following most accurately states the main point of the argument?

(A) Personal attacks on opponents serve a useful purpose for politicians.
(B) Political commentators should not resort to personal attacks on their opponents.
(C) Editorialists are right to criticize politicians who resort to personal attacks on their opponents.
(D) The purpose of serious debate about ideas and policies is to counteract the effect of personal attacks by politicians.
(E) Voters should be concerned about the personal attacks politicians make on each other.

I would go with D.
Debate seems to be main point of concern for the author in passage and D describes purpose of Debate over personal attacks.
Director
Director
User avatar
Joined: 01 Apr 2008
Posts: 909
Schools: IIM Lucknow (IPMX) - Class of 2014
Followers: 15

Kudos [?]: 234 [0], given: 18

Re: politicians personal attacks [#permalink] New post 13 May 2010, 07:57
I go with B.
OA?
SVP
SVP
avatar
Joined: 17 Feb 2010
Posts: 1560
Followers: 12

Kudos [?]: 226 [0], given: 6

Re: politicians personal attacks [#permalink] New post 13 May 2010, 11:46
it is between B and D.

i pick (D) and would also appreciate if someone can explain the premise in simple words.
1 KUDOS received
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 24 Jul 2009
Posts: 298
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 73 [1] , given: 0

Re: politicians personal attacks [#permalink] New post 13 May 2010, 13:20
1
This post received
KUDOS
RaviChandra wrote:
When politicians resort to personal attacks, many editorialists criticize these attacks but most voters pay them scant attention. Everyone knows such attacks will end after election day, and politicians can be excused for mudslinging. Political commentators, however, cannot be. Political commentators should be engaged in sustained and serious debate about ideas and policies. In such a context personal attacks on opponents serve not to beat those opponents but to cut off the debate.

Which of the following most accurately states the main point of the argument?

(A) Personal attacks on opponents serve a useful purpose for politicians.
(B) Political commentators should not resort to personal attacks on their opponents.
(C) Editorialists are right to criticize politicians who resort to personal attacks on their opponents.
(D) The purpose of serious debate about ideas and policies is to counteract the effect of personal attacks by politicians.
(E) Voters should be concerned about the personal attacks politicians make on each other.



IMHO B

If we simplify the argument>>>>>> When X do Z..it's OK, HOWEVER, Y should not do Z.
So, Conclusion : Y should not do Z. >>>>> Political commentators cannot be excused for mudslinging.

IMO, D is completely misleading...!!
Retired Moderator
User avatar
Joined: 01 Oct 2009
Posts: 486
Location: Bangalore,India
WE 1: 4yrs in IT Industry
Followers: 22

Kudos [?]: 112 [0], given: 338

Re: politicians personal attacks [#permalink] New post 13 May 2010, 17:56
[Reveal] Spoiler:
OA:B
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 16 Feb 2010
Posts: 175
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 14 [0], given: 10

Re: politicians personal attacks [#permalink] New post 15 May 2010, 04:11
yup B must be the answer
Director
Director
User avatar
Joined: 24 Aug 2007
Posts: 956
WE 1: 3.5 yrs IT
WE 2: 2.5 yrs Retail chain
Followers: 55

Kudos [?]: 733 [0], given: 40

Re: politicians personal attacks [#permalink] New post 15 May 2010, 06:11
Good question. It desrves to be in LSAT category.

RaviChandra wrote:
When politicians resort to personal attacks, many editorialists criticize these attacks but most voters pay them scant attention. Everyone knows such attacks will end after election day, and politicians can be excused for mudslinging. Political commentators, however, cannot be. Political commentators should be engaged in sustained and serious debate about ideas and policies. In such a context personal attacks on opponents serve not to beat those opponents but to cut off the debate.

Which of the following most accurately states the main point of the argument?

(A) Personal attacks on opponents serve a useful purpose for politicians.
(B) Political commentators should not resort to personal attacks on their opponents.
(C) Editorialists are right to criticize politicians who resort to personal attacks on their opponents.
(D) The purpose of serious debate about ideas and policies is to counteract the effect of personal attacks by politicians.
(E) Voters should be concerned about the personal attacks politicians make on each other.

_________________

Want to improve your CR: cr-methods-an-approach-to-find-the-best-answers-93146.html
Tricky Quant problems: 50-tricky-questions-92834.html
Important Grammer Fundamentals: key-fundamentals-of-grammer-our-crucial-learnings-on-sc-93659.html

Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 29 Dec 2010
Posts: 8
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 0

Re: politicians personal attacks [#permalink] New post 02 Jan 2011, 14:04
nverma's answer is amazing. the OA is B.
Verbal Forum Moderator
Verbal Forum Moderator
avatar
Joined: 31 Jan 2010
Posts: 500
WE 1: 4 years Tech
Followers: 10

Kudos [?]: 73 [0], given: 149

Re: politicians personal attacks [#permalink] New post 04 Jan 2011, 04:53
Nice question.Can u pls post a few more
_________________

My Post Invites Discussions not answers
Try to give back something to the Forum.I want your explanations, right now !
Please let me know your opinion about the Chandigarh Gmat Centrehttp://gmatclub.com/forum/gmat-experience-at-chandigarh-india-centre-111830.html

Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 07 Jul 2010
Posts: 101
Location: Hanoi, Vietnam
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 14 [0], given: 18

Re: politicians personal attacks [#permalink] New post 25 Jan 2011, 08:25
I go for B
_________________

Hung M.Tran
Faculty of Banking and Finance,
National Economics University of Vietnam


Follow me on Twitter : http://twitter.com/AndyTranHung

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 27 Jul 2010
Posts: 197
Location: Prague
Schools: University of Economics Prague
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 17 [0], given: 15

GMAT ToolKit User
Re: politicians personal attacks [#permalink] New post 25 Jan 2011, 13:01
woaw, B you say? bud D was better at the first glance
_________________

You want somethin', go get it. Period!

SVP
SVP
avatar
Joined: 16 Nov 2010
Posts: 1691
Location: United States (IN)
Concentration: Strategy, Technology
Followers: 31

Kudos [?]: 299 [0], given: 36

Premium Member Reviews Badge
Re: politicians personal attacks [#permalink] New post 23 Mar 2011, 21:19
The answer is B.
_________________

Formula of Life -> Achievement/Potential = k * Happiness (where k is a constant)

Get the best GMAT Prep Resources with GMAT Club Premium Membership

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 06 Sep 2010
Posts: 121
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 2 [0], given: 6

Re: politicians personal attacks [#permalink] New post 25 Mar 2011, 18:06
Can anyone explain why B and not D???
Thanks!
Current Student
avatar
Joined: 17 Mar 2011
Posts: 453
Location: United States (DC)
Concentration: General Management, Technology
GMAT 1: 760 Q49 V45
GPA: 3.37
WE: Information Technology (Consulting)
Followers: 11

Kudos [?]: 153 [0], given: 5

Re: politicians personal attacks [#permalink] New post 26 Mar 2011, 03:51
Quote:
(D) The purpose of serious debate about ideas and policies is to counteract the effect of personal attacks by politicians.


The relevant text from the argument is:
"Political commentators should be engaged in sustained and serious debate about ideas and policies. In such a context personal attacks on opponents serve not to beat those opponents but to cut off the debate."

If you notice, the first sentence doesn't indicate anything about the PURPOSE of serious debate.
Sentence two indicates a causal relationship between personal attacks (instead of serious debate) and cutting off the debate. "Personal Attacks by commentators CAUSES debate to be cut off". This is a cause/effect statement, but does not touch on purpose.
Retired Moderator
User avatar
Status: 2000 posts! I don't know whether I should feel great or sad about it! LOL
Joined: 04 Oct 2009
Posts: 1726
Location: Peru
Schools: Harvard, Stanford, Wharton, MIT & HKS (Government)
WE 1: Economic research
WE 2: Banking
WE 3: Government: Foreign Trade and SMEs
Followers: 68

Kudos [?]: 332 [0], given: 109

Re: politicians personal attacks [#permalink] New post 26 Mar 2011, 16:04
+1 B

Usually, the main point is the conclusion of the argument but rephrased.
_________________

"Life’s battle doesn’t always go to stronger or faster men; but sooner or later the man who wins is the one who thinks he can."

My Integrated Reasoning Logbook / Diary: my-ir-logbook-diary-133264.html

Get the best GMAT Prep Resources with GMAT Club Premium Membership

Re: politicians personal attacks   [#permalink] 26 Mar 2011, 16:04
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
10 Experts publish their posts in the topic Many politicians, business leaders, and scholars discount venmic 10 16 Aug 2012, 08:52
Many politicians, business leaders, and scholars discount eybrj2 4 19 May 2012, 17:59
When a study of aspirin s ability to prevent heart attacks vaivish1723 4 01 Jul 2009, 01:15
Many politicians, business leaders, and scholars discount ttanvir 2 14 Dec 2006, 16:34
Many politicians, business leaders, and scholars discount withme 4 14 Oct 2006, 21:44
Display posts from previous: Sort by

When politicians resort to personal attacks, many

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


cron

GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Privacy Policy| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.