Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 23 Oct 2014, 11:57

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

When rates were raised in 1985, postal service officials

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:
Manager
Manager
avatar
Affiliations: Beta Gamma Sigma
Joined: 14 Aug 2008
Posts: 211
Schools: Harvard, Penn, Maryland
Followers: 4

Kudos [?]: 27 [0], given: 3

Re: Rates [#permalink] New post 27 May 2009, 17:17
so if it said "it would not be necessary for further rate increases to occur," it would be fine? because the pronoun "it" was mentioned as ambiguous as well.

makes sense "for" has to be followed by a clause with a verb.
Director
Director
avatar
Joined: 23 May 2008
Posts: 840
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 31 [0], given: 0

Re: Rates [#permalink] New post 27 May 2009, 21:22
TheGMATChef wrote:
nightwing79 wrote:
When rates were raised in 1985, postal service officials predicted they would make further rate increases unnecessary for at least three years.

A. they would make further rate increases unnecessary

B. they would mean that further rate increases would not be needed

C. that it would not be necessary for further rate increases

D. that the increase would make further rate increases unnecessary

E. further rate increases will not be needed


Hi guys,
Very nice discussion indeed.
This question is somewhat testing your knowledge of English idioms. (C) is an attractive answer but it is idiomatically incorrect for this simple reason: "it is necessary for" must be followed by a person, a group of people, or some type of organization, not by an object or an abstraction.

Yes, (D) seems wordy but it is the correct answer. Adding "the increase" into the sentence does not make the sentence (I am stressing that point here) redundant but, rather, makes it clear.
Conciseness is the last thing you should worry about, as concise answers are always full of traps.
First and foremost, be grammatically correct and semantically clear.
The best sentence is not included in the answer choices as it would be evident to most of you and thus will not add any significant point value (as a reward) to the GMAT score of the more verbally inclined among you. :)


thanks..couldnt quite place my finger on why C was wrong
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 11 Sep 2009
Posts: 109
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 15 [0], given: 0

Re: Rates [#permalink] New post 24 Oct 2009, 07:37
nightwing79 wrote:
When rates were raised in 1985, postal service officials predicted they would make further rate increases unnecessary for at least three years.

A. they would make further rate increases unnecessary

B. they would mean that further rate increases would not be needed

C. that it would not be necessary for further rate increases

D. that the increase would make further rate increases unnecessary

E. further rate increases will not be needed


A and B - They have no clear antecedent and that is required here
E - that is required here
C - distort the meaning because it refers to for further rate increase... whereas in the original one refer to the increase in 1985
D - redundant (increase twice); nevertheless, this is the best one
Re: Rates   [#permalink] 24 Oct 2009, 07:37
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
To reverse the deterioration of the postal service - Please rate eshan429 0 06 Sep 2014, 10:35
When rates were raised in 1985, postal service officials pre jadixit 1 27 Dec 2013, 21:17
CR 1000: Postal Service vsaxena 9 01 Nov 2007, 00:51
When rates were raised in 1985, postal service officials GK_Gmat 4 20 Sep 2007, 07:56
When rates were raised in 1985, postal service officials MBA2ran 10 08 Nov 2006, 23:27
Display posts from previous: Sort by

When rates were raised in 1985, postal service officials

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  

Go to page   Previous    1   2   [ 23 posts ] 



GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Privacy Policy| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.