Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 30 Aug 2016, 14:47
GMAT Club Tests

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

When the defendant in a trial chooses not to testify, the

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 07 Sep 2010
Posts: 335
Followers: 5

Kudos [?]: 534 [0], given: 136

When the defendant in a trial chooses not to testify, the [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 21 Jun 2012, 06:57
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

  15% (low)

Question Stats:

79% (02:08) correct 21% (01:42) wrong based on 113 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

Please pour your thoughts on the below one-

When the defendant in a trial chooses not to testify, the jury is not supposed to view this as evidence of the defendant's guilt or innocence. Rather, the jury should base its decision on the evidence that is presented throughout the trial. Nevertheless, jurors will often take the failure of a defendant to testify as evidence of that defendant's guilt.

Which of the following can be most properly inferred.

A) Most defendants who refuse to testify in their trials are in fact guilty.

B) The rules should be modified to require defendants to testify regardless of their guilt or innocence.

C) The fact that a defendant refuses to testify is sometimes unfairly considered by a jury.

D) A defendant would sometimes be better served by testifying at trial than by choosing not to testify.

E) Even when a defendant does testify, some jurors not to believe the defendants testimony
[Reveal] Spoiler: OA

_________________

+1 Kudos me, Help me unlocking GMAT Club Tests

VP
VP
User avatar
Status: Top MBA Admissions Consultant
Joined: 24 Jul 2011
Posts: 1028
GMAT 1: 780 Q51 V48
GRE 1: 1540 Q800 V740
Followers: 109

Kudos [?]: 483 [0], given: 18

Re: Defendant Trial - CR [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 21 Jun 2012, 12:38
Seems like C.

A: This cannot be inferred and is a generalization. Incorrect.
B: We are not discussing what the rules ought to be here. Incorrect.
C: Correct. The jury sometimes tends to (unfairly) take lack of testimony by the defendant as guilt.
D: We cannot say this. It may turn out that the jury is more unfavorably impressed by the defendant's testimony than favorably impressed by the fact that he/she testified. Incorrect.
E: There is no evidence to believe this happens at all. Incorrect.
_________________

GyanOne | Top MBA Rankings and MBA Admissions Blog

Top MBA Admissions Consulting | Top MiM Admissions Consulting

Premium MBA Essay Review|Best MBA Interview Preparation|Exclusive GMAT coaching

Get a FREE Detailed MBA Profile Evaluation | Call us now +91 98998 31738

Expert Post
1 KUDOS received
Veritas Prep GMAT Instructor
User avatar
Joined: 16 Oct 2010
Posts: 6843
Location: Pune, India
Followers: 1932

Kudos [?]: 11996 [1] , given: 221

Re: Defendant Trial - CR [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 21 Jun 2012, 21:32
1
This post received
KUDOS
Expert's post
imhimanshu wrote:
Please pour your thoughts on the below one-

When the defendant in a trial chooses not to testify, the jury is not supposed to view this as evidence of the defendant's guilt or innocence. Rather, the jury should base its decision on the evidence that is presented throughout the trial. Nevertheless, jurors will often take the failure of a defendant to testify as evidence of that defendant's guilt.

Which of the following can be most properly inferred.

A) Most defendants who refuse to testify in their trials are in fact guilty.

B) The rules should be modified to require defendants to testify regardless of their guilt or innocence.

C) The fact that a defendant refuses to testify is sometimes unfairly considered by a jury.

D) A defendant would sometimes be better served by testifying at trial than by choosing not to testify.

E) Even when a defendant does testify, some jurors not to believe the defendants testimony


Responding to a pm:

It is a conclusion question. You have to choose the option that provides you with the inference that you can draw from the given premises. The premises tell us that the jury is not supposed to consider refusal to testify admission of guilt, but it does. This is what option (C) says and hence, it is most appropriate. It is the conclusion of our stimulus.
As for option (D), I wouldn't say it is incorrect but we are inferring too much in it. It is not the answer (and as you mentioned, you chose C as well). The reason is that you have to look for the "best" option. The question says "which can be most properly inferred?"
Your answer would be the one which gives you the most direct inference.

e.g.
A and B are best friends and usually sit together in class. Today they are sitting far away from each other. What can you infer from this?

1. A and B are not sitting together today
2. A and B fought today.

I hope you see that the direct inference is 1 and not 2.
It's the same case in this question.
_________________

Karishma
Veritas Prep | GMAT Instructor
My Blog

Get started with Veritas Prep GMAT On Demand for $199

Veritas Prep Reviews

BSchool Forum Moderator
User avatar
Status: Flying over the cloud!
Joined: 17 Aug 2011
Posts: 913
Location: Viet Nam
Concentration: International Business, Marketing
GMAT Date: 06-06-2014
GPA: 3.07
Followers: 70

Kudos [?]: 535 [0], given: 44

GMAT ToolKit User Premium Member Reviews Badge
Re: Defendant Trial - CR [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 22 Jun 2012, 10:34
Great example indirectly lead to the nice explanation. Thank for all of your help, Karishma.
_________________

Rules for posting in verbal gmat forum, read it before posting anything in verbal forum
Giving me + 1 kudos if my post is valuable with you :)

The more you like my post, the more you share to other's need

CR: Focus of the Week: Must be True Question

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 12 Mar 2012
Posts: 172
Location: India
Concentration: Technology, General Management
GMAT Date: 07-23-2012
WE: Programming (Telecommunications)
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 45 [0], given: 4

Re: Defendant Trial - CR [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 22 Jun 2012, 12:03
My choice is C..btw nice explanation Karishma.
_________________

FOCUS..this is all I need!

Ku-Do!

Re: Defendant Trial - CR   [#permalink] 22 Jun 2012, 12:03
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
7 Experts publish their posts in the topic If Elvira Johnson agrees to testify against the defendant bschool83 22 21 Jul 2011, 17:55
2 When choosing a digital camera, it is important to consider aalriy 10 30 May 2011, 12:07
Supporter / Defender assumption model ronniebassist 0 31 Oct 2009, 10:22
In defending the Hyperion School of Journalism from charges eyunni 3 05 Dec 2007, 09:33
1 Record companies defend their substitution of laser-read punnu_mba 13 18 Sep 2006, 07:29
Display posts from previous: Sort by

When the defendant in a trial chooses not to testify, the

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.