|
Author |
Message |
|
TAGS:
|
|
|
Verbal GMAT Forum Moderator
Status: Preparing for the another shot...!
Joined: 03 Feb 2011
Posts: 1322
Location: India
Concentration: Finance, Marketing
GMAT 1: 720 Q V
GPA: 3.75
Followers: 64
Kudos [?]:
312
[6] , given: 52
|
When you should eliminate BEING? The answer is here. [#permalink]
22 Oct 2012, 04:38
6
This post received KUDOS
Question Stats:
100% (00:00) correct
0% (00:00) wrong based on 4 sessions
The answer to the question is, ROUGHLY, that you should avoid "being" when expressing the IDENTITY or CHARACTERISTICS of some individual or thing. This is because "being" is usually unnecessary in such cases; there are simpler modifiers(such as appositives) that, while absolutely impossible to use in spoken language, are better in written language. Example: Being a cigar aficionado, John has strong opinions on when to use single guillotine cigar cutters rather than double guillotine cutters.--->BAD A cigar aficionado, John has strong opinions on when to use single guillotine cigar cutters rather than double guillotine cutters.----->GOOD. NOTICE THAT WE CAN SIMPLY OMIT BEING HERE. So to sum up: If "being" expresses IDENTITY or CHARACTERISTICS, then kill it. Otherwise, evaluate it on the same merits as you would have any other verb.
_________________
Prepositional Phrases Clarified|Elimination of BEING| Absolute Phrases Clarified Rules For Posting
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Manager
Joined: 03 Aug 2011
Posts: 203
Location: Bulgaria
GMAT 1: 640 Q44 V34
GPA: 3.7
WE: Project Management (Energy and Utilities)
Followers: 7
Kudos [?]:
21
[0], given: 236
|
Re: When you should eliminate BEING? The answer is here. [#permalink]
06 Dec 2012, 03:28
Dear Marcab, thanks for sharing this insight! While I undestand what we should understand under CHARACTERISTICS of an individual/thing, what do you exactly mean by IDENTITY? Can you give an example for this as well? Thanks in advance!
_________________
Thank you very much for reading this post till the end! Kudos?
Last edited by bgpower on 07 Dec 2012, 07:27, edited 1 time in total.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Verbal GMAT Forum Moderator
Status: Preparing for the another shot...!
Joined: 03 Feb 2011
Posts: 1322
Location: India
Concentration: Finance, Marketing
GMAT 1: 720 Q V
GPA: 3.75
Followers: 64
Kudos [?]:
312
[4] , given: 52
|
Re: When you should eliminate BEING? The answer is here. [#permalink]
06 Dec 2012, 06:40
4
This post received KUDOS
Hii BG. "Being" is the present tense form of the verb "to be". Use it when something is currently happening. Examples: Because of the Euro crisis, the world is being brought into the recession. My daughter is being a brat. These two are correct. Now consider this. Being female, my daughter is bla bla bla. This one is incorrect. Hope that will be crystal clear.
_________________
Prepositional Phrases Clarified|Elimination of BEING| Absolute Phrases Clarified Rules For Posting
|
|
|
|
|
|
MBA Section Director
Joined: 19 Mar 2012
Posts: 1273
Location: India
GPA: 3.8
WE: Marketing (Energy and Utilities)
Followers: 217
Kudos [?]:
800
[3] , given: 514
|
Re: When you should eliminate BEING? The answer is here. [#permalink]
06 Dec 2012, 06:47
3
This post received KUDOS
Marcab wrote: Hii BG. "Being" is the present tense form of the verb "to be". Use it when something is currently happening. Examples: Because of the Euro crisis, the world is being brought into the recession. My daughter is being a brat. These two are correct. Now consider this. Being female, my daughter is bla bla bla. This one is incorrect.
Hope that will be crystal clear. Marcab, this is pretty fantastic. My thumb rule: see "being" in a sentence If used as a modifier: ELIMINATE If not: keep it there and check for other errors. If there are none its a nice feeling because you just answered a trap question correctly. Hit NEXT and CONFIRM.
_________________
My GMAT Resources V30-V40: How to do it! | GMATPrep SC | GMATPrep CR | GMATPrep RC | Critical Reasoning Megathread | CR: Numbers and Statistics | CR: Weaken | CR: Strengthen | CR: Assumption | SC: Modifier | SC: Meaning | SC: SV Agreement | RC: Primary Purpose | PS/DS: Numbers and Inequalities | PS/DS: Combinatorics and Coordinates
My MBA Resources Low GPA: What you can do | Letter of Recommendation: The Guide | Indian B Schools accepting GMAT score | Why MBA?
My Reviews Veritas Prep Live Online
|
|
|
|
|
|
e-GMAT Representative
Joined: 02 Nov 2011
Posts: 1083
Followers: 509
Kudos [?]:
1053
[8] , given: 131
|
Re: When you should eliminate BEING? The answer is here. [#permalink]
12 Feb 2013, 17:02
8
This post received KUDOS
Great job Marcab putting this together. Pretty interesting thoughts on when "being" is incorrect. Thought I'd add my two cents here and provide a framework for when "being" is indeed correct. I am planning to write a much detailed article on it as well, but for now here is a treatment of this subject from my side.  Typically usage of "being" makes the answer choice wordy and awkward. But there are two perfectly correct usages of this word. Being cognizant of these usages is important. And make sure you do not blindly eliminate an answer choice just because you see the word "being" in it. Correct Usage 1 - When Being is used as a noun. For example: Being disrespectful to her elders is not an acceptable behavior. Notice the subject here - being disrespectful to her elders Correct Usage 2 - When passive continuous verb tense is required to communicate the meaning. For example: The residents of this 100-year old apartment complex are being evacuated because of structural instability of the building. Notice the verb tense here - are being evacuated - present continuous written in passive voice. So in the cases above, "being" is correct. Now there are only a handful of official questions in which "being" is correct. And in these sentences "being" is used in one of the two correct usages as detailed above. Here they are: OG13 Q100Being heavily committed to a course of action, especially one that has worked well in the past, is likely to make an executive miss signs of incipient trouble or misinterpret them when they do appear. GMAT PrepSimply being genetically engineered does not make a plant any more likely to become an invasive according to a decade-long study published in the journal Nature. GMAT PrepThe survival of coral colonies, which are composed of innumerable tiny polyps living in a symbiotic relationship with brilliantly colored algae, is being threatened, experts say, not only by pollutants such as agricultural runoff, oil sticks, and trash, but also by dropped anchors, probing drivers, and global warming. GMAT PrepPerforming a risky maneuver that required precision flying, space shuttle astronauts retrieved an orbiting satellite and simultaneously avoided being rear-ended by a passing ultraviolet telescope. GMAT PrepAccording to one expert, the cause of genetic irregularities in many breeds of dog is not so much that dogs are being bred for looks or to meet other narrow criteria as that the breeds have relatively few founding members. A small exercise for you. In the 5 sentences above, indicate the role in which "being" has been used. Now there are quite a few questions in which being is used incorrectly. Here are some official references from OG13: Q3, 4, 31, 49, 52, 63, 67, etc. Feel free to give your analysis of these incorrect usages as well. Hope this helps. I look forward to your classification of role of being. Regards, Payal
_________________
Free trial:Click here to start free trial (100+ free practice questions) Free Session (May 25): : Learn how to master Sentence Correction. Click here to attend.
  
|
|
|
|
|
|
Manager
Joined: 22 Jan 2013
Posts: 51
Followers: 0
Kudos [?]:
7
[0], given: 21
|
Re: When you should eliminate BEING? The answer is here. [#permalink]
13 Feb 2013, 21:38
egmat wrote: Correct Usage 1 - When Being is used as a noun. For example: Being disrespectful to her elders is not an acceptable behavior. Notice the subject here - being disrespectful to her elders
Hi Payal, great explanation by both of you, but I'm quite confused between both yours and Marcab's explanations In the below sentence Being a cigar aficionado, John has strong opinions on when to use single guillotine cigar cutters rather than double guillotine Being a cigar aficionado is a noun right??? Then why is is considered incorrect.
|
|
|
|
|
|
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
Status: Making every effort to create original content for you!!
Joined: 23 Dec 2010
Posts: 444
Location: United States
Concentration: Healthcare, Social Entrepreneurship
GMAT 1: 660 Q48 V34 GMAT 2: 750 Q49 V42
Followers: 86
Kudos [?]:
356
[9] , given: 75
|
Re: When you should eliminate BEING? The answer is here. [#permalink]
14 Feb 2013, 00:39
9
This post received KUDOS
aditya111 wrote: egmat wrote: Correct Usage 1 - When Being is used as a noun. For example: Being disrespectful to her elders is not an acceptable behavior. Notice the subject here - being disrespectful to her elders
Hi Payal, great explanation by both of you, but I'm quite confused between both yours and Marcab's explanations In the below sentence Being a cigar aficionado, John has strong opinions on when to use single guillotine cigar cutters rather than double guillotine Being a cigar aficionado is a noun right??? Then why is is considered incorrect. Hi Aditya, If something is acting as a noun then you can replace another noun at its place and check whether it makes sense. Swimming is good for health. --> we want to check whether swimming is a noun Apple is good for health --> makes sense so swimming is acting as a noun. Consider this example: Being a top footballer, Messi knows his way around the ball --> usage of being is unnecessary here In this sentence "Being a top footballer" is not acting as a noun. Can we replace "Being a top footballer" with a noun, no we can't. No noun would make sense here. Therefore "Being a top footballer" is not acting as anoun A top footballer, Messi knows his way around the ball --> more appropriate after removing "being" The phrase "a top footballer" is an appositive which renames another noun Visit this link for more info about appositives: http://www.chompchomp.com/terms/appositive.htmBeing a cigar aficionado is not something to be proud off. --> more appropriate In the sentence above the subject "Being a cigar aficionado" if replaced by a noun would make sense -- Cheating is not something to be proud of. Cheating is functioning as a noun here Now lets consider one more example Being a top footballer is something that Messi considers to be is proud of. --> correct lets replace "Being a top footballer" by a noun "honesty". Honesty is something that Messi considers to be proud of. --> makes sense, therefore "Being a top footballer" is acting as a noun. Also visit Ron's post from which the "cigar aficionado" example has been referred. http://www.manhattangmat.com/forums/hea ... t3173.htmlHope that helps, Vercules
_________________
Press Kudos if you want to say thanks
Ultimate Reading Comprehension Encyclopedia | Ultimate Sentence Correction Encyclopedia | GMAT Prep Software Analysis and What If Scenarios -- VERBAL | GMAT Prep Software Analysis and What If Scenarios -- IR
Please Read and Follow the 9 Rules of Posting in Verbal Forum
|
|
|
|
|
|
Manager
Joined: 22 Jan 2013
Posts: 51
Followers: 0
Kudos [?]:
7
[0], given: 21
|
Re: When you should eliminate BEING? The answer is here. [#permalink]
17 Feb 2013, 01:40
Vercules wrote: aditya111 wrote: egmat wrote: Correct Usage 1 - When Being is used as a noun. For example: Being disrespectful to her elders is not an acceptable behavior. Notice the subject here - being disrespectful to her elders
Hi Payal, great explanation by both of you, but I'm quite confused between both yours and Marcab's explanations In the below sentence Being a cigar aficionado, John has strong opinions on when to use single guillotine cigar cutters rather than double guillotine Being a cigar aficionado is a noun right??? Then why is is considered incorrect. Hi Aditya, If something is acting as a noun then you can replace another noun at its place and check whether it makes sense. Swimming is good for health. --> we want to check whether swimming is a noun Apple is good for health --> makes sense so swimming is acting as a noun. Consider this example: Being a top footballer, Messi knows his way around the ball --> usage of being is unnecessary here In this sentence "Being a top footballer" is not acting as a noun. Can we replace "Being a top footballer" with a noun, no we can't. No noun would make sense here. Therefore "Being a top footballer" is not acting as anoun A top footballer, Messi knows his way around the ball --> more appropriate after removing "being" The phrase "a top footballer" is an appositive which renames another noun Visit this link for more info about appositives: http://www.chompchomp.com/terms/appositive.htmBeing a cigar aficionado is not something to be proud off. --> more appropriate In the sentence above the subject "Being a cigar aficionado" if replaced by a noun would make sense -- Cheating is not something to be proud of. Cheating is functioning as a noun here Now lets consider one more example Being a top footballer is something that Messi considers to be is proud of. --> correct lets replace "Being a top footballer" by a noun "honesty". Honesty is something that Messi considers to be proud of. --> makes sense, therefore "Being a top footballer" is acting as a noun. Also visit Ron's post from which the "cigar aficionado" example has been referred. http://www.manhattangmat.com/forums/hea ... t3173.htmlHope that helps, Vercules G8 post. Thanks... Really Helped
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior Manager
Status: Prevent and prepare. Not repent and repair!!
Joined: 13 Feb 2010
Posts: 263
Location: India
Concentration: Technology, General Management
GPA: 3.75
WE: Sales (Telecommunications)
Followers: 8
Kudos [?]:
10
[0], given: 238
|
Re: When you should eliminate BEING? The answer is here. [#permalink]
28 Mar 2013, 10:46
Vercules wrote: aditya111 wrote: egmat wrote: Correct Usage 1 - When Being is used as a noun. For example: Being disrespectful to her elders is not an acceptable behavior. Notice the subject here - being disrespectful to her elders
Hi Payal, great explanation by both of you, but I'm quite confused between both yours and Marcab's explanations In the below sentence Being a cigar aficionado, John has strong opinions on when to use single guillotine cigar cutters rather than double guillotine Being a cigar aficionado is a noun right??? Then why is is considered incorrect. Hi Aditya, If something is acting as a noun then you can replace another noun at its place and check whether it makes sense. Swimming is good for health. --> we want to check whether swimming is a noun Apple is good for health --> makes sense so swimming is acting as a noun. Consider this example: Being a top footballer, Messi knows his way around the ball --> usage of being is unnecessary here In this sentence "Being a top footballer" is not acting as a noun. Can we replace "Being a top footballer" with a noun, no we can't. No noun would make sense here. Therefore "Being a top footballer" is not acting as anoun A top footballer, Messi knows his way around the ball --> more appropriate after removing "being" The phrase "a top footballer" is an appositive which renames another noun Visit this link for more info about appositives: http://www.chompchomp.com/terms/appositive.htmBeing a cigar aficionado is not something to be proud off. --> more appropriate In the sentence above the subject "Being a cigar aficionado" if replaced by a noun would make sense -- Cheating is not something to be proud of. Cheating is functioning as a noun here Now lets consider one more example Being a top footballer is something that Messi considers to be is proud of. --> correct lets replace "Being a top footballer" by a noun "honesty". Honesty is something that Messi considers to be proud of. --> makes sense, therefore "Being a top footballer" is acting as a noun. Also visit Ron's post from which the "cigar aficionado" example has been referred. http://www.manhattangmat.com/forums/hea ... t3173.htmlHope that helps, Vercules You are a great teacher! Your ability to teach things in a simple manner makes you the Roger Federer of GC's verbal section. Sure there are the Nadal's and the Djokovic's out there who can dig deeper
_________________
I've failed over and over and over again in my life and that is why I succeed--Michael Jordan Kudos drives a person to better himself every single time. So Pls give it generously Wont give up till i hit a 700+
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intern
Joined: 09 Apr 2013
Posts: 1
Followers: 0
Kudos [?]:
0
[0], given: 0
|
Re: When you should eliminate BEING? The answer is here. [#permalink]
13 Apr 2013, 08:40
" Cooperative apartment houses have the peculiar distinction of being dwellings that must also operate as businesses." "Cooperative apartment houses have the peculiar distinctionthat, as dwellings, they must also operate like businesses" guys colud help understand why former is better than latter
|
|
|
|
|
|
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
Status: Making every effort to create original content for you!!
Joined: 23 Dec 2010
Posts: 444
Location: United States
Concentration: Healthcare, Social Entrepreneurship
GMAT 1: 660 Q48 V34 GMAT 2: 750 Q49 V42
Followers: 86
Kudos [?]:
356
[0], given: 75
|
Re: When you should eliminate BEING? The answer is here. [#permalink]
13 Apr 2013, 15:30
vedavyas9 wrote: " Cooperative apartment houses have the peculiar distinction of being dwellings that must also operate as businesses." "Cooperative apartment houses have the peculiar distinctionthat, as dwellings, they must also operate like businesses" guys colud help understand why former is better than latter Hi vedavyas, Consider this short example - He has a distinctive quality of being rude at trivial conversations. -> Correct. The sentence means that "he" is not usually rude, but is rude at this instant i.e. "being rude".Now consider this - The apartment houses have a distinctive quality of being tall red structures. -> Now this sentence is inappropriate. The "apartment houses" are not "being" tall red structures, but they are "tall red structures" The apartment houses have a distinctive quality as tall red structures -> This sentence is better than the above sentence as it is just stating the quality of the houses. The same is the reason why former construction is better than the later in your example. "distinction, as dwellings" is better than "distinction of being dwellings"Moreover the later sentence seems to express that "the dwellings" operate as business, but the intended meaning is that the "houses" operate like businesses. Furthermore the usage "like businesses" is better than "as businesses"; "like" should be used with the noun businesses. Hope this helps, Vercules
_________________
Press Kudos if you want to say thanks
Ultimate Reading Comprehension Encyclopedia | Ultimate Sentence Correction Encyclopedia | GMAT Prep Software Analysis and What If Scenarios -- VERBAL | GMAT Prep Software Analysis and What If Scenarios -- IR
Please Read and Follow the 9 Rules of Posting in Verbal Forum
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior Manager
Joined: 23 Mar 2011
Posts: 475
Location: India
GPA: 2.5
WE: Operations (Hospitality and Tourism)
Followers: 9
Kudos [?]:
64
[0], given: 59
|
Re: When you should eliminate BEING? The answer is here. [#permalink]
24 Apr 2013, 12:47
Vercules wrote: vedavyas9 wrote: " Cooperative apartment houses have the peculiar distinction of being dwellings that must also operate as businesses." "Cooperative apartment houses have the peculiar distinctionthat, as dwellings, they must also operate like businesses" guys colud help understand why former is better than latter Hi vedavyas, Consider this short example - He has a distinctive quality of being rude at trivial conversations. -> Correct. The sentence means that "he" is not usually rude, but is rude at this instant i.e. "being rude".Now consider this - The apartment houses have a distinctive quality of being tall red structures. -> Now this sentence is inappropriate. The "apartment houses" are not "being" tall red structures, but they are "tall red structures" The apartment houses have a distinctive quality as tall red structures -> This sentence is better than the above sentence as it is just stating the quality of the houses. The same is the reason why former construction is better than the later in your example. "distinction, as dwellings" is better than "distinction of being dwellings"Moreover the later sentence seems to express that "the dwellings" operate as business, but the intended meaning is that the "houses" operate like businesses. Furthermore the usage "like businesses" is better than "as businesses"; "like" should be used with the noun businesses. Hope this helps, Vercules Hi Vercules, I am clear on the error of the latter sentence. However, I am not clear why the former is correct using "distinction of being dwellings" why cant we use simple present, why we need "being" a continuous form of verb to be
_________________
"When the going gets tough, the tough gets going!"
Bring ON SOME KUDOS MATES+++ ----------------------------- Quant Notes consolidated: consolodited-quant-guides-of-forum-most-helpful-in-preps-151067.html#p1217652My GMAT journey begins: my-gmat-journey-begins-122251.htmlAll about Richard Ivey: all-about-richard-ivey-148594.html#p1190518
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Re: When you should eliminate BEING? The answer is here.
[#permalink]
24 Apr 2013, 12:47
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Moderators:
metallicafan, rajeevrks27, souvik101990, PTK, MacFauz, noboru, kissthegmat, carcass, willigetmylifeback, mikemcgarry, doe007, Vercules, Legendaddy, tuanquang269, Marcab, Narenn, GetThisDone
|