|
Author |
Message |
|
TAGS:
|
|
|
Manager
Joined: 16 Apr 2006
Posts: 79
Followers: 1
Kudos [?]:
0
[0], given: 0
|
Whenever a major political scandal erupts before an election [#permalink]
26 Jul 2006, 18:47
Question Stats:
0% (00:00) correct
0% (00:00) wrong based on 0 sessions
Whenever a major political scandal erupts before an election and voters blame the scandal on all parties about equally, virtually all incumbents, from whatever party, seeking reelection are returned to office. However, when voters blame such a scandal on only one party, incumbents from that party are likely to be defeated by challengers from other parties. The proportion of incumbents who seek reelection is high and remarkably constant from election to election.
If the voters' reactions are guided by a principle, which one of the following principles would best account for the contrast in reactions described above?
(A) Whenever one incumbent is responsible for one major political scandal and another incumbent is responsible for another, the consequences for the two incumbents should be the same.
(B) When a major political scandal is blamed on incumbents from all parties, that judgment is more accurate than any judgment that incumbents from only on party are to blame.
(C) Incumbents who are rightly blamed for a major political scandal should not seek reelection, but if they do, they should not be returned to office.
(D) Major political scandals can practically always be blamed on incumbents, but whether those incumbents should be voted out of office depends on who their challengers are.
(E) When major political scandals are less the responsibility of individual incumbents than of the parties to which they belong, whatever party was responsible must be penalized when possible.
please explain your answers
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Director
Joined: 26 Sep 2005
Posts: 588
Location: Munich,Germany
Followers: 1
Kudos [?]:
7
[0], given: 0
|
well..this sure was tough for me, I choose D. I will explain if I'm right.
|
|
|
|
|
|
VP
Joined: 14 May 2006
Posts: 1421
Followers: 4
Kudos [?]:
22
[0], given: 0
|
if I had 2 min for this on the exam, I would go with C, I think it's tough
(A) we don't care about the consequences... we don't know what they are... OUT OF SCOPE
(B) we don't know whether the judgment is accurate, we know nothing about it from the argument itself OUT OF SCOPE
(E) again... cheezy.. penalty? where does the argument talk about it? OUT OF SCOPE
now to me the war is b/w C and D, but before we look into those remember this quote from the argument:
However, when voters blame such a scandal on only one party, incumbents from that party are likely to be defeated by challengers from other parties.
based on this I chose C... it shows contrast that the question is asking for
honestly I didn't even try to understand D as it took me a while just to digest the argument and C looked like IT to me, especially regarding contrast... so POE and this quote lead to my answer
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior Manager
Joined: 09 Aug 2005
Posts: 286
Followers: 1
Kudos [?]:
1
[0], given: 0
|
Re: CR - Political party [#permalink]
26 Jul 2006, 20:25
skandhadarshan wrote: Whenever a major political scandal erupts before an election and voters blame the scandal on all parties about equally, virtually all incumbents, from whatever party, seeking reelection are returned to office. However, when voters blame such a scandal on only one party, incumbents from that party are likely to be defeated by challengers from other parties. The proportion of incumbents who seek reelection is high and remarkably constant from election to election.
If the voters' reactions are guided by a principle, which one of the following principles would best account for the contrast in reactions described above?
(A) Whenever one incumbent is responsible for one major political scandal and another incumbent is responsible for another, the consequences for the two incumbents should be the same.
(B) When a major political scandal is blamed on incumbents from all parties, that judgment is more accurate than any judgment that incumbents from only on party are to blame.
(C) Incumbents who are rightly blamed for a major political scandal should not seek reelection, but if they do, they should not be returned to office.
(D) Major political scandals can practically always be blamed on incumbents, but whether those incumbents should be voted out of office depends on who their challengers are.
(E) When major political scandals are less the responsibility of individual incumbents than of the parties to which they belong, whatever party was responsible must be penalized when possible.
please explain your answers
It is about penalizing the incumbants.
If
others =! guilty , do not elect incumbant
else
elect incumbant
EndIf
D
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior Manager
Joined: 06 Jul 2004
Posts: 480
Location: united states
Followers: 1
Kudos [?]:
6
[0], given: 0
|
C can't be right. The incumbents are not blamed for the scandal, it's the parties that are blamed.
D for me.
_________________
for every person who doesn't try because he is
afraid of loosing , there is another person who
keeps making mistakes and succeeds..
|
|
|
|
|
|
CEO
Joined: 20 Nov 2005
Posts: 2934
Schools: Completed at SAID BUSINESS SCHOOL, OXFORD - Class of 2008
Followers: 7
Kudos [?]:
37
[0], given: 0
|
Nobody picked E????
Let me explain:
E says that if candidate is not responsible and party is responsible then party should be penalized.
If E is true then
1. When all parties are blamed: All parties are penalized and there should not be any effect.
2. When only one party is plamed: That party is penalized and will not be re-elected.
All other choices talks mostly about incumbents rather than political parties. But the passage is talking about blames on political parties.
_________________
SAID BUSINESS SCHOOL, OXFORD - MBA CLASS OF 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior Manager
Joined: 07 Mar 2006
Posts: 352
Followers: 1
Kudos [?]:
8
[0], given: 1
|
D.
Major political scandals can practically always be blamed on incumbents, but whether those incumbents should be voted out of office depends on who their challengers are.
If the challengers are also responsible for the scandal, then voters are left with no option.
|
|
|
|
|
|
SVP
Joined: 30 Mar 2006
Posts: 1744
Followers: 1
Kudos [?]:
12
[0], given: 0
|
Will go with E here.
Was torn between D and E.
But the problem with D IMO is that it talks only about incumbents and not about parties.
E should be right as explained by Dahiya
|
|
|
|
|
|
Manager
Joined: 12 Jun 2006
Posts: 69
Location: Hyderabad, India
Followers: 1
Kudos [?]:
2
[0], given: 0
|
I went with C. Very tricky one. OA please!!
_________________
Hema
|
|
|
|
|
|
Manager
Joined: 16 Apr 2006
Posts: 79
Followers: 1
Kudos [?]:
0
[0], given: 0
|
The OA is E.
Great job dahiya.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Director
Joined: 06 May 2006
Posts: 791
Followers: 3
Kudos [?]:
7
[0], given: 0
|
ps_dahiya wrote: Nobody picked E????
Let me explain: E says that if candidate is not responsible and party is responsible then party should be penalized.
If E is true then 1. When all parties are blamed: All parties are penalized and there should not be any effect. 2. When only one party is plamed: That party is penalized and will not be re-elected.
All other choices talks mostly about incumbents rather than political parties. But the passage is talking about blames on political parties.
Stroke of genius! I got D
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior Manager
Joined: 12 Mar 2006
Posts: 373
Schools: Kellogg School of Management
Followers: 2
Kudos [?]:
19
[0], given: 3
|
Dahiya I understand your reasoning, but I find the reasoning for D also valid could you explain why we prefer E over D ?
|
|
|
|
|
|
CEO
Joined: 20 Nov 2005
Posts: 2934
Schools: Completed at SAID BUSINESS SCHOOL, OXFORD - Class of 2008
Followers: 7
Kudos [?]:
37
[0], given: 0
|
prude_sb wrote: Dahiya I understand your reasoning, but I find the reasoning for D also valid could you explain why we prefer E over D ?
All other choices, except E, talk mostly about incumbents rather than political parties. But the passage is talking about blames on political parties.
_________________
SAID BUSINESS SCHOOL, OXFORD - MBA CLASS OF 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior Manager
Joined: 12 Mar 2006
Posts: 373
Schools: Kellogg School of Management
Followers: 2
Kudos [?]:
19
[0], given: 3
|
cool thank you
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Moderators:
metallicafan, rajeevrks27, souvik101990, PTK, MacFauz, noboru, kissthegmat, carcass, willigetmylifeback, mikemcgarry, doe007, Vercules, Legendaddy, tuanquang269, RaviChandra, Marcab, Narenn
|