|
Author |
Message |
|
TAGS:
|
|
|
Director
Affiliations: FRM Charter holder
Joined: 02 Dec 2006
Posts: 737
Schools: Stanford, Chicago Booth, Babson College
Followers: 5
Kudos [?]:
8
[0], given: 4
|
Whenever a major political scandal erupts before an election [#permalink]
23 Apr 2007, 23:35
Question Stats:
0% (00:00) correct
0% (00:00) wrong based on 0 sessions
Whenever a major political scandal erupts before an election and voters blame the scandal on all parties about equally, virtually all incumbents, from whatever party, seeking reelection are returned to office. However, when voters blame such a scandal on only one party, incumbents from that party are likely to be defeated by challengers from other parties. The proportion of incumbents who seek reelection is high and remarkably constant from election to election.
If the votersтАЩ reactions are guided by a principle, which one of the following principles would best account for the contrast in reactions described above?
(A) Whenever one incumbent is responsible for one major political scandal and another incumbent is responsible for another, the consequences for the two incumbents should be the same.
(B) When a major political scandal is blamed on incumbents from all parties, that judgment is more accurate than any judgment that incumbents from only on party are to blame.
(C) Incumbents who are rightly blamed for a major political scandal should not seek reelection, but if they do, they should not be returned to office.
(D) Major political scandals can practically always be blamed on incumbents, but whether those incumbents should be voted out of office depends on who their challengers are.
(E) When major political scandals are less the responsibility of individual incumbents than of the parties to which they belong, whatever party was responsible must be penalized when possible.
I got it right. But the question seemed interesting. Hence, thought of sharing with u.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Manager
Joined: 09 Nov 2006
Posts: 130
Followers: 1
Kudos [?]:
1
[0], given: 0
|
B or D?
On testday I would pick D
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intern
Joined: 23 Apr 2007
Posts: 5
Followers: 0
Kudos [?]:
0
[0], given: 0
|
I think it is D??? :idea: :?:
|
|
|
|
|
|
VP
Joined: 15 Jul 2004
Posts: 1481
Schools: Wharton (R2 - submitted); HBS (R2 - submitted); IIMA (admitted for 1 year PGPX)
Followers: 9
Kudos [?]:
59
[0], given: 13
|
Re: CR: Political scandal [#permalink]
24 Apr 2007, 01:03
aurobindo wrote: Whenever a major political scandal erupts before an election and voters blame the scandal on all parties about equally, virtually all incumbents, from whatever party, seeking reelection are returned to office. However, when voters blame such a scandal on only one party, incumbents from that party are likely to be defeated by challengers from other parties. The proportion of incumbents who seek reelection is high and remarkably constant from election to election. If the votersтАЩ reactions are guided by a principle, which one of the following principles would best account for the contrast in reactions described above? (A) Whenever one incumbent is responsible for one major political scandal and another incumbent is responsible for another, the consequences for the two incumbents should be the same. (B) When a major political scandal is blamed on incumbents from all parties, that judgment is more accurate than any judgment that incumbents from only on party are to blame. (C) Incumbents who are rightly blamed for a major political scandal should not seek reelection, but if they do, they should not be returned to office. (D) Major political scandals can practically always be blamed on incumbents, but whether those incumbents should be voted out of office depends on who their challengers are. (E) When major political scandals are less the responsibility of individual incumbents than of the parties to which they belong, whatever party was responsible must be penalized when possible. I got it right. But the question seemed interesting. Hence, thought of sharing with u. 
A..
|
|
|
|
|
|
Manager
Joined: 26 Oct 2006
Posts: 177
Location: uk
Followers: 1
Kudos [?]:
3
[0], given: 0
|
A it seems.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior Manager
Joined: 27 Mar 2007
Posts: 330
Followers: 1
Kudos [?]:
16
[0], given: 0
|
I think it is A.
(A) follows the principle of the voters and seems logical, therefore >Best answer
(B) could be true, but could not, we don't know (closest answer)
(C) and (D), it is not important for the principle who their challangers is
(E) out of scope
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior Manager
Joined: 01 Jan 2007
Posts: 332
Followers: 1
Kudos [?]:
10
[0], given: 0
|
i think its A.
Whats the OA
Javed.
Cheers!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intern
Joined: 08 May 2006
Posts: 24
Followers: 0
Kudos [?]:
0
[0], given: 0
|
I don't think it's A as "consequences should be the same..." could mean that challengers replace all incumbents and not that all incumbents get re-elected.
All answers A-D refer to blaming specific incumbents whereas the passage discusses a party being blamed and all incumbents from that party getting penalized.
The only answer referring to parties being blamed is E.
I go for E.
|
|
|
|
|
|
VP
Joined: 15 Jul 2004
Posts: 1481
Schools: Wharton (R2 - submitted); HBS (R2 - submitted); IIMA (admitted for 1 year PGPX)
Followers: 9
Kudos [?]:
59
[0], given: 13
|
doc14 wrote: I don't think it's A as "consequences should be the same..." could mean that challengers replace all incumbents and not that all incumbents get re-elected.
All answers A-D refer to blaming specific incumbents whereas the passage discusses a party being blamed and all incumbents from that party getting penalized.
The only answer referring to parties being blamed is E.
I go for E.
You're right doc. I was wrong. E is right.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Manager
Joined: 26 Feb 2007
Posts: 115
Followers: 1
Kudos [?]:
1
[0], given: 0
|
E.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Director
Joined: 29 Jul 2006
Posts: 877
Followers: 3
Kudos [?]:
10
[0], given: 0
|
doc14 wrote: I don't think it's A as "consequences should be the same..." could mean that challengers replace all incumbents and not that all incumbents get re-elected.
All answers A-D refer to blaming specific incumbents whereas the passage discusses a party being blamed and all incumbents from that party getting penalized.
The only answer referring to parties being blamed is E.
I go for E.
Good explanation...I got down to C and E...but couldnt decide between them...E it is.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Manager
Joined: 28 Dec 2006
Posts: 62
Followers: 1
Kudos [?]:
0
[0], given: 0
|
I would go with D. OA ?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Director
Joined: 24 Aug 2006
Posts: 758
Location: Dallas, Texas
Followers: 3
Kudos [?]:
9
[0], given: 0
|
(E)
What is the OA, Mr CR guru ?
_________________
"Education is what remains when one has forgotten everything he learned in school."
|
|
|
|
|
|
Director
Joined: 24 Aug 2006
Posts: 758
Location: Dallas, Texas
Followers: 3
Kudos [?]:
9
[0], given: 0
|
(E)
What is the OA, Mr CR guru ?
_________________
"Education is what remains when one has forgotten everything he learned in school."
|
|
|
|
|
|
Director
Affiliations: FRM Charter holder
Joined: 02 Dec 2006
Posts: 737
Schools: Stanford, Chicago Booth, Babson College
Followers: 5
Kudos [?]:
8
[0], given: 4
|
Thank you guys.
The OA is E.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Moderators:
metallicafan, rajeevrks27, souvik101990, PTK, MacFauz, noboru, kissthegmat, carcass, willigetmylifeback, mikemcgarry, doe007, Vercules, Legendaddy, tuanquang269, RaviChandra, Marcab, Narenn
|