Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 30 Aug 2014, 12:27

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

Which of the flowing most logically completes the argument?

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:
VP
VP
User avatar
Joined: 03 Apr 2007
Posts: 1377
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 173 [0], given: 10

GMAT Tests User Reviews Badge
Which of the flowing most logically completes the argument? [#permalink] New post 26 May 2008, 07:20
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

0% (00:00) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 0 sessions
Which of the flowing most logically completes the argument?
The attribution of the choral work Lacrimae to the composer Pescard (1400 – 1474) has
been regarded as tentative, since it was based on a single treatise from the early 1500’s
that named Pescard as the composer. Recently, several musical treatises from the late
1500’s have come to light, all of which name Pescard as the composer of Lacrimae.
Unfortunately, these newly discovered treatises lend no support to the attribution of
Lacrimae to Pescard, since _______.
A. the treatise from the early 1500’s misidentifies the composers of some of the
musical works it considers
B. the author of the treatise from the early 1500’s had no very strong evidence on
which to base the identification of Pescard as the composer of Lacrimae
C. there are works that can conclusively be attributed to Pescard that are not even
mentioned in the treatise from the early 1500’s
D. the later treatises probably had no source for their attribution other than the earlier
treatise
E. no known treatises from the 1600’s identify Pescard as the composer of Lacrimae

Can someone explain what the argument?
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 19 May 2008
Posts: 52
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 4 [0], given: 0

Re: CR-Pescard [#permalink] New post 26 May 2008, 07:34
goalsnr wrote:
Which of the flowing most logically completes the argument?
The attribution of the choral work Lacrimae to the composer Pescard (1400 – 1474) has
been regarded as tentative, since it was based on a single treatise from the early 1500’s
that named Pescard as the composer. Recently, several musical treatises from the late
1500’s have come to light, all of which name Pescard as the composer of Lacrimae.
Unfortunately, these newly discovered treatises lend no support to the attribution of
Lacrimae to Pescard, since _______.
A. the treatise from the early 1500’s misidentifies the composers of some of the
musical works it considers
B. the author of the treatise from the early 1500’s had no very strong evidence on
which to base the identification of Pescard as the composer of Lacrimae
C. there are works that can conclusively be attributed to Pescard that are not even
mentioned in the treatise from the early 1500’s
D. the later treatises probably had no source for their attribution other than the earlier
treatise
E. no known treatises from the 1600’s identify Pescard as the composer of Lacrimae

Can someone explain what the argument?


My answer is D.
The later treatises are not credible because their source is the early 1500's single treatise, which itself was apparently unreliable
Director
Director
avatar
Joined: 10 Sep 2007
Posts: 950
Followers: 7

Kudos [?]: 186 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
Re: CR-Pescard [#permalink] New post 26 May 2008, 07:39
Conclusion of this passage is "These newly discovered treatises lend no support to the attribution of
Lacrimae to Pescard". So this question is basically strengthening/weakening question.

A. the treatise from the early 1500’s misidentifies the composers of some of the musical works it considers
We are bothered about new treatise not about the old one.

B. the author of the treatise from the early 1500’s had no very strong evidence on which to base the identification of Pescard as the composer of Lacrimae
We are bothered about new treatise not about the old one.

C. there are works that can conclusively be attributed to Pescard that are not even mentioned in the treatise from the early 1500’s
We are bothered about new treatise not about the old one.

D. the later treatises probably had no source for their attribution other than the earlier treatise
If later treaties are also referring to same old book that means there is no other source other than the one main thing. So this is the most logical thing.

E. no known treatises from the 1600’s identify Pescard as the composer of Lacrimae
We are bothered about treaties other than present one's.

Answer is D.
VP
VP
User avatar
Joined: 03 Apr 2007
Posts: 1377
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 173 [0], given: 10

GMAT Tests User Reviews Badge
Re: CR-Pescard [#permalink] New post 26 May 2008, 18:31
abhijit_sen wrote:
Conclusion of this passage is "These newly discovered treatises lend no support to the attribution of
Lacrimae to Pescard". So this question is basically strengthening/weakening question.

A. the treatise from the early 1500’s misidentifies the composers of some of the musical works it considers
We are bothered about new treatise not about the old one.

B. the author of the treatise from the early 1500’s had no very strong evidence on which to base the identification of Pescard as the composer of Lacrimae
We are bothered about new treatise not about the old one.

C. there are works that can conclusively be attributed to Pescard that are not even mentioned in the treatise from the early 1500’s
We are bothered about new treatise not about the old one.

D. the later treatises probably had no source for their attribution other than the earlier treatise
If later treaties are also referring to same old book that means there is no other source other than the one main thing. So this is the most logical thing.

E. no known treatises from the 1600’s identify Pescard as the composer of Lacrimae
We are bothered about treaties other than present one's.

Answer is D.


excellent. OA id D
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 22 Dec 2007
Posts: 158
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 9 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
Re: CR-Pescard [#permalink] New post 27 May 2008, 18:05
straight D.
By making the later treatises reference the one produced in the early 1500's , D maintains the status quo ( that the treatise from the early 1500 does not provide evidence that Pescard composed Lacrimae).
Re: CR-Pescard   [#permalink] 27 May 2008, 18:05
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
2 Experts publish their posts in the topic Which of the flowing most logically completes the argument? bsv180985 13 09 Dec 2009, 10:12
Which of the flowing most logically completes the argument? singh_amit19 7 09 Oct 2007, 13:16
Which of the flowing most logically completes the argument? alimad 2 23 Sep 2007, 18:14
Which of the following most logically completes the argument pb_india 13 22 Feb 2005, 18:48
Which of the following most logically completes the argument marine 10 18 Sep 2004, 00:54
Display posts from previous: Sort by

Which of the flowing most logically completes the argument?

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Privacy Policy| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.