Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

It appears that you are browsing the GMAT Club forum unregistered!

Signing up is free, quick, and confidential.
Join other 350,000 members and get the full benefits of GMAT Club

Registration gives you:

Tests

Take 11 tests and quizzes from GMAT Club and leading GMAT prep companies such as Manhattan GMAT,
Knewton, and others. All are free for GMAT Club members.

Applicant Stats

View detailed applicant stats such as GPA, GMAT score, work experience, location, application
status, and more

Books/Downloads

Download thousands of study notes,
question collections, GMAT Club’s
Grammar and Math books.
All are free!

Thank you for using the timer!
We noticed you are actually not timing your practice. Click the START button first next time you use the timer.
There are many benefits to timing your practice, including:

Which of the following best approximates the percent by [#permalink]
10 Oct 2010, 02:58

4

This post received KUDOS

3

This post was BOOKMARKED

00:00

A

B

C

D

E

Difficulty:

55% (hard)

Question Stats:

62% (02:20) correct
38% (01:30) wrong based on 187 sessions

Which of the following best approximates the percent by which the distance from A to C along a diagonal of square ABCD reduces the distance from A to C around the edge of square ABCD?

Re: Square Diagonal versus Perimeter [#permalink]
10 Oct 2010, 03:57

1

This post received KUDOS

Expert's post

1

This post was BOOKMARKED

vivaslluis wrote:

Hello,

I've seen the following example that I have doubts to solve:

Which of the following best approximates the percent by which the distance from A to C along a diagonal of square ABCD reduces the distance from A to C around the edge of square ABCD? a. 30% b. 43% c. 45% d. 50% e. 70%

Thank you

Le the side of a square be \(a\).

Route from A to C along a diagonal AC is \(\sqrt{2}a\approx{1.4a}\); Route from A to C around the edge ABC is \(2a\);

Difference is \(2a-1.4a=0.6a\) --> \(\frac{0.6a}{2a}=0.3=30%\).

Re: Square Diagonal versus Perimeter [#permalink]
28 Nov 2010, 10:16

Please read the question carefully, the question says - "..the percent by which the distance from A to C along a diagonal of square ABCD reduces the distance from A to C around the edge of square ABCD?"

So its not asking what percent the diagonal is of the distance around the edge but rather the percent of the difference between the two distances.

Re: Square Diagonal versus Perimeter [#permalink]
30 Nov 2010, 12:07

Great discussion, everyone - I just want to point out that (fittingly), gettinit gets it! One of the easiest things for the GMAT to do to make a pretty hard problem very hard is to bait you toward answering the wrong question. I've seen them do this a lot with Geometry problems that involve percents - there's a significant but subtle difference between:

Percent OF and Percent GREATER THAN or LESS THAN

When you see a percentage problem, make sure you pause to answer the right question because pretty much any percent problem could be asked in either way.

Re: Square Diagonal versus Perimeter [#permalink]
30 Nov 2010, 15:46

1

This post received KUDOS

You could use pythagorean theorem to solve this.

x^2+x^2=y^2

All sides of a square are equal, hence the two x^2. Plug in any number and solve.

vivaslluis wrote:

Hello,

I've seen the following example that I have doubts to solve:

Which of the following best approximates the percent by which the distance from A to C along a diagonal of square ABCD reduces the distance from A to C around the edge of square ABCD? a. 30% b. 43% c. 45% d. 50% e. 70%

Re: Square Diagonal versus Perimeter [#permalink]
30 Nov 2010, 20:08

Hey Trojan,

Great call on that - even if you have the x-x-x*sqrt 2 ratio memorized, I think it's important to know where it comes from. In the a^2 + b^2 = c^2 Pythagorean Theorem, if we know that a = b then it's really 2a^2 = c^2.

And deriving that for yourself once or twice means there's very little chance you ever forget it (and you know you can always go back and prove it if you do forget).

Thanks for bringing that up - I'm a huge fan of knowledge over memorization! _________________

Re: Square Diagonal versus Perimeter [#permalink]
01 Dec 2010, 18:45

Brian great challenge question post -it fits this question perfectly!

VeritasPrepBrian wrote:

Great discussion, everyone - I just want to point out that (fittingly), gettinit gets it! One of the easiest things for the GMAT to do to make a pretty hard problem very hard is to bait you toward answering the wrong question. I've seen them do this a lot with Geometry problems that involve percents - there's a significant but subtle difference between:

Percent OF and Percent GREATER THAN or LESS THAN

When you see a percentage problem, make sure you pause to answer the right question because pretty much any percent problem could be asked in either way.

Re: Square Diagonal versus Perimeter [#permalink]
11 Oct 2013, 05:50

Bunuel wrote:

vivaslluis wrote:

Hello,

I've seen the following example that I have doubts to solve:

Which of the following best approximates the percent by which the distance from A to C along a diagonal of square ABCD reduces the distance from A to C around the edge of square ABCD? a. 30% b. 43% c. 45% d. 50% e. 70%

Thank you

Le the side of a square be \(a\).

Route from A to C along a diagonal AC is \(\sqrt{2}a\approx{1.4a}\); Route from A to C around the edge ABC is \(2a\);

Difference is \(2a-1.4a=0.6a\) --> \(\frac{0.6a}{2a}=0.3=30%\).

Answer: A.

Hi , i am confused about the denominator in the equation.

if the equation is (2a-1.4a) then the denominator should be 1.4a ??? how it is 2a??? not geeting...

Re: Square Diagonal versus Perimeter [#permalink]
11 Oct 2013, 05:53

Expert's post

sunny3011 wrote:

Bunuel wrote:

vivaslluis wrote:

Hello,

I've seen the following example that I have doubts to solve:

Which of the following best approximates the percent by which the distance from A to C along a diagonal of square ABCD reduces the distance from A to C around the edge of square ABCD? a. 30% b. 43% c. 45% d. 50% e. 70%

Thank you

Le the side of a square be \(a\).

Route from A to C along a diagonal AC is \(\sqrt{2}a\approx{1.4a}\); Route from A to C around the edge ABC is \(2a\);

Difference is \(2a-1.4a=0.6a\) --> \(\frac{0.6a}{2a}=0.3=30%\).

Answer: A.

Hi , i am confused about the denominator in the equation.

if the equation is (2a-1.4a) then the denominator should be 1.4a ??? how it is 2a??? not geeting...

We are comparing to the route from A to C around the edge, which is 2a, so 2a must be in the denominator. _________________

Re: Which of the following best approximates the percent by [#permalink]
15 Nov 2014, 06:13

Hello from the GMAT Club BumpBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email. _________________

This week went in reviewing all the topics that I have covered in my previous study session. I reviewed all the notes that I have made and started reviewing the Quant...

I was checking my phone all day. I wasn’t sure when I would receive the admission decision from Tepper. I received an acceptance from Goizueta in the early morning...

I started running as a cross country team member since highshcool and what’s really awesome about running is that...you never get bored of it! I participated in...