Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

It appears that you are browsing the GMAT Club forum unregistered!

Signing up is free, quick, and confidential.
Join other 500,000 members and get the full benefits of GMAT Club

Registration gives you:

Tests

Take 11 tests and quizzes from GMAT Club and leading GMAT prep companies such as Manhattan GMAT,
Knewton, and others. All are free for GMAT Club members.

Applicant Stats

View detailed applicant stats such as GPA, GMAT score, work experience, location, application
status, and more

Books/Downloads

Download thousands of study notes,
question collections, GMAT Club’s
Grammar and Math books.
All are free!

Thank you for using the timer!
We noticed you are actually not timing your practice. Click the START button first next time you use the timer.
There are many benefits to timing your practice, including:

Re: Which of the following fractions has a decimal equivalent [#permalink]

Show Tags

07 Sep 2013, 05:48

3

This post received KUDOS

akankshasoneja wrote:

salsal wrote:

Which of the following fractions has a decimal equivalent that is a terminating decimal?

a) 10/189 b) 15/196 c) 16/225 d) 25/144 e) 39/128

is there any simple method to find it?

Denominators of options a,c,d contains powers of 3...numerators of these options when divided by 3 will have non-terminating decimals Denominator of option b contains power of 7...numerator 15 when divided by 7 will give non terminating decimal Option E has denominator in powers of 2...so when 39 divided by 2 will give a terminating decimal

Which of the following fractions has a decimal equivalent that is a terminating decimal?

a) 10/189 b) 15/196 c) 16/225 d) 25/144 e) 39/128

THEORY: Reduced fraction \(\frac{a}{b}\) (meaning that fraction is already reduced to its lowest term) can be expressed as terminating decimal if and only \(b\) (denominator) is of the form \(2^n5^m\), where \(m\) and \(n\) are non-negative integers. For example: \(\frac{7}{250}\) is a terminating decimal \(0.028\), as \(250\) (denominator) equals to \(2*5^3\). Fraction \(\frac{3}{30}\) is also a terminating decimal, as \(\frac{3}{30}=\frac{1}{10}\) and denominator \(10=2*5\).

Note that if denominator already has only 2-s and/or 5-s then it doesn't matter whether the fraction is reduced or not.

For example \(\frac{x}{2^n5^m}\), (where x, n and m are integers) will always be the terminating decimal.

We need reducing in case when we have the prime in denominator other then 2 or 5 to see whether it could be reduced. For example fraction \(\frac{6}{15}\) has 3 as prime in denominator and we need to know if it can be reduced.

BACK TO THE QUESTION:

Only option E (when reduced to its lowest form) has the denominator of the form \(2^n5^m\): 39/128=39/2^7.

Re: Which of the following fractions has a decimal equivalent [#permalink]

Show Tags

07 Sep 2013, 09:07

You can solve this question in less than 30 seconds if you understand the concept of terminating decimal. The denominator must have only power's of 2 or 5 in the denominator no other powers ( if it has any other prime factors like 3,7, etc it won't be terminating). 2's and 5's can be in any possible combination but it must only have 2's and 5's

a) 10/189

denominator sum of digits is 18 so its divisible by 3 eliminate

b) 15/196

This has a prime factor of 7 when do the prime factorization of the denominator.. Eliminate

c) 16/225

denominator sum of digits is 9 so its divisible by 3 eliminate

d) 25/144

denominator sum of digits is 9 so its divisible by 3 eliminate

You can solve this question in less than 30 seconds if you understand the concept of terminating decimal. The denominator must have only power's of 2 or 5 in the denominator no other powers ( if it has any other prime factors like 3,7, etc it won't be terminating). 2's and 5's can be in any possible combination but it must only have 2's and 5's

This is true if a fraction is reduced to its lowest term.

Consider this: the denominator of 3/30 has other primes than 2 or 5, but 3/30 IS a terminating decimal because 3 in the denominator gets reduced: 3/30=1/10=0.1.

Re: Which of the following fractions has a decimal equivalent [#permalink]

Show Tags

01 Oct 2013, 11:54

1

This post received KUDOS

Bunuel wrote:

salsal wrote:

Which of the following fractions has a decimal equivalent that is a terminating decimal?

a) 10/189 b) 15/196 c) 16/225 d) 25/144 e) 39/128

THEORY: Reduced fraction \(\frac{a}{b}\) (meaning that fraction is already reduced to its lowest term) can be expressed as terminating decimal if and only \(b\) (denominator) is of the form \(2^n5^m\), where \(m\) and \(n\) are non-negative integers. For example: \(\frac{7}{250}\) is a terminating decimal \(0.028\), as \(250\) (denominator) equals to \(2*5^2\). Fraction \(\frac{3}{30}\) is also a terminating decimal, as \(\frac{3}{30}=\frac{1}{10}\) and denominator \(10=2*5\).

Note that if denominator already has only 2-s and/or 5-s then it doesn't matter whether the fraction is reduced or not.

For example \(\frac{x}{2^n5^m}\), (where x, n and m are integers) will always be the terminating decimal.

We need reducing in case when we have the prime in denominator other then 2 or 5 to see whether it could be reduced. For example fraction \(\frac{6}{15}\) has 3 as prime in denominator and we need to know if it can be reduced.

BACK TO THE QUESTION:

Only option E (when reduced to its lowest form) has the denominator of the form \(2^n5^m\): 39/128=39/2^7.

Re: Which of the following fractions has a decimal equivalent [#permalink]

Show Tags

01 Oct 2013, 18:02

1

This post received KUDOS

Bunuel wrote:

salsal wrote:

Which of the following fractions has a decimal equivalent that is a terminating decimal?

a) 10/189 b) 15/196 c) 16/225 d) 25/144 e) 39/128

THEORY: Reduced fraction \(\frac{a}{b}\) (meaning that fraction is already reduced to its lowest term) can be expressed as terminating decimal if and only \(b\) (denominator) is of the form \(2^n5^m\), where \(m\) and \(n\) are non-negative integers. For example: \(\frac{7}{250}\) is a terminating decimal \(0.028\), as \(250\) (denominator) equals to \(2*5^2\). Fraction \(\frac{3}{30}\) is also a terminating decimal, as \(\frac{3}{30}=\frac{1}{10}\) and denominator \(10=2*5\).

Note that if denominator already has only 2-s and/or 5-s then it doesn't matter whether the fraction is reduced or not.

For example \(\frac{x}{2^n5^m}\), (where x, n and m are integers) will always be the terminating decimal.

We need reducing in case when we have the prime in denominator other then 2 or 5 to see whether it could be reduced. For example fraction \(\frac{6}{15}\) has 3 as prime in denominator and we need to know if it can be reduced.

BACK TO THE QUESTION:

Only option E (when reduced to its lowest form) has the denominator of the form \(2^n5^m\): 39/128=39/2^7.

Which of the following fractions has a decimal equivalent that is a terminating decimal?

a) 10/189 b) 15/196 c) 16/225 d) 25/144 e) 39/128

THEORY: Reduced fraction \(\frac{a}{b}\) (meaning that fraction is already reduced to its lowest term) can be expressed as terminating decimal if and only \(b\) (denominator) is of the form \(2^n5^m\), where \(m\) and \(n\) are non-negative integers. For example: \(\frac{7}{250}\) is a terminating decimal \(0.028\), as \(250\) (denominator) equals to \(2*5^2\). Fraction \(\frac{3}{30}\) is also a terminating decimal, as \(\frac{3}{30}=\frac{1}{10}\) and denominator \(10=2*5\).

Note that if denominator already has only 2-s and/or 5-s then it doesn't matter whether the fraction is reduced or not.

For example \(\frac{x}{2^n5^m}\), (where x, n and m are integers) will always be the terminating decimal.

We need reducing in case when we have the prime in denominator other then 2 or 5 to see whether it could be reduced. For example fraction \(\frac{6}{15}\) has 3 as prime in denominator and we need to know if it can be reduced.

BACK TO THE QUESTION:

Only option E (when reduced to its lowest form) has the denominator of the form \(2^n5^m\): 39/128=39/2^7.

Which of the following fractions has a decimal equivalent that is a terminating decimal?

a) 10/189 b) 15/196 c) 16/225 d) 25/144 e) 39/128

THEORY: Reduced fraction \(\frac{a}{b}\) (meaning that fraction is already reduced to its lowest term) can be expressed as terminating decimal if and only \(b\) (denominator) is of the form \(2^n5^m\), where \(m\) and \(n\) are non-negative integers. For example: \(\frac{7}{250}\) is a terminating decimal \(0.028\), as \(250\) (denominator) equals to \(2*5^2\). Fraction \(\frac{3}{30}\) is also a terminating decimal, as \(\frac{3}{30}=\frac{1}{10}\) and denominator \(10=2*5\).

Note that if denominator already has only 2-s and/or 5-s then it doesn't matter whether the fraction is reduced or not.

For example \(\frac{x}{2^n5^m}\), (where x, n and m are integers) will always be the terminating decimal.

We need reducing in case when we have the prime in denominator other then 2 or 5 to see whether it could be reduced. For example fraction \(\frac{6}{15}\) has 3 as prime in denominator and we need to know if it can be reduced.

BACK TO THE QUESTION:

Only option E (when reduced to its lowest form) has the denominator of the form \(2^n5^m\): 39/128=39/2^7.

Re: Which of the following fractions has a decimal equivalent [#permalink]

Show Tags

02 Oct 2013, 06:12

Bunuel wrote:

AccipiterQ wrote:

I'm confused, 128 is 2^7, you said it had to be 2^n*5^m....there is no 5^m in 128

Yes, it is 128 = 2^7*5^0.

So ANY number with a 2^x or 5^x (where x is greater than or equal to 1) will fall into this then?

I'm confused though, so 6/15 a terminating decimal, because 15 is 5^1*3^1*2^0, but then why is 16/225 is not terminating? It follows the same pattern; 225 is 5^2*3^2*2^0

I'm confused, 128 is 2^7, you said it had to be 2^n*5^m....there is no 5^m in 128

Yes, it is 128 = 2^7*5^0.

So ANY number with a 2^x or 5^x (where x is greater than or equal to 1) will fall into this then?

I'm confused though, so 6/15 a terminating decimal, because 15 is 5^1*3^1*2^0, but then why is 16/225 is not terminating? It follows the same pattern; 225 is 5^2*3^2*2^0

Re: Which of the following fractions has a decimal equivalent [#permalink]

Show Tags

03 Jan 2015, 16:05

1

This post received KUDOS

Hello from the GMAT Club BumpBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
_________________

Re: Which of the following fractions has a decimal equivalent [#permalink]

Show Tags

13 Feb 2016, 04:16

every terminating decimal has 10,100,1000,10000 etc. in denominator when written as fraction. So, all fractions should have only 2 and/or 5 as a factors in their reduced state

a) 10/189, it is reduced, and 189 does not have any 2 or 5 b) 15/196, reduced, and 196=(2*7)^2, so does not fit c) 16/225, reduced, and 225=(3*5)^2, so does not fit d) 25/144, reduced, and 144=(3*4)^2, so does not fit e) 39/128, reduced, and 128=2^7, so can have 10^7 in denominator and fits

Re: Which of the following fractions has a decimal equivalent [#permalink]

Show Tags

28 Sep 2016, 15:22

1

This post received KUDOS

Top Contributor

salsal wrote:

Which of the following fractions has a decimal equivalent that is a terminating decimal?

a) 10/189 b) 15/196 c) 16/225 d) 25/144 e) 39/128

NOTE: this is one of those questions that require us to check/test each answer choice. In these situations, always check the answer choices from E to A, because the correct answer is typically closer to the bottom than to the top.

Happy New Year everyone! Before I get started on this post, and well, restarted on this blog in general, I wanted to mention something. For the past several months...

It’s quickly approaching two years since I last wrote anything on this blog. A lot has happened since then. When I last posted, I had just gotten back from...

Happy 2017! Here is another update, 7 months later. With this pace I might add only one more post before the end of the GSB! However, I promised that...