|
Author |
Message |
|
TAGS:
|
|
|
VP
Joined: 10 Jun 2007
Posts: 1478
Followers: 5
Kudos [?]:
70
[0], given: 0
|
Which of the following, if true, provides evidence that most [#permalink]
 29 Sep 2007, 15:55
Question Stats:
0% (00:00) correct
100% (00:05) wrong based on 0 sessions
Which of the following, if true, provides evidence that most logically completes the argument below?
According to a widely held economic hypothesis, imposing strict environmental regulations reduces economic growth. This hypothesis is undermined by the fact that the states with the strictest environmental regulations also have the highest economic growth. This fact does not show that environmental regulations promote growth, however, since ______.
A. those states with the strictest environmental regulations invest the most in education and job training
B. even those states that have only moderately strict environmental regulations have higher growth than those with the least-strict regulations
C. many states that are experiencing reduced economic growth are considering weakening their environmental regulations
D. after introducing stricter environmental regulations, many states experienced increased economic growth
E. even those states with very weak environmental regulations have experienced at least some growth
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Director
Joined: 23 Sep 2007
Posts: 806
Followers: 4
Kudos [?]:
66
[0], given: 0
|
IMO A
A offers an alternative explanation to the observation.
Other answer choices don't address the question.
|
|
|
|
|
|
VP
Joined: 08 Jun 2005
Posts: 1172
Followers: 5
Kudos [?]:
78
[0], given: 0
|
I think it's (E)
This fact does not show that environmental regulations promote growth, however, since ______.
even those states with very weak environmental regulations have experienced at least some growth.
I ignored the other parts of the CR segment.
|
|
|
|
|
|
VP
Joined: 10 Jun 2007
Posts: 1478
Followers: 5
Kudos [?]:
70
[0], given: 0
|
what's wrong with b?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Manager
Joined: 07 Mar 2007
Posts: 199
Followers: 1
Kudos [?]:
5
[0], given: 0
|
I couldn't decide between D and E. Think it's E though...
Last edited by ColumbiaDream on 29 Sep 2007, 18:42, edited 1 time in total.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Director
Joined: 18 Jul 2006
Posts: 536
Followers: 1
Kudos [?]:
14
[0], given: 0
|
Clear E.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Manager
Joined: 07 Aug 2005
Posts: 128
Followers: 1
Kudos [?]:
0
[0], given: 0
|
bkk145 wrote: Which of the following, if true, provides evidence that most logically completes the argument below?
According to a widely held economic hypothesis, imposing strict environmental regulations reduces economic growth. This hypothesis is undermined by the fact that the states with the strictest environmental regulations also have the highest economic growth. This fact does not show that environmental regulations promote growth, however, since ______.
A. those states with the strictest environmental regulations invest the most in education and job training
B. even those states that have only moderately strict environmental regulations have higher growth than those with the least-strict regulations
C. many states that are experiencing reduced economic growth are considering weakening their environmental regulations
D. after introducing stricter environmental regulations, many states experienced increased economic growth
E. even those states with very weak environmental regulations have experienced at least some growth
My pick A. It introduces another explanation that weakens the stated cause-effect relationship in the argument.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Manager
Joined: 07 Aug 2005
Posts: 128
Followers: 1
Kudos [?]:
0
[0], given: 0
|
bkk145 wrote: what's wrong with b?
it talks about moderately strict , though arg is about strict regulation and non-strict.
|
|
|
|
|
|
CEO
Joined: 29 Mar 2007
Posts: 2618
Followers: 13
Kudos [?]:
142
[0], given: 0
|
bkk145 wrote: Which of the following, if true, provides evidence that most logically completes the argument below?
According to a widely held economic hypothesis, imposing strict environmental regulations reduces economic growth. This hypothesis is undermined by the fact that the states with the strictest environmental regulations also have the highest economic growth. This fact does not show that environmental regulations promote growth, however, since ______.
A. those states with the strictest environmental regulations invest the most in education and job training
B. even those states that have only moderately strict environmental regulations have higher growth than those with the least-strict regulations
C. many states that are experiencing reduced economic growth are considering weakening their environmental regulations
D. after introducing stricter environmental regulations, many states experienced increased economic growth
E. even those states with very weak environmental regulations have experienced at least some growth
E: This establishes that environmental regulations are NOT the cause of economic growth.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Manager
Joined: 09 Jul 2007
Posts: 178
Followers: 0
Kudos [?]:
4
[0], given: 0
|
i'll go for E
|
|
|
|
|
|
VP
Joined: 10 Jun 2007
Posts: 1478
Followers: 5
Kudos [?]:
70
[0], given: 0
|
OA given for this is A
I thought A is irrelevant....
|
|
|
|
|
|
VP
Joined: 28 Mar 2006
Posts: 1396
Followers: 1
Kudos [?]:
14
[0], given: 0
|
bkk145 wrote: OA given for this is A
I thought A is irrelevant....
A??? 
|
|
|
|
|
|
SVP
Joined: 28 Dec 2005
Posts: 1612
Followers: 1
Kudos [?]:
53
[0], given: 2
|
A is actually what I had picked.
Stem starts off by saying that theory is that strict regulations = less growth.
Then it says that places with highest growth have the strictest regulations. Undermines the first premise.
Last sentence, author seems to think that there is something else causing the situation in sentence two, and so we need to look for an alternate explanation as to to why strict regulations = high growth.
A gives that
|
|
|
|
|
|
VP
Joined: 15 Jul 2004
Posts: 1481
Schools: Wharton (R2 - submitted); HBS (R2 - submitted); IIMA (admitted for 1 year PGPX)
Followers: 9
Kudos [?]:
59
[0], given: 13
|
Path wrote: bkk145 wrote: Which of the following, if true, provides evidence that most logically completes the argument below?
According to a widely held economic hypothesis, imposing strict environmental regulations reduces economic growth. This hypothesis is undermined by the fact that the states with the strictest environmental regulations also have the highest economic growth. This fact does not show that environmental regulations promote growth, however, since ______.
A. those states with the strictest environmental regulations invest the most in education and job training
B. even those states that have only moderately strict environmental regulations have higher growth than those with the least-strict regulations
C. many states that are experiencing reduced economic growth are considering weakening their environmental regulations
D. after introducing stricter environmental regulations, many states experienced increased economic growth
E. even those states with very weak environmental regulations have experienced at least some growth My pick A. It introduces another explanation that weakens the stated cause-effect relationship in the argument. Very nice..
|
|
|
|
|
|
SVP
Joined: 16 Jul 2009
Posts: 1635
Schools: CBS
WE 1: 4 years (Consulting)
Followers: 25
Kudos [?]:
119
[0], given: 2
|
Path wrote: bkk145 wrote: Which of the following, if true, provides evidence that most logically completes the argument below?
According to a widely held economic hypothesis, imposing strict environmental regulations reduces economic growth. This hypothesis is undermined by the fact that the states with the strictest environmental regulations also have the highest economic growth. This fact does not show that environmental regulations promote growth, however, since ______.
A. those states with the strictest environmental regulations invest the most in education and job training
B. even those states that have only moderately strict environmental regulations have higher growth than those with the least-strict regulations
C. many states that are experiencing reduced economic growth are considering weakening their environmental regulations
D. after introducing stricter environmental regulations, many states experienced increased economic growth
E. even those states with very weak environmental regulations have experienced at least some growth My pick A. It introduces another explanation that weakens the stated cause-effect relationship in the argument. Which is the "another explanation that weakens the stated C-E"? In order to prove that Strict Regulation does not promote economic growth, we have to find other explanation that actually promotes the economic growth. A would be correct if it were "those states with the strictest environmental regulations invest the most in education and job training, which is enough to promote the economic growth of a country" Please thoughts on that. Thanks.
_________________
The sky is the limit
800 is the limit
Find out what's new at GMAT Club - latest features and updates
|
|
|
|
|
|
Verbal GMAT Forum Moderator
Joined: 31 Jan 2010
Posts: 500
WE 1: 4 years Tech
Followers: 7
Kudos [?]:
67
[0], given: 149
|
noboru is this LSAT ?
_________________
My Post Invites Discussions not answers
Try to give back something to the Forum.I want your explanations, right now !
Please let me know your opinion about the Chandigarh Gmat Centrehttp://gmatclub.com/forum/gmat-experience-at-chandigarh-india-centre-111830.html
|
|
|
|
|
|
SVP
Joined: 01 Sep 2010
Posts: 1742
Followers: 55
Kudos [?]:
565
[0], given: 467
|
A has no sense. E has sense......any clue lead to E. 
_________________
KUDOS is the good manner to help the entire community.
|
|
|
|
|
|
SVP
Joined: 16 Jul 2009
Posts: 1635
Schools: CBS
WE 1: 4 years (Consulting)
Followers: 25
Kudos [?]:
119
[0], given: 2
|
mundasingh123 wrote: noboru is this LSAT ? No, is not. It's Gmat prep actually.
_________________
The sky is the limit
800 is the limit
Find out what's new at GMAT Club - latest features and updates
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Similar topics |
Author |
Replies |
Last post |
|
Similar
Topics:
|
 |
|
|
Which of the following, if true, is the most logical
|
rahulraao |
3 |
04 Oct 2005, 18:06 |
 |
|
|
Which of the following, if true, provides the strongest
|
thearch |
14 |
04 Jun 2006, 02:53 |
|
|
|
|
Which of the following, if true, provides evidence that most
|
younggun044 |
19 |
06 Oct 2007, 19:37 |
|
|
|
 |
Which of the following, if true, provides evidence that most
|
quantum |
13 |
14 Jun 2008, 01:45 |
|
|
1
|
|
Which of the following, if true, provides evidence that most
|
tejal777 |
12 |
17 Aug 2009, 01:05 |
|
|
|
|
|
Moderators:
metallicafan, rajeevrks27, souvik101990, PTK, MacFauz, noboru, kissthegmat, carcass, willigetmylifeback, mikemcgarry, doe007, Vercules, Legendaddy, tuanquang269, RaviChandra, Marcab, Narenn
|
close
