Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

It appears that you are browsing the GMAT Club forum unregistered!

Signing up is free, quick, and confidential.
Join other 500,000 members and get the full benefits of GMAT Club

Registration gives you:

Tests

Take 11 tests and quizzes from GMAT Club and leading GMAT prep companies such as Manhattan GMAT,
Knewton, and others. All are free for GMAT Club members.

Applicant Stats

View detailed applicant stats such as GPA, GMAT score, work experience, location, application
status, and more

Books/Downloads

Download thousands of study notes,
question collections, GMAT Club’s
Grammar and Math books.
All are free!

Thank you for using the timer!
We noticed you are actually not timing your practice. Click the START button first next time you use the timer.
There are many benefits to timing your practice, including:

So in other words sq rt of (x-3)^2 is +ve or -ve x-3? Sorry, but i don't really get that. I thought when we have a square of a sq rt, the answer is just what's under the sq rt, without any power.

It's not sq rt of 9 to be +-3, it's sq rt of 9^2, which is 9.
Please correct me if i am wrong.

I'm sorry; I just don't understand the logic behind this. I can arrive at the correct answer by plugging in but I cannot see how the answer is not x - 3 when solving algebraically. Obviously, I'm missing some basic concept. Can you explain? Thanks.

I'm sorry; I just don't understand the logic behind this. I can arrive at the correct answer by plugging in but I cannot see how the answer is not x - 3 when solving algebraically. Obviously, I'm missing some basic concept. Can you explain? Thanks.

by definition |x| = sqrt(x^2)

since |x| have two scenarios -x or x and sqrt(x^2) have the same scenarios -x or x.

I'm sorry; I just don't understand the logic behind this. I can arrive at the correct answer by plugging in but I cannot see how the answer is not x - 3 when solving algebraically. Obviously, I'm missing some basic concept. Can you explain? Thanks.

by definition |x| = sqrt(x^2)

since |x| have two scenarios -x or x and sqrt(x^2) have the same scenarios -x or x.

Whew! Finally it makes sense. Thanks KS.

wait a second: it is true that |x| can have -ve or +ve values i.e. lxl = x or -x.

I'm sorry; I just don't understand the logic behind this. I can arrive at the correct answer by plugging in but I cannot see how the answer is not x - 3 when solving algebraically. Obviously, I'm missing some basic concept. Can you explain? Thanks.

by definition |x| = sqrt(x^2)

since |x| have two scenarios -x or x and sqrt(x^2) have the same scenarios -x or x.

Whew! Finally it makes sense. Thanks KS.

wait a second: it is true that |x| can have -ve or +ve values i.e. lxl = x or -x.

But sqrt(x^2) has only one i.e x not -x.

the unknown x in sqrt(x^2) can be negative - the outcome will be positive ---> sqrt(-2^2) = 2 ---> x=-2

I'm sorry; I just don't understand the logic behind this. I can arrive at the correct answer by plugging in but I cannot see how the answer is not x - 3 when solving algebraically. Obviously, I'm missing some basic concept. Can you explain? Thanks.

by definition |x| = sqrt(x^2)

since |x| have two scenarios -x or x and sqrt(x^2) have the same scenarios -x or x.

Whew! Finally it makes sense. Thanks KS.

wait a second: it is true that |x| can have -ve or +ve values i.e. lxl = x or -x.

But sqrt(x^2) has only one i.e x not -x.

No... ... In bold, we can only say : sqrt(x^2) = |x|

KillerSquirrel gave an exemple that proves it as well

I'm sorry; I just don't understand the logic behind this. I can arrive at the correct answer by plugging in but I cannot see how the answer is not x - 3 when solving algebraically. Obviously, I'm missing some basic concept. Can you explain? Thanks.

by definition |x| = sqrt(x^2)

since |x| have two scenarios -x or x and sqrt(x^2) have the same scenarios -x or x.

Whew! Finally it makes sense. Thanks KS.

wait a second: it is true that |x| can have -ve or +ve values i.e. lxl = x or -x.

But sqrt(x^2) has only one i.e x not -x.

No... ... In bold, we can only say : sqrt(x^2) = |x|

KillerSquirrel gave an exemple that proves it as well

Fig, I am still not convinced. I am in line with what Honghu and hobbit said here:

I'm sorry; I just don't understand the logic behind this. I can arrive at the correct answer by plugging in but I cannot see how the answer is not x - 3 when solving algebraically. Obviously, I'm missing some basic concept. Can you explain? Thanks.

by definition |x| = sqrt(x^2)

since |x| have two scenarios -x or x and sqrt(x^2) have the same scenarios -x or x.

Whew! Finally it makes sense. Thanks KS.

wait a second: it is true that |x| can have -ve or +ve values i.e. lxl = x or -x.

But sqrt(x^2) has only one i.e x not -x.

No... ... In bold, we can only say : sqrt(x^2) = |x|

KillerSquirrel gave an exemple that proves it as well

Fig, I am still not convinced. I am in line with what Honghu and hobbit said here:

It's not the same debate ... y = sqrt(2*x) can only be positive or nul. But hobbit and HongHu said that y = the square root of () has another meaning...

I will draw u
> the function : sqrt (9+x^2-6x) in fig 1
> the function : 3-x in fig 2

These 2 draws show that there are not equal

Attachments

Fig1_Sqrt__ an hidden Abs.gif [ 3.54 KiB | Viewed 5542 times ]

Fig2_3 minus X, half correct.gif [ 3.38 KiB | Viewed 5539 times ]

I'm sorry; I just don't understand the logic behind this. I can arrive at the correct answer by plugging in but I cannot see how the answer is not x - 3 when solving algebraically. Obviously, I'm missing some basic concept. Can you explain? Thanks.

by definition |x| = sqrt(x^2)

since |x| have two scenarios -x or x and sqrt(x^2) have the same scenarios -x or x.

Whew! Finally it makes sense. Thanks KS.

wait a second: it is true that |x| can have -ve or +ve values i.e. lxl = x or -x.

But sqrt(x^2) has only one i.e x not -x.

No... ... In bold, we can only say : sqrt(x^2) = |x|

KillerSquirrel gave an exemple that proves it as well

Fig, I am still not convinced. I am in line with what Honghu and hobbit said here:

Not sure if this is your confusion and not trying to complicate things further, but ...
9+x^2-6x = (3-x)^2
So when you plug this back in the original equation, you get:
sqrt(9+x^2-6x) = sqrt((3-x)^2) = |3-x|

This means that
sqrt (9+x^2-6x) = +(3-x) OR -(3-x)

However, if you rearrange 9+x^2-6x to x^2-6x+9, you can get
x^2-6x+9 = (x-3)^2
Plug this back in the equation, you get
sqrt(x^2-6x+9) = sqrt((x-3)^2) = |x-3|

This means there are four solutions to this problem as follows:
sqrt(x^2-6x+9) = +(3-x) AND-(3-x) OR +(x-3) AND -(x-3) In sum,
sqrt(x^2-6x+9) = |3-x| OR |x-3|

This is true and absolute value properties confirms this because:
|a-b| = |b-a|

This is the kickoff for my 2016-2017 application season. After a summer of introspect and debate I have decided to relaunch my b-school application journey. Why would anyone want...

Check out this awesome article about Anderson on Poets Quants, http://poetsandquants.com/2015/01/02/uclas-anderson-school-morphs-into-a-friendly-tech-hub/ . Anderson is a great place! Sorry for the lack of updates recently. I...

“Oh! Looks like your passport expires soon” – these were the first words at the airport in London I remember last Friday. Shocked that I might not be...