Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 20 Aug 2014, 12:38

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

Which of the following most logically completes the

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 08 Apr 2004
Posts: 137
Location: Corea
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 49 [0], given: 0

Which of the following most logically completes the [#permalink] New post 20 Sep 2004, 05:54
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

0% (00:00) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 1 sessions
Which of the following most logically completes the argument?

The irradiation of food kills bacteria and thus retards spoilage. However, it also lowers the nutritional value of many foods. For example, irradiation destroys a significant percentage of whatever vitamin B1 a food may contain. Proponents of irradiation point out that irradiation is no worse in this respect than cooking. However, this fact is either beside the point, since much irradiated food is eaten raw, or else misleading, since _______.

A. many of the proponents of irradiation are food distributors who gain from food’s having a longer shelf life
B. it is clear that killing bacteria that may be present on food is not the only effect that irradiation has
C. cooking is usually the final step in preparing food for consumption, whereas irradiation serves to ensure a longer shelf life for perishable foods
D. certain kinds of cooking are, in fact, even more destructive of vitamin B1 than carefully controlled irradiation is
E. for food that is both irradiated and cooked, the reduction of vitamin B1 associated with either process individually is compounded
Kaplan GMAT Prep Discount CodesKnewton GMAT Discount CodesVeritas Prep GMAT Discount Codes
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 21 Aug 2004
Posts: 136
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 5 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 20 Sep 2004, 10:22
The irradiation of food kills bacteria and thus retards spoilage. However, it also lowers the nutritional value of many foods. For example, irradiation destroys a significant percentage of whatever vitamin B1 a food may contain. Proponents of irradiation point out that irradiation is no worse in this respect than cooking. However, this fact is either beside the point, since much irradiated food is eaten raw, or else misleading, since _______.

A. many of the proponents of irradiation are food distributors who gain from food’s having a longer shelf life
B. it is clear that killing bacteria that may be present on food is not the only effect that irradiation has
C. cooking is usually the final step in preparing food for consumption, whereas irradiation serves to ensure a longer shelf life for perishable foods I will go with this one because if this is true then te comparison above is misleading, that is the author is citing an alternative which has nothing in common with the first
D. certain kinds of cooking are, in fact, even more destructive of vitamin B1 than carefully controlled irradiation is
E. for food that is both irradiated and cooked, the reduction of vitamin B1 associated with either process individually is compounded
Director
Director
User avatar
Joined: 05 May 2004
Posts: 577
Location: San Jose, CA
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 27 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
Re: CR: Bacteria [#permalink] New post 20 Sep 2004, 12:59
I will go with C
The author says "this fact is either beside the point" and says why irr and cooking are unrelated. This has to be parallel to "misleading" point ....
Only C mentions that irr and cooking are not related
GMAT Club Legend
GMAT Club Legend
avatar
Joined: 15 Dec 2003
Posts: 4318
Followers: 20

Kudos [?]: 155 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 20 Sep 2004, 13:08
Totally C; the comparison is invalid because the reference methods are unrelated
_________________

Best Regards,

Paul

SVP
SVP
User avatar
Joined: 30 Oct 2003
Posts: 1798
Location: NewJersey USA
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 31 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 26 Sep 2004, 14:29
The cooking does not come into picture at all because most of irradiated food is eaten raw.

I dont know how (C) undermines proponents claim because the tone of the argument says that the author is trying to undermine proponents claim.
Director
Director
User avatar
Joined: 13 Nov 2003
Posts: 971
Location: Florida
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 14 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 27 Sep 2004, 20:00
I, first, fell for C, but finally chose E.

for foods that are irradiated and cooked B1 should get destroyed twice, but the premise says irradiation destroys all the B1 available. So what does cooking gonna destroy? Proponents of irradiation failed to take this case in consideration.
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
Joined: 16 Aug 2004
Posts: 328
Location: India
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 38 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 28 Sep 2004, 03:18
Will go for D.

The author is making an attempt to support the conclusion that irradiation is a better method for preserving food. The approach is to present a counter arguement (cooking) and then to proove it wrong and attacks the counter premise (B1), as done by choice D.
Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 18 Aug 2004
Posts: 96
Location: Santa Clara
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 0

Re: CR: Bacteria [#permalink] New post 28 Sep 2004, 08:24
marine wrote:
Which of the following most logically completes the argument?

The irradiation of food kills bacteria and thus retards spoilage. However, it also lowers the nutritional value of many foods. For example, irradiation destroys a significant percentage of whatever vitamin B1 a food may contain. Proponents of irradiation point out that irradiation is no worse in this respect than cooking. However, this fact is either beside the point, since much irradiated food is eaten raw, or else misleading, since _______.

A. many of the proponents of irradiation are food distributors who gain from food’s having a longer shelf life
B. it is clear that killing bacteria that may be present on food is not the only effect that irradiation has
C. cooking is usually the final step in preparing food for consumption, whereas irradiation serves to ensure a longer shelf life for perishable foods
D. certain kinds of cooking are, in fact, even more destructive of vitamin B1 than carefully controlled irradiation is
E. for food that is both irradiated and cooked, the reduction of vitamin B1 associated with either process individually is compounded


So we are looking for WHY IT IS MISLEADING....the first part of the argument already talks about BESIDE THE POINT which is mentioned in C

E shows why it is misleading cause it describes the negative effect. it is worse to combine the two....
_________________

"Do or do not, there is no try."
-Yoda

Re: CR: Bacteria   [#permalink] 28 Sep 2004, 08:24
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
Which of the following most logically completes the rw6183 6 24 May 2008, 23:19
Which of the following most logically completes the JCLEONES 5 08 Jan 2008, 07:33
Which of the following most logically completes the johnycute 11 10 Dec 2006, 00:41
Which of the following is the most logical completion of the MBA2ran 7 06 Dec 2006, 21:12
Which of the following most logically completes the rbcola 7 05 Oct 2006, 07:42
Display posts from previous: Sort by

Which of the following most logically completes the

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Privacy Policy| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.