Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

 It is currently 25 Jun 2016, 15:09

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# Which of the following most logically completes the

Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

Veritas Prep GMAT Instructor
Joined: 16 Oct 2010
Posts: 6666
Location: Pune, India
Followers: 1828

Kudos [?]: 11099 [1] , given: 218

### Show Tags

12 Dec 2012, 04:49
1
KUDOS
Expert's post
krackgmat wrote:
Which of the following most logically completes the arguement?

Utrania was formerly a major petroleum exporter, but in recent decades economic stagnation and restrictive regulations inhibited investment in new oil fields. In consequence, Utranian oil exports dropped steadily as old fields became depleted. Utrania's currently improving economic situation, together with less-restrictive regulations, will undoubtedly result in the rapid development of new fields. However, it would be premature to conclude that the rapid developemtn of new fields will result in higher oil exports, because

A. the price of oil is expected to remain relatively stable over the next several years.
B. the improvement in the economic situation in Utrania is expected to result in a dramatic increase in the proprtion of Utranians who own automobiles.
C. most of the investment in new oil fields in Utrania is expected to come from foreign sources
D. new technology is available to recover oil from old oil fields formerly regarded as depleted.
E. many of the new oil fields in Utrania are likely to be as productive as those that were developed during the period when Utrania was a major oil exporter.

Responding to a pm:

You are right. It is an easy B.

Go with the flow of the argument.
The last sentence says that development of new fields may not lead to higher exports because ...
It's a very basic question. Production is increasing but exports may not. Why? Because domestic demand may be higher now. You are looking for an option that says this.
B offers you a possible cause of increase in domestic demand so it logically completes the sentence.
_________________

Karishma
Veritas Prep | GMAT Instructor
My Blog

Get started with Veritas Prep GMAT On Demand for $199 Veritas Prep Reviews VP Status: Been a long time guys... Joined: 03 Feb 2011 Posts: 1420 Location: United States (NY) Concentration: Finance, Marketing GPA: 3.75 Followers: 167 Kudos [?]: 1096 [0], given: 62 Re: Utrania was formerly [#permalink] ### Show Tags 12 Dec 2012, 05:20 Expert's post Hii karishma. Restating the argument: "it would be premature to conclude that the rapid developemtn of new fields will result in higher oil exports". Two things are possible 1) there is an alternate way,apart from new fields, through which export can be increased. 2) there is no increase in exports at all. Both the above options create a doubt that rapid development of new fields lead to higher exports. Now D creates an alternate source(point 1) without making an assumption, whereas again saying B makes another assumption. Ask yourself, do the cars only run on fuels? Now someone please let me know how my solution is incorrect. _________________ Veritas Prep GMAT Instructor Joined: 16 Oct 2010 Posts: 6666 Location: Pune, India Followers: 1828 Kudos [?]: 11099 [0], given: 218 Re: Utrania was formerly [#permalink] ### Show Tags 12 Dec 2012, 20:29 Expert's post Marcab wrote: Hii karishma. Restating the argument: "it would be premature to conclude that the rapid developemtn of new fields will result in higher oil exports". Two things are possible 1) there is an alternate way,apart from new fields, through which export can be increased. 2) there is no increase in exports at all. Both the above options create a doubt that rapid development of new fields lead to higher exports. Now D creates an alternate source(point 1) without making an assumption, whereas again saying B makes another assumption. Ask yourself, do the cars only run on fuels? Now someone please let me know how my solution is incorrect. You need to analyze the argument properly. Argument: Utrania was a major exporter of oil. Some yrs back, exports dropped because investments in new fields were inhibited and old fields became depleted. Now, new fields will be developed. Still, rapid development of new fields may not result in higher exports because .... All you are interested in is why development of new fields may not lead to increase in exports. The point is not what may lead to increase in exports. The point is why exports may not increase even though new fields will be developed. Where will the oil from the new fields go? Ofcourse, domestic consumption. Also, there is no assumption here. Most automobiles run on fuel today. If there is a dramatic increase in the number of automobiles, a big chunk is bound to run on fuel. It's a simple question. Treat it as such. _________________ Karishma Veritas Prep | GMAT Instructor My Blog Get started with Veritas Prep GMAT On Demand for$199

Veritas Prep Reviews

Senior Manager
Status: Prevent and prepare. Not repent and repair!!
Joined: 13 Feb 2010
Posts: 275
Location: India
Concentration: Technology, General Management
GPA: 3.75
WE: Sales (Telecommunications)
Followers: 9

Kudos [?]: 65 [0], given: 282

Re: Which of the following most logically completes the [#permalink]

### Show Tags

10 Jan 2013, 11:20
I agree with Marcab, there is a slight assumption here that automobiles run on fuel. But B is the best ans and not D because we cannot conclude that new technology to extract oil from depleted resources will increase the export.
_________________

I've failed over and over and over again in my life and that is why I succeed--Michael Jordan
Kudos drives a person to better himself every single time. So Pls give it generously
Wont give up till i hit a 700+

Intern
Joined: 21 Oct 2012
Posts: 26
GMAT Date: 01-19-2013
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 5 [0], given: 15

Re: Which of the following most logically completes the [#permalink]

### Show Tags

11 Jan 2013, 14:08
Karishma is right, the key word here is EXPORT. Great internal consumption of oil products makes export forecast uncertain. B is clear
_________________

MGMAT1 - 610
MGMAT2 - 670
MGMAT3 - 640

OMG

e-GMAT Representative
Joined: 02 Nov 2011
Posts: 1957
Followers: 1866

Kudos [?]: 6070 [1] , given: 251

### Show Tags

20 Jan 2013, 20:44
1
KUDOS
Expert's post
Marcab wrote:
Hii karishma.
Restating the argument: "it would be premature to conclude that the rapid developemtn of new fields will result in higher oil exports".
Two things are possible
1) there is an alternate way,apart from new fields, through which export can be increased.
2) there is no increase in exports at all.
Both the above options create a doubt that rapid development of new fields lead to higher exports.

Now D creates an alternate source(point 1) without making an assumption, whereas again saying B makes another assumption. Ask yourself, do the cars only run on fuels?

Now someone please let me know how my solution is incorrect.

Hi Marcab,

You have raised an interesting point here. Initially, I could not understand why you chose option D but after reading this post, I understand.

Let's understand the last line:

" it would be premature to conclude that the rapid development of new fields will result in higher oil exports, because"

Now, here you say that one thing possible is that " there is an alternate way,apart from new fields, through which export can be increased".

Well, even if there are alternate ways to increase exports, how does it make a conclusion premature that new fields will lead to increased exports.

An Analogy

Sometime analogies can be useful. Let's consider an analogy here:

It would be premature to say that eating one more apple a day will increase my height because I can increase height by drinking milk.

Is this argument correct? No. Why?

Because the guy is not saying that there is no other way to increase your height; He is just saying that eating an extra apple will increase my height.

Similarly, in this case, even if we say that there could be other sources through which higher exports could be achieved, we are not weakening the given argument.

Only way vs one of the ways

However, if the argument had said that

" it would be premature to conclude that the rapid development of new fields is the only way to achieve higher oil exports, because"

then we could have said that there are other avenues to increase exports, than only through new fields.

Therefore, option D is not correct.

Weakeners make assumptions

Now, regarding your other query that option B makes some assumptions. Again, a good point.

The idea is that almost all weakeners make some assumptions. There are not many weakeners, if you look at OG, which would conclusively disprove the conclusion just by their own. And in this question, we are looking for a weakener only.

Hope this helps

Feel free to ask in case of further queries.

-Chiranjeev
_________________

Aiming to score 760+ on the GMAT? Attend our free webinars to learn how to:

[*] Master Number Properties
[*] Ace Critical Reasoning

The webinars will start at 7 AM PST on the 11th and 12th of July, 2015.

VP
Joined: 09 Jun 2010
Posts: 1288
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 85 [0], given: 697

Re: Which of the following most logically completes the [#permalink]

### Show Tags

27 Jan 2013, 01:15
Weakeners make assumptions

Now, regarding your other query that option B makes some assumptions. Again, a good point.

The idea is that almost all weakeners make some assumptions. There are not many weakeners, if you look at OG, which would conclusively disprove the conclusion just by their own. And in this question, we are looking for a weakener only.

Hope this helps

thank you e gmat for deep analysis.

I do not understand the above idea. Pls cite the og questions in which weakeners disprove the conclusion and in which weakener only weaken the conclusion. pls, cite only one question for each case. thank you very much.
I understand that if information shatters an assumption, it disproves the conclusion. if information increases doubt in an assumption, it increase doubt in the conclusion. The first is the destroyer, the second the weakner. both destroyer and weakner are correct answer for weakening question.

is my thinking correct?
VP
Joined: 09 Jun 2010
Posts: 1288
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 85 [0], given: 697

Re: Which of the following most logically completes the [#permalink]

### Show Tags

27 Jan 2013, 01:23
second point, so I post second time

above argument is proposal passage. if we do X, Y happen. assumption for this passage is that there is no bad agent. weakner is that there is some bad agent which prevent the happening of Y.

be armed with above thinking before going to answer choices for analysis.

now, among answer choices, B match our prethinking.

choose B.

pls, comment my above process. is it right? Thank you .
e-GMAT Representative
Joined: 02 Nov 2011
Posts: 1957
Followers: 1866

Kudos [?]: 6070 [1] , given: 251

Re: Which of the following most logically completes the [#permalink]

### Show Tags

27 Jan 2013, 20:05
1
KUDOS
Expert's post
thangvietnam wrote:
Weakeners make assumptions

Now, regarding your other query that option B makes some assumptions. Again, a good point.

The idea is that almost all weakeners make some assumptions. There are not many weakeners, if you look at OG, which would conclusively disprove the conclusion just by their own. And in this question, we are looking for a weakener only.

Hope this helps

thank you e gmat for deep analysis.

I do not understand the above idea. Pls cite the og questions in which weakeners disprove the conclusion and in which weakener only weaken the conclusion. pls, cite only one question for each case. thank you very much.
I understand that if information shatters an assumption, it disproves the conclusion. if information increases doubt in an assumption, it increase doubt in the conclusion. The first is the destroyer, the second the weakner. both destroyer and weakner are correct answer for weakening question.

is my thinking correct?

Hi Thang.

Please find below an OG question where weakener doesn't disprove the conclusion. Or, in other words, it would require us to make assumptions to disprove the conclusion.

(Posted on according-to-the-tristate-transportation-authority-making-113718.html)
According to the Tristate Transportation Authority, making certain improvements to the main commuter rail line
would increase ridership dramatically. The authority plans to finance these improvements over the course of five
years by raising automobile tolls on the two high-way bridges along the route the rail line serves. Although the
proposed improvements are indeed needed, the authority’s plan for securing the necessary funds should be
rejected because it would unfairly force drivers to absorb the entire cost of something from which they receive no
benefit.

1.. Which of the following, if true, would cast the most doubt on the effectiveness of the authority’s plan to
finance the proposed improvements by increasing bridge tolls?
(A) Before the authority increases tolls on any of the area bridges, it is required by law to hold public hearings at
which objections to the proposed increase can be raised.
(B) Whenever bridge tolls are increased, the authority must pay a private contractor to adjust the automated
toll-collecting machines.
(C) Between the time a proposed toll increase is announced and the time the increase is actually put into effect,
many commuters buy more tokens than usual to postpone the effects of the increase.
(D) When tolls were last increased on the two bridges in question, almost 20 percent of the regular commuter
traffic switched to a slightly longer alternative route that has since been improved.
(E) The chairman of the authority is a member of the Tristate Automobile Club that has registered strong
opposition to the proposed toll increase.

The asnwer is Option D. One very obvious assumption required in this question is that past trends will be followed in the future too.

And below is the OG question where weakener does shatter the conclusion:
(Posted on unlike-the-wholesale-price-of-raw-wool-the-wholesale-price-93250.html)

Unlike the wholesale price of raw wool, the wholesale price of raw cotton has fallen considerably in the last Year.
Thus, although the retail price of cotton clothing at retail cloting stores has not yet fallen, it will inevitably fall.
Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument above?

A. The cost of processing raw cotton for cloth has increased during the last Year.
B. The wholesale price is typically higher than that of the same volume of raw cotton.
C. The operating costs of the average retail cloting store have remained constant during the last year.
D. Changes in retail prices always lag behind changes in wholesale prices.
E. The cost of harvesting raw cotton has increased in the last year.

Since, as per the weakener, the cost of processing raw cotton for cloth has increased during the last Year, we cannot say that "retail price of cotton will inevitably fall". It might or it might not fall (depends how much processing costs has increased).

As far as your reasoning goes, it is precisely right. Whether a statement increased doubt or shatters the conclusion, in both the cases, it is a weakener.

Hope this helps

Thanks,
Chiranjeev
_________________

Aiming to score 760+ on the GMAT? Attend our free webinars to learn how to:

[*] Master Number Properties
[*] Ace Critical Reasoning

The webinars will start at 7 AM PST on the 11th and 12th of July, 2015.

VP
Joined: 09 Jun 2010
Posts: 1288
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 85 [0], given: 697

Re: Which of the following most logically completes the [#permalink]

### Show Tags

28 Jan 2013, 00:42
Thank you e gmat expert.

pls continue this discussion which is about the behavior of weakener, and, so which is important.

in the first og question, oa D requires an assumption to increase the doubt on the conclusion

in the second og question, oa A dose not requires any assumption to increase the doubt on the conclusion

that is the difference I get from you. Thank you very much.

another question

can you give me an og question, in which the weakener truely shatter the conclusion ? pls,

in the above second og question, oa A dose not shatter. oa A only cast doubt on the conlusion.

Thank you
VP
Joined: 09 Jun 2010
Posts: 1288
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 85 [0], given: 697

Re: Which of the following most logically completes the [#permalink]

### Show Tags

28 Jan 2013, 00:54
dear e gmat expert.

if in the second og , oa A is changed to
cost of processing of raw cotton increases much more than the price of raw cotton reduces

we have a situation in which a weakener truely shatter the conclusion.

but could you pls cite an og question which presents this case of shattering?

thank you e gmat experts.
e-GMAT Representative
Joined: 02 Nov 2011
Posts: 1957
Followers: 1866

Kudos [?]: 6070 [0], given: 251

Re: Which of the following most logically completes the [#permalink]

### Show Tags

28 Jan 2013, 01:25
Expert's post
thangvietnam wrote:
Thank you e gmat expert.

pls continue this discussion which is about the behavior of weakener, and, so which is important.

in the first og question, oa D requires an assumption to increase the doubt on the conclusion

in the second og question, oa A dose not requires any assumption to increase the doubt on the conclusion

that is the difference I get from you. Thank you very much.

another question

can you give me an og question, in which the weakener truely shatter the conclusion ? pls,

in the above second og question, oa A dose not shatter. oa A only cast doubt on the conlusion.

Thank you

Hi Thang,

In the second case, the weakener does shatter the conclusion. The conclusion was "retail price of cotton will inevitably fall". Now, if the weakener is inserted, we cannot be sure if the price will fall.

Now, we cannot say that retail price will inevitably fall. The conclusion is not only weakened, it doesn't hold true. It is not inevitable anymore.

Hope I am making sense.

Thanks
Chiranjeev
_________________

Aiming to score 760+ on the GMAT? Attend our free webinars to learn how to:

[*] Master Number Properties
[*] Ace Critical Reasoning

The webinars will start at 7 AM PST on the 11th and 12th of July, 2015.

Veritas Prep GMAT Instructor
Joined: 16 Oct 2010
Posts: 6666
Location: Pune, India
Followers: 1828

Kudos [?]: 11099 [0], given: 218

Re: Which of the following most logically completes the [#permalink]

### Show Tags

28 Jan 2013, 21:21
Expert's post
1
This post was
BOOKMARKED
thangvietnam wrote:

I do not understand the above idea. Pls cite the og questions in which weakeners disprove the conclusion and in which weakener only weaken the conclusion. pls, cite only one question for each case. thank you very much.
I understand that if information shatters an assumption, it disproves the conclusion. if information increases doubt in an assumption, it increase doubt in the conclusion. The first is the destroyer, the second the weakner. both destroyer and weakner are correct answer for weakening question.

is my thinking correct?

In CR questions we deal with real world scenarios. New information will either strengthen or weaken or do nothing to the conclusion. It is very very difficult for the new info to establish something without a doubt because then the new info will need to consider all possible cases. There will always be some assumptions. The new info will change the degree of confidence in our conclusion. It will not establish or refute our conclusion without any doubt.

Let me explain using an example:

Your argument: Mr X was found on the crime scene (I have been watching too much Fox Crime lately!) with a gun in his hand, blood on his clothes and victim on the floor. Mr X must be the killer (your conclusion).

I want to weaken your argument: Mr X was trying to coerce the gun out of the killer's hand. He is not the killer.
(I have successfully cast doubt on your conclusion but there are assumptions here. You can still get back. )

Your argument: But we can say without a doubt that there was no other person in that room during that time. (perhaps there is a single exit/entry point and it was guarded) Now you have strengthened your case and weakened mine but still there are assumptions.

My argument: The victim was trying to kill himself and Mr X was trying to stop him. The victim succeeded in committing suicide. Mr X is innocent.
Now I have weakened your case and strengthened mine.

We can keep at it for a long time and every new piece of info can strengthen/weaken the argument. Every new piece of info does come with assumptions. That is why, criminals are punished when their crime is established without REASONABLE doubt.

Basically, it will be very very difficult to disprove a conclusion. You can generally just weaken it.
_________________

Karishma
Veritas Prep | GMAT Instructor
My Blog

Get started with Veritas Prep GMAT On Demand for \$199

Veritas Prep Reviews

Intern
Joined: 05 Mar 2013
Posts: 15
GMAT Date: 04-20-2013
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 3 [0], given: 9

Re: Which of the following most logically completes the [#permalink]

### Show Tags

13 Apr 2013, 16:07
Blue Book CR65

Strengthen
Conclusion: The development of new oil fields WILL NOT result in higher oil exports.
Premise: Though economic situation improving and regulations are less strict.

Had C: Foreign source gives oil to Utrania, so it does not make sense for Utrania to export oil resulting in higher oil exports.
Not C: Foreigners investment in Utrania's new oil fields is good for its development and helps Utrania's oil exports resulting in higher oil exports.
It's B: Utrania's improved economic situation caused its people to use more of its oil and it is very likely that there will be LESS oil exports.
Not A: The stable price of oil will still result in higher oil exports.
Senior Manager
Joined: 03 Dec 2012
Posts: 367
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 96 [1] , given: 291

Re: Which of the following most logically completes the [#permalink]

### Show Tags

25 Oct 2013, 02:06
1
KUDOS
The OA is B guys.... Its a straight B. I can see no other answer fitting the bill.
Senior Manager
Joined: 10 Mar 2013
Posts: 290
GMAT 1: 620 Q44 V31
GMAT 2: 690 Q47 V37
GMAT 3: 610 Q47 V28
GMAT 4: 700 Q50 V34
GMAT 5: 700 Q49 V36
GMAT 6: 690 Q48 V35
GMAT 7: 750 Q49 V42
GMAT 8: 730 Q50 V39
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 76 [0], given: 2404

Re: Which of the following most logically completes the [#permalink]

### Show Tags

07 May 2014, 20:26
mohnish104 wrote:
The OA is B guys.... Its a straight B. I can see no other answer fitting the bill.

Well said. We should not argue with the OA, because it will always be the OA.
Moderator
Joined: 25 Apr 2012
Posts: 728
Location: India
GPA: 3.21
Followers: 41

Kudos [?]: 590 [0], given: 723

Re: Which of the following most logically completes the [#permalink]

### Show Tags

30 Sep 2014, 22:25
eazyb81 wrote:
Official Guide for GMAT Verbal Review, 2nd Edition

Practice Question
Question No.: 65
Page: 142
Difficulty:

Which of the following most logically completes the argument?

Utrania was formerly a major petroleum exporter, but in recent decades economic stagnation and restrictive regulations inhibited investment in new oild fields. In consequence, Utrania oil exports dropped steadily as old fields became depleted. Utrania's currently improving economic condition, together with less restrictive regulations, will undoubtedly result in the rapid development of new fields. However, it would be premature to conclude that the rapid development of new fields will result in higher oil exports, because:

A. the price of oil is expected to remain relatively stable over the next several years.

B. the improvement in the economic situation in Utrania is expected to result in a dramatic increase in the proportion of Utranian's who own automobiles.

C. most of the investment in the oil fields in Utrania is expected to come from foreign sources.

D. new technology is available to recover oil from old oil fields formerly regarded as depleted.

E. many of the new oil fields in Utrania are likely to be as productive as those that were developing during the period when Utrania was a major oil exporter.

The more i re-look at Gmatprep problems the more i become a fan of them..
Again, Do this when you come across a complete the passage question
Attachment:

Untitled.png [ 8.55 KiB | Viewed 565 times ]

Clearly, we need to reason as to why in spite of rapid development of of new fields, the exports many not be higher....We need to strengthen this argument...
Gap in the argument: Earlier exporter but Stagnant economy for decades and restrictive regulations inhibited investments in new oil fields.Oil exports steadily decreased because oil fields became depleted.. of Now things have changed with improving economy and less restrictive investment policies..but still we may not have higher exports from new oil fields
B points to reason of increased domestic consumption on account of vehicles..oil will come from new fields..
D. new technology is available to recover oil but from fields regarded depleted...we need to have higher exports and we have only technology but yields from these fields may not be high enough leading to low exports
_________________

“If you can't fly then run, if you can't run then walk, if you can't walk then crawl, but whatever you do you have to keep moving forward.”

GMAT Club Legend
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Posts: 8025
Followers: 729

Kudos [?]: 151 [0], given: 0

Re: Which of the following most logically completes the [#permalink]

### Show Tags

04 Nov 2015, 13:35
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
Re: Which of the following most logically completes the   [#permalink] 04 Nov 2015, 13:35

Go to page   Previous    1   2   [ 38 posts ]

Similar topics Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
Which of the following most logically completes the 0 13 Apr 2013, 16:07
Which of the following most logically completes the 16 10 Sep 2006, 19:12
Which of the following most logically completes the 4 25 Aug 2006, 07:39
Which of the following most logically completes the 8 01 Aug 2006, 22:39
Which of the following most logically completes the 10 14 Jul 2006, 18:14
Display posts from previous: Sort by