|
Author |
Message |
|
TAGS:
|
|
|
Manager
Joined: 19 Aug 2006
Posts: 222
Followers: 1
Kudos [?]:
3
[0], given: 0
|
Which of the following most logically completes the [#permalink]
 10 Dec 2006, 01:41
Question Stats:
0% (00:00) correct
 0% (00:00) wrong based on 0 sessions
Which of the following most logically completes the argument?
The irradiation of food kills bacteria and thus retards spoilage. However, it also lowers the nutritional value of many foods. For example, irradiation destroys a significant percentage of whatever vitamin B1 a food may contain. Proponents of irradiation point out that irradiation is no worse in this respect than cooking. However, this fact is either beside the point, since much irradiated food is eaten raw, or else misleading, since _______.
A. many of the proponents of irradiation are food distributors who gain from food’s having a longer shelf life
B. it is clear that killing bacteria that may be present on food is not the only effect that irradiation has
C. cooking is usually the final step in preparing food for consumption, whereas irradiation serves to ensure a longer shelf life for perishable foods
D. certain kinds of cooking are, in fact, even more destructive of vitamin B1 than carefully controlled irradiation is
E. for food that is both irradiated and cooked, the reduction of vitamin B1 associated with either process individually is compounded
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Director
Joined: 24 Aug 2006
Posts: 758
Location: Dallas, Texas
Followers: 3
Kudos [?]:
9
[0], given: 0
|
E - both processes have a compounded effect.
_________________
"Education is what remains when one has forgotten everything he learned in school."
|
|
|
|
|
|
Director
Joined: 01 Oct 2006
Posts: 502
Followers: 1
Kudos [?]:
5
[0], given: 0
|
My pick is C
|
|
|
|
|
|
SVP
Joined: 08 Nov 2006
Posts: 1560
Location: Ann Arbor
Schools: Ross '10
Followers: 12
Kudos [?]:
155
[0], given: 1
|
I pick E.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior Manager
Joined: 24 Sep 2006
Posts: 281
Followers: 1
Kudos [?]:
3
[0], given: 0
|
E it is.
Conclusion is trying to say that the proponet’s argument is misleading
So a choice that reiterates the effect of irradiation will be a logical completion.
_________________
AimHigher
|
|
|
|
|
|
Director
Affiliations: FRM Charter holder
Joined: 02 Dec 2006
Posts: 737
Schools: Stanford, Chicago Booth, Babson College
Followers: 5
Kudos [?]:
8
[0], given: 4
|
Re: CR [ Logically Complete ] [#permalink]
11 Dec 2006, 04:18
johnycute wrote: Which of the following most logically completes the argument?
The irradiation of food kills bacteria and thus retards spoilage. However, it also lowers the nutritional value of many foods. For example, irradiation destroys a significant percentage of whatever vitamin B1 a food may contain. Proponents of irradiation point out that irradiation is no worse in this respect than cooking. However, this fact is either beside the point, since much irradiated food is eaten raw, or else misleading, since _______.
A. many of the proponents of irradiation are food distributors who gain from food’s having a longer shelf life
B. it is clear that killing bacteria that may be present on food is not the only effect that irradiation has
C. cooking is usually the final step in preparing food for consumption, whereas irradiation serves to ensure a longer shelf life for perishable foods
D. certain kinds of cooking are, in fact, even more destructive of vitamin B1 than carefully controlled irradiation is
E. for food that is both irradiated and cooked, the reduction of vitamin B1 associated with either process individually is compounded
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior Manager
Joined: 23 May 2005
Posts: 266
Location: Sing/ HK
Followers: 1
Kudos [?]:
3
[0], given: 0
|
C for me
_________________
Impossible is nothing
|
|
|
|
|
|
Manager
Joined: 26 Oct 2006
Posts: 177
Location: uk
Followers: 1
Kudos [?]:
3
[0], given: 0
|
My answer is A .
It is the proponents who will be gaining and so they are the ones who are misleading with their argument.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior Manager
Joined: 04 Nov 2006
Posts: 269
Location: California
Followers: 1
Kudos [?]:
3
[0], given: 0
|
I chose C.. what's OA?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Manager
Joined: 28 Aug 2006
Posts: 245
Location: Albuquerque, NM
Followers: 1
Kudos [?]:
1
[0], given: 0
|
A and E both out of scope, I chose C
Please provide OA ASAP
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior Manager
Joined: 19 Jul 2006
Posts: 367
Followers: 1
Kudos [?]:
1
[0], given: 0
|
E makes more sense to me ...
However, this fact is either beside the point, since much irradiated food is eaten raw, or else misleading ....... that it is not eaten raw and cooking adds further loss in vitamins
|
|
|
|
|
|
SVP
Joined: 03 Jan 2005
Posts: 2322
Followers: 9
Kudos [?]:
157
[0], given: 0
|
Re: CR [ Logically Complete ] [#permalink]
13 Dec 2006, 06:40
johnycute wrote: Which of the following most logically completes the argument?
The irradiation of food kills bacteria and thus retards spoilage. However, it also lowers the nutritional value of many foods. For example, irradiation destroys a significant percentage of whatever vitamin B1 a food may contain. Proponents of irradiation point out that irradiation is no worse in this respect than cooking. However, this fact is either beside the point, since much irradiated food is eaten raw, or else misleading, since _______.
Fact 1: Irradiation kills bacteria.
Fact 2: Irradiation destroys nutritional value of foods.
Argument : It's no worse than cooking (cooking destroys some nutritional value of foods).
Counter argument:
For foods that are eaten raw, there won't be any cooking, but irradiation will lower the nutrition value compared to otherwise;
For foods that will be cooked, the effects from irradiation and cooking will be compounded and thus irradiation lowers the nutrition value compared to no irradiation.
In other words, irradiation is bad to nutrition value of food, and the fact that its effect size is similar to cooking is irrelevent.
This would be the complete argument of the passage. The two "since" indicate that the two clauses are parallel, one regards raw food (fruits etc) and the other natually flows to be "non-raw food", ie. foods that need to be cooked.
_________________
Keep on asking, and it will be given you;
keep on seeking, and you will find;
keep on knocking, and it will be opened to you.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Re: CR [ Logically Complete ]
[#permalink]
13 Dec 2006, 06:40
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Moderators:
metallicafan, rajeevrks27, souvik101990, PTK, MacFauz, noboru, kissthegmat, carcass, willigetmylifeback, mikemcgarry, doe007, Vercules, Legendaddy, tuanquang269, RaviChandra, Marcab, Narenn
|
close
