While Governor Verdant has been in office, the state s : GMAT Critical Reasoning (CR)
Check GMAT Club App Tracker for the Latest School Decision Releases http://gmatclub.com/AppTrack

 It is currently 07 Dec 2016, 12:40

# Chicago-Booth

is Calling R1 Admits |  Join Chat Room2 for Live Updates

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# While Governor Verdant has been in office, the state s

 new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics
Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

Intern
Joined: 05 May 2011
Posts: 11
Concentration: General Management, Strategy
GMAT 1: 690 Q50 V32
GMAT 2: 720 Q50 V36
GPA: 3.78
WE: Consulting (Computer Software)
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 15 [2] , given: 1

While Governor Verdant has been in office, the state s [#permalink]

### Show Tags

20 Feb 2012, 08:44
2
KUDOS
3
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00

Difficulty:

75% (hard)

Question Stats:

52% (02:34) correct 48% (01:58) wrong based on 269 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

While Governor Verdant has been in office, the state’s budget has increased by an average of 6 percent each year. While the previous governor was in office, the state’s budget increased by an average of 11.5 percent each year. Obviously, the austere budgets during Governor Verdant’s term have caused the slowdown in the growth in state spending.

Which of the following, if true, would most seriously weaken the conclusion drawn above?

(A) The rate of inflation in the state averaged 10 percent each year during the previous governor’s term in office and 3 percent each year during Verdant’s term.
(B) Both federal and state income tax rates have been lowered considerably during Verdant’s term in office.
(C) In each year of Verdant’s term in office, the state’s budget has shown some increase in spending over the previous year.
(D) During Verdant’s term in office, the state has either discontinued or begun to charge private citizens for numerous services that the state offered free to citizens during the previous governor’s term.
(E) During the previous governor’s term in office, the state introduced several so-called “austerity” budgets intended to reduce the growth in state spending.

[Reveal] Spoiler:
I chose D, thinking that the previous governor had some budget for free services, now that budget is not there so, less spending. Where is the gap in my understanding?
[Reveal] Spoiler: OA

_________________

the Battle continues ..

If you have any questions
you can ask an expert
New!
Magoosh GMAT Instructor
Joined: 28 Nov 2011
Posts: 307
Followers: 511

Kudos [?]: 953 [0], given: 2

Re: While Governor Verdant has been in office, the state s [#permalink]

### Show Tags

20 Feb 2012, 17:34
The argument boils down to the numbers: the state's budget increased by less percent during
Governor V.'s tenure than that of his predecessor (6% vs. 11.5%). Thus, Gov. V. represented a
slow down in budget spending.

Can we rely solely on the numbers? That question becomes the crux of the conclusion.

What if there was more inflation during the previous governor's tenure? Well, then we have
an alternative explanation for the greater percentage increase in state budget during the
previous governor's term.

Therefore, (A) is the answer.

@newdawn - the phenomenon in (D) could have multiple interpretations. For one, that the state discontinued/charged citizens for services does not definitively prove that the state spending slowed down during Gov. V's time (remember this is the conclusion). Perhaps, the budget actually increased and the funds were spent on other projects, e.g. state highway, etc. Indeed, the money that was saved from not scrapping citizens' services could be used for new projects.

Basically (D) doesn't provide us with any info. regarding the actual budget size during Gov. V's reign - just that certain programs were eliminated.

Hope that helps
_________________

Christopher Lele
Magoosh Test Prep

Manager
Joined: 17 Sep 2011
Posts: 209
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 103 [0], given: 8

Re: While Governor Verdant has been in office, the state s [#permalink]

### Show Tags

20 Feb 2012, 23:22
A is the correct answer as it clearly states an alternate reason why the state’s budget during Governor Verdant term had been lower.
_________________

_________________
Giving +1 kudos is a better way of saying 'Thank You'.

Senior Manager
Affiliations: UWC
Joined: 09 May 2012
Posts: 399
GMAT 1: 620 Q42 V33
GMAT 2: 680 Q44 V38
GPA: 3.43
WE: Engineering (Entertainment and Sports)
Followers: 29

Kudos [?]: 1054 [0], given: 100

Re: While Governor Verdant has been in office, the state s [#permalink]

### Show Tags

14 Jun 2012, 23:01
I chose B and fell into a trap: the stimulus refers to state budget; for some reason, I was thinking about state spending.
Manager
Joined: 01 Aug 2011
Posts: 84
Location: India
Concentration: Finance, Finance
GPA: 3.4
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 201 [0], given: 29

Re: While Governor Verdant has been in office, the state s [#permalink]

### Show Tags

16 Jun 2012, 05:16
why not e , as austere budget were introduced during previous governors term , Verdant should not be blamed for reduced budget
Manager
Affiliations: Project Management Professional (PMP)
Joined: 30 Jun 2011
Posts: 213
Location: New Delhi, India
Followers: 5

Kudos [?]: 65 [1] , given: 12

Re: While Governor Verdant has been in office, the state s [#permalink]

### Show Tags

16 Jun 2012, 20:07
1
KUDOS
ChrisLele wrote:
The argument boils down to the numbers: the state's budget increased by less percent during
Governor V.'s tenure than that of his predecessor (6% vs. 11.5%). Thus, Gov. V. represented a
slow down in budget spending.

Can we rely solely on the numbers? That question becomes the crux of the conclusion.

What if there was more inflation during the previous governor's tenure? Well, then we have
an alternative explanation for the greater percentage increase in state budget during the
previous governor's term.

Therefore, (A) is the answer.

@newdawn - the phenomenon in (D) could have multiple interpretations. For one, that the state discontinued/charged citizens for services does not definitively prove that the state spending slowed down during Gov. V's time (remember this is the conclusion). Perhaps, the budget actually increased and the funds were spent on other projects, e.g. state highway, etc. Indeed, the money that was saved from not scrapping citizens' services could be used for new projects.

Basically (D) doesn't provide us with any info. regarding the actual budget size during Gov. V's reign - just that certain programs were eliminated.

Hope that helps

Hi Chris

Why option E is incorrect.
_________________

Best
Vaibhav

If you found my contribution helpful, please click the +1 Kudos button on the left, Thanks

Senior Manager
Affiliations: UWC
Joined: 09 May 2012
Posts: 399
GMAT 1: 620 Q42 V33
GMAT 2: 680 Q44 V38
GPA: 3.43
WE: Engineering (Entertainment and Sports)
Followers: 29

Kudos [?]: 1054 [0], given: 100

Re: While Governor Verdant has been in office, the state s [#permalink]

### Show Tags

16 Jun 2012, 20:16
narangvaibhav wrote:
ChrisLele wrote:
The argument boils down to the numbers: the state's budget increased by less percent during
Governor V.'s tenure than that of his predecessor (6% vs. 11.5%). Thus, Gov. V. represented a
slow down in budget spending.

Can we rely solely on the numbers? That question becomes the crux of the conclusion.

What if there was more inflation during the previous governor's tenure? Well, then we have
an alternative explanation for the greater percentage increase in state budget during the
previous governor's term.

Therefore, (A) is the answer.

@newdawn - the phenomenon in (D) could have multiple interpretations. For one, that the state discontinued/charged citizens for services does not definitively prove that the state spending slowed down during Gov. V's time (remember this is the conclusion). Perhaps, the budget actually increased and the funds were spent on other projects, e.g. state highway, etc. Indeed, the money that was saved from not scrapping citizens' services could be used for new projects.

Basically (D) doesn't provide us with any info. regarding the actual budget size during Gov. V's reign - just that certain programs were eliminated.

Hope that helps

Hi Chris

Why option E is incorrect.

hey narangvaibhav, in order to weaken the argument we need to somehow undermine the cause - effect relationship claimed in the argument.
CAUSE: Gov. Verdant's austere budgets
EFFECT: Slowdown in spending.

Choice E is a trap answer because it does not undermine the cause-effect relationship in any way but it distracts you away from the main argument. So what if the previous governor introduced austerity measures? Did these measures actually work? And most importantly, how does this relate to the effectiveness of gov. Verdant's austerity measures? You see, choice E is completely tangential to the argument.
GMAT Club Legend
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Posts: 10439
Followers: 886

Kudos [?]: 191 [0], given: 0

Re: While Governor Verdant has been in office, the state s [#permalink]

### Show Tags

21 Oct 2015, 07:51
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
Senior Manager
Status: Always try to face your worst fear because nothing GOOD comes easy. You must be UNCOMFORTABLE to get to your COMFORT ZONE
Joined: 15 Aug 2014
Posts: 384
Concentration: Marketing, Technology
GMAT 1: 570 Q44 V25
GMAT 2: 600 Q48 V25
WE: Information Technology (Consulting)
Followers: 6

Kudos [?]: 37 [0], given: 471

While Governor Verdant has been in office, the state s [#permalink]

### Show Tags

10 Feb 2016, 03:35
mikemcgarry

Dear Mike

Please explain how the high rate of Inflation during previous governor’s term resulted for higher budget increase?

Many thanks in advance.
_________________

"When you want to succeed as bad as you want to breathe, then you’ll be successful.” - Eric Thomas

I need to work on timing badly!!

While Governor Verdant has been in office, the state s   [#permalink] 10 Feb 2016, 03:35
Similar topics Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
6 While Governor Verdant has been in office, the state s 10 29 Apr 2012, 07:29
While Governor Verdant has been in office, the state s 8 21 Jul 2009, 02:10
22 While Governor Verdant has been in office, the state s 29 31 Mar 2009, 13:46
While Governor Verdant has been in office, the state s 2 18 Mar 2007, 16:20
While Governor Verdant has been in office, the state s 10 10 Dec 2006, 23:21
Display posts from previous: Sort by

# While Governor Verdant has been in office, the state s

 new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics

 Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.