|
Author |
Message |
|
TAGS:
|
|
|
Intern
Joined: 10 Mar 2005
Posts: 5
Followers: 0
Kudos [?]:
0
[0], given: 0
|
While Governor Verdant has been in office, the state s [#permalink]
20 Mar 2005, 16:13
Question Stats:
0% (00:00) correct
0% (00:00) wrong based on 0 sessions
While Governor Verdant has been in office, the state’s budget has increased by an average of 6 percent each year. While the previous governor was in office, the state’s budget increased by an average of 11.5 percent each year. Obviously, the austere budgets during Governor Verdant’s term have caused the slowdown in the growth in state spending.
Which of the following, if true, would most seriously weaken the conclusion drawn above?
(A) The rate of inflation in the state averaged 10 percent each year during the previous governor’s term in office and 3 percent each year during Verdant’s term.
(B) Both federal and state income tax rates have been lowered considerably during Verdant’s term in office.
(C) In each year of Verdant’s term in office, the state’s budget has shown some increase in spending over the previous year.
(D) During Verdant’s term in office, the state has either discontinued or begun to charge private citizens for numerous services that the state offered free to citizens during the previous governor’s term.
(E) During the previous governor’s term in office, the state introduced several so-called “austerityâ€
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SVP
Joined: 18 Nov 2004
Posts: 1544
Followers: 2
Kudos [?]:
9
[0], given: 0
|
"A"
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intern
Joined: 10 Mar 2005
Posts: 5
Followers: 0
Kudos [?]:
0
[0], given: 0
|
the answer given in the book was "E". Can someone please explain.
|
|
|
|
|
|
GMAT Club Legend
Joined: 07 Jul 2004
Posts: 5134
Location: Singapore
Followers: 9
Kudos [?]:
87
[0], given: 0
|
Conclusion: austere budgest during Governor Verdant's term have caused slowdown in the growth in state spending.
We want something to weaken this conclusion (i.e. answer choice should not suggest that low budgets affect growth in state spending)
Which of the following, if true, would most seriously weaken the conclusion drawn above?
(A) The rate of inflation in the state averaged 10 percent each year during the previous governor’s term in office and 3 percent each year during Verdant’s term.
- only suggest why budget is low
(B) Both federal and state income tax rates have been lowered considerably during Verdant’s term in office.
- does not challenge conclusion
(C) In each year of Verdant’s term in office, the state’s budget has shown some increase in spending over the previous year.
- 'some increase' does not challenge the conclusion that growth in spending is low
(D) During Verdant’s term in office, the state has either discontinued or begun to charge private citizens for numerous services that the state offered free to citizens during the previous governor’s term.
- out of scope
(E) During the previous governor’s term in office, the state introduced several so-called “austerityâ€
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intern
Joined: 10 Mar 2005
Posts: 5
Followers: 0
Kudos [?]:
0
[0], given: 0
|
Got it
Thank you so much.
|
|
|
|
|
|
SVP
Joined: 18 Nov 2004
Posts: 1544
Followers: 2
Kudos [?]:
9
[0], given: 0
|
damn! how in the world did I choose "A"...it is clearly "E"
|
|
|
|
|
|
VP
Joined: 26 Apr 2004
Posts: 1255
Location: Taiwan
Followers: 1
Kudos [?]:
7
[0], given: 0
|
[quote="ywilfred"]Conclusion: austere budgest during Governor Verdant's term have caused slowdown in the growth in state spending.
We want something to weaken this conclusion (i.e. answer choice should not suggest that low budgets affect growth in state spending)
Which of the following, if true, would most seriously weaken the conclusion drawn above?
(A) The rate of inflation in the state averaged 10 percent each year during the previous governor’s term in office and 3 percent each year during Verdant’s term.
- only suggest why budget is low
(B) Both federal and state income tax rates have been lowered considerably during Verdant’s term in office.
- does not challenge conclusion
(C) In each year of Verdant’s term in office, the state’s budget has shown some increase in spending over the previous year.
- 'some increase' does not challenge the conclusion that growth in spending is low
(D) During Verdant’s term in office, the state has either discontinued or begun to charge private citizens for numerous services that the state offered free to citizens during the previous governor’s term.
- out of scope
(E) During the previous governor’s term in office, the state introduced several so-called “austerityâ€
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Similar topics |
Author |
Replies |
Last post |
|
Similar Topics:
|
|
|
|
While Governor Verdant has been in office, the state s
|
vivek123 |
6 |
29 Dec 2005, 19:58 |
|
|
|
While Governor Verdant has been in office, the state s
|
pelihu |
12 |
27 Aug 2006, 23:09 |
|
|
|
While Governor Verdant has been in office, the state s
|
mm007 |
10 |
11 Dec 2006, 00:21 |
|
|
|
While Governor Verdant has been in office, the state s
|
leeye84 |
2 |
18 Mar 2007, 17:20 |
|
|
|
While Governor Verdant has been in office, the state s
|
sidbidus |
5 |
19 Jun 2007, 18:31 |
|
|
|
|
|
Moderators:
metallicafan, rajeevrks27, souvik101990, PTK, MacFauz, noboru, kissthegmat, carcass, willigetmylifeback, mikemcgarry, doe007, Vercules, Legendaddy, tuanquang269, RaviChandra, Marcab, Narenn
|