Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 24 Oct 2014, 04:56

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

While Governor Verdant has been in office, the state s

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 19 Jan 2009
Posts: 5
Schools: Kellog,LBS,INSEAD
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 0

While Governor Verdant has been in office, the state s [#permalink] New post 31 Mar 2009, 13:46
4
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

  85% (hard)

Question Stats:

45% (02:08) correct 55% (01:27) wrong based on 325 sessions
While Governor Verdant has been in office, the state’s budget has increased by an average of 6 percent each year. While the previous governor was in office, the state’s budget increased by an average of 11.5 percent each year. Obviously, the austere budgets during Governor Verdant’s term have caused the slowdown in the growth in state spending.

Which of the following, if true, would most seriously weaken the conclusion drawn above?

(A) The rate of inflation in the state averaged 10 percent each year during the previous governor’s term in office and 3 percent each year during Verdant’s term.
(B) Both federal and state income tax rates have been lowered considerably during Verdant’s term in office.
(C) In each year of Verdant’s term in office, the state’s budget has shown some increase in spending over the previous year.
(D) During Verdant’s term in office, the state has either discontinued or begun to charge private citizens for numerous services that the state offered free to citizens during the previous governor’s term.
(E) During the previous governor’s term in office, the state introduced several so-called “austerity” budgets intended to reduce the growth in state spending.

thanks
[Reveal] Spoiler: OA
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 01 Mar 2009
Posts: 372
Location: PDX
Followers: 6

Kudos [?]: 66 [0], given: 24

Re: austere budgets [#permalink] New post 31 Mar 2009, 15:33
Conclusion: The austere budgets during Governor Verdant’s term have caused the slowdown in the growth in state spending.

Premise: While Governor Verdant has been in office, the state’s budget has increased by an average of 6 percent each year. While the previous governor was in office, the state’s budget increased by an average of 11.5 percent each year

If you look at the argument, it stands out as a very weak argument. Just because the budget has increased by a lesser percentage, it cannot be concluded that the reduction has caused slowdown. So weakening an already weak argument is fairly easy.

(A) The rate of inflation in the state averaged 10 percent each year during the previous governor’s term in office and 3 percent each year during Verdant’s term.
OOS - Inflation is not talked about in the argument
(B) Both federal and state income tax rates have been lowered considerably during Verdant’s term in office.
OOS -There is no mention of income tax in the argument
(C) In each year of Verdant’s term in office, the state’s budget has shown some increase in spending over the previous year.
Does not affect the conclusion
(D) During Verdant’s term in office, the state has either discontinued or begun to charge private citizens for numerous services that the state offered free to citizens during the previous governor’s term.
Perfect - This shows that the reduction in budget is because of the increased spending on citizen services which were offered free of cost in the previous budget.
(E) During the previous governor’s term in office, the state introduced several so-called “austerity” budgets intended to reduce the growth in state spending.
Does not affect the conclusion.

-pradeep
_________________

In the land of the night, the chariot of the sun is drawn by the grateful dead

Director
Director
User avatar
Joined: 01 Apr 2008
Posts: 909
Schools: IIM Lucknow (IPMX) - Class of 2014
Followers: 15

Kudos [?]: 234 [0], given: 18

Re: austere budgets [#permalink] New post 01 Apr 2009, 04:38
B ? OA?

D >> If they started charging for services which were earlier free then budget should increase and not decrease.
B >> some other factors like lowering of tax rates were responsible for lower budget this year.

pbanavara wrote:
Conclusion: The austere budgets during Governor Verdant’s term have caused the slowdown in the growth in state spending.

Premise: While Governor Verdant has been in office, the state’s budget has increased by an average of 6 percent each year. While the previous governor was in office, the state’s budget increased by an average of 11.5 percent each year

If you look at the argument, it stands out as a very weak argument. Just because the budget has increased by a lesser percentage, it cannot be concluded that the reduction has caused slowdown. So weakening an already weak argument is fairly easy.

(A) The rate of inflation in the state averaged 10 percent each year during the previous governor’s term in office and 3 percent each year during Verdant’s term.
OOS - Inflation is not talked about in the argument
(B) Both federal and state income tax rates have been lowered considerably during Verdant’s term in office.
OOS -There is no mention of income tax in the argument
(C) In each year of Verdant’s term in office, the state’s budget has shown some increase in spending over the previous year.
Does not affect the conclusion
(D) During Verdant’s term in office, the state has either discontinued or begun to charge private citizens for numerous services that the state offered free to citizens during the previous governor’s term.
Perfect - This shows that the reduction in budget is because of the increased spending on citizen services which were offered free of cost in the previous budget.
(E) During the previous governor’s term in office, the state introduced several so-called “austerity” budgets intended to reduce the growth in state spending.
Does not affect the conclusion.

-pradeep
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 19 Jan 2009
Posts: 5
Schools: Kellog,LBS,INSEAD
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 0

Re: austere budgets [#permalink] New post 01 Apr 2009, 13:13
OA is A. but don't have OE.
3 KUDOS received
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 07 Apr 2009
Posts: 4
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 5 [3] , given: 0

Re: austere budgets [#permalink] New post 07 Apr 2009, 22:05
3
This post received
KUDOS
I think the answer is A, reasoning below.

Budget is equivalent to spending, i.e. output.

Argument is a lack of spending has caused economic slowdown under Governor Verdant.

B) is incorrect as taxes are not the only source of state funding (bonds etc), and reduced taxes should spur business, not hinder it.
C) does not consider inflationary effects (but hints at answer)
D) concerns where money is raised, not how it is spent. Burden of paying for services moved from general levy (tax) to specific levy (fees) and hence does not concern spending. If services had been moved to private sector would be a valid argument, but they haven't.
E) concerns the cause of austere budgets, not their effect, not relevant.

Answer is A) real spending increase under Verdant is 6% - 3% = 3%, real spending increase under previous governer is 11.5% - 10% = 1.5%

Clearly Verdant spends more in real terms, and therefore is not more austere.
Current Student
avatar
Joined: 13 Jan 2009
Posts: 374
Location: India
Followers: 19

Kudos [?]: 69 [0], given: 1

Re: austere budgets [#permalink] New post 12 Apr 2009, 18:12
A should be answers.

Karlsyf said it.
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 12 Mar 2009
Posts: 319
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 67 [0], given: 1

GMAT ToolKit User
Re: austere budgets [#permalink] New post 13 Apr 2009, 21:54
(A) The rate of inflation in the state averaged 10 percent each year during the previous governor’s term in office and 3 percent each year during Verdant’s term. – out of the lot this gives the reason to weaken the argument.
(B) Both federal and state income tax rates have been lowered considerably during Verdant’s term in office. – out of scope
(C) In each year of Verdant’s term in office, the state’s budget has shown some increase in spending over the previous year.- states the same info given in the para.
(D) During Verdant’s term in office, the state has either discontinued or begun to charge private citizens for numerous services that the state offered free to citizens during the previous governor’s term. – private citizens is out of scope
(E) During the previous governor’s term in office, the state introduced several so-called “austerity” budgets intended to reduce the growth in state spending. – in that case the spending should have been reduced and not increased, Contrary to info given.
Director
Director
avatar
Joined: 23 May 2008
Posts: 840
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 31 [0], given: 0

Re: austere budgets [#permalink] New post 15 Apr 2009, 21:34
A and B are OOS
C doesnt argue against the fact that the austere budget reduced spending
D strengthens the argument by saying the austere budget reduced government spending

E works because it wekens the idea of austere budgets being the cause of reduced spending
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 28 Dec 2008
Posts: 4
Schools: NYU
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 0

Re: austere budgets [#permalink] New post 17 Apr 2009, 11:53
i think, in this ques A is better option than B, but B is also a very good option.
if A were not in the question, B would have been the best choice according to me.
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 22 Feb 2009
Posts: 140
Schools: Kellogg (R1 Dinged),Cornell (R2), Emory(Interview Scheduled), IESE (R1 Interviewed), ISB (Interviewed), LBS (R2), Vanderbilt (R3 Interviewed)
Followers: 8

Kudos [?]: 76 [0], given: 10

Re: austere budgets [#permalink] New post 17 Apr 2009, 21:59
A.
1 KUDOS received
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 20 Feb 2010
Posts: 3
Location: Madagascar
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 1 [1] , given: 1

Re: austere budgets [#permalink] New post 24 Feb 2010, 07:12
1
This post received
KUDOS
While Governor Verdant has been in office, the state’s budget has increased by an average of 6 percent each year. While the previous governor was in office, the state’s budget increased by an average of 11.5 percent each year. Obviously, the austere budgets during Governor Verdant’s term have caused the slowdown in the growth in state spending.
Which of the following, if true, would most seriously weaken the conclusion drawn above?

(A) The rate of inflation in the state averaged 10 percent each year during the previous governor’s term in office and 3 percent each year during Verdant’s term.
Seems to be right. Expenses have slow down since prices are linked to inflation.

(B) Both federal and state income tax rates have been lowered considerably during Verdant’s term in office.
Actually, out of scope, because it introduced Federal Tax which has nothing to do with State Budget
(C) In each year of Verdant’s term in office, the state’s budget has shown some increase in spending over the previous year.
In line with the premises
(D) During Verdant’s term in office, the state has either discontinued or begun to charge private citizens for numerous services that the state offered free to citizens during the previous governor’s term.
Cant be since it is actually strengthening the argument, some of state expenses have been passed onto Citizens
(E) During the previous governor’s term in office, the state introduced several so-called “austerity” budgets intended to reduce the growth in state spending.
Out of Scope
_________________

You Can Go Higher, You Can Go Deeper, There Are No Boundaries Above Or Beneath You

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 27 Aug 2009
Posts: 147
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 13 [0], given: 1

Re: austere budgets [#permalink] New post 24 Feb 2010, 10:48
A should be the answer
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
Joined: 21 Dec 2009
Posts: 268
Location: India
Followers: 9

Kudos [?]: 72 [0], given: 25

Re: austere budgets [#permalink] New post 24 Feb 2010, 11:13
kumarp256 wrote:
pls explain. please let me know if already discussed. source-1000CR

While Governor Verdant has been in office, the state’s budget has increased by an average of 6 percent each year. While the previous governor was in office, the state’s budget increased by an average of 11.5 percent each year. Obviously, the austere budgets during Governor Verdant’s term have caused the slowdown in the growth in state spending.

Which of the following, if true, would most seriously weaken the conclusion drawn above?

(A) The rate of inflation in the state averaged 10 percent each year during the previous governor’s term in office and 3 percent each year during Verdant’s term. So the actual budget increase during the term of Verdant is 3% while the actual budget increase during the term of the previous governor is only 1.5 percent. So, governor Verdant’s term have caused the increase in state spending. A is the perfect answer
(B) Both federal and state income tax rates have been lowered considerably during Verdant’s term in office.
(C) In each year of Verdant’s term in office, the state’s budget has shown some increase in spending over the previous year.
(D) During Verdant’s term in office, the state has either discontinued or begun to charge private citizens for numerous services that the state offered free to citizens during the previous governor’s term.
(E) During the previous governor’s term in office, the state introduced several so-called “austerity” budgets intended to reduce the growth in state spending.

[Reveal] Spoiler: OA
A


thanks

_________________

Cheers,
SD

1 KUDOS received
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 14 Aug 2009
Posts: 54
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 17 [1] , given: 29

Re: austere budgets [#permalink] New post 24 Feb 2010, 11:34
1
This post received
KUDOS
A is the answer:

While Governor Verdant has been in office, the state’s budget has increased by an average of 6 percent each year. While the previous governor was in office, the state’s budget increased by an average of 11.5 percent each year. Obviously, the austere budgets during Governor Verdant’s term have caused the slowdown in the growth in state spending.

Which of the following, if true, would most seriously weaken the conclusion drawn above?

(A) The rate of inflation in the state averaged 10 percent each year during the previous governor’s term in office and 3 percent each year during Verdant’s term.

It states the the reason the new govenor is spending at a lower rate is because inflation is lower therefore cost are rising at a slower rate. Thus spending hasn't increase because prices have not increased. This means he is spending the same but prices have not risen so his expenses hasn't risen. This is directly related to spending.

(B) Both federal and state income tax rates have been lowered considerably during Verdant’s term in office.

This ask you to link the outside idea that lower taxes means less spending and thus is outsie the scope of the arguement.

(C) In each year of Verdant’s term in office, the state’s budget has shown some increase in spending over the previous year.

This is given in the paragraph. He had 6% increase on avarage. Does not weaken.

(D) During Verdant’s term in office, the state has either discontinued or begun to charge private citizens for numerous services that the state offered free to citizens during the previous governor’s term.

This supports the arguement.

(E) During the previous governor’s term in office, the state introduced several so-called “austerity” budgets intended to reduce the growth in state spending.

This is close but no cigar. If this statement included "which were expected to not effect the growth of state spending till sometime in the future" it would have been a stonger candidate. However it does not directly erode at the assumption that the new govenor is responsible for the reduced spending.
_________________

My will shall shape the future. Whether I fail or succeed shall be no man's doing but my own. I am the force; I can clear any obstacle before me or I can be lost in the maze. My choice; my responsibility; win or lose, only I hold the key to my destiny - Elaine Maxwell

Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 31 Jan 2010
Posts: 14
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 0

Re: austere budgets [#permalink] New post 24 Feb 2010, 22:51
wow, i got this one right. I was just looking for a clear reason explaining reduced budget.
Current Student
avatar
Joined: 26 Sep 2010
Posts: 155
Location: United States (TX)
Nationality: Indian
Concentration: Entrepreneurship, General Management
GMAT 1: 760 Q V0
GPA: 3.36
Followers: 5

Kudos [?]: 52 [0], given: 18

GMAT ToolKit User
Re: austere budgets [#permalink] New post 01 Mar 2011, 09:02
Definitely A.

The conclusion states that austere budgets caused the slowdown in growth of state budget but if the real growth of state budget in recent yr has been 6-3=3 % as opposed to 11.5-10=1.5%, there has not been any slowdown in growth !

Posted from my mobile device Image
_________________

You have to have a darkness...for the dawn to come.

Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 02 Feb 2011
Posts: 7
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 2 [0], given: 2

Re: austere budgets [#permalink] New post 01 Mar 2011, 09:24
the argument is that the small budget has slowed down spending.

weakening the argument is based on showing that the % numbers dont mean very much with regard to the spending.

if you know that 10% inflation was under the previous gov then real spending was only 1.5%, if the current gov has 6% spending but only 3% inflation, then there is 3% real spending....you are weaking the argument by showing that there actually isnt any slowing down. Real spending actually doubled.
Director
Director
avatar
Status: Matriculating
Affiliations: Chicago Booth Class of 2015
Joined: 03 Feb 2011
Posts: 929
Followers: 11

Kudos [?]: 200 [0], given: 123

Reviews Badge
Re: austere budgets [#permalink] New post 01 Mar 2011, 09:46
Does not looks like a official question. C is a trap. E does nothing to prevent the conclusion. The other two are irrelevant. cant help but pick A :-)
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 11 Feb 2011
Posts: 80
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 0

Re: austere budgets [#permalink] New post 01 Mar 2011, 11:19
A...good one
Manager
Manager
avatar
Status: A continuous journey of self-improvement is essential for every person -Socrates
Joined: 02 Jan 2011
Posts: 72
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 2 [0], given: 14

Re: austere budgets [#permalink] New post 01 Mar 2011, 20:55
karlsyf wrote:
I think the answer is A, reasoning below.

Budget is equivalent to spending, i.e. output.

Argument is a lack of spending has caused economic slowdown under Governor Verdant.
argument, but they haven't.
E) concerns the cause of austere budgets, not their effect, not relevant.

Answer is A) real spending increase under Verdant is 6% - 3% = 3%, real spending increase under previous governer is 11.5% - 10% = 1.5%

Clearly Verdant spends more in real terms, and therefore is not more austere.


Agree with answer and explanation!!!
Re: austere budgets   [#permalink] 01 Mar 2011, 20:55
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
1 Experts publish their posts in the topic While Governor Verdant has been in office, the state s newdawn 6 20 Feb 2012, 08:44
While Governor Verdant has been in office, the state s EnterMatrix 5 04 Jul 2010, 08:39
While Governor Verdant has been in office, the state s shrutisingh 8 21 Jul 2009, 02:10
While Governor Verdant has been in office, the state s vivek123 6 29 Dec 2005, 18:58
While Governor Verdant has been in office, the state s amitgrover 5 20 Mar 2005, 15:13
Display posts from previous: Sort by

While Governor Verdant has been in office, the state s

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  

Go to page    1   2    Next  [ 27 posts ] 



GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Privacy Policy| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.