Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 23 Apr 2014, 19:23

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

While Governor Verdant has been in office, the states budget

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:
Intern
Intern
Joined: 28 Feb 2009
Posts: 28
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 8

While Governor Verdant has been in office, the states budget [#permalink] New post 04 Jun 2009, 20:49
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

  5% (low)

Question Stats:

75% (02:09) correct 25% (00:00) wrong based on 4 sessions
While Governor Verdant has been in office, the states budget has increased by an average of 6 percent each year. While the previous governor was in office, the states budget increased by an average of 11.5 percent each year. Obviously, the austere budgets during Governor Verdants term have caused the slowdown in the growth in state spending.

Which of the following, if true, would most seriously weaken the conclusion drawn above?

(A) The rate of inflation in the state averaged 10 percent each year during the previous governors term in office and 3 percent each year during Verdants term.

(B) Both federal and state income tax rates have been lowered considerably during Verdants term in office.

(C) In each year of Verdants term in office, the states budget has shown some increase in spending over the previous year.

(D) During Verdants term in office, the state has either discontinued or begun to charge private citizens for numerous services that the state offered free to citizens during the previous governors term.

(E) During the previous governors term in office, the state introduced several so-called austerity budgets intended to reduce the growth in state spending.


Can anyone help me in the same?
Director
Director
User avatar
Joined: 03 Jun 2009
Posts: 805
Location: New Delhi
WE 1: 5.5 yrs in IT
Followers: 56

Kudos [?]: 334 [0], given: 56

GMAT Tests User
Re: Governor Verdant [#permalink] New post 04 Jun 2009, 21:09
I think the answer should be E

(A) The rate of inflation in the state averaged 10 percent each year during the previous governors term in office and 3 percent each year during Verdants term. - Strengthens the argument

(B) Both federal and state income tax rates have been lowered considerably during Verdants term in office. - Out of scope

(C) In each year of Verdants term in office, the states budget has shown some increase in spending over the previous year.- Out of scope

(D) During Verdants term in office, the state has either discontinued or begun to charge private citizens for numerous services that the state offered free to citizens during the previous governors term.- Out of scope

(E) During the previous governors term in office, the state introduced several so-called austerity budgets intended to reduce the growth in state spending. - weakens the argument by providing an alternate reason for slowdown. Based on this one can say that the slowdown might has happened due to previous governors policies.
_________________

ISB 2011-12 thread | Ask ISB Alumni @ ThinkISB
All information related to Indian candidates and B-schools | Indian B-schools accepting GMAT scores
Self evaluation for Why MBA?

Intern
Intern
Joined: 28 Feb 2009
Posts: 28
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 8

Re: Governor Verdant [#permalink] New post 04 Jun 2009, 21:31
Answer as per 1000 SC is A.

as per one of the explaination on net
http://www.beatthegmat.com/state-s-budg ... 12655.html

In India, right now the rate of inflation is 11.05%. the highest is last 13yrs.
following r the main reasons, as cited by the experts:
1)high import oil prices.
2)big farm loan waiver by the government (close to Rs71000 crore - an election gimmick).
3)high GDP growth.
4)depreciting rupee .........etc.
so if the inflation is down, in some cases it will allow the government to have extra funds to spend on the states, if it wants to.in such cases A will actually strengthen the argument.

so u see it depends upon what the scenario is. there is nothing mentioned in the passage about the rate of inflation.
hence A is out of scope.


Thanks!


yeah i saw that in newpaper today ...... and reasons given by you are true....

BUT, you forgot to mention a very important reason .... India's growth .... In any economy one of the main reasons for hight inflation is high growth rate...

so coming back to our question..... if we take option A, some portion of less growth can be attributed to less infaltion (10 to 3). So its not entirley Mr Verdant's fault .....

BTW the question is from 1000CR and the OA is A.... 8)

Do u think Inflation has something to do with state spending ...???
Director
Director
User avatar
Joined: 03 Jun 2009
Posts: 805
Location: New Delhi
WE 1: 5.5 yrs in IT
Followers: 56

Kudos [?]: 334 [0], given: 56

GMAT Tests User
Re: Governor Verdant [#permalink] New post 04 Jun 2009, 22:00
ya, may be "state spending" is directly effected by "inflation". If inflation increases, prices will increase and "state spending" will slowdown.

But, if we take it other way, if "state spending" slows down, prices will fall, inflation will decrease (this is what is happening currently across globe).

So if inflation is lower during Verdant's period, is it due to slowdown in "state spending" or is it due to his policies ? confusing ?

I think this argument has been written before the recent global meltdown :lol:
_________________

ISB 2011-12 thread | Ask ISB Alumni @ ThinkISB
All information related to Indian candidates and B-schools | Indian B-schools accepting GMAT scores
Self evaluation for Why MBA?

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
Joined: 15 Jan 2008
Posts: 295
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 22 [0], given: 3

GMAT Tests User
Re: Governor Verdant [#permalink] New post 04 Jun 2009, 22:33
imo, the answer shud be A.

The argument states that governor verdant has given austere budgets which caused slowdown in the state's budget.

and option A says that the rate of inflation was low when compared to rate of inflation in previous terms.. hence more budget is not necessary.. inturn means no slow down in govt spending..

for example,

when rate of inflation is 10 %, laying a road will cost you 110.-->budget 110
when rate of inflation is 3%, laying the same road will cost you only 103. --> budget 106. ( surplus )

hence verdant didnt actually slowdown govt expenditure.. when the rate of inflation is considered.
Manager
Manager
Joined: 24 May 2009
Posts: 108
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 0

Re: Governor Verdant [#permalink] New post 07 Jun 2009, 10:00
I'm with A too as the point of inflation clearly weakens the Austerity aspect.
Manager
Manager
Joined: 17 Aug 2010
Posts: 90
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 4 [0], given: 22

GMAT Tests User
Re: Governor Verdant [#permalink] New post 07 Apr 2011, 10:27
i got that lower Inflation led to lower spending.
but i believe i can convincingly argue that Higher inflation will also lead to lower spending.

So we get: be it lower or higher, either way we have lower spending. i think the question is badly constructed.
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
Joined: 12 Oct 2009
Posts: 274
Schools: Columbia, INSEAD, RSM, LBS
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 27 [0], given: 4

GMAT Tests User
Re: Governor Verdant [#permalink] New post 07 Apr 2011, 17:13
Was confused between A & B. Going with A
VP
VP
User avatar
Status: I'm back and not stopping until I hit 760+
Joined: 06 Sep 2013
Posts: 1378
Location: United States
Concentration: Finance, General Management
Schools: Wharton '17
GPA: 3.5
WE: Corporate Finance (Investment Banking)
Followers: 7

Kudos [?]: 88 [0], given: 187

GMAT ToolKit User CAT Tests
Re: While Governor Verdant has been in office, the states budget [#permalink] New post 24 Oct 2013, 15:21
nik1608nik wrote:
While Governor Verdant has been in office, the states budget has increased by an average of 6 percent each year. While the previous governor was in office, the states budget increased by an average of 11.5 percent each year. Obviously, the austere budgets during Governor Verdants term have caused the slowdown in the growth in state spending.

Which of the following, if true, would most seriously weaken the conclusion drawn above?

(A) The rate of inflation in the state averaged 10 percent each year during the previous governors term in office and 3 percent each year during Verdants term.

(B) Both federal and state income tax rates have been lowered considerably during Verdants term in office.

(C) In each year of Verdants term in office, the states budget has shown some increase in spending over the previous year.

(D) During Verdants term in office, the state has either discontinued or begun to charge private citizens for numerous services that the state offered free to citizens during the previous governors term.

(E) During the previous governors term in office, the state introduced several so-called austerity budgets intended to reduce the growth in state spending.


Can anyone help me in the same?


Yes, I can help. OK let's do it!

Conclusion: Austere B of New G ---> Slowdown in growth in spending.
Premise: New G, B +6%, Old G B +11.5%

So this is basically saying that since the budget increased less then the new governor is also spending less money.

Which will weaken?

Sounds like we need to find a reason to show why despite an declining budget the amount of spending has not decreased at all.

(A) The rate of inflation in the state averaged 10 percent each year during the previous governors term in office and 3 percent each year during Verdants term. ----> So this basically says that if inflation was higher previously then this may be the the reason why state budgets were higher during that time. So the fact that we have a lower budget now is explained by some other reason. So the use of this piece of evidence to prove that the G is spending less is not precise. We'll leave this one in

(B) Both federal and state income tax rates have been lowered considerably during Verdants term in office ---> OK, so taxes are lowered, this could mean with have more or less budget, we don't know depends on laffer curve, so this tells us nothing

(C) In each year of Verdants term in office, the states budget has shown some increase in spending over the previous year--> OK this is the past, we don't really care what happened

(D) During Verdants term in office, the state has either discontinued or begun to charge private citizens for numerous services that the state offered free to citizens during the previous governors term.--> OK so if they provide less free services they should have a higher budget, well it seems that it is not working for some reason, but again this doesn't really tells us anything

(E) During the previous governors term in office, the state introduced several so-called austerity budgets intended to reduce the growth in state spending.---> So old G introduced measures to reduce growth in spending. This is again something that happened in the past and does not really give us much information.

So I will go with (A)
Hope it helps!
Cheers!
J :)

Kudos please!
Intern
Intern
User avatar
Status: Bring it on.....!
Joined: 11 Jul 2013
Posts: 24
Location: India
GMAT 1: 660 Q49 V31
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 5 [0], given: 4

Re: While Governor Verdant has been in office, the states budget [#permalink] New post 24 Oct 2013, 22:23
Hi, why is C wrong/"out of scope" here ?

Conclusion : Austere budgets during Governor Verdants term have caused the slowdown in the growth in state spending.

(C) In each year of Verdants term in office, the states budget has shown some increase in spending over the previous year.

Weaken the conclusion : (C) weakens by saying that under Verdant's term state spending was increasing over previous years i.e. there was an increase in growth in state spending year by year under his term.

Please advise if the argument stated above is faulty.
_________________

Live as if your were to die tomorrow. Learn as if you were to live forever - Gandhi

Re: While Governor Verdant has been in office, the states budget   [#permalink] 24 Oct 2013, 22:23
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
New posts While Governor Verdant has been in office, the states budget Geethu 9 16 Jul 2004, 21:06
New posts While Governor Verdant has been in office, the state s amitgrover 5 20 Mar 2005, 15:13
New posts While Governor Verdant has been in office, the state s vivek123 6 29 Dec 2005, 18:58
Popular new posts While Governor Verdant has been in office, the state s pelihu 12 27 Aug 2006, 22:09
New posts While Governor Verdant has been in office, the state's shalu 5 05 Aug 2010, 13:00
Display posts from previous: Sort by

While Governor Verdant has been in office, the states budget

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Privacy Policy| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.