While Governor Verdant has been in office, the states budget : GMAT Critical Reasoning (CR)
Check GMAT Club Decision Tracker for the Latest School Decision Releases http://gmatclub.com/AppTrack

 It is currently 23 Jan 2017, 05:19

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# While Governor Verdant has been in office, the states budget

 new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics
Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

Senior Manager
Joined: 05 May 2003
Posts: 424
Location: Aus
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 10 [0], given: 0

While Governor Verdant has been in office, the states budget [#permalink]

### Show Tags

16 Jul 2004, 21:06
00:00

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

0% (00:00) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 0 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

While Governor Verdant has been in office, the stateâ€™s budget has increased by an average of 6 percent each year. While the previous governor was in office, the stateâ€™s budget increased by an average of 11.5 percent each year. Obviously, the austere budgets during Governor Verdantâ€™s term have caused the slowdown in the growth in state spending.
Which of the following, if true, would most seriously weaken the conclusion drawn above?
(A) The rate of inflation in the state averaged 10 percent each year during the previous governorâ€™s term in office and 3 percent each year during Verdantâ€™s term.
(B) Both federal and state income tax rates have been lowered considerably during Verdantâ€™s term in office.
(C) In each year of Verdantâ€™s term in office, the stateâ€™s budget has shown some increase in spending over the previous year.
(D) During Verdantâ€™s term in office, the state has either discontinued or begun to charge private citizens for numerous services that the state offered free to citizens during the previous governorâ€™s term.
(E) During the previous governorâ€™s term in office, the state introduced several so-called â€œausterityâ€
If you have any questions
you can ask an expert
New!
Manager
Joined: 02 Jun 2004
Posts: 154
Location: san jose,ca
Followers: 5

Kudos [?]: 22 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

16 Jul 2004, 21:42
E for me.

(E) During the previous governorâ€™s term in office, the state introduced several so-called â€œausterityâ€
_________________

GS
No excuses - Need 750!!!

Director
Joined: 13 Nov 2003
Posts: 964
Location: Florida
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 127 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

16 Jul 2004, 21:45
A for me. I will try to explain, a bit later.
Director
Joined: 01 Feb 2003
Posts: 851
Followers: 4

Kudos [?]: 102 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

17 Jul 2004, 00:29
Agree with DJ

A is my FA (1min 26s)

Reason: If the rate of inflation increased by a greater factor in the previous governer's term, and just by 3% in Verdant's term then low spending does not imply that there is a stunted growth, rather, it would imply that with the same amount of money the state could achieve more growth (the only thing which I am still thinking about is whether 10% and 3% mean anything!...it is possible that money spent (or) the value achieved with 10% rate of increase in inflation might be more than with 3% increase in the rate of inflation....but will wail for the OA!)
Manager
Joined: 20 Jun 2004
Posts: 171
Location: Noida, UP
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 29 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

17 Jul 2004, 07:20
E for me too.

A - I don't know how inflation is linked to "growth in state spending"
B - ditto for the tax cuts
C- It is obvious because budget has only increased, so this is just restating the facts
D - This also seems out of scope of the question
Senior Manager
Joined: 22 Jun 2004
Posts: 393
Location: Bangalore, India
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 8 [0], given: 0

Re: CR: Governor [#permalink]

### Show Tags

17 Jul 2004, 07:30
I believe it is E. It would most seriously weaken the conclusion drawn below because the austerety budgets were introduced earlier - an another cause to refute the conclusion.

A looks out of scope. Inflation and slowdown in the growth in state spending are unrelated within the scope of the passage.

What is OA?

Geethu wrote:

While Governor Verdant has been in office, the state’s budget has increased by an average of 6 percent each year. While the previous governor was in office, the state’s budget increased by an average of 11.5 percent each year. Obviously, the austere budgets during Governor Verdant’s term have caused the slowdown in the growth in state spending.
Which of the following, if true, would most seriously weaken the conclusion drawn above?
(A) The rate of inflation in the state averaged 10 percent each year during the previous governor’s term in office and 3 percent each year during Verdant’s term.
(B) Both federal and state income tax rates have been lowered considerably during Verdant’s term in office.
(C) In each year of Verdant’s term in office, the state’s budget has shown some increase in spending over the previous year.
(D) During Verdant’s term in office, the state has either discontinued or begun to charge private citizens for numerous services that the state offered free to citizens during the previous governor’s term.
(E) During the previous governor’s term in office, the state introduced several so-called “austerity” budgets intended to reduce the growth in state spending

_________________

Awaiting response,

Thnx & Rgds,
Chandra

Senior Manager
Joined: 22 Jun 2004
Posts: 393
Location: Bangalore, India
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 8 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

17 Jul 2004, 07:32
The growth you are talking about is different from the growth in state spending.

Anyway, let us await OA.

Vithal wrote:
Agree with DJ

A is my FA (1min 26s)

Reason: If the rate of inflation increased by a greater factor in the previous governer's term, and just by 3% in Verdant's term then low spending does not imply that there is a stunted growth, rather, it would imply that with the same amount of money the state could achieve more growth (the only thing which I am still thinking about is whether 10% and 3% mean anything!...it is possible that money spent (or) the value achieved with 10% rate of increase in inflation might be more than with 3% increase in the rate of inflation....but will wail for the OA!)

_________________

Awaiting response,

Thnx & Rgds,
Chandra

Senior Manager
Joined: 05 May 2003
Posts: 424
Location: Aus
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 10 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

17 Jul 2004, 10:43
A is the answer.

Thanks for your explanation Vithal.

Vithal wrote:
Agree with DJ

A is my FA (1min 26s)

Reason: If the rate of inflation increased by a greater factor in the previous governer's term, and just by 3% in Verdant's term then low spending does not imply that there is a stunted growth, rather, it would imply that with the same amount of money the state could achieve more growth (the only thing which I am still thinking about is whether 10% and 3% mean anything!...it is possible that money spent (or) the value achieved with 10% rate of increase in inflation might be more than with 3% increase in the rate of inflation....but will wail for the OA!)
Manager
Joined: 02 Jun 2004
Posts: 154
Location: san jose,ca
Followers: 5

Kudos [?]: 22 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

17 Jul 2004, 12:41
wow, A is the answer! That means it is expected to know some basic facts, like inflation is taken into consideration in comparing spendings. I thought otherwise, and eliminated A.
_________________

GS
No excuses - Need 750!!!

Senior Manager
Joined: 22 Jun 2004
Posts: 393
Location: Bangalore, India
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 8 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

17 Jul 2004, 16:52
Congrats Vithal. Right answer says it all.

mallelac wrote:
The growth you are talking about is different from the growth in state spending.

Anyway, let us await OA.

Vithal wrote:
Agree with DJ

A is my FA (1min 26s)

Reason: If the rate of inflation increased by a greater factor in the previous governer's term, and just by 3% in Verdant's term then low spending does not imply that there is a stunted growth, rather, it would imply that with the same amount of money the state could achieve more growth (the only thing which I am still thinking about is whether 10% and 3% mean anything!...it is possible that money spent (or) the value achieved with 10% rate of increase in inflation might be more than with 3% increase in the rate of inflation....but will wail for the OA!)

_________________

Awaiting response,

Thnx & Rgds,
Chandra

17 Jul 2004, 16:52
Similar topics Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
6 While Governor Verdant has been in office, the state s 10 29 Apr 2012, 07:29
5 While Governor Verdant has been in office, the state s 8 20 Feb 2012, 08:44
3 While Governor Verdant has been in office, the state s 7 24 Apr 2010, 12:08
4 While Governor Verdant has been in office, the states budget 11 04 Jun 2009, 20:49
While Governor Verdant has been in office, the state s 2 18 Mar 2007, 16:20
Display posts from previous: Sort by

# While Governor Verdant has been in office, the states budget

 new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics

 Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.