Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 31 Aug 2015, 22:38
GMAT Club Tests

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

While it costs about the same to run nuclear plants as other

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:
8 KUDOS received
Current Student
User avatar
Affiliations: UWC
Joined: 09 May 2012
Posts: 399
Location: Canada
GMAT 1: 620 Q42 V33
GMAT 2: 680 Q44 V38
GPA: 3.43
WE: Engineering (Entertainment and Sports)
Followers: 27

Kudos [?]: 498 [8] , given: 100

Reviews Badge
While it costs about the same to run nuclear plants as other [#permalink] New post 21 Jun 2012, 01:55
8
This post received
KUDOS
26
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

  45% (medium)

Question Stats:

63% (02:27) correct 37% (01:31) wrong based on 1591 sessions
While it costs about the same to run nuclear plants as other types of power plants, it is the fixed costs that stem from building nuclear plants that makes it more expensive for them to generate electricity.

A. While it costs about the same to run nuclear plants as other types of power plants, it is the fixed costs that stem from building nuclear plants that makes it more expensive for them to generate electricity.
B While the cost of running nuclear plants is about the same as for other types of power plants, the fixed costs that stem from building nuclear plants make the electricity they generate more expensive.
C. Even though it costs about the same to run nuclear plants as for other types of power plants, it is the fixed costs that stem from building nuclear plants that makes the electricity they generate more expensive.
D. It costs about the same to run nuclear plants as for other types of power plants, whereas the electricity they generate is more expensive, stemming from the fixed costs of building nuclear plants.
E. The cost of running nuclear plants is about the same as other types of power plants, but the electricity they generate is made more expensive because of the fixed costs stemming from building nuclear plants.
[Reveal] Spoiler: OA

Last edited by macjas on 21 Jun 2012, 16:52, edited 2 times in total.
Expert Post
14 KUDOS received
e-GMAT Representative
User avatar
Joined: 02 Nov 2011
Posts: 1870
Followers: 1631

Kudos [?]: 4932 [14] , given: 224

Re: While it costs about the same to run nuclear plants as other [#permalink] New post 18 Mar 2013, 13:01
14
This post received
KUDOS
Expert's post
4
This post was
BOOKMARKED
imhimanshu wrote:
I tried to understand this concept by taking clues from MGMAT, but failed to do so. I would appreciate if someone can help me out.

Here is an example from MGMAT-
The incidence of the disease among men exceeds the incidence among women.
The incidence of the disease among men exceeds that among women.
Here, that is referring to incidence, per explanantion from MGMAT.

So, ellipsis should be -
The incidence of the disease among men exceeds that(of the disease) among women.
Now, going by same concept -

The cost of running nuclear plants is same as that for electric plants.
In the below sentence, what THAT is referring to . Is it "the cost" or "the cost of running".

If it is later, then why do we require an extra preposition?

The cost of running nuclear plants is same as {the cost of running }for electric plants.

Appreciate your help
Thanks
H


Very interesting question Himanshu.
When you are dealing with ellipsis, it always helps to begin from the completely expanded version with all the words and then move your way to the abbreviated version by applying ellipsis along the way. I will do the same here:

Let's consider only the pertinent portion of the sentence.

1. The cost of running nuclear plants is about the same as the cost of running other types of power plants.
No issues here with the comparison. Both sides of the comparison are grammatically and logically parallel.

Now what if I replace "the cost of running" with "that". After it is obvious that we are comparing cost of running of the two categories of plants. But when I apply this ellipsis, I need something to connect "that" with "other types of power plants".

2. (Without connection with that)
The cost of running nuclear plants is about the same as that other types of power plants. WRONG

2. (with correct connection)
The cost of running nuclear plants is about the same as that for other types of power plants.
So this is where the preposition "for" comes from.

Now we continue with our ellipsis. We can indeed even omit "that" from here since this omission will not lead to any ambiguity.

3. The cost of running nuclear plants is about the same as for other types of power plants.

So this is how I get to the correct sentence containing "for".

Now let's apply the same on the set of sentences:
1. The incidence of the disease among men exceeds the incidence of the disease among women.
1 to 2 - The incidence of the disease among men exceeds the incidence of the disease among women.
2. The incidence of the disease among men exceeds the incidence among women.
2 to 3 - The incidence of the disease among men exceeds the incidence among women.
3. The incidence of the disease among men exceeds that among women.


Image

So the key thing here is that as you replace or omit words, think about what connections you may need to get the correct sentence. The nature of the two sentences is different. In the Official sentence, the main component - cost of running - took direct object without the need of any preposition. So when we replaced this with "that" we needed a connection - i.e. a preposition. However, in the other example, the main component - incidence of the disease - itself needed a preposition to connect to the object and hence when we replaced it with "that" we did not need to get another preposition.

Thus when you cross-check your work in ellipsis, start from the complete sentence and then work your way to simplified version with replacement words and omitted words.

Hope this helps.

Regards,

Payal
_________________

Aiming to score 760+ on the GMAT? Attend our free webinars to learn how to:

[*] Master Number Properties
[*] Ace Critical Reasoning

The webinars will start at 7 AM PST on the 11th and 12th of July, 2015.

Expert Post
5 KUDOS received
Retired Moderator
avatar
Status: worked for Kaplan's associates, but now on my own, free and flying
Joined: 19 Feb 2007
Posts: 2625
Location: India
WE: Education (Education)
Followers: 345

Kudos [?]: 2643 [5] , given: 265

Re: While it costs about the same to run nuclear plants as other [#permalink] New post 08 Sep 2012, 13:56
5
This post received
KUDOS
Expert's post
1
This post was
BOOKMARKED
There are two distinct splits here, as you may see; one is the comparison of the costs to run a nuclear plant with just the other types of plants and not their running costs. The second split is the ambiguity of the pronouns, precisely the –third - it in the original. Of course the other two it pronouns may be argued as passable as place holders.

A. While it costs about the same to run nuclear plants as other types of power plants, it is the fixed costs that stem from building nuclear plants that makes it more expensive for them to generate electricity. ----- 1.faulty comparison; cost of running compared with other types of power plants 2. The third pronoun it is dangling without an antecedent. Makes what more expensive? Makes electricity more expensive to generate electricity 3. Costs that makes … A SV mismatch


B While the cost of running nuclear plants is about the same as for other types of power plants, the fixed costs that stem from building nuclear plants make the electricity they generate more expensive.
The comparison, the pronoun problem and the SV mismatch nicely fixed. Correct choice.

C. Even though it costs about the same to run nuclear plants as for other types of power plants, it is the fixed costs that stem from building nuclear plants that makes the electricity they generate more expensive. -----Though the comparison problems are fixed, costs and that makes is S-V mismatch.

D. It costs about the same to run nuclear plants as for other types of power plants, whereas the electricity they generate is more expensive, stemming from the fixed costs of building nuclear plants.
Pronoun they is rather ambiguous; they may refer to either the nuclear or other types.

E. The cost of running nuclear plants is about the same as other types of power plants, but the electricity they generate is made more expensive because of the fixed costs stemming from building nuclear plants. -------- Faulty comparison
_________________

GMAT Club Premium Membership - big benefits and savings

5 KUDOS received
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 03 Apr 2014
Posts: 16
Location: India
Concentration: Marketing, Finance
GMAT 1: 710 Q50 V35
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 0 [5] , given: 43

Re: While it costs about the same to run nuclear plants as other [#permalink] New post 18 May 2014, 11:49
5
This post received
KUDOS
D is, i guess, wrong because it uses 'to run' along with 'as for'.
i mean take B, "cost of running nuclear plants is about the same as for" is the correct usage.
Expert Post
4 KUDOS received
Magoosh GMAT Instructor
User avatar
Joined: 28 Dec 2011
Posts: 2515
Followers: 817

Kudos [?]: 3326 [4] , given: 38

Re: While it costs about the same to run nuclear plants as other [#permalink] New post 03 Feb 2014, 14:20
4
This post received
KUDOS
Expert's post
aeglorre wrote:
IMO, this is quite a bad question. Because arguably, the "they" in B is ambiguous. Both costs and nuclear plants are plural, so there is definitely room for confusion.
The pronoun "they" in D clearly refers back to power plannts, there's no pronoun ambiguity there. Sure, the present participle "stemming" modifies the whole preceding clause but I don't see why that's a problem, what's "stemming" is, in fact, the expensive electricity, so I don't see where the modifier error is.
All in all, this question is just confusing..

Dear aeglorre,
This is a high quality question, SC #107 from the OG13. Yes, it's one of the harder questions in the OG, probably a question that many test takers would get wrong, but it is a very solid question, as are all the questions in the OG. The questions in the OG of such high quality that all other practice questions are striving to reach that level. If I may give you some advice, it usually doesn't reflect well on a student who argues that an OG question is of low quality.
In choice (B)the subject of the sentence unarguably is "nuclear plants." This rhetorical focus, as well as the logic of the context, makes the antecedent of the pronoun "they" completely unambiguous.
You're correct, in (D), "stemming" begins a dangling modifier. Choice (D) is clearly wrong, and choice (B) is clearly correct.


SleeB wrote:
Many people have chimed in on aspects of the question/answers and, moreover, a few tangents have been well developed.
But can someone (preferably an expert :lol: ) break down exactly what is wrong with each of the wrong answers here. There is so much going on and I'm still confused.
-Some people say "they" or "it" is wrong, others say it's right.
-There's this topic of "emphatic construction"
Also, I'm still pretty confused on the use of "for" in B versus the wrong answers. Can someone please elaborate on that?
Thank you!!

Dear SleeB,
First of all, about emphatic construction, see:
http://magoosh.com/gmat/2013/gmat-idiom ... ed-idioms/
Here's the question again:
While it costs about the same to run nuclear plants as other types of power plants, it is the fixed costs that stem from building nuclear plants that makes it more expensive for them to generate electricity.
A. While it costs about the same to run nuclear plants as other types of power plants, it is the fixed costs that stem from building nuclear plants that makes it more expensive for them to generate electricity.

The comparison in the first half is fine, but in the second half, we have the unnecessary emphatic construction. This is incorrect.
B While the cost of running nuclear plants is about the same as for other types of power plants, the fixed costs that stem from building nuclear plants make the electricity they generate more expensive.
Correct.
C. Even though it costs about the same to run nuclear plants as for other types of power plants, it is the fixed costs that stem from building nuclear plants that makes the electricity they generate more expensive.
The comparison at the beginning is funky .....we could have
(1) it costs about the same to run nuclear plants as other types of power plants
or
(2) the cost of running nuclear plants is about the same as for other types of power plants
but combining these two correct versions, putting the "for" in with the verb "to run," is redundant. This also has the unnecessary emphatic construction in the second half. This is incorrect.
D. It costs about the same to run nuclear plants as for other types of power plants, whereas the electricity they generate is more expensive, stemming from the fixed costs of building nuclear plants.
Second half, beginning with "stemming," is a dangling modifier. This is incorrect.
E. The cost of running nuclear plants is about the same as other types of power plants, but the electricity they generate is made more expensive because of the fixed costs stemming from building nuclear plants.
We meed the "for" in the comparison in the first part, and "is made more expensive" is awkward because it is excessively wordy. This is incorrect.

Does all this make sense?
Mike :-)
_________________

Mike McGarry
Magoosh Test Prep

Image

Image

2 KUDOS received
Current Student
avatar
Joined: 03 May 2013
Posts: 351
Location: India
Concentration: Operations, Human Resources
Schools: ISB '16, IIMA (M)
GPA: 4
WE: Human Resources (Human Resources)
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 76 [2] , given: 68

Re: While it costs about the same to run nuclear plants as other [#permalink] New post 01 Feb 2014, 11:18
2
This post received
KUDOS
While it costs about the same to run nuclear plants as other types of power plants, it is the fixed costs that stem from building nuclear plants that makes it more expensive for them to generate electricity.

A. While it costs about the same to run nuclear plants as other types of power plants, it is the fixed costs that stem from building nuclear plants that makes it more expensive for them to generate electricity.
B While the cost of running nuclear plants is about the same as for other types of power plants, the fixed costs that stem from building nuclear plants make the electricity they generate more expensive....CORRECT
C.Even though it costs about the same to run nuclear plants as for other types of power plants, it is the fixed costs that stem from building nuclear plants that makes the electricity they generate more expensive.
D. It costs about the same to run nuclear plants as for other types of power plants, whereas the electricity they generate is more expensive, stemming from the fixed costs of building nuclear plants.
E. The cost of running nuclear plants is about the same as other types of power plants, but the electricity they generate is made more expensive because of the fixed costs stemming from building nuclear plants.
Expert Post
2 KUDOS received
Magoosh GMAT Instructor
User avatar
Joined: 28 Dec 2011
Posts: 2515
Followers: 817

Kudos [?]: 3326 [2] , given: 38

Re: While it costs about the same to run nuclear plants as other [#permalink] New post 18 May 2014, 17:19
2
This post received
KUDOS
Expert's post
rishi081992 wrote:
D is, i guess, wrong because it uses 'to run' along with 'as for'.
i mean take B, "cost of running nuclear plants is about the same as for" is the correct usage.

Dear rishi081992
I'm happy to respond. ;-)

Choice (D) has multiple problems. Here it is:
(D) It costs about the same to run nuclear plants as for other types of power plants, whereas the electricity they generate is more expensive, stemming from the fixed costs of building nuclear plants.
I would say the first part, before the first comma, is more-or-less correct. It may be a little awkward, but there is nothing unambiguously incorrect about that first part.
One problem is ambiguous pronoun "they" --- to whom does this refer? The "nuclear plants" or the "other types of power plants"? That is a major logical flaw.
The whole arrangement of the second half of the sentence has a choppy awkward feel to it. Among other things, the putative cause of the increased expense, the building costs, is illogically relegated to a parenthetical structure, and is not part of a direct & powerful statement of cause & effect.
Overall, choice (D) is just a poor way to phrase the information, and (B) is much more powerful & clear & direct.

Does all this make sense?
Mike :-)
_________________

Mike McGarry
Magoosh Test Prep

Image

Image

1 KUDOS received
Director
Director
User avatar
Status:
Joined: 24 Jul 2011
Posts: 706
GMAT 1: 780 Q51 V48
GRE 1: 1540 Q800 V740
Followers: 92

Kudos [?]: 380 [1] , given: 14

Re: While it costs about the same to run nuclear plants as other [#permalink] New post 21 Jun 2012, 04:53
1
This post received
KUDOS
B for sure.

A) The costs of running nuclear plants are compared with other types of plants. Incorrect.
B) Correct. Compares the costs correctly and there is no pronoun ambiguity either.
C) 'to run'....'as for' is ungrammatical and incorrect usage. Incorrect.
D) Same issue as C. Incorrect.
E) Same issue as A. Incorrect.

B it is.
_________________

GyanOne | http://www.GyanOne.com | +91 9899831738

Get a free detailed MBA profile evaluation

Top MBA Rankings and MBA Admissions blog


Image

1 KUDOS received
Current Student
User avatar
Affiliations: UWC
Joined: 09 May 2012
Posts: 399
Location: Canada
GMAT 1: 620 Q42 V33
GMAT 2: 680 Q44 V38
GPA: 3.43
WE: Engineering (Entertainment and Sports)
Followers: 27

Kudos [?]: 498 [1] , given: 100

Reviews Badge
Re: While it costs about the same to run nuclear plants as other [#permalink] New post 21 Jun 2012, 16:53
1
This post received
KUDOS
TomB wrote:
In B "costs" is plural. Is the verb " is" correct here.

please explain


Sorry; typo fixed. BTW. this is from OG13. No 'dubiosity' here OldFritz, just a typo..
1 KUDOS received
Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 27 Jul 2011
Posts: 184
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 125 [1] , given: 103

Re: While it costs about the same to run nuclear plants as other [#permalink] New post 16 Sep 2012, 22:39
1
This post received
KUDOS
One more imp learning from this SC:

A costs the same as B- sub to sub comparison
The costs of running A is same for B---Obj to Obj comparison need Preposition
{Got this rule from Magoosh video so can rely on it :wave }

Analysis based on above rules:
A. While it costs about the same to run nuclear plants as other types of power plants, it is the fixed costs that stem from building nuclear plants that makes it more expensive for them to generate electricity.->correct

Use of "makes " is wrong, Also "It is" in second clause is not needed [/color]

B While the cost of running nuclear plants is about the same as for other types of power plants, the fixed costs that stem from building nuclear plants make the electricity they generate more expensive.->Correct

C. Even though it costs about the same to run nuclear plants as for other types of power plants, it is the fixed costs that stem from building nuclear plants that makes the electricity they generate more expensive.-> wrong we don't need prep here

D. It costs about the same to run nuclear plants as for other types of power plants, whereas the electricity they generate is more expensive, stemming from the fixed costs of building nuclear plants.--> wrong same as C

E. The cost of running nuclear plants is about the same as other types of power plants, but the electricity they generate is made more expensive because of the fixed costs stemming from building nuclear plants.----> wrong Need a preposition
_________________

If u can't jump the 700 wall , drill a big hole and cross it .. I can and I WILL DO IT ...need some encouragement and inspirations from U ALL

Expert Post
1 KUDOS received
Retired Moderator
avatar
Status: worked for Kaplan's associates, but now on my own, free and flying
Joined: 19 Feb 2007
Posts: 2625
Location: India
WE: Education (Education)
Followers: 345

Kudos [?]: 2643 [1] , given: 265

Re: While it costs about the same to run nuclear plants as other [#permalink] New post 16 Mar 2013, 09:22
1
This post received
KUDOS
Expert's post
When expanded in full (with ellipsis in brackets), B will be
B While the cost of running nuclear plants is about the same as for (the cost of running) other types of power plants, the fixed costs that stem from building nuclear plants make the electricity they generate more expensive.
The comparison is still between the costs of running one type with the costs for running other types. The only difference is that in the first case we are using ‘of’ as the preposition while in the second arm, we are using ‘for’. As long as we use a preposition for another acceptable preposition, the comparison can be considered be logical and parallel, IMO.

As far as B changing the meaning from the original, I feel the meaning is flawed. There is no way we can ascertain what the “it” stands for. The term ‘it’ does not convey clearly and logically the intended meaning. Hence we have to amend it. B is logical.
_________________

GMAT Club Premium Membership - big benefits and savings

Expert Post
1 KUDOS received
e-GMAT Representative
User avatar
Joined: 02 Nov 2011
Posts: 1870
Followers: 1631

Kudos [?]: 4932 [1] , given: 224

Re: While it costs about the same to run nuclear plants as other [#permalink] New post 26 Mar 2013, 23:36
1
This post received
KUDOS
Expert's post
aditya8062 wrote:
TO EGMAT

A says:While it costs about the same to run nuclear plants as other types of power plants, it is the fixed costs that stem from building nuclear plants that makes it more expensive for them to generate electricity.


though i had eliminated A but i want to know if the initial comparison in A is faulty ?

if i say : nuclear power plants cost twice as much to run as other power plants . i know that this comparison is oki even without the helping verb "do" because there is no ambiguity

so i get a feeling that in A this initial comparison :While it costs about the same to run nuclear plants as other types of power plants seems to be right comparison wise .it might be wrong because of usage of "it" or because of some redundancy but comparison wise it seems oki .
any thought



Sorry about the delay. I was been busy with some schedule driven activities :) I am pasting my response here: Hope this helps.
I took your sentence sets and applied my method of ellipsis to figure out if the ellipsis results in clear sentence or not.

Your Sentence Set 1
• Nuclear power plants cost twice as much to run as other power plants cost.
o Nuclear power plants cost twice as much to run as other power plants do.
o Nuclear power plants cost twice as much to run as other power plants.

Your Sentence Set 2
• It costs about the same to run nuclear plants as other types of power plants
o It costs about the same to run nuclear plants as it does to run other types of power plants
o It costs about the same to run nuclear plants as other types of power plants.
 Here IMO the meaning is distorted a bit. One may construe this sentence to state the following non-sensical meaning - running “nuclear plants” in the role of “other types of power plants”.
 This is the reason why I believe the ellipsis cannot be applied in the manner we can in the previous set of sentence.

Notice another thing – in the first set of sentences we have “as much as” comparison marker. Whereas in the second set of sentences, we only have “as” marker and hence this can be construed to mean “function” instead of “comparison”.

Pardon my hurried response.
-Payal
_________________

Aiming to score 760+ on the GMAT? Attend our free webinars to learn how to:

[*] Master Number Properties
[*] Ace Critical Reasoning

The webinars will start at 7 AM PST on the 11th and 12th of July, 2015.

Expert Post
1 KUDOS received
Magoosh GMAT Instructor
User avatar
Joined: 28 Dec 2011
Posts: 2515
Followers: 817

Kudos [?]: 3326 [1] , given: 38

Re: While it costs about the same to run nuclear plants as other [#permalink] New post 27 Aug 2013, 16:14
1
This post received
KUDOS
Expert's post
blueseas wrote:
macjas wrote:
While it costs about the same to run nuclear plants as other types of power plants, it is the fixed costs that stem from building nuclear plants that makes it more expensive for them to generate electricity.

A. While it costs about the same to run nuclear plants as other types of power plants, it is the fixed costs that stem from building nuclear plants that makes it more expensive for them to generate electricity.
B While the cost of running nuclear plants is about the same as for other types of power plants, the fixed costs that stem from building nuclear plants make the electricity they generate more expensive.
C. Even though it costs about the same to run nuclear plants as for other types of power plants, it is the fixed costs that stem from building nuclear plants that makes the electricity they generate more expensive.
D. It costs about the same to run nuclear plants as for other types of power plants, whereas the electricity they generate is more expensive, stemming from the fixed costs of building nuclear plants.
E. The cost of running nuclear plants is about the same as other types of power plants, but the electricity they generate is made more expensive because of the fixed costs stemming from building nuclear plants.

hi folks,
regarding the solution of this question OG13 SAYS :
The emphatic construction "It is X that does Y"(as in the phrase it is Jane who knows answer)should be used only when there is a compelling reason to emphasize the doer of the action.IN this sentence ,emphatic construction is used without good reason.

I am unable to understand what does this mean and request all experts to share their views on this with examples.

Dear blueseas
The emphatic structure "it is the fixed costs that ..." would be most appropriate if there were several cost sources under consideration, perhaps one that most people commonly thought was the most expensive, and the sentence were saying: no, contrary to what you expect, the fixed building costs are the most expensive, etc. In this sentence, we have emphatic structure, and it's not particularly clear what contrast we are trying to make. If we emphasize one thing, it should be clear --- this thing is being picked out, highlighted, from what other thing or from among what other things.

You will find a few more examples here:
http://magoosh.com/gmat/2013/gmat-idiom ... ed-idioms/

I hope this helps.
Mike :-)
_________________

Mike McGarry
Magoosh Test Prep

Image

Image

Expert Post
1 KUDOS received
Magoosh GMAT Instructor
User avatar
Joined: 28 Dec 2011
Posts: 2515
Followers: 817

Kudos [?]: 3326 [1] , given: 38

Re: While it costs about the same to run nuclear plants as other [#permalink] New post 10 Mar 2014, 11:43
1
This post received
KUDOS
Expert's post
saumya12 wrote:
mikemcgarry wrote:
... that of women. (correct)

Hello Mike, can you let me what "that" would refer to in this sentence.

Is my following understanding correct:

..that among women.

"that" refers to "incidence of disease".

..that of women.

"that" refers to "incidence". I somehow am not getting convinced about this. Because this could either mean:
(A) incidence of women
(B) incidence of (disease among) women

Can you explain; would help us understand better.

Dear saumya12,
I'm happy to respond. :-)

Here's egmat's original sentence:
The incidence of the disease among men exceeds that among women.
Perfectly correct. Now, think about the parallelism. Think if we didn't abbreviate with the word "that":
The incidence of the disease among men exceeds the incidence of the disease among women.
Of course, that version is very wordy and never would be correct on the GMAT, but it makes clear the nature of the parallelism. Men are parallel to women in this sentence. No one is talking about the incidence of men. It's all about the "incidence of the disease among men."

Notice that, in the structure "that among women," whatever the "that" represents must be followed by the word "among."
incidence among women = incidence of what??? This is not the same as "incidence of women"
incidence of among women = wrong
incidence of the disease among women = correct

Does this make sense?
Mike :-)
_________________

Mike McGarry
Magoosh Test Prep

Image

Image

Expert Post
1 KUDOS received
Magoosh GMAT Instructor
User avatar
Joined: 28 Dec 2011
Posts: 2515
Followers: 817

Kudos [?]: 3326 [1] , given: 38

Re: While it costs about the same to run nuclear plants as other [#permalink] New post 09 Mar 2015, 09:14
1
This post received
KUDOS
Expert's post
apolo wrote:
Hey Mike,
Could we solve this question ONLY by using S-V agreement and pronoun ambiguity?

A) Violates S-V
C) Violates S-V
D) "they" is ambiguous: 'other types of power plants' is closer.
E) "they" is ambiguous: 'other types of power plants' is closer

B) S-V agreement is met; 'they' is now closer to the 'nuclear power plants' and actually 'nuclear plants' has been repeated in the second part of the sentence, and only after this repetition the 'they' pronoun appears. In contrast, in D and E, 'they' appears before the second repetition of the nuclear plants in the sentence.

Dear apolo,
I'm happy to respond. :-)

My friend, the "ONLY" approach is not the most productive approach to studying GMAT SC. When you are studying these sentences, your job is to understand, in depth, everything wrong with each wrong answer choice. Any approach which allows you to jump to a "done with that" perspective on a question cuts short deeper kinds of understanding.

Having said that, SVA certainly is one good reason to reject both (A) & (C). The pronoun usage in (D) &(E) are problematic, but not too different from what might be acceptable. It's very important to understand not merely the grammatical issues, but the rhetorical issues: the logical flow of the sentence, the power of phrasing things a certain way, what sounds clear vs. awkward, etc. Rhetorical Construction is one of the eight major areas tested on the GMAT SC. For more on this, see:
http://magoosh.com/gmat/2013/rhetorical ... orrection/

Does all this make sense?
Mike :-)
_________________

Mike McGarry
Magoosh Test Prep

Image

Image

Expert Post
1 KUDOS received
Magoosh GMAT Instructor
User avatar
Joined: 28 Dec 2011
Posts: 2515
Followers: 817

Kudos [?]: 3326 [1] , given: 38

Re: While it costs about the same to run nuclear plants as other [#permalink] New post 10 Mar 2015, 10:28
1
This post received
KUDOS
Expert's post
apolo wrote:
Thanks Mike.
My question did not mean that we should only restrict ourselves to purely grammatical rules.
Actually I asked this question to know whether using pronoun ambiguity is a safe tool for eliminating some choices in the case of this question; that turned out to be: not! (as you have explained in the bold part of your answer).
I know from MGMAT that generally slight pronoun ambiguity might be tolerated, and even some of the published questions in OG have some slight pronoun ambiguity in their correct answer choices.
However, for me it was interesting that the right choice in this questions ALSO has the least problematic usage of the pronoun 'they' compared to answer choices E and D. So I was just curious to know whether this has happened intentionally or simply accidentally.

In contrast to S-V agreement, for example, pronoun ambiguity in some cases, like the one in this question, seems not to be a pretty suitable reason used for eliminating a choice.

Dear apolo,
My friend, I will say SVA is one of the few areas of grammar that is almost mathematical in its sharp right/wrong distinction.
The company is . . . correct
The company are . . . incorrect
With pronouns, mistake of number are similarly black/white:
The store opened in June, and by July it was successful. = correct
The store opened in June, and by July they were successful. = incorrect
For number mistakes in pronoun, we can be just as certain in rejecting answers as we are with SVA mistakes.

The multiple pronoun thing, the same pronoun for two different things, is also a big no-no:
When anthropologist first encountered, they were surprised by their mode of dress.
Who was surprised by who? This is also a wrong-100%-of-the-time kind of error. See:
https://magoosh.com/gmat/2013/gmat-pronoun-traps/

As for antecedent, which noun is the antecedent, then we get into shades of gray. This involves issues of rhetoric and style, not just pure mathematical word order. Parallelism and logical focus of the sentence can sway issues of pronoun-antecedent pairings.

Does all this make sense?
Mike :-)
_________________

Mike McGarry
Magoosh Test Prep

Image

Image

Expert Post
1 KUDOS received
Magoosh GMAT Instructor
User avatar
Joined: 28 Dec 2011
Posts: 2515
Followers: 817

Kudos [?]: 3326 [1] , given: 38

Re: While it costs about the same to run nuclear plants as other [#permalink] New post 12 Mar 2015, 10:12
1
This post received
KUDOS
Expert's post
apolo wrote:
Thanks Mike.
For the second case that you have mentioned, let me show an example from Verbal review, SC problem #92:

Schistosomiasis, a disease caused by a parasitic worm, is prevalent in hot, humid climates, and it has become more widespread as irrigation projects have enlarged the habitat of the freshwater snails that are the parasite’s hosts for part of its life cycle.

(the original sentence is correct)

According to Manhattan SC book, every 'it and its' and every 'they, them, their' must refer to the same antecedent in a sentence.

However, in this sentence 'it' refers to the disease and 'its' refers to 'parasite'.
Of course they explained this contradiction by saying that we have two clauses, and that rules is about clauses not sentences: kind of weird, because in their book they have not clearly mentioned this. Also here (after 'and') indeed we have a complex sentence made of a main clause and a subordinate clause ...

Dear apolo
My friend, I think you misunderstand the sense of that rule. Yes, it's absolutely true, as MGMAT says, that it's a big no-no to have the same pronoun referring to two different things in the same part of the sentence.
. . . they would not sell them the rights . . .
. . . it prevented it from . . .
Think of it this way: every clause within sentence is a mini-sentence in itself. Similarly, participial & infinitive & gerund phrases revolve around a verb-form, exactly as a clause revolves around a verb. Each one is a kind of mini-sentence within the whole. Using the same pronoun inside the same mini-sentence for two different things is a huge no-no. By contrast, if in one part of the sentence, I have [antecedent #1] . . "its," and then later, in another part, I have [antecedent #2] . . . "it," that's perfectly fine. How close is too close? When are two of the same pronoun far enough away that no ambiguity arises? To some extent, this is a judgment call, but certainly when they only a few words apart in the same phrase or clause, that's a problem.

In that sentence from the OG Verbal Review,
Schistosomiasis, a disease caused by a parasitic worm, is prevalent in hot, humid climates, and it has become . . .
The main sentence structure involves two parallel independent clauses. The first "it" is the subject of the second independent clause, parallel to the subject of the first. This parallelism, as well as the rhetorical focus of the sentence on schistosomiasis, make it unambiguously clear that this "it" should refer to schistosomiasis.

Then, later in the sentence, we have a that-clause, a relative clause that modifies the noun "freshwater snails."
. . . freshwater snails that are the parasite’s hosts for part of its life cycle.
In that region of the sentence, that mini-sentence zone, the only singular noun is "parasite," because the snails are plural. Normally, a noun in the possessive cannot be an antecedent, but it can be if the pronoun is also in the possessive, as it is here. This is a dependent clause. Think about if we made this information a sentence on its own:
Freshwater snails are the parasite’s hosts for part of its life cycle.
That's a perfectly clear sentence. The pronoun usage in that sentence is completely unambiguous. That's precisely why we can turn the sentence back into the clause, stick it in the larger sentence, and the pronoun usage is still clear. The two "it" usages are "far away" from each other, doing very different things in very different parts of the sentence, and each one has its own strong relationship with its own antecedent.

Does all this make sense?
Mike :-)
_________________

Mike McGarry
Magoosh Test Prep

Image

Image

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 18 Sep 2009
Posts: 367
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 198 [0], given: 2

Re: While it costs about the same to run nuclear plants as other [#permalink] New post 21 Jun 2012, 09:49
In B "costs" is plural. Is the verb " is" correct here.

please explain
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
Joined: 15 Sep 2009
Posts: 271
GMAT 1: 750 Q V
Followers: 9

Kudos [?]: 65 [0], given: 6

Re: While it costs about the same to run nuclear plants as other [#permalink] New post 21 Jun 2012, 09:57
That's the problem with posting questions of dubious origins.
TomB wrote:
In B "costs" is plural. Is the verb " is" correct here.

please explain


Posted from my mobile device Image
_________________

+1 Kudos me - I'm half Irish, half Prussian.

Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 20 May 2012
Posts: 1
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 0

Re: While it costs about the same to run nuclear plants as other [#permalink] New post 08 Sep 2012, 10:18
But doesn't B change the meaning? B talks about the electricity becoming more expensive but the original sentence talks about it becoming more expensive for the plant to generate electricity.
These are two different things.

Posted from my mobile device Image
Re: While it costs about the same to run nuclear plants as other   [#permalink] 08 Sep 2012, 10:18

Go to page    1   2   3   4    Next  [ 71 posts ] 

    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
1 While it costs about the same to run nuclear plants as other Kay11 3 14 Feb 2014, 10:55
2 Experts publish their posts in the topic Added to worries about budget cuts and cost of living monikaleoster 17 04 Sep 2012, 17:34
added to worries about budget cuts and cost of living vermatanya 5 07 Jan 2008, 15:59
The new implementation for the plant will cost about 30 litlit 6 15 Apr 2007, 00:14
SC: Nuclear Power Plants gmatirp 23 28 Jan 2007, 21:25
Display posts from previous: Sort by

While it costs about the same to run nuclear plants as other

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Privacy Policy| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.