Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 22 Aug 2014, 04:10

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

will post the answer soon.please explain till then

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
Joined: 20 Feb 2006
Posts: 332
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 8 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
will post the answer soon.please explain till then [#permalink] New post 25 Jun 2006, 01:02
Contrary to the charges made by some of its opponents, the provisions of the new deficit-reduction law for indiscriminate cuts in the federal budget are justified. Opponents should remember that the New Deal pulled this country out of great economic troubles even though some of its programs
were later found to be unconstitutional.

The opponents could effectively defend their position against the author’s strategy by pointing out that
(A) the expertise of those opposing the law is outstanding
(B) the lack of justification for the new law does not imply that those who drew it up were either inept or immoral
(C) the practical application of the new law will not entail indiscriminate budget cuts
(D) economic troubles present at the time of the New Deal were equal in severity to those that have led to the present law
(E) the fact that certain flawed programs or laws have improved the economy does not prove that every such program can do so
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 31 Mar 2006
Posts: 165
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 5 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 25 Jun 2006, 01:05
E...

will explain if correct
SVP
SVP
avatar
Joined: 30 Mar 2006
Posts: 1741
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 25 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 27 Jun 2006, 00:49
Clear winner E

The author cites evidence from the past to justify something in the future.
VP
VP
User avatar
Joined: 15 Jun 2006
Posts: 1124
Schools: Chicago Booth
Followers: 4

Kudos [?]: 39 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
Re: will post the answer soon.please explain till then [#permalink] New post 27 Jun 2006, 01:03
sharadGmat wrote:
Contrary to the charges made by some of its opponents, the provisions of the new deficit-reduction law for indiscriminate cuts in the federal budget are justified. Opponents should remember that the New Deal pulled this country out of great economic troubles even though some of its programs
were later found to be unconstitutional.

The opponents could effectively defend their position against the author’s strategy by pointing out that
(A) the expertise of those opposing the law is outstanding
(B) the lack of justification for the new law does not imply that those who drew it up were either inept or immoral
(C) the practical application of the new law will not entail indiscriminate budget cuts
(D) economic troubles present at the time of the New Deal were equal in severity to those that have led to the present law
(E) the fact that certain flawed programs or laws have improved the economy does not prove that every such program can do so


E, obviously
the logic of the author is flawed by drawing a weak analogy between two things, E directly points this out
Director
Director
User avatar
Joined: 06 May 2006
Posts: 783
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 14 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 27 Jun 2006, 10:32
E holds.
CEO
CEO
User avatar
Joined: 20 Nov 2005
Posts: 2922
Schools: Completed at SAID BUSINESS SCHOOL, OXFORD - Class of 2008
Followers: 15

Kudos [?]: 79 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 27 Jun 2006, 11:43
E is clear winner.
_________________

SAID BUSINESS SCHOOL, OXFORD - MBA CLASS OF 2008

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 12 Jun 2006
Posts: 69
Location: Hyderabad, India
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 2 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 27 Jun 2006, 23:47
E is the answer
A - not supported by the argument
B-is irrelevant
C-does the support the opponents
D-does not validate thier argument.
_________________

Hema

Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 23 Apr 2006
Posts: 16
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 28 Jun 2006, 04:36
E for me too. Its is clearly stating the flaw in argument
Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 22 May 2006
Posts: 176
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 2 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 28 Jun 2006, 08:07
yup. It's E.
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 06 Jul 2004
Posts: 474
Location: united states
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 10 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 11 Jul 2006, 10:52
E for me too.. time for OA.
_________________

for every person who doesn't try because he is
afraid of loosing , there is another person who
keeps making mistakes and succeeds..

  [#permalink] 11 Jul 2006, 10:52
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
Experts publish their posts in the topic CR question with answer, pls explain vishukhandelwal 1 20 Feb 2014, 11:08
1 doubtful question. can anyone explain the answer choice..? pranit 2 27 Aug 2011, 14:01
How do you see the official answer and the explaination? Waylon 2 28 May 2011, 15:02
2 Experts publish their posts in the topic What is the remainder when the positive integer n is divided naaga 9 25 Feb 2011, 06:20
4 CR Qs: Please Explain Answers Fasttrack 3 24 Aug 2008, 12:36
Display posts from previous: Sort by

will post the answer soon.please explain till then

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Privacy Policy| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.