|
Author |
Message |
|
TAGS:
|
|
|
Senior Manager
Joined: 18 Jun 2010
Posts: 305
Schools: Chicago Booth Class of 2013
Followers: 19
Kudos [?]:
115
[0], given: 194
|
Question Stats:
48% (02:23) correct
51% (01:23) wrong based on 0 sessions
Last edited by Financier on 25 Sep 2010, 05:31, edited 1 time in total.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Director
Joined: 18 Feb 2008
Posts: 508
Location: Kolkata
Followers: 5
Kudos [?]:
50
[1] , given: 66
|
1
This post received
KUDOS
Even i went for C at first go.Financier source of the que?BTW great debrief...i have read it innumerable times 
|
|
|
|
|
|
Manager
Joined: 25 Jul 2010
Posts: 147
Followers: 1
Kudos [?]:
13
[0], given: 29
|
Re: William Shakespear [#permalink]
 25 Sep 2010, 04:02
E
If publishers are not responsible for the contents of newspaper, the conclusion gets weakened.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior Manager
Joined: 18 Jun 2010
Posts: 305
Schools: Chicago Booth Class of 2013
Followers: 19
Kudos [?]:
115
[0], given: 194
|
Re: William Shakespear [#permalink]
25 Sep 2010, 04:04
Orange08 wrote: E
If publishers are not responsible for the contents of newspaper, the conclusion gets weakened. What do you think about C?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Manager
Joined: 25 Jul 2010
Posts: 147
Followers: 1
Kudos [?]:
13
[0], given: 29
|
Re: William Shakespear [#permalink]
25 Sep 2010, 04:08
C and E are indeed very close and I struggled a bit to conclude E.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior Manager
Joined: 18 Jun 2010
Posts: 305
Schools: Chicago Booth Class of 2013
Followers: 19
Kudos [?]:
115
[0], given: 194
|
Re: William Shakespear [#permalink]
25 Sep 2010, 04:56
Orange08 wrote: C and E are indeed very close and I struggled a bit to conclude E. But saing that they are responsible does not explain why they are NOT working hard enough... They might work hard but inefficiently... On the other hand, C may help up resolve a problem, because if they are not able to distinguish, than they can not be blamed for their malice...
|
|
|
|
|
|
Manager
Joined: 25 Jul 2010
Posts: 147
Followers: 1
Kudos [?]:
13
[0], given: 29
|
Re: William Shakespear [#permalink]
25 Sep 2010, 05:21
Conclusion of the argument is : "Publishers are more interested in selling the newspapers than in providing the public with the truth"
Thus its more related to Publisher.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Manager
Joined: 25 Jul 2010
Posts: 147
Followers: 1
Kudos [?]:
13
[0], given: 29
|
what's the OA?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior Manager
Joined: 18 Jun 2010
Posts: 305
Schools: Chicago Booth Class of 2013
Followers: 19
Kudos [?]:
115
[0], given: 194
|
Orange08 wrote: what's the OA? OA is E. You seem to be a smart man - try this one : us-history-101659.html
|
|
|
|
|
|
Manager
Joined: 25 Jul 2010
Posts: 147
Followers: 1
Kudos [?]:
13
[0], given: 29
|
Thanks. I wish my smartness gets proved in the real exam.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Manager
Joined: 22 Jun 2010
Posts: 209
Followers: 1
Kudos [?]:
19
[0], given: 9
|
negation of E question the conclusion :D
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intern
Joined: 10 Oct 2010
Posts: 36
Followers: 0
Kudos [?]:
1
[0], given: 3
|
agree c and e caught my eye but c contained the word "always". Absolutes are usually (not an absolute ) give away that it is not the answer
|
|
|
|
|
|
Manager
Status: Bunuel's fan!
Joined: 08 Jul 2011
Posts: 213
Followers: 0
Kudos [?]:
6
[0], given: 47
|
Re: William Shakespear [#permalink]
24 Apr 2012, 09:11
Orange08 wrote: Conclusion of the argument is : "Publishers are more interested in selling the newspapers than in providing the public with the truth"
Thus its more related to Publisher. I agree that negate E makes the conclusion weak. However, I cant pinpoint why C is wrong. Any one? My try to negate C: "Fact checker are not always able to verify fact"= they do not work hard enough= support the conclusion rather than breaking it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intern
Joined: 17 Dec 2010
Posts: 5
Location: Bangladesh
Followers: 0
Kudos [?]:
1
[0], given: 7
|
I agree that negate E makes the conclusion weak. However, I cant pinpoint why C is wrong. Any one?
My try to negate C: "Fact checker are not always able to verify fact"= they do not work hard enough= support the conclusion rather than breaking it.
Conclusion of the argument is --"Publishers are more interested in selling the newspapers than in providing the public with the truth"
***Answer choice C does not address the conclusion..that's the problem with C....I think
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intern
Joined: 05 Apr 2012
Posts: 45
Followers: 0
Kudos [?]:
8
[0], given: 12
|
Financier wrote: Hello I will go for E evidences 1 publisher are concerned about less readership Evidence 2 Fraudulent story are left by those who are responsible of cheecking them hence conclusion based on the situation The publisher are concerned about selling newspaper this true if the publishers are the one in charge to check the story true the others answers are a outside the scope b will weaken the conclusion c so what d unrelated e ok ! hope it helps best regards
|
|
|
|
|
|
Manager
Joined: 12 Mar 2012
Posts: 171
Location: India
Concentration: Technology, General Management
GMAT Date: 07-23-2012
WE: Programming (Telecommunications)
Followers: 0
Kudos [?]:
25
[0], given: 4
|
The conclusion depends on the work done by the news verifier. So IMO the answer is C.
_________________
FOCUS..this is all I need!
Ku-Do!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intern
Joined: 29 Aug 2011
Posts: 24
Followers: 1
Kudos [?]:
1
[0], given: 3
|
Financier wrote: Sorry, can't see the question any more as the image is not loading.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Moderators:
metallicafan, rajeevrks27, souvik101990, PTK, MacFauz, noboru, kissthegmat, carcass, willigetmylifeback, mikemcgarry, doe007, Vercules, Legendaddy, tuanquang269, RaviChandra, Marcab, Narenn
|
close
