Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

 It is currently 26 Aug 2016, 00:34

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# Wisconsin, Illinois, Florida, and Minnesota have begun to

 new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics
Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

Senior Manager
Status: Do and Die!!
Joined: 15 Sep 2010
Posts: 326
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 356 [2] , given: 193

Wisconsin, Illinois, Florida, and Minnesota have begun to [#permalink]

### Show Tags

02 Dec 2011, 12:08
2
This post received
KUDOS
14
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00

Difficulty:

15% (low)

Question Stats:

67% (01:42) correct 33% (00:56) wrong based on 851 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

Wisconsin, Illinois, Florida, and Minnesota have begun to enforce statewide bans prohibiting landfills to accept leaves, brush, and grass clippings.

(A) prohibiting landfills to accept leaves, brush, and grass clippings
(B) prohibiting that landfills accept leaves, brush, and grass clippings
(C) prohibiting landfills from accepting leaves, brush, and grass clippings
(D) that leaves, brush, and grass clippings cannot be accepted in landfills
(E) that landfills cannot accept leaves, brush, and grass clippings

[Reveal] Spoiler:
isn't Ban fallowed by prohibiting is redundant ?
[Reveal] Spoiler: OA

_________________

I'm the Dumbest of All !!

Manager
Status: Enjoying the MBA journey :)
Joined: 09 Sep 2011
Posts: 137
Location: United States (DC)
Concentration: General Management, Entrepreneurship
GMAT 1: 710 Q49 V38
WE: Corporate Finance (Other)
Followers: 18

Kudos [?]: 112 [3] , given: 16

Re: Wisconsin, Illinois, Florida, and Minnesota have begun [#permalink]

### Show Tags

02 Dec 2011, 12:44
3
This post received
KUDOS
1
This post was
BOOKMARKED
Here's the explanation:

ban and prohibit mean the same thing, but in this context, their usage is different and hence they complement each other.
Here, the sentence is actually trying to say that Wisconsin, Illinois, Florida and Minnesota do not accept leaves, brush and grass clippings in their landfills.

Option A uses an incorrect idiom. The correct idiom is 'prohibit ... from' and not 'prohibit ... to'. Hence incorrect.

Option B suffers from a similar error. 'Prohibiting that' is incorrect usage.

Options C is the clearest answer choice here. It correctly uses the idiom 'prohibiting ... from'. Hence this is the correct answer.

Options D and E are both incorrect because they do not have a clear meaning due to the usage of 'bans that'.

Hope this helps!
_________________

MBA Candidate 2015 | Georgetown University
McDonough School of Business

Senior Manager
Status: Do and Die!!
Joined: 15 Sep 2010
Posts: 326
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 356 [0], given: 193

Re: Wisconsin, Illinois, Florida, and Minnesota have begun [#permalink]

### Show Tags

02 Dec 2011, 13:29
Thanks !!

i x out the first three, ....SCCCCCCC
_________________

I'm the Dumbest of All !!

Senior Manager
Joined: 11 May 2011
Posts: 373
Location: US
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 89 [0], given: 46

Re: Wisconsin, Illinois, Florida, and Minnesota have begun [#permalink]

### Show Tags

02 Dec 2011, 14:33
sudish wrote:
Here's the explanation:

ban and prohibit mean the same thing, but in this context, their usage is different and hence they complement each other.
Here, the sentence is actually trying to say that Wisconsin, Illinois, Florida and Minnesota do not accept leaves, brush and grass clippings in their landfills.

Option A uses an incorrect idiom. The correct idiom is 'prohibit ... from' and not 'prohibit ... to'. Hence incorrect.

Option B suffers from a similar error. 'Prohibiting that' is incorrect usage.

Options C is the clearest answer choice here. It correctly uses the idiom 'prohibiting ... from'. Hence this is the correct answer.

Options D and E are both incorrect because they do not have a clear meaning due to the usage of 'bans that'.

Hope this helps!

@sudish - why usage of 'bans that' is incorrect? Can you illustrate?
Cheers!
_________________

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
What you do TODAY is important because you're exchanging a day of your life for it!
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Manager
Status: Enjoying the MBA journey :)
Joined: 09 Sep 2011
Posts: 137
Location: United States (DC)
Concentration: General Management, Entrepreneurship
GMAT 1: 710 Q49 V38
WE: Corporate Finance (Other)
Followers: 18

Kudos [?]: 112 [4] , given: 16

Re: Wisconsin, Illinois, Florida, and Minnesota have begun [#permalink]

### Show Tags

03 Dec 2011, 00:17
4
This post received
KUDOS
@Capricorn369:

Let's look at the first part of the sentence:
'Wisconsin, Illinois, Florida, and Minnesota have begun to enforce statewide bans'
This part can stand on its own and hence it's an independent clause.

The next part of the sentence in options D and E are:
'leaves, brush, and grass clippings cannot be accepted in landfills' and
'landfills cannot accept leaves, brush, and grass clippings'
Both these sentences are independent clauses as well and as such, can stand on their own.
The first part of the sentence does not require the second part to complete its meaning. Hence, the second part is non-essential and is therefore a non-restrictive clause.

Now, we know that we use 'that' only when the clause is restrictive. If the clause is non-restrictive, we use 'which' so that the clause acts as subordinate to the main clause.

Had the options D and E been of the form:
'prohibit landfills from accepting leaves, brush and grass clippings.'
they would have been correct because the latter part would have then acted as a restrictive clause required to complete the meaning of the main clause and could have been aptly joined to the main clause using 'that'.

Hope this is clear now!
_________________

MBA Candidate 2015 | Georgetown University
McDonough School of Business

BSchool Forum Moderator
Status: Flying over the cloud!
Joined: 17 Aug 2011
Posts: 913
Location: Viet Nam
Concentration: International Business, Marketing
GMAT Date: 06-06-2014
GPA: 3.07
Followers: 70

Kudos [?]: 531 [2] , given: 44

Re: Wisconsin, Illinois, Florida, and Minnesota have begun [#permalink]

### Show Tags

03 Dec 2011, 05:45
2
This post received
KUDOS
1
This post was
BOOKMARKED
shrive555 wrote:
Wisconsin, Illinois, Florida, and Minnesota have begun to enforce statewide bans prohibiting landfills to accept leaves, brush, and grass clippings.

(A) Same
(B) prohibiting that landfills accept leaves, brush, and grass clippings
(C) prohibiting landfills from accepting leaves, brush, and grass clippings
(D) that leaves, brush, and grass clippings cannot be accepted in landfills
(E) that landfills cannot accept leaves, brush, and grass clippings

isn't Ban fallowed by prohibiting is redundant ?

Nope, it is not redundant, " prohibiting landfills from accepting leaves, brush, and grass clippings" is the adjective phrase that help the meaning of "statewide bans" is clearer. The right idiom is "prohibit X from Y". Other choices seem awkward and wrong idiom. Choice D and E do not have clear meaning when use form "bans that"
_________________

Rules for posting in verbal gmat forum, read it before posting anything in verbal forum
Giving me + 1 kudos if my post is valuable with you

The more you like my post, the more you share to other's need

CR: Focus of the Week: Must be True Question

Current Student
Joined: 06 Sep 2013
Posts: 2035
Concentration: Finance
GMAT 1: 770 Q0 V
Followers: 54

Kudos [?]: 513 [1] , given: 355

Re: Wisconsin, Illinois, Florida, and Minnesota have begun to [#permalink]

### Show Tags

18 Oct 2013, 13:58
1
This post received
KUDOS
shrive555 wrote:
Wisconsin, Illinois, Florida, and Minnesota have begun to enforce statewide bans prohibiting landfills to accept leaves, brush, and grass clippings.

(A) Same
(B) prohibiting that landfills accept leaves, brush, and grass clippings
(C) prohibiting landfills from accepting leaves, brush, and grass clippings
(D) that leaves, brush, and grass clippings cannot be accepted in landfills
(E) that landfills cannot accept leaves, brush, and grass clippings

isn't Ban fallowed by prohibiting is redundant ?

Also, recall this example
The law PROHIBITS any citizen FROM VOTING twice (The law PROHIBITS any citizen TO VOTE twice/PROHIBITS THAT any person VOTE twice are both wrong)

According to my notes

Cheers!
J

Kudos rain!
Current Student
Joined: 03 Aug 2012
Posts: 915
Concentration: General Management, General Management
GMAT 1: 630 Q47 V29
GMAT 2: 680 Q50 V32
GPA: 3.7
WE: Information Technology (Investment Banking)
Followers: 21

Kudos [?]: 600 [0], given: 322

Re: Wisconsin, Illinois, Florida, and Minnesota have begun to [#permalink]

### Show Tags

05 Apr 2014, 09:03
Experts,

Can anyone explain the reasoning behind the OE from VR2 why (D) and (E) are wrong?

(D) that leaves, brush, and grass clippings cannot be accepted in landfills

OE:Bans that . . . cannot be accepted is not a correct idiom and does not make sense.

(E). that landfills cannot accept leaves, brush, and grass clippings

OE:Bans that . . . cannot accept is an incorrect idiom, and cannot following bans is illogical.

Can someone come up with the idioms starting with BANS?

Why cannot following BANS is illogical?

Rgds,
TGC!
_________________

Rgds,
TGC!
_____________________________________________________________________
I Assisted You => KUDOS Please
_____________________________________________________________________________

SVP
Joined: 17 Jul 2014
Posts: 1637
Location: United States
Schools: Stanford '19
GMAT 1: 550 Q39 V27
GMAT 2: 560 Q42 V26
GMAT 3: 560 Q43 V24
GMAT 4: 650 Q49 V30
GPA: 3.56
WE: General Management (Transportation)
Followers: 12

Kudos [?]: 193 [0], given: 109

Re: Wisconsin, Illinois, Florida, and Minnesota have begun to [#permalink]

### Show Tags

28 Apr 2015, 11:02
isn't ban prohibiting redundant? ban = prohibit
no?
Intern
Joined: 26 Feb 2015
Posts: 16
Concentration: Entrepreneurship, Strategy
GMAT 1: 560 Q46 V19
GMAT 2: 630 Q49 V27
GPA: 2.92
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 46

Wisconsin, Illinois, Florida, and Minnesota have begun to [#permalink]

### Show Tags

25 Apr 2016, 07:51
is subjunctive mood ok here?
I thought about subjunctive mood structure, so I choose B
Math Forum Moderator
Status: Moving Towards Perfection Now
Joined: 11 Jun 2011
Posts: 1187
Location: India
Concentration: International Business, Finance
Schools: ISB
WE: Corporate Finance (Commercial Banking)
Followers: 32

Kudos [?]: 298 [0], given: 210

Re: Wisconsin, Illinois, Florida, and Minnesota have begun to [#permalink]

### Show Tags

25 Apr 2016, 11:27
shrive555 wrote:
Wisconsin, Illinois, Florida, and Minnesota have begun to enforce statewide bans prohibiting landfills to accept leaves, brush, and grass clippings.

(A) prohibiting landfills to accept leaves, brush, and grass clippings
(B) prohibiting that landfills accept leaves, brush, and grass clippings
(C) prohibiting landfills from accepting leaves, brush, and grass clippings
(D) that leaves, brush, and grass clippings cannot be accepted in landfills
(E) that landfills cannot accept leaves, brush, and grass clippings

[Reveal] Spoiler:
isn't Ban fallowed by prohibiting is redundant ?

Correct idiomatic usage of Prohibit is -

Prohibit X from Y

Only (C) uses it correctly , hence correct answer will definitely be (C)
_________________

Abhishek....

Re: Wisconsin, Illinois, Florida, and Minnesota have begun to   [#permalink] 25 Apr 2016, 11:27
Similar topics Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
2 The ophthalmologists' offices have begun selling 10 17 Sep 2012, 07:07
4 Q. Wisconsin, Illinois, Florida, and Minnesota have begun to 12 17 Apr 2011, 00:26
Wisconsin, Illinois, Florida, and Minnesota have begun to 5 05 Jun 2010, 10:18
Wisconsin, Illinois, Florida, and Minnesota have begun to 3 26 Jan 2009, 23:20
Wisconsin, Illinois, Florida, and Minnesota have begun to 15 08 Jul 2008, 02:50
Display posts from previous: Sort by

# Wisconsin, Illinois, Florida, and Minnesota have begun to

 new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics

 Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.