|
Author |
Message |
|
TAGS:
|
|
|
Director
Status: Impossible is not a fact. It's an opinion. It's a dare. Impossible is nothing.
Joined: 26 Nov 2009
Posts: 995
Followers: 12
Kudos [?]:
271
[1] , given: 36
|
With a record number of new companies starting up in [#permalink]
05 Sep 2010, 01:59
1
This post received KUDOS
Question Stats:
54% (02:19) correct
45% (01:22) wrong based on 3 sessions
With a record number of new companies starting up in Derderia, and with previously established companies adding many new jobs, a record number of new jobs were created last year in the Derderian economy. This year, previously established companies will not be adding as many new jobs overall as such companies added last year. Therefore, unless a record number of companies start up this year, Derderia will not break its record for new jobs created. Which of the following is an assumption on which the argument relies? A. In a given year, new companies starting up create more new jobs on average than do previously established companies. B. The number of people seeking employment is no larger this year than it was last year. C. This year, the new companies starting up will not provide substantially more jobs per company than did new companies last year. D. Previously established companies in Derderia will be less profitable this year than such companies were last year. E. The number of jobs created in the Derderian economy last year was substantially larger than the number of jobs lost.
_________________
Please press kudos if you like my post.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Manager
Joined: 15 Apr 2010
Posts: 174
Followers: 4
Kudos [?]:
19
[1] , given: 3
|
Re: Interesting one ! [#permalink]
05 Sep 2010, 02:54
1
This post received KUDOS
new jobs created = jobs created by new companies + new jobs added by established companies
The stimulus says that the established companies will not be adding as many new jobs as they did last year. Hence for the number of new jobs created this year to be greater than that created last year, number of jobs created by new companies this year should be greater than that created by the new companies last year. The argument concludes that this can be possible only if number of new companies this year is greater than the number of new companies last year. The conclusion can hold only if we assume that the new companies starting up will not provide substantially more jobs per company than did new companies last year.
Hence C.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior Manager
Joined: 16 Apr 2006
Posts: 284
Followers: 2
Kudos [?]:
5
[0], given: 2
|
Re: Interesting one ! [#permalink]
05 Sep 2010, 06:13
C. Record Number of new companies are required only of few new companies can't provide large number of jobs.
_________________
Trying hard to achieve something unachievable now....
|
|
|
|
|
|
Director
Joined: 18 Feb 2008
Posts: 508
Location: Kolkata
Followers: 5
Kudos [?]:
50
[0], given: 66
|
Re: Interesting one ! [#permalink]
05 Sep 2010, 11:10
Clear C.Can also eliminate other choices easily.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intern
Joined: 08 Jun 2010
Posts: 26
GMAT 1: 690 Q48 V36
GPA: 3.59
WE: Accounting (Accounting)
Followers: 0
Kudos [?]:
5
[0], given: 8
|
Re: Interesting one ! [#permalink]
06 Sep 2010, 00:11
The Answer is C because: Last Year: Jobs created by EC + Jobs created by SC = Record number of new Jobs
This Year: Jobs Created by EC is down + Jobs created by SC = To achieve Record number of new Jobs
Conclusion: unless a record number of companies start up this year, Derderia will not break its record for new jobs created.
Assumption: Since we need record number of startups, the average number of jobs created should be approximately the same as the last year figure.
Comments, I know this is very vague explanation, but from among the given choices only answer C provides needed information.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intern
Joined: 10 May 2010
Posts: 12
Followers: 0
Kudos [?]:
0
[0], given: 0
|
Re: Interesting one ! [#permalink]
06 Sep 2010, 01:13
can anyone point out why not A? Although I picked C, I had to read A twice just to be sure. Thanks
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intern
Joined: 22 Jun 2010
Posts: 6
Followers: 0
Kudos [?]:
4
[0], given: 1
|
Re: Interesting one ! [#permalink]
06 Sep 2010, 01:35
It cannot be A because there is no clear statement anywhere in the passage saying new companies create more jobs than the established companies on a given year when they are equal in numbers . To be more precise, the number of jobs created between old and new companies was never compared or discussed. When the old companies don't create more jobs , it says that "unless a record number of new companies start this year" . So it means the number of new companies should be more than the previous year . Say there were Last year = 5 new companies --- > 50 new jobs | 10 jobs per comp This year = same 5 new new companies --> 60 new jobs | 12 jobs per comp But the argument states that the new companies should be more to create more jobs , so the assumption is average number of jobs per company does not increase. ( If it increases , then the number of new companies need not be more than the previous year to achieve more new jobs ) - Option C Hope I 've not confused you any further
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior Manager
Affiliations: Volunteer Operation Smile India, Creative Head of College IEEE branch (2009-10), Chief Editor College Magazine (2009), Finance Head College Magazine (2008)
Joined: 26 Jul 2010
Posts: 472
Location: India
WE2: Entrepreneur (E-commerce - The Laptop Skin Vault)
Concentration: Marketing, Entrepreneurship
GMAT 1: 710 Q49 V38
WE: Marketing (Other)
Followers: 10
Kudos [?]:
73
[0], given: 24
|
Re: Interesting one ! [#permalink]
06 Sep 2010, 11:01
Very easy
_________________
Kidchaos
http://www.laptopskinvault.com
Follow The Laptop Skin Vault on: Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/TheLaptopSkinVault Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/LaptopSkinVault
Consider Kudos if you think the Post is good Unless someone like you cares a whole awful lot. Nothing is going to change. It's not. - Dr. Seuss
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intern
Joined: 10 May 2010
Posts: 12
Followers: 0
Kudos [?]:
0
[0], given: 0
|
Re: Interesting one ! [#permalink]
06 Sep 2010, 11:17
@sizzler - thanks! no you havent confused me.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Manager
Joined: 20 Apr 2010
Posts: 227
Schools: ISB, HEC, Said
Followers: 4
Kudos [?]:
8
[0], given: 28
|
Re: Interesting one ! [#permalink]
18 Oct 2010, 04:37
Nice post
|
|
|
|
|
|
SVP
Status: 2000 posts! I don't know whether I should feel great or sad about it! LOL
Joined: 04 Oct 2009
Posts: 1756
Location: Peru
Schools: Harvard, Stanford, Wharton, MIT & HKS (Government)
WE 1: Economic research
WE 2: Banking
WE 3: Government: Foreign Trade and SMEs
Followers: 50
Kudos [?]:
145
[0], given: 108
|
Re: Interesting one ! [#permalink]
19 Oct 2010, 06:22
+1 C
_________________
"Life’s battle doesn’t always go to stronger or faster men; but sooner or later the man who wins is the one who thinks he can."
My Integrated Reasoning Logbook / Diary: my-ir-logbook-diary-133264.html
Find out what's new at GMAT Club - latest features and updates
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior Manager
Status: Can't give up
Joined: 20 Dec 2009
Posts: 322
Followers: 2
Kudos [?]:
20
[0], given: 35
|
Re: Interesting one ! [#permalink]
17 Nov 2010, 07:05
yeah C it is....
|
|
|
|
|
|
Manager
Joined: 04 May 2009
Posts: 71
Location: Astoria, NYC
Followers: 1
Kudos [?]:
6
[0], given: 1
|
Re: Interesting one ! [#permalink]
17 Nov 2010, 07:55
went for B but see why its C....good question
|
|
|
|
|
|
SVP
Joined: 16 Nov 2010
Posts: 1721
Location: United States (IN)
Concentration: Strategy, Technology
Followers: 26
Kudos [?]:
228
[0], given: 34
|
Re: Interesting one ! [#permalink]
08 Apr 2011, 00:41
The answer is C.
_________________
Formula of Life -> Achievement/Potential = k * Happiness (where k is a constant)
Find out what's new at GMAT Club - latest features and updates
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior Manager
Joined: 12 Oct 2009
Posts: 278
Schools: Columbia, INSEAD, RSM, LBS
Followers: 2
Kudos [?]:
17
[0], given: 4
|
Re: Interesting one ! [#permalink]
08 Apr 2011, 09:31
C for sure
|
|
|
|
|
|
VP
Status: There is always something new !!
Affiliations: PMI,QAI Global,eXampleCG
Joined: 08 May 2009
Posts: 1400
Followers: 8
Kudos [?]:
84
[0], given: 10
|
Re: Interesting one ! [#permalink]
14 Jun 2011, 04:16
between B and C. Negating B leaves with a neutral view of the conclusion. C it is.
_________________
Visit -- http://www.sustainable-sphere.com/ Promote Green Business,Sustainable Living and Green Earth !!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Manager
Joined: 08 Sep 2010
Posts: 176
Followers: 0
Kudos [?]:
9
[0], given: 18
|
Re: Interesting one ! [#permalink]
14 Jun 2011, 16:36
Good question....between A and C. rest all are irrelevant C for me
_________________
My will shall shape the future. Whether I fail or succeed shall be no man's doing but my own.
If you like my explanations award kudos.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Manager
Joined: 16 Mar 2011
Posts: 190
Followers: 1
Kudos [?]:
3
[0], given: 1
|
Re: Interesting one ! [#permalink]
14 Jun 2011, 16:43
C, the key phrase is "per company compare to last year"
|
|
|
|
|
|
Manager
Joined: 16 Aug 2011
Posts: 98
Followers: 0
Kudos [?]:
1
[0], given: 3
|
Re: Interesting one ! [#permalink]
02 Nov 2011, 14:40
Good Question. Tough one. I got A but C is the winner.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Manager
Joined: 29 Jun 2011
Posts: 123
WE 1: Information Technology(Retail)
Followers: 3
Kudos [?]:
3
[0], given: 9
|
Re: Interesting one ! [#permalink]
03 Nov 2011, 01:55
C clearly. Fills the gap between the Premise-with previously established companies adding many new jobs, a record number of new jobs were created last year in the Derderian economy and Conclusion-unless a record number of companies start up this year, Derderia will not break its record for new jobs created.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Re: Interesting one !
[#permalink]
03 Nov 2011, 01:55
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Moderators:
metallicafan, rajeevrks27, souvik101990, PTK, MacFauz, noboru, kissthegmat, carcass, willigetmylifeback, mikemcgarry, doe007, Vercules, Legendaddy, tuanquang269, RaviChandra, Marcab, Narenn
|