Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 20 Jun 2013, 01:15
Customize  |  Hide

With no natural predators and expanses of green suburban

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews  
Author Message
TAGS:
Forum Moderator
Forum Moderator
User avatar
Status: doing good things...
Joined: 02 Jul 2009
Posts: 1234
Concentration: Entrepreneurship, Finance
GMAT 1: Q V
GMAT 2: 690 Q49 V35
GPA: 3.77
WE: Corporate Finance (Other)
Followers: 126

Kudos [?]: 419 [0], given: 523

GMAT ToolKit User GMAT Tests User Reviews Badge
With no natural predators and expanses of green suburban [#permalink] New post 18 Oct 2010, 01:29
00:00

Question Stats:

45% (01:43) correct 54% (01:17) wrong based on 79 sessions
With no natural predators and expanses of green suburban neighborhoods that allow no hunting, wildlife officials estimate the New Jersey deer population to have grown to exceed 175,000.

A. With no natural predators and expanses of green suburban neighborhoods that allow no hunting, wildlife officials estimate the New Jersey deer population to have

B. With no natural predators and with expanses of green suburban neighborhoods that donot allow hunting, wildlife officails' estimate of deer population in New Jersey has

C. With no natural predators and with expanses of green suburban neighborhoods where there is no hunting, the Deer Population in New Jersey, wildlife officials estimate, has

D. Without natural predators and no hunting allowed in expanses of green suburban neighborhoods, New Jersey has a deer population that wildlife officials estimate to have

E. Without natural predators and with expanses of green suburban neighbourhoods where there is no hunting, wildlife officials in New Jersey estimate a deer population that has
[Reveal] Spoiler: OA

_________________

Follow me, if you find my explanations useful.

Audaces fortuna juvat!

Find out what's new at GMAT Club - latest features and updates

1 KUDOS received
SVP
SVP
Status: worked for Kaplan's associates, but now on my own, free and flying
Joined: 19 Feb 2007
Posts: 1987
Location: India
Followers: 131

Kudos [?]: 673 [1] , given: 170

GMAT Tests User
Re: deer population [#permalink] New post 18 Oct 2010, 03:25
1
This post received
KUDOS
Choice C becos, it is the only one in which, the modifier phrase introducing the
passage genuinely modifies the intended modified noun the deer population
_________________

” I truly believe in online learning, I have been a student in both an Ivy League school (brick and mortar) and in an online setting and I have learned 1,000 times more in an online setting. You do not have anyone there lecturing you and then you do the work, online you are made to do it all yourself. Amazing how different the results are. - Heather(a student)”

Alicia Helle, an online student at the UW, "Obtaining my degree online has been a blessing. With two small children, I am able to work when it is convenient for my family and me. I have nothing but positive comments and experiences from my time at UW-Stout.”

Find out what's new at GMAT Club - latest features and updates

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
Joined: 20 Jul 2010
Posts: 276
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 26 [0], given: 9

GMAT ToolKit User Reviews Badge
Re: deer population [#permalink] New post 18 Oct 2010, 05:38
The starting modifier should modify deer population and not wildlife officials. So I am down with C and D.

I selected D as I felt two characteristics are desribed for 'in expanses of green suburban neighborhoods" - no predators and no hunting area.
_________________

If you like my post, consider giving me some KUDOS !!!!! Like you I need them

1 KUDOS received
Manager
Manager
Joined: 24 Aug 2010
Posts: 193
Location: Finland
Schools: Admitted: IESE($$),HEC, RSM,Esade
WE 1: 3.5 years international
Followers: 4

Kudos [?]: 42 [1] , given: 18

GMAT Tests User
Re: deer population [#permalink] New post 18 Oct 2010, 05:56
1
This post received
KUDOS
Pkit wrote:
With no natural predators and expanses of green suburban neighborhoods that allow no hunting, wildlife officials estimate the New Jersey deer population to have grown to exceed 175,000.

A. With no natural predators and expanses of green suburban neighborhoods that allow no hunting, wildlife officials estimate the New Jersey deer population to have

B. With no natural predators and with expanses of green suburban neighborhoods that donot allow hunting, wildlife officails' estimate of deer population in New Jersey has

C. With no natural predators and with expanses of green suburban neighborhoods where there is no hunting, the Deer Population in New Jersey, wildlife officials estimate, has

D. Without natural predators and no hunting allowed in expanses of green suburban neighborhoods, New Jersey has a deer population that wildlife officials estimate to have

E. Without natural predators and with expanses of green suburban neighbourhoods where there is no hunting, wildlife officials in New Jersey estimate a deer population that has

I go for C.
This problem is a very good example of ellipsis, as explained by Kaplan. Firstly, the negation is used wrongly. It should be "....no and no..." or "...no or ....". In this sentence the negation is applied to natural predators and to expanses of green suburban neighbourhoods, which is not the intended meaning.
Secondly, parallelism calls for the use of "with" on both sides of the parallel marker. Thirdly, "deer population" is a singular subject and requires a singular verb such as "has".
Lastly, the plural possessive noun (s') is almost always wrong on the GMAT.
Manager
Manager
Joined: 24 Aug 2010
Posts: 193
Location: Finland
Schools: Admitted: IESE($$),HEC, RSM,Esade
WE 1: 3.5 years international
Followers: 4

Kudos [?]: 42 [0], given: 18

GMAT Tests User
Re: deer population [#permalink] New post 18 Oct 2010, 06:09
Pkit wrote:
saxenashobhit wrote:
The starting modifier should modify deer population and not wildlife officials. So I am down with C and D.

I selected D as I felt two characteristics are desribed for 'in expanses of green suburban neighborhoods" - no predators and no hunting area.


I also was mislead by D.

One more reason why D is wrong because of parallelism. In D, the phrase "without" is applied to the whole main clause which goes against the meaning of the sentence. You have to use the word "with" in the second part before "no hunting..." in order to preserve the original meaning.
Manager
Manager
Joined: 13 Aug 2009
Posts: 154
WE 1: 4 years in IT
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 10 [0], given: 7

Re: deer population [#permalink] New post 19 Oct 2010, 04:09
D. Without natural predators and no hunting allowed in expanses of green suburban neighborhoods, New Jersey has a deer population that wildlife officials estimate to have

Modifier error in D ...Natural predators modifies new jersey wrongly...

C is best among.
SVP
SVP
User avatar
Joined: 16 Jul 2009
Posts: 1634
Schools: CBS
WE 1: 4 years (Consulting)
Followers: 25

Kudos [?]: 122 [0], given: 2

GMAT Tests User
Re: deer population [#permalink] New post 04 Jan 2011, 03:43
how can expanses of green suburban neighborhoods modify the deer population in C?
_________________

The sky is the limit
800 is the limit


Find out what's new at GMAT Club - latest features and updates

Intern
Intern
Status: I will it!!!
Affiliations: Certified Credit Card Banking Professional
Joined: 20 Jul 2010
Posts: 37
Schools: Chicago Booth, ISB
WE 1: 6 years in IT BFSI Cards application
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 11

CAT Tests
Re: deer population [#permalink] New post 04 Jan 2011, 08:55
I am not at all convinced as to how "With no natural predators....there is no hunting" --> modifies Deer Population ??
I was expecting the ans to be " D " because , the statement "With no natural predators...." modifies the place , which is New Jersey .

If you guys say that population is singular , hence "Have" in option D is wrong , then I did read somewhere that population can be singular OR plural depending on whether the population is being considered collectively or as individuals.

I am not 100% sure about what I am saying , but would request some more convincing answers as to why C is right ?

----------
C. With no natural predators and with expanses of green suburban neighborhoods where there is no hunting, the Deer Population in New Jersey, wildlife officials estimate, has

D. Without natural predators and no hunting allowed in expanses of green suburban neighborhoods, New Jersey has a deer population that wildlife officials estimate to have
----------
_________________

[align=]- Abhishek [/align]

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
Joined: 29 Nov 2012
Posts: 394
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 18 [0], given: 313

Re: With no natural predators and expanses of green suburban [#permalink] New post 19 Jun 2013, 02:01
Can someone provide a detailed explanation for this one? Thanks in advance!
1 KUDOS received
Director
Director
User avatar
Joined: 02 Sep 2012
Posts: 767
Location: Italy
Concentration: Finance, Entrepreneurship
GMAT Date: 08-02-2013
GPA: 3.8
Followers: 33

Kudos [?]: 513 [1] , given: 118

Re: With no natural predators and expanses of green suburban [#permalink] New post 19 Jun 2013, 02:13
1
This post received
KUDOS
fozzzy wrote:
Can someone provide a detailed explanation for this one? Thanks in advance!


We can solve this in under 10 seconds if we look at the inital phrase. In every option except C there are refering errors

A. With no natural predators and expanses of green suburban neighborhoods that allow no hunting, wildlife officials estimate the New Jersey deer population to have
B. With no natural predators and with expanses of green suburban neighborhoods that donot allow hunting, wildlife officails' estimate of deer population in New Jersey has
C. With no natural predators and with expanses of green suburban neighborhoods where there is no hunting, the Deer Population in New Jersey, wildlife officials estimate, has
D. Without natural predators and no hunting allowed in expanses of green suburban neighborhoods, New Jersey has a deer population that wildlife officials estimate to have
E. Without natural predators and with expanses of green suburban neighbourhoods where there is no hunting, wildlife officials in New Jersey estimate a deer population that has

I do not care about how the first part is written ("Without VS With no" etc...), about the grammar, but I know that this part refers to the deer population. Only C has this correct counstruct.
Take E for instance, it says that wildlife officials have no natural predators and so on... this is logically incorrect
_________________

If you have a garden and a library, you have everything you need.

Cicero , Ad Familiares IX

First rule about GMATClub : you do not talk about GMATClub ;)
Second rule about GMATClub : a great post deserves a +1 KUDOS

Tips and tricks: Inequalities , Mixture | Review: MGMAT workshop
Strategy: SmartGMAT v1.0 | Questions: Verbal challenge SC CR New SC set out !! , My Quant

Intern
Intern
Joined: 27 Apr 2013
Posts: 2
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 7

Re: With no natural predators and expanses of green suburban [#permalink] New post 19 Jun 2013, 07:57
I too selected D.I checked the explanation later.
But it somehow appeared the clause should modify the place and not deer population.

Thanks all for explaining.
Princeton Review Representative
User avatar
Joined: 17 Jun 2013
Posts: 10
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 0

Re: With no natural predators and expanses of green suburban [#permalink] New post 19 Jun 2013, 09:56
PTK wrote:
With no natural predators and expanses of green suburban neighborhoods that allow no hunting, wildlife officials estimate the New Jersey deer population to have grown to exceed 175,000.

A. With no natural predators and expanses of green suburban neighborhoods that allow no hunting, wildlife officials estimate the New Jersey deer population to have
B. With no natural predators and with expanses of green suburban neighborhoods that donot allow hunting, wildlife officails' estimate of deer population in new Jersey has
C. With no natural predators and with expanses of green suburban neighborhoods where there is no hunting, the Deer Population in New Jersey, wildlife officials estimate, has
D. Without natural predators and no hunting allowed in expanses of green suburban neighborhoods, New Jersey has a deer population that wildlife officials estimate to have
E. Without natural predators and with expanses of green suburban neighbourhoods where there is no hunting, wildlife officials in New Jersey estimate a deer population that has

There is a subject verb agreement issue at the end of the sentence. the population is singular so we need has - this eliminates A and D. B, C and D all have the same type of modifier so the way the begining is worded is not at issue adn teh different between without and with no is an issue of style, not grammar. B says that the officials estimate as grown, not the deer population so it changes the meaning and is wrong. In E the begining phrase modifies wildlife officials, not the deer population so E is wrong and C is hte best answer.
Re: With no natural predators and expanses of green suburban   [#permalink] 19 Jun 2013, 09:56
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
New posts 1 With no natural predators and expenses of green suburban dreamgmat1 7 08 Jul 2007, 11:46
New posts natural predators rohansherry 6 24 Aug 2009, 12:48
This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies. New 8 With no natural predators and expanses of green suburban rampuria 12 28 Aug 2009, 03:16
New posts 1 With no natural predators and expanses of green suburban udaymathapati 5 25 Apr 2011, 09:13
New posts Experts publish their posts in the topic No Natural predators GmatSlayer112 3 11 Jan 2012, 18:37
Display posts from previous: Sort by

With no natural predators and expanses of green suburban

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Privacy Policy| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.