Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

 It is currently 27 Aug 2016, 16:16

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

With no natural predators and expenses of green suburban

Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

Manager
Joined: 23 May 2007
Posts: 108
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 8 [0], given: 0

With no natural predators and expenses of green suburban [#permalink]

Show Tags

08 Jul 2007, 11:46
3
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00

Difficulty:

75% (hard)

Question Stats:

46% (01:59) correct 54% (01:30) wrong based on 180 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

With no natural predators and expenses of green suburban neighborhoods that allow no hunting, wildlife officials estimate the New Jersey deer population to have grown to exceed 175,000

A. With no natural predators and expenses of green suburban neighborhoods that allow no hunting, wildlife officials estimate the New Jersey deer population to have
B. With no natural predators and with expenses of green suburban neighbourhoods that do not allow hunting, wildlife officials' estimate of the deer population in New Jersey has
C. With no natural predators and with expenses of green suburban neighborhoods where there is no hunting, the deer population in New Jersey, wildlife officials estimate, has
D. Without natural predators and no hunting allowed in expense of green suburban neighborhoods, New Jersey has a deer pupulation that wildlife officials estimate to have
E. Without natural predators and with expenses of green neighborhoods where there is no hunting, wildlife officials in New Jersey estimate a deer population that has
[Reveal] Spoiler: OA

Last edited by JarvisR on 02 Jul 2015, 04:16, edited 1 time in total.
OA updated
Intern
Joined: 04 Feb 2007
Posts: 39
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 0

Re: With no natural predators and expenses of green suburban [#permalink]

Show Tags

08 Jul 2007, 12:14
C......

WITH NO..................., THE DEER_____________MODIFICATION.
Director
Joined: 17 Sep 2005
Posts: 924
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 65 [0], given: 0

Re: With no natural predators and expenses of green suburban [#permalink]

Show Tags

24 Sep 2007, 16:19
A long SC.

I would go with C.....Although long but clear....

- Brajesh
Director
Joined: 03 Sep 2006
Posts: 879
Followers: 6

Kudos [?]: 622 [0], given: 33

Re: With no natural predators and expenses of green suburban [#permalink]

Show Tags

24 Sep 2007, 18:51
dreamgmat1 wrote:
With no natural predators and expenses of green suburban neighborhoods that allow no hunting, wildlife officials estimate the New Jersey deer population to have grown to exceed 175,000

A. With no natural predators and expenses of green suburban neighborhoods that allow no hunting, wildlife officials estimate the New Jersey deer population to have

B. With no natural predators and with expenses of green suburban neighbourhoods that do not allow hunting, wildlife officials' estimate of the deer population in New Jersey has

C. With no natural predators and with expenses of green suburban neighborhoods where there is no hunting, the deer population in New Jersey, wildlife officials estimate, has

D. Without natural predators and no hunting allowed in expense of green suburban neighborhoods, New Jersey has a deer pupulation that wildlife officials estimate to have

E. Without natural predators and with expenses of green neighborhoods where there is no hunting, wildlife officials in New Jersey estimate a deer population that has

Usage of "with" makes no sense as far as the choices "A", "B" and "C" are concerned. So we narrow down to either one of "D" or "E".

D is incorrect because ....." populations" is singular and " estimate to have" is incorrect usage.

Thus "E".
CEO
Joined: 29 Mar 2007
Posts: 2583
Followers: 19

Kudos [?]: 373 [1] , given: 0

Re: With no natural predators and expenses of green suburban [#permalink]

Show Tags

24 Sep 2007, 20:20
1
KUDOS
1
This post was
BOOKMARKED
dreamgmat1 wrote:
With no natural predators and expenses of green suburban neighborhoods that allow no hunting, wildlife officials estimate the New Jersey deer population to have grown to exceed 175,000

A. With no natural predators and expenses of green suburban neighborhoods that allow no hunting, wildlife officials estimate the New Jersey deer population to have

B. With no natural predators and with expenses of green suburban neighbourhoods that do not allow hunting, wildlife officials' estimate of the deer population in New Jersey has

C. With no natural predators and with expenses of green suburban neighborhoods where there is no hunting, the deer population in New Jersey, wildlife officials estimate, has

D. Without natural predators and no hunting allowed in expense of green suburban neighborhoods, New Jersey has a deer pupulation that wildlife officials estimate to have

E. Without natural predators and with expenses of green neighborhoods where there is no hunting, wildlife officials in New Jersey estimate a deer population that has

This is a clear C.

"With no natural predators and expenses of green suburban neighborhoods that allow no hunting" -- cannot refer to anything but deers or deer population.
Manager
Joined: 10 Sep 2007
Posts: 161
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 6 [0], given: 0

Re: With no natural predators and expenses of green suburban [#permalink]

Show Tags

26 Sep 2007, 16:28
I first thought it was D but after re-reading the first sentence modifies deers not new jersey. A little wordy but i finally got it.

C
Manager
Joined: 20 Mar 2005
Posts: 170
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 65 [0], given: 0

Re: With no natural predators and expenses of green suburban [#permalink]

Show Tags

26 Sep 2007, 23:50
With no natural predators and with expenses of green suburban neighborhoods where there is no hunting, the deer population in New Jersey, wildlife officials estimate, has

the red part modifies the deer

Manager
Joined: 24 Jul 2007
Posts: 87
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 4 [0], given: 0

Re: With no natural predators and expenses of green suburban [#permalink]

Show Tags

01 Oct 2007, 20:55
late but C....

The fist clause needs to modify deer population....
GMAT Club Legend
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Posts: 9250
Followers: 804

Kudos [?]: 165 [0], given: 0

Re: With no natural predators and expenses of green suburban [#permalink]

Show Tags

20 Jul 2016, 15:49
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
Re: With no natural predators and expenses of green suburban   [#permalink] 20 Jul 2016, 15:49
Similar topics Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
With no natural predators and expanses of green suburban neighborhoods 0 02 Feb 2015, 06:04
2 With no natural predators and expanses of green suburban 6 25 Apr 2011, 09:13
58 With no natural predators and expanses of green suburban 29 18 Oct 2010, 01:29
18 With no natural predators and expanses of green suburban neighborhoods 14 04 Feb 2010, 00:18
12 With no natural predators and expanses of green suburban 12 28 Aug 2009, 03:16
Display posts from previous: Sort by