Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 29 Jun 2016, 14:56
GMAT Club Tests

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

Within 20 years it will probably be possible to identify the

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 10 Jan 2006
Posts: 89
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 2 [0], given: 0

Within 20 years it will probably be possible to identify the [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 28 Dec 2006, 03:35
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

93% (01:44) correct 7% (01:35) wrong based on 29 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

Within 20 years it will probably be possible to identify the genetic susceptibility an individual may have toward any particular disease. Eventually, effective strategies will be discovered to counteract each such susceptibility. Once these effective strategies are found, therefore, the people who follow them will never get sick.

The argument above is based on which of the following assumptions?

(A) For every disease there is only one strategy that can prevent its occurrence.
(B) In the future, genetics will be the only medical specialty of any importance.
(C) All human sicknesses are in part the result of individuals’ genetic susceptibilities
(D) All humans are genetically susceptible to some diseases.
(E) People will follow medical advice when they are convinced that it is effective.
Director
Director
avatar
Joined: 28 Dec 2005
Posts: 921
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 43 [0], given: 0

Re: Critical Reasoning _3:Within 20 years it will probably b [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 28 Dec 2006, 04:43
I will go with C. The author states genetic susceptibility to any disease.

MBA2ran wrote:
Within 20 years it will probably be possible to identify the genetic susceptibility an individual may have toward any particular disease. Eventually, effective strategies will be discovered to counteract each such susceptibility. Once these effective strategies are found, therefore, the people who follow them will never get sick.

The argument above is based on which of the following assumptions?

(A) For every disease there is only one strategy that can prevent its occurrence.
(B) In the future, genetics will be the only medical specialty of any importance.
(C) All human sicknesses are in part the result of individuals’ genetic susceptibilities
(D) All humans are genetically susceptible to some diseases.
(E) People will follow medical advice when they are convinced that it is effective.
1 KUDOS received
Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 03 Dec 2006
Posts: 77
Location: London
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 4 [1] , given: 0

 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 28 Dec 2006, 04:46
1
This post received
KUDOS
My pick is C.

(C) All human sicknesses are in part the result of individuals’ genetic susceptibilities

If all sicknesses are in part the result of individuals’ genetic susceptibilities, then people who follow the strategies will never get sick.
However, if some sicknesses are a result of something other than genetic susceptibilities, then the argument won't stand.

Therefore the argument is based on C
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 17 Aug 2005
Posts: 392
Location: Boston, MA
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 59 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 28 Dec 2006, 08:33
C.
argument assumes that all diseases are a result of susceptibilities. Otherwise they would not be able to prevent all people from getting sick.
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 19 Jul 2006
Posts: 361
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 4 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 28 Dec 2006, 08:38
buckkitty wrote:
C.
argument assumes that all diseases are a result of susceptibilities. Otherwise they would not be able to prevent all people from getting sick.


Agree C
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
Joined: 04 Nov 2006
Posts: 267
Location: California
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 139 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 28 Dec 2006, 12:43
very much C...
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 22 Oct 2006
Posts: 74
Location: India
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 2 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 28 Dec 2006, 15:32
Agree with C
VP
VP
User avatar
Joined: 25 Jun 2006
Posts: 1172
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 118 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 28 Dec 2006, 22:48
OG qn. C.
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 05 Oct 2006
Posts: 267
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 12 [0], given: 0

Re: Critical Reasoning _3:Within 20 years it will probably b [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 28 Dec 2006, 23:27
choice C..
Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 19 Aug 2006
Posts: 217
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 26 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 29 Dec 2006, 07:50
Its C.
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
Joined: 24 Nov 2006
Posts: 350
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 18 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 31 Dec 2006, 17:15
One more for C. To infer that people will never get sick, we need an assumption stating that all diseases are in fact the result of genetic susceptibilities.
GMAT Club Legend
GMAT Club Legend
User avatar
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Posts: 8102
Followers: 739

Kudos [?]: 152 [0], given: 0

Premium Member
Re: Within 20 years it will probably be possible to identify the [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 14 Jun 2016, 11:49
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
Re: Within 20 years it will probably be possible to identify the   [#permalink] 14 Jun 2016, 11:49
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
2 Manager: Last year, within the sales division Source: Powerscore apoorv601 1 04 Jun 2015, 04:01
Experts publish their posts in the topic It is probably within the reach of human technology to make TGC 3 30 Jan 2013, 22:20
Within 20 years it will probably be possible to identify the lys8207 4 21 Jan 2010, 15:16
It is probably within the reach of human technology to make vineetgupta 2 12 Apr 2007, 04:24
Within 20 years it will probably be possible to identify the ayushi 8 18 Oct 2006, 16:00
Display posts from previous: Sort by

Within 20 years it will probably be possible to identify the

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.