Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

It appears that you are browsing the GMAT Club forum unregistered!

Signing up is free, quick, and confidential.
Join other 500,000 members and get the full benefits of GMAT Club

Registration gives you:

Tests

Take 11 tests and quizzes from GMAT Club and leading GMAT prep companies such as Manhattan GMAT,
Knewton, and others. All are free for GMAT Club members.

Applicant Stats

View detailed applicant stats such as GPA, GMAT score, work experience, location, application
status, and more

Books/Downloads

Download thousands of study notes,
question collections, GMAT Club’s
Grammar and Math books.
All are free!

Thank you for using the timer!
We noticed you are actually not timing your practice. Click the START button first next time you use the timer.
There are many benefits to timing your practice, including:

Working alone at its constant rate, machine K took 3 hours [#permalink]

Show Tags

29 Nov 2012, 22:44

2

This post received KUDOS

6

This post was BOOKMARKED

00:00

A

B

C

D

E

Difficulty:

15% (low)

Question Stats:

77% (02:55) correct
23% (01:44) wrong based on 197 sessions

HideShow timer Statictics

Working alone at its constant rate, machine K took 3 hours to produce 1/4 of the units produced last Friday. Then machine M started working and the two machines, working simultaneously at their respective constant rates, took 6 hours to produce the rest of the units produced last Friday. How many hours would it have taken machine M, working alone at its constant rate, to produce all of the units produced last Friday?

Re: No hours machine M takes to do last friday's work alone [#permalink]

Show Tags

29 Nov 2012, 23:09

1

This post received KUDOS

Lets assume the work to be something like moving 24 bricks. (Three fourths of 24 gives a multiple of 6 & one fourth of 24 gives a multiple of 3. Hence we are selecting 24 for ease of calculation. This method should work fine for any number) Machine K works at 2 bricks per hour K & M together work at 3 bricks per hour So, M works at 1 brick per hour So, M working alone would have took 24 hours.

Answer should be D _________________

Did you find this post helpful?... Please let me know through the Kudos button.

Re: No hours machine M takes to do last friday's work alone [#permalink]

Show Tags

30 Nov 2012, 00:21

the explanation sounds logical and the correct answer to this is D.Though,that's the (pick an answer an work upon) approach.how can we approach the same question through the conventional method (conceptual), by taking out the respective rates etc.can any one explain?

Re: No hours machine M takes to do last friday's work alone [#permalink]

Show Tags

30 Nov 2012, 00:32

3

This post received KUDOS

samdarsh88 wrote:

the explanation sounds logical and the correct answer to this is D.Though,that's the (pick an answer an work upon) approach.how can we approach the same question through the conventional method (conceptual), by taking out the respective rates etc.can any one explain?

1st 2nd and 3 columns are Rate, Time and Work done.

R * 3 = 1/4 so rate of K = 1/12

Now 3/4 of the job is done by both K and M in 6 hrs

(1/12 + rate of M ) * 6 = 3/4 solving we get rate of M = 1/24

Re: No hours machine M takes to do last friday's work alone [#permalink]

Show Tags

30 Nov 2012, 01:31

samdarsh88 wrote:

the explanation sounds logical and the correct answer to this is D.Though,that's the (pick an answer an work upon) approach.how can we approach the same question through the conventional method (conceptual), by taking out the respective rates etc.can any one explain?

As I mentioned in my previous comment, I was not picking an answer. Rather I was just picking a smart number. In this case both happened to be the same. The same method would work just as well with any other number.

Illustration :

Lets assume the work to be making 30 bricks :

\(Rate of Machine K = \frac{30}{4*3} = \frac{30}{12}\)

\(Rate of K & M together = \frac{30*3}{4*6} = \frac{90}{24} = \frac{45}{12}\)

\(Rate of machine M = \frac{45}{12} - \frac{30}{12} = \frac{15}{12} = \frac{5}{4}\)

\(Machine M alone = \frac{30}{5/4} = \frac{120}{5} = 24\)

So, we can see that answer is still 24. I had picked 24 only to avoid fractions. _________________

Did you find this post helpful?... Please let me know through the Kudos button.

Re: Working alone at its constant rate, machine K took 3 hours [#permalink]

Show Tags

30 Nov 2012, 03:18

3

This post received KUDOS

Expert's post

1

This post was BOOKMARKED

samdarsh88 wrote:

Working alone at its constant rate, machine K took 3 hours to produce 1/4 of the units produced last Friday. Then machine M started working and the two machines, working simultaneously at their respective constant rates, took 6 hours to produce the rest of the units produced last Friday. How many hours would it have taken machine M, working alone at its constant rate, to produce all of the units produced last Friday?

A. 8 B. 12 C. 16 D. 24 E. 30

Given that machines M and K, working together, can produce 3/4 of units in 6 hours. Since also given that machine K can produce 1/4 of units in 3 hours, then in 6 hours it can produce 2/4 of units. Which means that when working together, machine M produced 3/4-2/4=1/4 of units in 6 hours, thus it needs 6*4=24 hours to produce all of the units.

Re: Working alone at its constant rate, machine K took 3 hours [#permalink]

Show Tags

20 Nov 2014, 17:37

Hello from the GMAT Club BumpBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email. _________________

Re: Working alone at its constant rate, machine K took 3 hours [#permalink]

Show Tags

18 Dec 2015, 10:06

Hello from the GMAT Club BumpBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email. _________________

Re: Working alone at its constant rate, machine K took 3 hours [#permalink]

Show Tags

21 Dec 2015, 14:03

Would be curious to know whether veritasprep's joint variation method would apply here. Or am I missing the point of the joint variation method to begin with...

Re: Working alone at its constant rate, machine K took 3 hours [#permalink]

Show Tags

21 Dec 2015, 16:44

samdarsh88 wrote:

Working alone at its constant rate, machine K took 3 hours to produce 1/4 of the units produced last Friday. Then machine M started working and the two machines, working simultaneously at their respective constant rates, took 6 hours to produce the rest of the units produced last Friday. How many hours would it have taken machine M, working alone at its constant rate, to produce all of the units produced last Friday?

A. 8 B. 12 C. 16 D. 24 E. 30

Machine K in 6 hours produced 2/4 As Machine K already had produced 1/4, so machine M produced only 1/4 in 6 hours

1/4x = 6 x = 24

gmatclubot

Re: Working alone at its constant rate, machine K took 3 hours
[#permalink]
21 Dec 2015, 16:44

So, my final tally is in. I applied to three b schools in total this season: INSEAD – admitted MIT Sloan – admitted Wharton – waitlisted and dinged No...

HBS alum talks about effective altruism and founding and ultimately closing MBAs Across America at TED: Casey Gerald speaks at TED2016 – Dream, February 15-19, 2016, Vancouver Convention Center...