|
Author |
Message |
|
TAGS:
|
|
|
Manager
Joined: 10 Oct 2008
Posts: 61
Followers: 1
Kudos [?]:
0
[0], given: 0
|
Working alone at its constant rate, machine K took 3 hours [#permalink]
05 Nov 2008, 19:50
Working alone at its constant rate, machine K took 3 hours to produce of the units produced last Friday. Then machine M started working and the two machines, working simultaneously at their respective constant rates, took 6 hours to produce the rest of the units produced last Friday. How many hours would it have taken machine M, working alone at its constant rate, to produce all of the units produced last Friday?
A. 8 B. 12 C. 16 D. 24 E. 30
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intern
Joined: 04 Nov 2008
Posts: 15
Followers: 0
Kudos [?]:
1
[0], given: 0
|
tough question. I did not understand the question...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Similar topics |
Author |
Replies |
Last post |
|
Similar Topics:
|
|
|
|
Working alone at its own constant rate, a machine seals k
|
acfuture |
4 |
28 May 2006, 19:52 |
|
|
|
Working alone at its own constant rate, a machine seals k
|
axl169 |
2 |
10 Oct 2006, 15:46 |
|
1
|
|
Working alone at its constant rate, machine K took 3 hours
|
sset009 |
3 |
26 Jul 2008, 09:32 |
|
|
|
Working alone at its constant rate, machine K took 3 hours
|
caiyun |
1 |
06 Nov 2008, 09:41 |
|
4
|
|
Working alone at its constant rate, machine K took 3 hours
|
samdarsh88 |
7 |
29 Nov 2012, 22:44 |
|
|
|
|
|
|