|
Author |
Message |
|
TAGS:
|
|
|
Manager
Joined: 29 Sep 2006
Posts: 95
Followers: 1
Kudos [?]:
1
[0], given: 0
|
Working shorter workweeks causes managers to feel less [#permalink]
 12 Oct 2006, 10:07
Question Stats:
0% (00:00) correct
 0% (00:00) wrong based on 0 sessions
Working shorter workweeks causes managers to feel less stress than does working longer workweeks. In addition, greater perceived control over one’s work life reduces stress levels. It can be concluded, therefore, that shorter workweeks cause managers to feel they have more control over their work life.
The argument made above uses which of the following questionable techniques?
(A) Associating two conditions as cause and effect on the basis of their being causally associated with the same phenomenon
(B) Taking for granted that two factors that have a certain effect individually produce that effect more strongly when both act together
(C) Assuming what it sets out to prove
(D) Using an irrelevant point in order to draw a conclusion
(E) Basing a conclusion on preconceived views about the needs of managers
please explain
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior Manager
Joined: 13 Sep 2006
Posts: 286
Location: New York
Followers: 1
Kudos [?]:
0
[0], given: 0
|
A seems like the best to me.
B - Not true (no where does it say a greater effect is produced)
C,D,E - not applicable/irrelevant
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior Manager
Joined: 11 Jul 2006
Posts: 386
Location: TX
Followers: 1
Kudos [?]:
5
[0], given: 0
|
Going with B
X causes Y
Z causes Y
Does that mean X causes Z ?
B is irrelevant and out of scope.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior Manager
Joined: 13 Sep 2006
Posts: 286
Location: New York
Followers: 1
Kudos [?]:
0
[0], given: 0
|
What is the OA/OE and where is this question from please. Thanks
_________________
"Never let the fear of striking out get in your wayâ€
|
|
|
|
|
|
Director
Joined: 23 Jun 2005
Posts: 853
GMAT 1: 740 Q48 V42
Followers: 3
Kudos [?]:
9
[0], given: 1
|
Straight a.
Shorter work week --> less stress
More control over work --> less stress
So, the specious argument: Shorter work week = more control over work.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Manager
Joined: 29 Sep 2006
Posts: 95
Followers: 1
Kudos [?]:
1
[0], given: 0
|
OA is A
Matrix 02, this question is from CR-1000
|
|
|
|
|
|
VP
Joined: 25 Jun 2006
Posts: 1185
Followers: 1
Kudos [?]:
16
[0], given: 0
|
A 2
|
|
|
|
|
|
Director
Joined: 18 Jul 2006
Posts: 536
Followers: 1
Kudos [?]:
14
[0], given: 0
|
straight A.
|
|
|
|
|
|
VP
Joined: 21 Mar 2006
Posts: 1138
Location: Bangalore
Followers: 2
Kudos [?]:
14
[0], given: 0
|
Matrix02 wrote: A seems like the best to me.
B - Not true (no where does it say a greater effect is produced)
C,D,E - not applicable/irrelevant
The argument does not say anything about combined effect of shorter workweeks and greater control.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Manager
Joined: 31 Aug 2006
Posts: 215
Followers: 1
Kudos [?]:
2
[0], given: 0
|
My answer (A)
Only (A) and (B) were close. And (B) could be true only if the conclusion was something like "It can be concluded, therefore, that shorter workweeks and greater perceived control over one’s work life causes the stress to be reduced to null/nill."
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current Student
Joined: 29 Jan 2005
Posts: 5289
Followers: 17
Kudos [?]:
91
[0], given: 0
|
ayushi wrote: Working shorter workweeks causes managers to feel less stress than does working longer workweeks. In addition, greater perceived control over one’s work life reduces stress levels. It can be concluded, therefore, that shorter workweeks cause managers to feel they have more control over their work life.
The argument made above uses which of the following questionable techniques?
(A) Associating two conditions as cause and effect on the basis of their
please explain
Wouldn't that be nice... more like a "pipe dream." 
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Moderators:
metallicafan, rajeevrks27, souvik101990, PTK, MacFauz, noboru, kissthegmat, carcass, willigetmylifeback, mikemcgarry, doe007, Vercules, Legendaddy, tuanquang269, RaviChandra, Marcab, Narenn
|
close
