Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

It appears that you are browsing the GMAT Club forum unregistered!

Signing up is free, quick, and confidential.
Join other 500,000 members and get the full benefits of GMAT Club

Registration gives you:

Tests

Take 11 tests and quizzes from GMAT Club and leading GMAT prep companies such as Manhattan GMAT,
Knewton, and others. All are free for GMAT Club members.

Applicant Stats

View detailed applicant stats such as GPA, GMAT score, work experience, location, application
status, and more

Books/Downloads

Download thousands of study notes,
question collections, GMAT Club’s
Grammar and Math books.
All are free!

Thank you for using the timer!
We noticed you are actually not timing your practice. Click the START button first next time you use the timer.
There are many benefits to timing your practice, including:

x^2 - 3x -10 > 0 ? Seems pretty easy, but I need someone [#permalink]

Show Tags

09 Sep 2008, 18:59

This topic is locked. If you want to discuss this question please re-post it in the respective forum.

x^2 - 3x -10 > 0 ?

Seems pretty easy, but I need someone to confirm if my logic is correct.

This is what I learned way back in the HS days.

Step 1. Factor

(x-5)(x+2) > 0

Step 2. Solve X > 5 and X > -2

Step 3. If a solution has a negative sign (in this example it would be x > -2 ), then you flip the sign, and doing so would will you the correct solution.

X > -2 - flip it and it becomes X< -2

Step 4. Confirm Solution

x>5, and x<-2

Is this correct for all cases (especially for step 3, which I am not confident about).

Re: How do you solve this inequality algebraically? [#permalink]

Show Tags

09 Sep 2008, 21:17

also not sure about your rule but agree with the solution.

since (x-5)(x+2) > 0, both terms should be either +ve or -ve. Then only (x-5)(x+2) becomes greater than 0. to achieve bother terms either only +ve or only -ve, x must be either greater than 5 or smaller than -2.
_________________

Re: How do you solve this inequality algebraically? [#permalink]

Show Tags

10 Sep 2008, 06:48

bigfernhead wrote:

Can someone prove my Step #3 Wrong? I've tried about 10 different samples, and all of them worked...

(x-5)(x+2) > 0

is possible when both (x-5) and (x-2) are +ve or both negative.

two solutions. (1) x-5>0 and x+2>0 ----> x>5 and x>-2 ----> x>5 (this includes x>-2 also) (2) x-5<0 and x+2<0 ---> x<5 and x<-2 ---> x<-2(this inclludes x<5 also)

so final solution is : x<-2 or x>5
_________________

Your attitude determines your altitude Smiling wins more friends than frowning

Re: How do you solve this inequality algebraically? [#permalink]

Show Tags

10 Sep 2008, 20:05

Suresh, scthakur - Try this example, and tell me what solutions you get?

X^2+2x-15<0

x2suresh wrote:

bigfernhead wrote:

Can someone prove my Step #3 Wrong? I've tried about 10 different samples, and all of them worked...

(x-5)(x+2) > 0

is possible when both (x-5) and (x-2) are +ve or both negative.

two solutions. (1) x-5>0 and x+2>0 ----> x>5 and x>-2 ----> x>5 (this includes x>-2 also) (2) x-5<0 and x+2<0 ---> x<5 and x<-2 ---> x<-2(this inclludes x<5 also)

Re: How do you solve this inequality algebraically? [#permalink]

Show Tags

10 Sep 2008, 21:53

can we apply the principle presented in the Step-3 above when both the solutions are negative

eg. x^2+8x+15>0 (x+5)(x+3) > 0

1) when both (x+5) and (x+3) are +ve, we have x > -5 and x > -3 , this essentially means x > -3 2) when both (x+5) and (x+3) are -ve, we have x < -5 and x < -3 , this essentially means x < -5

so -3 < x <-5

If we try and apply step 3

on solving the equation we get (x+5)(x+3) > 0 x> -5 and x>-3 so reversing the signs we get x<-5 and x<-3

i guess it is not working or did I miss something ?
_________________

"You have to find it. No one else can find it for you." - Bjorn Borg

Re: How do you solve this inequality algebraically? [#permalink]

Show Tags

10 Sep 2008, 22:00

amitdgr wrote:

can we apply the principle presented in the Step-3 above when both the solutions are negative

eg. x^2+8x+15>0 (x+5)(x+3) > 0

1) when both (x+5) and (x+3) are +ve, we have x > -5 and x > -3 , this essentially means x > -3 2) when both (x+5) and (x+3) are -ve, we have x < -5 and x < -3 , this essentially means x < -5

so -3 < x <-5

If we try and apply step 3

on solving the equation we get (x+5)(x+3) > 0 x> -5 and x>-3 so reversing the signs we get x<-5 and x<-3

i guess it is not working or did I miss something ?

I would prefer the basic principle. If the multiplication of two algebraic expressions is negative, one of them will be negative and another one will be positive.

Thus, if (x+5)(x-3) < 0 then either (x+5) < 0 and (x-3) > 0 or (x+5) > 0 and (x-3) < 0

If (x+5) < 0 and (x-3) > 0 then, x < -5 and x > 3 which is illogical. Hence, disregard.

However, if (x+5) > 0 and (x-3) < 0 then x > -5 and x < 3 and hence this will be the solution.

Re: How do you solve this inequality algebraically? [#permalink]

Show Tags

10 Sep 2008, 22:21

scthakur wrote:

amitdgr wrote:

can we apply the principle presented in the Step-3 above when both the solutions are negative

eg. x^2+8x+15>0 (x+5)(x+3) > 0

1) when both (x+5) and (x+3) are +ve, we have x > -5 and x > -3 , this essentially means x > -3 2) when both (x+5) and (x+3) are -ve, we have x < -5 and x < -3 , this essentially means x < -5

so -3 < x <-5

If we try and apply step 3

on solving the equation we get (x+5)(x+3) > 0 x> -5 and x>-3 so reversing the signs we get x<-5 and x<-3

i guess it is not working or did I miss something ?

I would prefer the basic principle. If the multiplication of two algebraic expressions is negative, one of them will be negative and another one will be positive.

Thus, if (x+5)(x-3) < 0 then either (x+5) < 0 and (x-3) > 0 or (x+5) > 0 and (x-3) < 0

If (x+5) < 0 and (x-3) > 0 then, x < -5 and x > 3 which is illogical. Hence, disregard.

However, if (x+5) > 0 and (x-3) < 0 then x > -5 and x < 3 and hence this will be the solution.

Thanks scthakur , how would you solve for (x+5)(x+3) > 0 ?
_________________

"You have to find it. No one else can find it for you." - Bjorn Borg

Re: How do you solve this inequality algebraically? [#permalink]

Show Tags

11 Sep 2008, 12:02

I think this problem is easy if you just graph it.

The graph of this equation is a parabola with x intercepts 5 and -2. Additionally, since the leading term in the equation is positive the parabola opens up, like a U.

Thus, the value of this equation must be greater than 0 when x < -2 or x > 5.

Re: How do you solve this inequality algebraically? [#permalink]

Show Tags

11 Sep 2008, 19:50

You're right, it doesn't work. Thanks for proving me wrong.

amitdgr wrote:

can we apply the principle presented in the Step-3 above when both the solutions are negative

eg. x^2+8x+15>0 (x+5)(x+3) > 0

1) when both (x+5) and (x+3) are +ve, we have x > -5 and x > -3 , this essentially means x > -3 2) when both (x+5) and (x+3) are -ve, we have x < -5 and x < -3 , this essentially means x < -5

so -3 < x <-5

If we try and apply step 3

on solving the equation we get (x+5)(x+3) > 0 x> -5 and x>-3 so reversing the signs we get x<-5 and x<-3

i guess it is not working or did I miss something ?

Re: How do you solve this inequality algebraically? [#permalink]

Show Tags

11 Sep 2008, 20:40

For quadratic inequalities

1) ax² + bx + c > 0 , where a > 0 and say p and q are the roots ( q having smaller value and p the larger value) then the inequality will hold good for values of x where x>p and x<q, in other words ; when the inequality sign is greater than, the value of x does not lie between the two roots p and q

2) ax² + bx + c < 0 , where a > 0 and say p and q are the roots ( q having smaller value and p the larger value) then the inequality will hold good for values of x where q < x < p, in other words ; when the inequality sign is lesser than , the value of x lies between the two roots p and q
_________________

"You have to find it. No one else can find it for you." - Bjorn Borg