Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 22 Oct 2014, 00:13

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

XYZ, aquatic mammals inhabiting Florida s rivers and coastal

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:
3 KUDOS received
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 25 Jul 2011
Posts: 50
Location: United Kingdom
Concentration: Finance, Strategy
Schools: Schulich (A)
GMAT 1: 660 Q49 V31
GPA: 3.13
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 10 [3] , given: 7

XYZ, aquatic mammals inhabiting Florida s rivers and coastal [#permalink] New post 26 Jul 2011, 06:04
3
This post received
KUDOS
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

  55% (hard)

Question Stats:

62% (02:36) correct 38% (01:58) wrong based on 344 sessions
XYZ, aquatic mammals inhabiting Florida’s rivers and coastal waters, swim close to the surface and are frequently killed in collisions with boats. To address the problem, boat traffic in XYZ-populated waters is being required to maintain very low speeds. Unfortunately, XYZs are unable to hear low-pitched sounds and a boat’s sound lowers in pitch as the boats slows. Therefore, this approach may in fact make things worse rather than better.

Question) Which of the following if true would strengthen the conclusion?

a) The areas where boats would have to maintain low speeds were decided partly on the basis of XYZ-population estimates and partly from numbers of reported collisions between XYZ and boats.

b) Because the water hyacinth that XYZ feed on grow best in water that is nearly still, water hyacinth beds can be disturbed or damaged by fast-moving boat traffic.

c) Over the last several decades, boat traffic in Florida’s coastal waters has been increasing almost continuously and now represents the greater threat to the endangered XYZ population.

d) The sound of a boat engine generally travels much further under water than it does through the air.

e) When experimenters exposed XYZs to the recorded sounds of boats moving at various speeds, the creature were unable to discern the sounds over normal background noise.
[Reveal] Spoiler: OA
3 KUDOS received
Current Student
User avatar
Joined: 05 Jul 2011
Posts: 316
Location: United States (CA)
Concentration: Marketing, Entrepreneurship
GMAT 1: 620 Q39 V35
GMAT 2: 620 Q43 V33
GMAT 3: 730 Q50 V40
Followers: 10

Kudos [?]: 66 [3] , given: 3

Re: Mammal Inhabiting waters [#permalink] New post 26 Jul 2011, 09:08
3
This post received
KUDOS
Answer is E , explained below :
UtterNonsense wrote:
XYZ, aquatic mammals inhabiting Florida’s rivers and coastal waters, swim close to the surface and are frequently killed in collisions with boats. To address the problem, boat traffic in XYZ-populated waters is being required to maintain very low speeds. Unfortunately, XYZs are unable to hear low-pitched sounds and a boat’s sound lowers in pitch as the boats slows. Therefore, this approach may in fact make things worse rather than better.

Question) [b]Which of the following if true would strengthen the conclusion?[/b]

Answer should essentially hint/provide evidence that low speed boats are not effective

a) The areas where boats would have to maintain low speeds were decided partly on the basis of XYZ-population estimates and partly from numbers of reported collisions between XYZ and boats.
Ok..but this does not address the low speed collision problem in anyway.Eliminate

b) Because the water hyacinth that XYZ feed on grow best in water that is nearly still, water hyacinth beds can be disturbed or damaged by fast-moving boat traffic.
Irrelevant.Eliminate

c) Over the last several decades, boat traffic in Florida’s coastal waters has been increasing almost continuously and now represents the greater threat to the endangered XYZ population.
Maybe ..but still does not answer anything about low speeds.Eliminate

d) The sound of a boat engine generally travels much further under water than it does through the air.
Irrelevant fact . fast as well as slow boat engine's sounds will travel much further under water.Eliminate

e) When experimenters exposed XYZs to the recorded sounds of boats moving at various speeds, the creature were unable to discern the sounds over normal background noise.
Bingo ! since XYZ cannot discern the boat sounds over normal background noise of boats moving at various speeds,low boat speed law doesn't really affect the collisions issue as it doesn't matter if the boats are traveling fast or slow.
XYZ are not able to discren the boat sound regardless of the speed is the key here .


_________________

My GMAT Debrief : http://gmatclub.com/forum/third-time-s-a-charm-142800.html#p1145912
Quant Concept Videos : http://gmatlife.blogspot.com/2012/07/gm ... ideos.html
My GMAT Blog : http://gmatlife.blogspot.com/

1 KUDOS received
Current Student
User avatar
Joined: 05 Jul 2011
Posts: 316
Location: United States (CA)
Concentration: Marketing, Entrepreneurship
GMAT 1: 620 Q39 V35
GMAT 2: 620 Q43 V33
GMAT 3: 730 Q50 V40
Followers: 10

Kudos [?]: 66 [1] , given: 3

Re: Mammal Inhabiting waters [#permalink] New post 26 Jul 2011, 12:28
1
This post received
KUDOS
^^^ you are right . the conclusion for the arguments is "this approach may in fact make things worse rather than better"
E doesn't necessarily make things worse but thats the only one in the answer choices that is very close to the expected option.
none of the other answer choices even fit the argument
_________________

My GMAT Debrief : http://gmatclub.com/forum/third-time-s-a-charm-142800.html#p1145912
Quant Concept Videos : http://gmatlife.blogspot.com/2012/07/gm ... ideos.html
My GMAT Blog : http://gmatlife.blogspot.com/

Expert Post
1 KUDOS received
Magoosh GMAT Instructor
User avatar
Joined: 28 Nov 2011
Posts: 305
Followers: 308

Kudos [?]: 486 [1] , given: 2

CAT Tests
Re: XYZ, aquatic mammals inhabiting Florida s rivers and coastal [#permalink] New post 15 Mar 2012, 13:17
1
This post received
KUDOS
Expert's post
What I like about CR is the feeling of sudden awareness that an answer choice is correct; everything just clicks into place.

With this question, there were no clicks. In fact, I found (E) to be WEAKENING the conclusion. Of course no other answer choices worked, but we can't work by default here, and choose the answer choice that is most relevant to the prompt (in this case (E).

But just to run a little experiment, let me argue for (E) to illustrate what I must do in order to make this answer choice work.

(E) says that XYZ cannot tell the difference between low-pitched and high-pitched sounds. But a slow boat spends more time moving across a body of water, so that gives XYZ more time to collide with it. Therefore, slow boats are more dangerous.

That answer may seem sensible, but I am doing a few things you should never do on GMAT Critical Reasoning. First off, I am discounting part of the conclusion, which states: slow boats are more dangerous to XYZ than are fast boats, because XYZ cannot hear slow boats.

Secondly, I am making some inferences that are not backed up by the passage (and indeed may not be backed up by reality). Namely, that XYZ is more likely to collide with a slow moving object.

Here nothing is "clicking into place," and I have to really labor to come up with an answer. The less straightforward the reasoning the more likely the given answer choice is wrong.

So it is only by breaking rules fundamental to GMAT that I can conceivably make (E) work. So (E) is definitely NOT the answer

The question--which I like, besides the prosaic tag XYZ (couldn't we just say hu-manatee)--is therefore broken. To fix it, all we would need to do is to add the word WEAKEN to the question. As in:

Which one of the following would WEAKEN the conclusion.

Then, the answer is clearly (E). The conclusion states that XYZ is likely to hear low-pitch than high pitch. (E) says that XYZ is unable to determine the difference).

So again, there is NO ANSWER to the question. It is faulty, but can easily be emended by the addition of one word.
_________________

Christopher Lele
Magoosh Test Prep


Image

Image


Last edited by ChrisLele on 19 Mar 2012, 17:57, edited 2 times in total.
Intern
Intern
User avatar
Joined: 29 Jun 2011
Posts: 38
Location: Yugoslavia
Concentration: International Business, Entrepreneurship
GMAT 1: 700 Q48 V38
GPA: 3.72
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 4 [0], given: 3

GMAT ToolKit User
Re: Mammal Inhabiting waters [#permalink] New post 26 Jul 2011, 08:22
Good question, I got it wrong but E does make the most sense.
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 25 Jul 2011
Posts: 50
Location: United Kingdom
Concentration: Finance, Strategy
Schools: Schulich (A)
GMAT 1: 660 Q49 V31
GPA: 3.13
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 10 [0], given: 7

Re: Mammal Inhabiting waters [#permalink] New post 26 Jul 2011, 08:31
Yeah E makes most sense but I was hoping if someone could provide an explanation
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 25 Jul 2011
Posts: 50
Location: United Kingdom
Concentration: Finance, Strategy
Schools: Schulich (A)
GMAT 1: 660 Q49 V31
GPA: 3.13
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 10 [0], given: 7

Re: Mammal Inhabiting waters [#permalink] New post 26 Jul 2011, 09:40
Zynga wrote:
Answer is E , explained below :
XYZ, aquatic mammals inhabiting Florida’s rivers and coastal waters, swim close to the surface and are frequently killed in collisions with boats. To address the problem, boat traffic in XYZ-populated waters is being required to maintain very low speeds. Unfortunately, XYZs are unable to hear low-pitched sounds and a boat’s sound lowers in pitch as the boats slows. Therefore, this approach may in fact make things worse rather than better.

Question) [b]Which of the following if true would strengthen the conclusion?[/b]

Answer should essentially hint/provide evidence that low speed boats are not effective
e) When experimenters exposed XYZs to the recorded sounds of boats moving at various speeds, the creature were unable to discern the sounds over normal background noise.
Bingo ! since XYZ cannot discern the boat sounds over normal background noise of boats moving at various speeds,low boat speed law doesn't really affect the collisions issue as it doesn't matter if the boats are traveling fast or slow.
XYZ are not able to discren the boat sound regardless of the speed is the key here .

[/quote]

As you pointed out that this approach [slow boats] would make situation worse rather than improve it so if the mammal are not able to distinguish than slow boats are as bad as fast boats so it doesn't really effect [as you mentioned the answer should be] but since it doesn't effect then it would mean that it just wouldn't improve the situation. Is that what we are looking for in the answer - since no change in situation so he it doesn't improve it hence it does the opposite i.e. makes it worse?
Manager
Manager
User avatar
Status: Writing my first GMAT on MArch 28/2012
Joined: 13 Sep 2010
Posts: 124
Location: Canada
Concentration: Finance, International Business
Schools: Schulich, Rotman '15
GMAT Date: 03-28-2012
GPA: 2.8
WE: Corporate Finance (Other)
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 24 [0], given: 9

Re: Mammal Inhabiting waters [#permalink] New post 26 Jul 2011, 11:52
certainly a tough one, I understand that we are making the speed irrelevant, but is the conclusion not "Therefore, this approach may in fact make things worse rather than better." So strengthening this argument would mean that the approach will make things worse than better? I get E is the right answer I'm not arguing that but I guess my concern is what am I missing about the conclusion rather then the answer :?
_________________

“Focus on the journey, not the destination. Joy is found not in finishing an activity but in doing it.” - Greg Anderson

Follow my Journey at: nphelan-s-road-to-117533.html

Kudos? Don't mind if I do!

Manager
Manager
User avatar
Status: Writing my first GMAT on MArch 28/2012
Joined: 13 Sep 2010
Posts: 124
Location: Canada
Concentration: Finance, International Business
Schools: Schulich, Rotman '15
GMAT Date: 03-28-2012
GPA: 2.8
WE: Corporate Finance (Other)
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 24 [0], given: 9

Re: Mammal Inhabiting waters [#permalink] New post 26 Jul 2011, 16:37
ahh i see i guess that makes sense! thanks, kudos!
_________________

“Focus on the journey, not the destination. Joy is found not in finishing an activity but in doing it.” - Greg Anderson

Follow my Journey at: nphelan-s-road-to-117533.html

Kudos? Don't mind if I do!

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 26 Sep 2010
Posts: 114
GMAT 1: 680 Q49 V34
GPA: 3.65
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 0

Re: Mammal Inhabiting waters [#permalink] New post 07 Aug 2011, 02:10
good explanation !!!
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 25 Sep 2010
Posts: 85
Schools: HBS, LBS, Wharton, Kelloggs, Booth
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 2 [0], given: 15

Re: XYZ, aquatic mammals inhabiting Florida s rivers and coastal [#permalink] New post 29 Jan 2012, 20:32
If XYZs can't differentiate between low speed and high speed, I can't understand how having low speeds will make it worse. None of the options sound good. :( Pl. help
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
Joined: 19 Apr 2011
Posts: 290
Schools: Booth,NUS,St.Gallon
Followers: 4

Kudos [?]: 90 [0], given: 51

Re: XYZ, aquatic mammals inhabiting Florida s rivers and coastal [#permalink] New post 30 Jan 2012, 07:34
Exactly nikhilsamuel89 .If the XYZ is unable to distinguish between low and high speed .It does not matter at what speed the boats are travelling .Someone pls give a valid explanation .
_________________

+1 if you like my explanation .Thanks :)

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
Status: May The Force Be With Me (D-DAY 15 May 2012)
Joined: 06 Jan 2012
Posts: 292
Location: India
Concentration: General Management, Entrepreneurship
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 89 [0], given: 16

Reviews Badge
Re: XYZ, aquatic mammals inhabiting Florida s rivers and coastal [#permalink] New post 03 Feb 2012, 03:28
+ 1 E

Just used process of elimination & double checked :-P
_________________

Giving +1 kudos is a better way of saying 'Thank You'.

Current Student
avatar
Status: If u've ego, u've reached ur limit; if ur humble u've no limit.
Affiliations: IIT
Joined: 04 Mar 2011
Posts: 72
Location: United States
Concentration: General Management, Marketing
GMAT 1: 720 Q50 V37
GPA: 3.1
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 16 [0], given: 30

Re: XYZ, aquatic mammals inhabiting Florida s rivers and coastal [#permalink] New post 03 Feb 2012, 13:25
I chose option E but didn't liked the grammar in it.

"When experimenters exposed XYZs to the recorded sounds of boats moving at various speeds, the creature were unable to discern the sounds over normal background noise. "

creature is singular; why does the sentence uses plurel were?
_________________

--Syed
" Some are desperate for success, and therefore destined for it."

Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 14 Jun 2011
Posts: 18
Location: India
Schools: NUS,Rotterdam
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 2 [0], given: 1

Re: XYZ, aquatic mammals inhabiting Florida s rivers and coastal [#permalink] New post 04 Feb 2012, 08:13
saikarthikreddy wrote:
Exactly nikhilsamuel89 .If the XYZ is unable to distinguish between low and high speed .It does not matter at what speed the boats are travelling .Someone pls give a valid explanation .


Hi,

Option E is the one which perfectly weakens the argument. I guess someone might have flipped the question here.. :?
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 28 Feb 2011
Posts: 58
GMAT 1: Q V
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 12 [0], given: 18

Re: XYZ, aquatic mammals inhabiting Florida s rivers and coastal [#permalink] New post 06 Feb 2012, 05:05
UtterNonsense wrote:
XYZ, aquatic mammals inhabiting Florida’s rivers and coastal waters, swim close to the surface and are frequently killed in collisions with boats. To address the problem, boat traffic in XYZ-populated waters is being required to maintain very low speeds. Unfortunately, XYZs are unable to hear low-pitched sounds and a boat’s sound lowers in pitch as the boats slows. Therefore, this approach may in fact make things worse rather than better.

Question) Which of the following if true would strengthen the conclusion?




premise : xyz swims close to water surface and are frequently killed by collision with speed boat
premise :XYZs are unable to hear low-pitched sounds and a boat’s sound lowers in pitch as the boats slows

conclusion : the approach of maintaining low speed is making problem of collision is actually worse

thus a strengthener would either
1. provide an evidence or support that event that additional support to prove conclusion ( slow speed doesn't prevent collision)
or 2. it would close/negate any alternate reason for collision. (may be suicidal tendency of xyz is infact the cause :lol: )

let's search out for any of these in answers

a) The areas where boats would have to maintain low speeds were decided partly on the basis of XYZ-population estimates and partly from numbers of reported collisions between XYZ and boats. [color=#800080] even if areas were determined using this logic, it does not provide any support to the theory tht low speeds doesn't help in solving of collision. Out of scope

b) Because the water hyacinth that XYZ feed on grow best in water that is nearly still, water hyacinth beds can be disturbed or damaged by fast-moving boat traffic. this option is again out of scope, thou it may be helpful in increasing the population of xyz , but our stimulus is manily concerned with accident btw xyz and slow moving boats.

c) Over the last several decades, boat traffic in Florida’s coastal waters has been increasing almost continuously and now represents the greater threat to the endangered XYZ population. again same as B. it does not address the issue of collision btw slow moving boats n xyz

d) The sound of a boat engine generally travels much further under water than it does through the air. out of scope we are concerned with pitch of sound rather than its speed

e) When experimenters exposed XYZs to the recorded sounds of boats moving at various speeds, the creature were unable to discern the sounds over normal background noise if xyz cannot distinguish btw various boat sounds over background noise, then it doesn't make any difference if boat travels slower or faster. hence it doesn't destroy conclusion Although slow speed doesn't make matter worse but it doesn't improve it either.

Hence out of all the choices only one which comes close by is E [/color]
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 17 Nov 2011
Posts: 18
Location: India
GMAT 1: 700 Q50 V35
WE: Business Development (Manufacturing)
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 7 [0], given: 2

Re: XYZ, aquatic mammals inhabiting Florida s rivers and coastal [#permalink] New post 07 Feb 2012, 03:16
Option E sounds good. 8-)
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 08 Jun 2010
Posts: 397
Location: United States
Concentration: General Management, Finance
GMAT 1: 680 Q50 V32
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 60 [0], given: 13

Re: XYZ, aquatic mammals inhabiting Florida s rivers and coastal [#permalink] New post 07 Feb 2012, 17:55
e) When experimenters exposed XYZs to the recorded sounds of boats moving at various speeds, the creature were unable to discern the sounds over normal background noise.

Option E ties a new evidence to the conclusion that the XYZs can't differentiate the sounds over the normal noise (Something which may be present in the waters).
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 25 May 2011
Posts: 163
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 40 [0], given: 71

Re: XYZ, aquatic mammals inhabiting Florida s rivers and coastal [#permalink] New post 17 Feb 2012, 23:56
I'm not convinced with answer explanations. CR experts please help me why E is the right answer?? It doesn't worse the situation AT ALL.
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 12 Nov 2011
Posts: 143
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 6 [0], given: 24

Re: XYZ, aquatic mammals inhabiting Florida s rivers and coastal [#permalink] New post 07 Mar 2012, 15:49
shahideh wrote:
I'm not convinced with answer explanations. CR experts please help me why E is the right answer?? It doesn't worse the situation AT ALL.

the same question
stem assumes that XYZ does hear the noise from fast-speed boat
E says that it's not true
so E can't be correct
please clarify
Re: XYZ, aquatic mammals inhabiting Florida s rivers and coastal   [#permalink] 07 Mar 2012, 15:49
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
3 Manatees, aquatic mammals inhabiting Florida’s rivers and coastal wate TooLong150 1 04 Oct 2014, 11:24
Manatees, aquatic mammals inhabiting Florida s rivers and prasannar 10 27 Apr 2008, 11:05
Manatees, aquatic mammals inhabiting Florida s rivers and younggun044 7 06 Oct 2007, 18:46
Manatees, aquatic mammals inhabiting Florida s rivers and Jamesk486 6 01 Jun 2007, 08:48
Manatees, aquatic mammals inhabiting Florida s rivers and ttanvir 4 11 Dec 2006, 16:06
Display posts from previous: Sort by

XYZ, aquatic mammals inhabiting Florida s rivers and coastal

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  

Go to page    1   2    Next  [ 31 posts ] 



GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Privacy Policy| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.