Years ago, some in the government's intelligence community : GMAT Critical Reasoning (CR)
Check GMAT Club Decision Tracker for the Latest School Decision Releases http://gmatclub.com/AppTrack

 It is currently 16 Jan 2017, 15:37

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# Years ago, some in the government's intelligence community

 new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics
Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

Manager
Joined: 24 Aug 2012
Posts: 129
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 211 [2] , given: 2

Years ago, some in the government's intelligence community [#permalink]

### Show Tags

06 Nov 2012, 18:13
2
This post received
KUDOS
1
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00

Difficulty:

85% (hard)

Question Stats:

54% (02:55) correct 46% (02:26) wrong based on 310 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

Years ago, some in the government's intelligence community feared the work of telecommunications researchers at then-emerging private security firms. The government experts concluded that these private firms posed the biggest risk to successful government espionage. As the private security firms began publicly releasing and advertising encryption algorithms and other security products, these government experts saw support for their conclusion when an encryption algorithm that government experts could not break began appearing in countless emails.
Which of the following, if true, most weakens the conclusion of the government experts referred to above?

A) Shortly before the government experts reached their conclusions, two private security companies each claimed to have developed "the world's strongest email encryption algorithm"
B) The private security firms' decision to advertise their products and sell them publicly led to other members of the private sector and academia scrutinizing the encryption algorithms.
C) An open-source encryption algorithm, developed by an academic and freely available from popular websites, is recognized by numerous ex-government code breakers as the most unbreakable algorithm ever developed.
D) An enemy government recently succeeded in placing a spy within the government espionage operations referred to above.
E) To strengthen the reputation of the private security firms, employees of these firms publish information about the strength of their products and the benefits of using them.
[Reveal] Spoiler: OA

_________________

Push +1 kudos button please, if you like my post

If you have any questions
you can ask an expert
New!
Intern
Joined: 22 Sep 2012
Posts: 21
GMAT Date: 09-12-2013
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 7 [0], given: 35

Re: Years ago, some in the government's intelligence community [#permalink]

### Show Tags

30 Aug 2013, 13:20
Somebody plz explain why B is wrong and howcome C is right?

My thought process:
Conclusion: these government experts saw support for their conclusion when an encryption algorithm that government experts could not break began appearing in countless emails.

(in my mind) the govt experts saw support...that means they are now able to break this encrytion....so to weaken this... option B states.... more the advertisements more other ppl scrutinize the algo. hence, the conclusion (advertisements instead of helping creates more problems) is weakened.

Someone plz explain !!
_________________

If KUDOS then gmatclub Test series.
YEAH!!

Director
Joined: 14 Dec 2012
Posts: 842
Location: India
Concentration: General Management, Operations
GMAT 1: 700 Q50 V34
GPA: 3.6
Followers: 59

Kudos [?]: 1287 [2] , given: 197

Re: Years ago, some in the government's intelligence community [#permalink]

### Show Tags

30 Aug 2013, 14:07
2
This post received
KUDOS
SmokedRing wrote:
Somebody plz explain why B is wrong and howcome C is right?

My thought process:
Conclusion: these government experts saw support for their conclusion when an encryption algorithm that government experts could not break began appearing in countless emails.

(in my mind) the govt experts saw support...that means they are now able to break this encrytion....so to weaken this... option B states.... more the advertisements more other ppl scrutinize the algo. hence, the conclusion (advertisements instead of helping creates more problems) is weakened.

Someone plz explain !!

CONCLUSION:The government experts concluded that these private firms posed the biggest risk to successful government espionage.==>IT MEANS WHATEVER SOFTWARE FIRMS ARE MAKING they are threat to government firms.
they got support to their conclusion by finding a software which government expert were unable to break.

now here government experts are assuming that the software they found is made by THOSE FIRMS.
OK if we can find something which will say that this software is not from THOSE FIRMS then assuption will not hold true...hence it will weaken.

option C:
An open-source encryption algorithm, developed by an academic and freely available from popular websites, is recognized by numerous ex-government code breakers as the most unbreakable algorithm ever developed.
NOW THIS OPTION is creating doubt that this algorithm doesnt belong to those firms...this algorithm is made by some academia.....hence it weakens.

hope it helps
_________________

When you want to succeed as bad as you want to breathe ...then you will be successfull....

GIVE VALUE TO OFFICIAL QUESTIONS...

GMAT RCs VOCABULARY LIST: http://gmatclub.com/forum/vocabulary-list-for-gmat-reading-comprehension-155228.html
learn AWA writing techniques while watching video : http://www.gmatprepnow.com/module/gmat-analytical-writing-assessment
: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=APt9ITygGss

Intern
Joined: 14 Mar 2013
Posts: 48
Location: United States
Concentration: General Management, Leadership
GMAT Date: 12-03-2013
WE: General Management (Retail)
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 54 [2] , given: 119

Re: Years ago, some in the government's intelligence community [#permalink]

### Show Tags

31 Aug 2013, 08:16
2
This post received
KUDOS
"The government experts concluded that these private firms posed the biggest risk to successful government espionage."

C) An open-source encryption algorithm, developed by an academic and freely available from popular websites, is recognized by numerous ex-government code breakers as the most unbreakable algorithm ever developed.

If "the most unbreakable algorithm ever developed" was not developed by private firms, they are not biggest the biggest risk to successful government espionage.

---------
Give me kudos if I have helped you
Current Student
Joined: 25 Jul 2015
Posts: 100
Location: India
Concentration: Strategy, Marketing
GMAT 1: 750 Q49 V42
WE: Information Technology (Computer Software)
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 19 [1] , given: 65

Re: Years ago, some in the government's intelligence community [#permalink]

### Show Tags

08 Sep 2015, 03:57
1
This post received
KUDOS
But just because something is developed, we can't assumed it will be used right? Maybe this encryption is designed to secure online banking, which won't affect the espionage efforts of the government.

What's the source of this question please? And do we have an OE?
Manager
Joined: 19 Nov 2014
Posts: 82
Location: India
Concentration: Technology, General Management
Schools: ISB '18
WE: Information Technology (Computer Software)
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: -16 [3] , given: 57

Re: Years ago, some in the government's intelligence community [#permalink]

### Show Tags

18 Jan 2016, 05:02
3
This post received
KUDOS
This is a little tough to analyse ; so I used POE to get the best answer . D AND E ARE clear OOS . Left A , B and C

A) Shortly before the government experts reached their conclusions, two private security companies each claimed to have developed "the world's strongest email encryption algorithm" .
here there are two companies stating they have the strongest algo that the govt may not be able to crack - and these may hamper thier own plans . doesnt weaken

B) The private security firms' decision to advertise their products and sell them publicly led to other members of the private sector and academia scrutinizing the encryption algorithms. - Other firms are scruntinizing means they are taking a deeper look at the algo ; this doesnt have much affect on the conc. moreover it is not even saying the algos get cracked by other firms ; even if it did C clearly wins here

C) An open-source encryption algorithm, developed by an academic and freely available from popular websites, is recognized by numerous ex-government code breakers as the most unbreakable algorithm ever developed.
okay so here if u read the option carefully , we can see that these algos are available on the websites by some academic or free style programmer so its not the private firm to be blamed because the algos are freely available to use and they are as stated by numerous ex-government code breakers as the most unbreakable algorithm ever developed.

SO C WINS the race against B and rest of the others tooo

D) An enemy government recently succeeded in placing a spy within the government espionage operations referred to above.
Clearly OOS
E) To strengthen the reputation of the private security firms, employees of these firms publish information about the strength of their products and the benefits of using them.
Clearly OOS

Left A , b and C
_________________

KUDOS pls if you like My Post

Manager
Status: You have to have the darkness for the dawn to come
Joined: 09 Nov 2012
Posts: 141
Location: India
saurav: suman
Concentration: Operations, Technology
GPA: 4
WE: Engineering (Energy and Utilities)
Followers: 8

Kudos [?]: 33 [0], given: 147

Re: Years ago, some in the government's intelligence community [#permalink]

### Show Tags

28 Nov 2016, 02:47
kingb wrote:
Years ago, some in the government's intelligence community feared the work of telecommunications researchers at then-emerging private security firms. The government experts concluded that these private firms posed the biggest risk to successful government espionage. As the private security firms began publicly releasing and advertising encryption algorithms and other security products, these government experts saw support for their conclusion when an encryption algorithm that government experts could not break began appearing in countless emails.
Which of the following, if true, most weakens the conclusion of the government experts referred to above?

A) Shortly before the government experts reached their conclusions, two private security companies each claimed to have developed "the world's strongest email encryption algorithm"
B) The private security firms' decision to advertise their products and sell them publicly led to other members of the private sector and academia scrutinizing the encryption algorithms.
C) An open-source encryption algorithm, developed by an academic and freely available from popular websites, is recognized by numerous ex-government code breakers as the most unbreakable algorithm ever developed.
D) An enemy government recently succeeded in placing a spy within the government espionage operations referred to above.
E) To strengthen the reputation of the private security firms, employees of these firms publish information about the strength of their products and the benefits of using them.

Togh question
Conclusion: The government experts concluded that these private firms posed the biggest risk to successful government espionage.

Here if we find that these company didn't pose the greatest risk to government then the conlcusion is weakened

Option C says the same
D and E have no impact on the conclusion
B says other firms are also scrutinizing. So What. B is also not a weakner.
A een supports the conclusion a bit.
Hence C is the answer.
_________________

You have to have the darkness for the dawn to come.

Give Kudos if you like my post

Re: Years ago, some in the government's intelligence community   [#permalink] 28 Nov 2016, 02:47
Similar topics Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
15 Two years ago, the government of Runagia increased by 20 5 25 Jul 2012, 23:31
2 One year ago a local government initiated an antismoking 20 23 Jul 2010, 08:31
9 Some scientists believe that 65 million years ago an 28 27 Sep 2009, 10:14
Parent 1: Ten years ago, children in communities like ours 8 16 Apr 2008, 10:51
3 CR Twenty years ago. 14 29 Mar 2008, 13:34
Display posts from previous: Sort by

# Years ago, some in the government's intelligence community

 new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics

 Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.