Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 28 Aug 2014, 01:12

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

Zelda: Dr. Ladlow, a research psychologist, has convincingly

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:
Expert Post
Moderator
Moderator
User avatar
Joined: 01 Sep 2010
Posts: 2375
Followers: 268

Kudos [?]: 2298 [0], given: 692

Re: CR: Dr.Ladlow [#permalink] New post 31 Jul 2011, 17:30
Expert's post
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 25 Nov 2012
Posts: 7
Schools: Darden '16 (A)
GMAT 1: 700 Q49 V35
GPA: 3.29
WE: Corporate Finance (Consulting)
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 1

Re: CR: Dr.Ladlow [#permalink] New post 17 Apr 2013, 05:14
grumpyoldman wrote:
It certainly LOOKS like an LSAT question. Even if it isn't, LSAT techniques are very useful in answering it.

The most useful thing to do is to recognize that Anson's third sentence is actually an if-then statement. It means: "If X is a responsible psychologist, then X accepts the possibility that new evidence will show that his/her theory is incorrect."

Since Zelda tells us and Anson that Dr. Ladlow considers his theory to be irrefutable -- in other words, he does not think it is possible for new evidence to show that it is incorrect -- Anson's conclusion (that Dr. Ladlow is not a responsible psychologist) is logically sound. (As always, "logically sound" means that if the evidence is true, the conclusion MUST be true as well.) Now we are looking for the answer choice which ALSO is a logically sound conclusion, if Anson's statements are true.

(C) does not logically follow from this evidence. Anson's statement says that responsible psychologists must accept the POSSIBILITY of their theories being found to be wrong, but this clearly does NOT mean that the theories ARE or MUST BE wrong.

(E) does not follow from the evidence. As was already stated, it "reverses" the stimulus. As shown above, Anson's third statement means: "If X is a responsible psychologist, then X accepts the possibility that new evidence will show that his/her theory is incorrect." Choice (E) says: "If X accepts the possibility that new evidence will show that his/her theory is incorrect, then X is a responsible psychologist." The stimulus says "If A, then B", and choice (E) says "If B, then A". You can NEVER deduce "If B, then A" from "If A, then B".

(B) is correct. It is another concealed "if-then" statement. It means: "If a psychologist making a specific kind of prediction reasons responsibly, he/she cannot conclude that his/her theory is irrefutable." This can be accurately restated as: "If a psychologist making a certain kind of prediction reasons responsibly, he or she must accept the possibility that his/her theory could be refuted." Anson's third statement says exactly this about ALL psychologists. Since the psychologists who make predictions about rats in mazes are a subset of all psychologists, (B) is necessarily true if Anson's third statement is true.


^ this explains the reasoning behind the correct answer the best.
Verbal Forum Moderator
Verbal Forum Moderator
User avatar
Joined: 15 Jun 2012
Posts: 1016
Location: United States
Followers: 117

Kudos [?]: 1182 [0], given: 118

Premium Member
Re: Zelda: Dr. Ladlow, a research psychologist, has convincingly [#permalink] New post 17 Apr 2013, 13:36
kman wrote:
Zelda: Dr. Ladlow, a research psychologist, has convincingly demonstrated that his theory about the determinants of rat behavior generates consistently accurate predictions about how rats will perform in a maze. On the basis of this evidence, Dr. Ladlow has claimed that his theory is irrefutably correct.

Anson: Then Dr. Ladlow is not responsible psychologist. Dr. Ladlow’s evidence does not conclusively prove that his theory is correct. Responsible psychologists always accept the possibility that new evidence will show that their theories are incorrect.

17. Which one of the following can be properly inferred from Anson’s argument?
(A) Dr. Ladlow’s evidence that his theory generates consistently accurate predictions about how rates will perform in a maze is inaccurate.
(B) Psychologists who can derive consistently accurate predictions about how rats will perform in a maze from their theories cannot responsibly conclude that those theories cannot be disproved.
(C) No matter how responsible psychologists are, they can never develop correct theoretical explanations.
(D) Responsible psychologists do not make predictions about how rats will perform in a maze.
(E) Psychologists who accept the possibility that new evidence will show that their theories are incorrect are responsible psychologists.


I see a big debate between B and E. But E is wrong. it's a reverse answer. Let examine E.
Psychologists who accept the possibility that new evidence will show that their theories are incorrect are responsible psychologists.
You can see, E says Psychologist will show that their theories are incorrect. It's totally wrong.

B is correct.
_________________

Please +1 KUDO if my post helps. Thank you.

"Designing cars consumes you; it has a hold on your spirit which is incredibly powerful. It's not something you can do part time, you have do it with all your heart and soul or you're going to get it wrong."

Chris Bangle - Former BMV Chief of Design.

Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 06 Sep 2012
Posts: 15
Concentration: Entrepreneurship, Sustainability
GPA: 3.11
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 3 [0], given: 2

GMAT ToolKit User
Re: Zelda: Dr. Ladlow, a research psychologist, has convincingly [#permalink] New post 10 Jun 2013, 05:56
can some one please explain why any statement that restates the inference is not right ans for inference question.
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
Joined: 28 Apr 2012
Posts: 310
Location: India
GMAT 1: 610 Q49 V23
GMAT 2: 650 Q48 V31
GMAT 3: 770 Q50 V47
WE: Information Technology (Computer Software)
Followers: 12

Kudos [?]: 180 [0], given: 141

Re: Zelda: Dr. Ladlow, a research psychologist, has convincingly [#permalink] New post 10 Jun 2013, 06:15
mbmanoj wrote:
can some one please explain why any statement that restates the inference is not right ans for inference question.


Inference, as dictionary defines, is the act or process of deriving logical conclusions from premises known or assumed to be true.

So inference is all about finding something new from the existing. If you restate the premise, then what do you derive ?
_________________

"Appreciation is a wonderful thing. It makes what is excellent in others belong to us as well."
― Voltaire


Press Kudos, if I have helped.
Thanks!

shit-happens-my-journey-to-172475.html#p1372807

Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 06 Sep 2012
Posts: 15
Concentration: Entrepreneurship, Sustainability
GPA: 3.11
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 3 [0], given: 2

GMAT ToolKit User
Re: Zelda: Dr. Ladlow, a research psychologist, has convincingly [#permalink] New post 10 Jun 2013, 06:36
ConnectTheDots wrote:
mbmanoj wrote:
can some one please explain why any statement that restates the inference is not right ans for inference question.


Inference, as dictionary defines, is the act or process of deriving logical conclusions from premises known or assumed to be true.

So inference is all about finding something new from the existing. If you restate the premise, then what do you derive ?



Thank you, ddo you find such ans choices in OG or GMAT?
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
Joined: 28 Apr 2012
Posts: 310
Location: India
GMAT 1: 610 Q49 V23
GMAT 2: 650 Q48 V31
GMAT 3: 770 Q50 V47
WE: Information Technology (Computer Software)
Followers: 12

Kudos [?]: 180 [0], given: 141

Re: Zelda: Dr. Ladlow, a research psychologist, has convincingly [#permalink] New post 10 Jun 2013, 07:27
mbmanoj wrote:
Thank you, ddo you find such ans choices in OG or GMAT?


I am no expert. As per the available materials -

Powerscore CR Bible brings Inference, Conclusion, Argument Completion under one umbrella - the "Must be true" questions and says the correct answers are paraphrase of the stimulus in different terms. If the answer choice mirrors the stimulus, its the correct answer. Combination answers result from two or more statements in the stimulus.

However, there is always something in the question stem that lets us know whether the question is asking for paraphrase or seeking a deduction. Inference necessarily says to derive something new. And in this particular question there is not a single answer choice that mimics the stimulus, everyone, apart from B, is a distortion.

You can practice must be true type questions from OG 13: 26, 54, 60, 66, 74, 103, 104, 105
_________________

"Appreciation is a wonderful thing. It makes what is excellent in others belong to us as well."
― Voltaire


Press Kudos, if I have helped.
Thanks!

shit-happens-my-journey-to-172475.html#p1372807

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 22 Dec 2012
Posts: 117
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 10 [0], given: 57

Re: Zelda: Dr. Ladlow, a research psychologist, has convincingly [#permalink] New post 15 Jun 2013, 13:50
I think it is more of "necessary" and "sufficient" type of question.

The last line of the argument talks about the "responsible psychologists" who are ready to get flak for their theories.

E seems to fit this line. B seems to be more specific to the maze experiment.
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 22 Dec 2012
Posts: 117
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 10 [0], given: 57

Re: Zelda: Dr. Ladlow, a research psychologist, has convincingly [#permalink] New post 15 Jun 2013, 13:53
Did not read the option E correctly. B it is ...
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 03 Jul 2013
Posts: 48
Concentration: Entrepreneurship, International Business
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 3 [0], given: 9

Re: Zelda: Dr. Ladlow, a research psychologist, has convincingly [#permalink] New post 06 Oct 2013, 09:38
B is what the argument infers, can absolutely be prove to be 100% correct by the passage

E is what the passage suggest, can be provide to be correct by the passage 99% of the time i.e not absolutely
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
Joined: 03 Dec 2012
Posts: 367
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 31 [0], given: 291

Re: Zelda: Dr. Ladlow, a research psychologist, has convincingly [#permalink] New post 31 Oct 2013, 01:06
Answer is B. E is a classic inference question trap.
Re: Zelda: Dr. Ladlow, a research psychologist, has convincingly   [#permalink] 31 Oct 2013, 01:06
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
7 Experts publish their posts in the topic Zelda: Dr. Ladlow, a research psychologist, has convincingly Marcab 9 09 Dec 2012, 22:09
2 Experts publish their posts in the topic Zelda: Dr. Ladlow, a research psychologist, has convincingly nevergiveup 21 14 Nov 2007, 11:53
Zelda: Dr. Ladlow, a research psychologist, has convincingly rahulraao 3 13 Oct 2005, 17:31
Questions 17-18 Zelda: Dr. Ladlow, a research psychologist, WinWinMBA 7 10 May 2005, 14:55
Zelda: Dr. Ladlow, a research psychologist, has convincingly chunjuwu 7 09 Sep 2004, 06:53
Display posts from previous: Sort by

Zelda: Dr. Ladlow, a research psychologist, has convincingly

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  

Go to page   Previous    1   2   [ 31 posts ] 



GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Privacy Policy| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.