Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

 It is currently 25 May 2013, 14:25

ZY<XY<0 is |X-Z| + |x| = |Z| 1.) Z<X 2.) Y<0

 Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews
Author Message
TAGS:
Intern
Joined: 08 May 2006
Posts: 24
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 0

ZY<XY<0 is |X-Z| + |x| = |Z| 1.) Z<X 2.) Y<0 [#permalink]  25 Apr 2007, 04:18
00:00

Question Stats:

9% (03:29) correct 90% (01:13) wrong based on 0 sessions
ZY<XY<0 is |X-Z| + |x| = |Z|
1.) Z<X
2.) Y<0
What is a good approach here?

Thanks!
SVP
Joined: 01 May 2006
Posts: 1837
Followers: 8

Kudos [?]: 71 [1] , given: 0

[#permalink]  25 Apr 2007, 06:15
1
This post received
KUDOS
(D) for me

ZY<XY<0

=>ZY - XY < 0
<=> Y*(Z-X) < 0
Implies that :
o Y < 0 and Z-X > 0 <=> Z > X
or
o Y > 0 and Z-X < 0 <=> Z < X

As, ZY<XY<0, the 2 cases above become:
o Y < 0 and Z > X > 0 (case A)
or
o Y > 0 and Z < X < 0 (case B)

|X-Z| + |X| = |Z| ?

From 1
Z < X => We are forced to be in the case B.

That implies:
o Z < 0
o X < 0
o X-Z > 0

So,
|X-Z| + |X|
= (X-Z) + (-X)
= -Z
= |Z| as Z < 0

SUFF.

From 2
Y < 0 => We are forced to be in the case A.

That implies:
o Z > 0
o X > 0
o Z-X > 0 <=> X-Z < 0

So,
|X-Z| + |X|
= (-(X-Z)) + (X)
= Z
= |Z| as Z > 0

SUFF.

Last edited by Fig on 25 Apr 2007, 07:22, edited 1 time in total.
Intern
Joined: 24 Apr 2007
Posts: 9
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 0

my answer [#permalink]  25 Apr 2007, 06:16
ZY<XY<0 is |X-Z| + |x| = |Z|
1.) Z<X
2.) Y<0
What is a good approach here?

Thanks!

The question is asking is |X-Z| + |X| = |Z|

|X-Z| + |X| = |Z|

|X-Z| = |Z| - |X|

This is true only when X and Z are the same sign, or essentially when they are both either greater than zero or less than zero. Since the assumption is that they are both less than zero when multiplied by Y, then if Y is positive, they are both negative, and if Y is negative, they are both positive.

1. Z < X
All this tells us is that Y < 0

2. Y < 0
This also tells us that Y < 0

IF Y < 0 then Z and X must be positive. Thus they are the same sign, thus the answer is D. However, I would say that if Y was positive, then |X-Z| + |X| = |Z| would still be true. Y can't be zero because then XY and ZY can't be less than zero.

My question is, will there be questions like this on the Real Gmat, where the data given is not required to solve the question?
Intern
Joined: 08 May 2006
Posts: 24
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 0

[#permalink]  25 Apr 2007, 06:41
The question is from GMAT PREP so presumably it's representative of the real GMAT.

I hope not to see it on the real thing though - I hate this type of Q and have a limit on how many scenarios I'm willing to write out before moving onto the next question!

I'm guessing it might be a 50/51 threshold question, I didn't get it but got a 50 on the practice test.
Intern
Joined: 08 May 2006
Posts: 24
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 0

[#permalink]  25 Apr 2007, 06:41
Forgot to say- Thanks a million guys for your help!
SVP
Joined: 01 May 2006
Posts: 1837
Followers: 8

Kudos [?]: 71 [0], given: 0

[#permalink]  25 Apr 2007, 07:36
doc14 wrote:
Forgot to say- Thanks a million guys for your help!

You are welcome !

If u want to practice more, try these ones :
http://www.gmatclub.com/phpbb/viewtopic.php?t=39533
GMAT Instructor
Joined: 04 Jul 2006
Posts: 1278
Location: Madrid
Followers: 9

Kudos [?]: 69 [0], given: 0

Re: my answer [#permalink]  25 Apr 2007, 08:23
jayt696969 wrote:
ZY<XY<0 is |X-Z| + |x| = |Z|
1.) Z<X
2.) Y<0
What is a good approach here?

Thanks!

The question is asking is |X-Z| + |X| = |Z|

|X-Z| + |X| = |Z|

|X-Z| = |Z| - |X|

This is true only when X and Z are the same sign, or essentially when they are both either greater than zero or less than zero. Since the assumption is that they are both less than zero when multiplied by Y, then if Y is positive, they are both negative, and if Y is negative, they are both positive.

1. Z < X
All this tells us is that Y < 0

2. Y < 0
This also tells us that Y < 0

IF Y < 0 then Z and X must be positive. Thus they are the same sign, thus the answer is D. However, I would say that if Y was positive, then |X-Z| + |X| = |Z| would still be true. Y can't be zero because then XY and ZY can't be less than zero.

My question is, will there be questions like this on the Real Gmat, where the data given is not required to solve the question?

This is a necessary, but not sufficient condition for the statement in the question to be true. It must also be true that |z| -|x| is positive
Intern
Joined: 10 Jun 2009
Posts: 33
Location: Stockholm, Sweden
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 0

Re: GMATPREP Modulus Q [#permalink]  15 Jun 2009, 12:53
Im a little lost here. If Z<X and Y<0 then these would be possible numbers:

Y = -1
Z = 2
X = 10

Then ZY would be -2 and XY would be -10 making XY<ZY (the question states that ZY<XY). What is wrong with this conclusion?
Manager
Joined: 22 Sep 2009
Posts: 228
Location: Tokyo, Japan
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 14 [0], given: 8

Re: GMATPREP Modulus Q [#permalink]  25 Nov 2009, 08:30
Fig, I understand your explanation but shouldn't the statements themselves be always true? If so, the two scenarios Y>0 and Y<0 are contradictory? Am I missing something here?
Manager
Joined: 24 Aug 2009
Posts: 156
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 21 [0], given: 46

Re: [#permalink]  15 Dec 2009, 21:26
Fig wrote:
(D) for me

ZY<XY<0

=>ZY - XY < 0
<=> Y*(Z-X) < 0
Implies that :
o Y < 0 and Z-X > 0 <=> Z > X
or
o Y > 0 and Z-X < 0 <=> Z < X

As, ZY<XY<0, the 2 cases above become:
o Y < 0 and Z > X > 0 (case A)
or
o Y > 0 and Z < X < 0 (case B)

|X-Z| + |X| = |Z| ?

From 1
Z < X => We are forced to be in the case B.

That implies:
o Z < 0
o X < 0
o X-Z > 0

So,
|X-Z| + |X|
= (X-Z) + (-X)
= -Z
= |Z| as Z < 0

SUFF.

From 2
Y < 0 => We are forced to be in the case A.

That implies:
o Z > 0
o X > 0
o Z-X > 0 <=> X-Z < 0

So,
|X-Z| + |X|
= (-(X-Z)) + (X)
= Z
= |Z| as Z > 0

SUFF.

Hi

How do you conclude this

Y > 0 and Z < X < 0 (case B)

if Y>0, then Z-X<0 , the case can be z=2, X=3 and Z-X<0 which dont agree with z<x<0

please advise
GMAT Club team member
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 11633
Followers: 1802

Kudos [?]: 9611 [1] , given: 829

Re: Re: [#permalink]  17 Dec 2009, 11:22
1
This post received
KUDOS
ISBtarget wrote:
Hi

How do you conclude this

Y > 0 and Z < X < 0 (case B)

if Y>0, then Z-X<0 , the case can be z=2, X=3 and Z-X<0 which dont agree with z<x<0

please advise

This is not a good question, for two reasons:

1. Neither of statement is needed to answer the question, stem is enough to do so. I don't know if such kind of situation can occur in real GMAT. Maybe someone can clarify this?
2. Statements contradict. This will never occur in real GMAT.

If zy<xy<0 is |x-z|+|x| = |z|

Look at the inequality zy<xy<0:

We can have two cases:

A. If y<0 --> when reducing we should flip signs and we'll get: z>x>0.
In this case: as z>x --> |x-z|=-x+z; as x>0 and z>0 --> |x|=x and |z|=z.

Hence in this case |x-z|+|x|=|z| will expand as follows: -x+z+x=z --> 0=0, which is true.

And:

B. If y>0 --> when reducing we'll get: z<x<0.
In this case: as z<x --> |x-z|=x-z; as x<0 and z<0 --> |x|=-x and |z|=-z.

Hence in this case |x-z|+|x|=|z| will expand as follows: x-z-x=-z --> 0=0, which is true.

So knowing that zy<xy<0 is true, we can conclude that |x-z|+|x| = |z| will also be true. Answer should be D even not considering the statements themselves.

Next:

Statement (1) says that z<x, hence we have case B, which implies that y>0.

BUT

Statement (2) says that y<0.

So statements are contradictory, which will never occur in GMAT.

Hope it helps.
_________________
Manager
Joined: 04 Apr 2010
Posts: 179
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 21 [0], given: 31

Re: GMATPREP Modulus Q [#permalink]  05 May 2010, 08:08
the given condition itself is sufficient without considering 1 and 2.
_________________

Consider me giving KUDOS, if you find my post helpful.
If at first you don't succeed, you're running about average. ~Anonymous

Manager
Joined: 23 Nov 2009
Posts: 88
Schools: Wharton..:)
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 30 [0], given: 13

Re: GMATPREP Modulus Q [#permalink]  06 May 2010, 13:17
ZY<XY<0 is |X-Z| + |x| = |Z|
1.) Z<X
2.) Y<0
What is a good approach here?

----------------------------------------------------
A simpler approach ::
-make a few cases

subcases x y z
case 1 + - +
2 - + -
case1:: if x,y +ve and y negative thn z>x to satisfy zy<xy
frm question part 1) given z<x exact opposite of wht we just did i.e x,z negative and y positive
take numbers say x=-3 , z=-4 , y =+1 so 4=4 substitute in the equation ::same goes for any othr number ..
hence part 1 satisfies similary do for part 2..m too tired to write [:)]
_________________

" What [i] do is not beyond anybody else's competence"- warren buffett
My Gmat experience -http://gmatclub.com/forum/gmat-710-q-47-v-41-tips-for-non-natives-107086.html

Re: GMATPREP Modulus Q   [#permalink] 06 May 2010, 13:17
Similar topics Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
If zy<xy<0 is |x-z| + |x| = |z|? 1. z<x>0 2. 5 02 Feb 2007, 19:01
If zy < xy < 0, is |x-z| + |x| = |z|? (1) z<x>0 13 13 May 2007, 12:40
If zy<xy<0, is |x-z| + |x| = |z|? 1: z<x 2: y>0 5 29 Jul 2007, 14:43
If zy < xy < 0, is |x-z| + |x| = |z|? (1) z<x (2) 9 31 Jul 2008, 06:24
3 If zy < xy < 0, is |x-z| + |x| = |z| a) z < x b) y 3 28 Jan 2010, 02:50
Display posts from previous: Sort by

ZY<XY<0 is |X-Z| + |x| = |Z| 1.) Z<X 2.) Y<0

 Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews

 Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.