Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

It appears that you are browsing the GMAT Club forum unregistered!

Signing up is free, quick, and confidential.
Join other 500,000 members and get the full benefits of GMAT Club

Registration gives you:

Tests

Take 11 tests and quizzes from GMAT Club and leading GMAT prep companies such as Manhattan GMAT,
Knewton, and others. All are free for GMAT Club members.

Applicant Stats

View detailed applicant stats such as GPA, GMAT score, work experience, location, application
status, and more

Books/Downloads

Download thousands of study notes,
question collections, GMAT Club’s
Grammar and Math books.
All are free!

Thank you for using the timer!
We noticed you are actually not timing your practice. Click the START button first next time you use the timer.
There are many benefits to timing your practice, including:

ZY<XY<0 is |X-Z| + |x| = |Z|
1.) Z<X
2.) Y<0
What is a good approach here?

Thanks!

The question is asking is |X-Z| + |X| = |Z|

|X-Z| + |X| = |Z|

|X-Z| = |Z| - |X|

This is true only when X and Z are the same sign, or essentially when they are both either greater than zero or less than zero. Since the assumption is that they are both less than zero when multiplied by Y, then if Y is positive, they are both negative, and if Y is negative, they are both positive.

1. Z < X
All this tells us is that Y < 0

2. Y < 0
This also tells us that Y < 0

IF Y < 0 then Z and X must be positive. Thus they are the same sign, thus the answer is D. However, I would say that if Y was positive, then |X-Z| + |X| = |Z| would still be true. Y can't be zero because then XY and ZY can't be less than zero.

My question is, will there be questions like this on the Real Gmat, where the data given is not required to solve the question?

The question is from GMAT PREP so presumably it's representative of the real GMAT.

I hope not to see it on the real thing though - I hate this type of Q and have a limit on how many scenarios I'm willing to write out before moving onto the next question!

I'm guessing it might be a 50/51 threshold question, I didn't get it but got a 50 on the practice test.

ZY<XY<0 is |X-Z| + |x| = |Z| 1.) Z<X 2.) Y<0 What is a good approach here?

Thanks!

The question is asking is |X-Z| + |X| = |Z|

|X-Z| + |X| = |Z|

|X-Z| = |Z| - |X|

This is true only when X and Z are the same sign, or essentially when they are both either greater than zero or less than zero. Since the assumption is that they are both less than zero when multiplied by Y, then if Y is positive, they are both negative, and if Y is negative, they are both positive.

1. Z < X All this tells us is that Y < 0

2. Y < 0 This also tells us that Y < 0

IF Y < 0 then Z and X must be positive. Thus they are the same sign, thus the answer is D. However, I would say that if Y was positive, then |X-Z| + |X| = |Z| would still be true. Y can't be zero because then XY and ZY can't be less than zero.

My question is, will there be questions like this on the Real Gmat, where the data given is not required to solve the question?

This is a necessary, but not sufficient condition for the statement in the question to be true. It must also be true that |z| -|x| is positive

Fig, I understand your explanation but shouldn't the statements themselves be always true? If so, the two scenarios Y>0 and Y<0 are contradictory? Am I missing something here?

if Y>0, then Z-X<0 , the case can be z=2, X=3 and Z-X<0 which dont agree with z<x<0

please advise

This is not a good question, for two reasons:

1. Neither of statement is needed to answer the question, stem is enough to do so. I don't know if such kind of situation can occur in real GMAT. Maybe someone can clarify this? 2. Statements contradict. This will never occur in real GMAT.

If \(zy<xy<0\) is \(|x-z|+|x| = |z|\)

Look at the inequality \(zy<xy<0\):

We can have two cases:

A. If \(y<0\) --> when reducing we should flip signs and we'll get: \(z>x>0\). In this case: as \(z>x\) --> \(|x-z|=-x+z\); as \(x>0\) and \(z>0\) --> \(|x|=x\) and \(|z|=z\).

Hence in this case \(|x-z|+|x|=|z|\) will expand as follows: \(-x+z+x=z\) --> \(0=0\), which is true.

And:

B. If \(y>0\) --> when reducing we'll get: \(z<x<0\). In this case: as \(z<x\) --> \(|x-z|=x-z\); as \(x<0\) and \(z<0\) --> \(|x|=-x\) and \(|z|=-z\).

Hence in this case \(|x-z|+|x|=|z|\) will expand as follows: \(x-z-x=-z\) --> \(0=0\), which is true.

So knowing that \(zy<xy<0\) is true, we can conclude that \(|x-z|+|x| = |z|\) will also be true. Answer should be D even not considering the statements themselves.

Next:

Statement (1) says that \(z<x\), hence we have case B, which implies that \(y>0\).

BUT

Statement (2) says that \(y<0\).

So statements are contradictory, which will never occur in GMAT.

ZY<XY<0 is |X-Z| + |x| = |Z| 1.) Z<X 2.) Y<0 What is a good approach here?

---------------------------------------------------- A simpler approach :: -make a few cases

subcases x y z case 1 + - + 2 - + - case1:: if x,y +ve and y negative thn z>x to satisfy zy<xy frm question part 1) given z<x exact opposite of wht we just did i.e x,z negative and y positive take numbers say x=-3 , z=-4 , y =+1 so 4=4 substitute in the equation ::same goes for any othr number .. hence part 1 satisfies similary do for part 2..m too tired to write [:)] _________________

" What [i] do is not beyond anybody else's competence"- warren buffett My Gmat experience -http://gmatclub.com/forum/gmat-710-q-47-v-41-tips-for-non-natives-107086.html

ZY<XY<0 is |X-Z| + |x| = |Z| 1.) Z<X 2.) Y<0 What is a good approach here?

Thanks!

The question is asking is |X-Z| + |X| = |Z|

|X-Z| + |X| = |Z|

|X-Z| = |Z| - |X|

This is true only when X and Z are the same sign, or essentially when they are both either greater than zero or less than zero. Since the assumption is that they are both less than zero when multiplied by Y, then if Y is positive, they are both negative, and if Y is negative, they are both positive.

1. Z < X All this tells us is that Y < 0

2. Y < 0 This also tells us that Y < 0

IF Y < 0 then Z and X must be positive. Thus they are the same sign, thus the answer is D. However, I would say that if Y was positive, then |X-Z| + |X| = |Z| would still be true. Y can't be zero because then XY and ZY can't be less than zero.

My question is, will there be questions like this on the Real Gmat, where the data given is not required to solve the question?

I think you almost got it but you are missing the case when both are zero

For |X-Z| = |Z| - |X| both x and z must have the same sign OR be both equal to zero.

Funny thing is that as you mention we already know that y is different from zero since we are told that 0>xy>zy, so it will work in either case Anyone else thinks that this question is flawed?

So, my final tally is in. I applied to three b schools in total this season: INSEAD – admitted MIT Sloan – admitted Wharton – waitlisted and dinged No...

HBS alum talks about effective altruism and founding and ultimately closing MBAs Across America at TED: Casey Gerald speaks at TED2016 – Dream, February 15-19, 2016, Vancouver Convention Center...