{"id":4132,"date":"2010-08-17T08:18:05","date_gmt":"2010-08-17T16:18:05","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/gmatclub.com\/blog\/?p=4132"},"modified":"2010-08-17T08:18:05","modified_gmt":"2010-08-17T16:18:05","slug":"veritas-prep-gmat-tips-tackling-data-sufficiency","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/gmatclub.com\/blog\/veritas-prep-gmat-tips-tackling-data-sufficiency\/","title":{"rendered":"Veritas Prep GMAT Tips: Tackling Data Sufficiency"},"content":{"rendered":"

Brian Galvin is the Director of Academic Programs at Veritas Prep, where he oversees all of the company\u2019s GMAT preparation courses<\/a>.<\/p>\n

Data Sufficiency questions are maddening. They are phrased in an awkward way -- we live in a results-oriented society, where we want to get the answer, solve the problem, and move on. Why would we want to spend time simply determining if we can? Those who can do, and those who cannot have no business at a top business school, right?<\/p>\n

To an extent, the statement above is an underlying philosophy behind the data sufficiency setup. Think about it -- the GMAT should reward those who can solve problems with partial information more often than it rewards those who can\u2019t. By that logic, E is an \u201cinferior\u201d answer choice to the others -- E simply says that \u201cthe problem cannot be solved with the information given.\u201d Now, if it were always incorrect, it would be a waste of an answer choice, so it has to be a plausible answer, but it stands to reason that business schools don\u2019t want to reward the \u201cI don\u2019t know, so I guess it can\u2019t be done\u201d guess too often.<\/p>\n

Consider the answer choices in this way:<\/p>\n

D -- With either piece of information on its own, I can solve it<\/p>\n

A \/ B -- I can solve it with one, but just can\u2019t do it with the other<\/p>\n

C - I cannot quite do it with either alone, but I can solve it with both of them<\/p>\n

E -- I cannot solve it with this information<\/p>\n

The above is a loosely hierarchical structure. It is not that D is inherently a \u201csuperior\u201d choice, but you can see why Harvard Business School is likely to be more confident about admitting someone who can solve problems in multiple ways than admitting someone who can\u2019t. Thinking tactically, then, you should approach data sufficiency problems this way: If you feel that it was easy to arrive at an answer choice, be sure to check the \u201clevel\u201d above it to ensure that you couldn\u2019t have squeezed more out of the information given.<\/p>\n

Consider a problem such as:<\/p>\n

Is the product of integers xy > 2?<\/p>\n

1)\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 x + y = 3<\/p>\n

2)\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 x - y = 1<\/p>\n

You might be disposed to select choice C, noting that, with two equations and two variables, you will be able to solve for both variables and definitively answer the question. Nevertheless, it should seem pretty obvious that you\u2019ll be able to do so, which might give you pause \u2013 they are probably testing something deeper. If you look closer at statement 1, then, you can notice that, if x and y are both positive, the only combinations that will work are 1, 2 and 2, 1. In either case, the product is 2, which is not greater than 2. If we want either x or y to be larger than 2, our options are 3, 0 (in which case the product is 0, which is less than 2) or something greater than 3 and a negative number, in which case the product will be negative. Accordingly, there simply isn\u2019t a combination that could possibly give us the answer \u201cyes,\u201d so we can conclude that statement 1 is sufficient.<\/p>\n

Questions like this are frequent on the GMAT, which has a vested interest in determining who can make the most of their resources and do more with less. Knowing this, push yourself to consider the \u201chigher level\u201d answer choices on data sufficiency questions, and you should put yourself in position to reap those rewards.<\/p>\n

Ready to sign up for a GMAT course<\/a>? Enroll through GMAT Club and save up to $180 (use discount code GMATC10)!
\nEnroll now. Pay later.<\/span> Take advantage of Veritas Prep\u2019s flexible payment plan options.<\/span><\/p>\n

\"Veritas
\n<\/span><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Brian Galvin is the Director of Academic Programs at Veritas Prep, where he oversees all of the company\u2019s GMAT preparation courses. Data Sufficiency questions are maddening. They are phrased in…<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":101,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-4132","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-uncategorized","entry"],"aioseo_notices":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/gmatclub.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4132","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/gmatclub.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/gmatclub.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/gmatclub.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/101"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/gmatclub.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=4132"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/gmatclub.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4132\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":4134,"href":"https:\/\/gmatclub.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4132\/revisions\/4134"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/gmatclub.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=4132"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/gmatclub.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=4132"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/gmatclub.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=4132"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}