What most MBA programs want, more than anything, is to hear an assessment of your abilities by someone who knows you well and has been in a position to evaluate you. This is why your direct supervisor is usually the ideal choice \u2014 he or she should spend a lot of time thinking about your performance, making it easy to provide an assessment of you as a young professional. Assuming that person is out of the picture, then you need to find someone else who meets these criteria:<\/p>\n
Has your recommender worked with you recently?<\/strong> Does he or she have experience evaluating others in a professional setting?<\/strong> Does your recommender know you well, in a non-social capacity?<\/strong> Does the person in question have enough time to do the job?<\/strong> Keep in mind that what really matters is what your recommender writes about you, more than what job title he holds. MBA admissions officers keep an open mind about these things, but it\u2019s critical that your letters of recommendation provide all the clues that schools look for. Not only should your recommendations emphasize the four dimensions mentioned at the start of this post, but they should also clearly demonstrate the enthusiasm that your recommenders have about you and your business school candidacy. Find someone who can do that, and you will be fine.
\nWe frequently talk to business applicants who have a seemingly good candidate in mind, but they haven\u2019t worked with that person for a few years. When you are a young professional, a few years is an eternity in terms of your development. Ideally, your substitute recommender will have worked with you in just the last year or two, or (even better) still works with you now.<\/p>\n
\nIf your recommendation writer has never delivered a performance review in any setting, how will he or she be able to speak about your candidacy with authority? This doesn\u2019t mean that your recommendation writer needs to have managed an entire department for years; the point is to find someone who can deliver a fair, even-handed-sounding (but still glowingly positive!) review of your candidacy.<\/p>\n
\nThis person must have worked closely with you for some period of time; otherwise, they don\u2019t really know your professional abilities and potential. We wrote \u201cnon-social\u201d to make clear that this person needs to be more than an acquaintance, but we stopped short of saying \u201cprofessional\u201d since this person may come from outside of your job. For instance, if you devote serious time to a non-profit organization, someone who has worked with you\u00a0 there may know you very well and may be a good person to provide a letter of recommendation.<\/p>\n
\nThis question always applies, even if your recommendation comes from your current boss. Too often, the recommendation writer will underestimate the task, or will simply say, \u201cI don\u2019t have time. You just write it for me and I\u2019ll sign it.\u201d Make sure that your recommendation writer understands the task at hand, and devotes enough time to it. You can help a great deal by providing specific examples of your recent successes that he or she may not remember. Doing that makes their\u00a0 job easier, and makes the final product stronger.<\/p>\n
\nMake sure to subscribe to the Veritas Prep blog <\/a>for up to date admissions information!<\/p>\n
![\"\"](\"https:\/\/gmatclub.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2011\/10\/Veritas-New-Logo.jpg\" "\\"Veritas"){kind=logo}
<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"