Posting this again because not satisfied with explanations : GMAT Sentence Correction (SC)
Check GMAT Club Decision Tracker for the Latest School Decision Releases https://gmatclub.com/AppTrack

 It is currently 26 Feb 2017, 06:13

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# Posting this again because not satisfied with explanations

Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

Director
Joined: 08 Jun 2007
Posts: 583
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 97 [0], given: 0

Posting this again because not satisfied with explanations [#permalink]

### Show Tags

07 Sep 2007, 10:26
00:00

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

0% (00:00) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 0 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

Posting this again because not satisfied with explanations earlier.
Please I am looking for explanations and not straight answer, which I know.

Contrary to popular opinion, the movement toward a service economy is leading neither to lower standards of living, more of an unequal distribution of income, or displacing the physical production of goods.

(A) leading neither to lower standards of living, more of an unequal distribution of income, or
(B) leading neither to lower standards of living nor a more unequal distribution of income, or
(C) not leading to either lower standards of living nor to more of an unequal distribution of income, and neither is it
(D) not leading to lower standards of living, more of an unequal distribution of income, and it is not
(E) not leading to lower standards of living or to a more unequal distribution of income, nor is it
If you have any questions
New!
CEO
Joined: 21 Jan 2007
Posts: 2756
Location: New York City
Followers: 11

Kudos [?]: 884 [0], given: 4

### Show Tags

07 Sep 2007, 10:34
http://www.gmatclub.com/forum/viewtopic ... rds+living

what is wrong with our explanation?
VP
Joined: 10 Jun 2007
Posts: 1459
Followers: 7

Kudos [?]: 263 [0], given: 0

Re: SC - Neither - Nor - Or . [#permalink]

### Show Tags

07 Sep 2007, 10:41
ashkrs wrote:
Posting this again because not satisfied with explanations earlier.
Please I am looking for explanations and not straight answer, which I know.

Contrary to popular opinion, the movement toward a service economy is leading neither to lower standards of living, more of an unequal distribution of income, or displacing the physical production of goods.

(A) leading neither to lower standards of living, more of an unequal distribution of income, or
(B) leading neither to lower standards of living nor a more unequal distribution of income, or
(C) not leading to either lower standards of living nor to more of an unequal distribution of income, and neither is it
(D) not leading to lower standards of living, more of an unequal distribution of income, and it is not
(E) not leading to lower standards of living or to a more unequal distribution of income, nor is it

Clearly E.
Were you confused between D and E? Or are you not sure about the "nor" construction?
Director
Joined: 08 Jun 2007
Posts: 583
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 97 [0], given: 0

Re: SC - Neither - Nor - Or . [#permalink]

### Show Tags

07 Sep 2007, 10:48
bkk145 wrote:
ashkrs wrote:
Posting this again because not satisfied with explanations earlier.
Please I am looking for explanations and not straight answer, which I know.

Contrary to popular opinion, the movement toward a service economy is leading neither to lower standards of living, more of an unequal distribution of income, or displacing the physical production of goods.

(A) leading neither to lower standards of living, more of an unequal distribution of income, or
(B) leading neither to lower standards of living nor a more unequal distribution of income, or
(C) not leading to either lower standards of living nor to more of an unequal distribution of income, and neither is it
(D) not leading to lower standards of living, more of an unequal distribution of income, and it is not
(E) not leading to lower standards of living or to a more unequal distribution of income, nor is it

Clearly E.
Were you confused between D and E? Or are you not sure about the "nor" construction?

I was more confused in fitting "not" instead of "neither".
I know these idioms involving "Not"
Not X but Y
Not only…but also
Not so much…as

and none of them were fitting here.

bmw's explanation in earlier thread helps->
idiom is Neither A or B, nor C
in this question, it is Not A or B, nor C
Re: SC - Neither - Nor - Or .   [#permalink] 07 Sep 2007, 10:48
Similar topics Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
5 Because of Elnath Industries posting a second consecutive 13 04 Dec 2012, 11:49
This is already posted but the explanation isnt clear in the 4 03 Jul 2009, 20:58
Posted again : SC_baggio(1) 3 12 Feb 2009, 18:25
Need explanation 6 26 Dec 2007, 20:25
I am posting this again as I see two different (OA) 19 14 Aug 2007, 11:26
Display posts from previous: Sort by