It is currently 11 Dec 2017, 16:06

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# 1000 CR doubt

 new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics
Author Message
Intern
Joined: 20 Mar 2010
Posts: 3

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 0

1000 CR doubt [#permalink]

### Show Tags

20 Mar 2010, 12:16
00:00

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

0% (00:00) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 0 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

Hi Guys,
I need help with the below CR question. Please post your choice along with the explanation.GMAT

Statement of a United States copper mining company: Import quotas should be imposed on the less expensive copper mined outside the country to maintain the price of copper in this country; otherwise, our companies will not be able to stay in business.

Response of a United States copper wire manufacturer: United States wire and cable manufacturers purchase about 70 percent of the copper mined in the United States. If the copper prices we pay are not at the international level, our sales will drop, and then the demand for United States copper will go down.
If the factual information presented by both companies is accurate, the best assessment of the logical relationship between the two arguments is that the wire manufacturer’s argument

(A) is self-serving and irrelevant to the proposal of the mining company
(B) is circular, presupposing what it seeks to prove about the proposal of the mining company
(C) shows that the proposal of the mining company would have a negative effect on the mining company’s own business
(D) fails to give a reason why the proposal of the mining company should not be put into effect to alleviate the concern of the mining company for staying in business
(E) establishes that even the mining company’s business will prosper if the mining company’s proposal is rejected

Cheers,

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 0

Manager
Joined: 17 Jan 2010
Posts: 212

Kudos [?]: 57 [0], given: 21

Schools: UCLA (Anderson) - Class of 2013
GMAT 3: 740 Q49 V41
Re: 1000 CR doubt [#permalink]

### Show Tags

20 Mar 2010, 17:21
aiming800 wrote:
Hi Guys,
I need help with the below CR question. Please post your choice along with the explanation.GMAT

Statement of a United States copper mining company: Import quotas should be imposed on the less expensive copper mined outside the country to maintain the price of copper in this country; otherwise, our companies will not be able to stay in business.

Response of a United States copper wire manufacturer: United States wire and cable manufacturers purchase about 70 percent of the copper mined in the United States. If the copper prices we pay are not at the international level, our sales will drop, and then the demand for United States copper will go down.
If the factual information presented by both companies is accurate, the best assessment of the logical relationship between the two arguments is that the wire manufacturer’s argument

(A) is self-serving and irrelevant to the proposal of the mining company (the argument states that the demand for the copper will go down)

(B) is circular, presupposing what it seeks to prove about the proposal of the mining company (i don't see a circular reasoning)

(C) shows that the proposal of the mining company would have a negative effect on the mining company’s own business (the wire manufacturers use 70% of its copper from the US and if the wire price is not competitive from the price increase caused by the import quota, then the sales will drop along with the demand for copper from the US wire manufacturing companies)

(D) fails to give a reason why the proposal of the mining company should not be put into effect to alleviate the concern of the mining company for staying in business (the reason is given as, the import quota will hurt the mining company)

(E) establishes that even the mining company’s business will prosper if the mining company’s proposal is rejected (this is not mentioned)

Cheers,

C
_________________

Kudos [?]: 57 [0], given: 21

Re: 1000 CR doubt   [#permalink] 20 Mar 2010, 17:21
Display posts from previous: Sort by

# 1000 CR doubt

 new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics

Moderators: GMATNinjaTwo, GMATNinja

 Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.