GMAT Question of the Day - Daily to your Mailbox; hard ones only

It is currently 16 Jul 2018, 13:29

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel

A 1972 agreement between Canada and the United States reduce

  post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
VP
VP
avatar
Status: Final Lap Up!!!
Affiliations: NYK Line
Joined: 21 Sep 2012
Posts: 1022
Location: India
GMAT 1: 410 Q35 V11
GMAT 2: 530 Q44 V20
GMAT 3: 630 Q45 V31
GPA: 3.84
WE: Engineering (Transportation)
Re: A 1972 agreement between Canada and the United States reduce [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 13 Dec 2012, 09:01
egmat wrote:
Hi All

the verb tense - past perfect tense - had been allowed - is incorrect because it non-sensically implies that municipalities were allowed to dump a certain amount sometime in the past - (they are no longer allowed to dump now, since the action is already completed) and then the next event in the past happened - the agreement reduced this amount. It is not possible to reduce an amount for something that has already happened (had been allowed).


Hi shradha
I am confused when you say both A and B has the same tense error i.e. the job is no more done...

I advised him because I had done the job in the past.<<<It means i am not doing that job>>>
I advised him because I had been doing it.<<<It means i am doing the job>>> or <<<I am no more doing the job>>>

Also what is the difference between "reduced the amount of phosphate" and "reduced the phosphate amount.."

Can we blindly infer that with which ever action "had" is used that will mean that action itself is over.......

Thanks
Archit
e-GMAT Discount CodesOptimus Prep Discount CodesEconomist GMAT Tutor Discount Codes
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 04 Dec 2011
Posts: 8
Re: A 1972 agreement between Canada and the United States reduce [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 14 Dec 2012, 00:10
Hi Shraddha,

I got 2 sentences from http://magoosh.com/gmat/2012/gmat-gramm ... -vs-fewer/

1. This amount of mashed potatoes should be enough for dinner.

2. This number of baked potatoes should be enough for dinner.

I learned a rule that "Amount" is used for un-countable noun. I donn't understand the first sentence. Could you help explain?

Thanks,
Expert Post
e-GMAT Representative
User avatar
G
Joined: 02 Nov 2011
Posts: 2547
Re: A 1972 agreement between Canada and the United States reduce [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 14 Dec 2012, 07:05
tinyturtle wrote:

1. This amount of mashed potatoes should be enough for dinner.

2. This number of baked potatoes should be enough for dinner.

I learned a rule that "Amount" is used for un-countable noun. I donn't understand the first sentence. Could you help explain?

Thanks,


Hi tinyturtle,

Yes, we do use "amount" for uncountable noun. And this rule is in play the first sentence.

1. This amount of mashed potatoes should be enough for dinner.

Mashed potatoes can not be counted because they are crushed and mashed after being boiled. Hence, it is not possible to count them.

2. This number of baked potatoes should be enough for dinner.

However, when a potato is baked, it still remains in its shape and can be counted. Hence, this sentence is correct.

Hope this helps. :)
Thanks.
Shraddha
_________________












| '4 out of Top 5' Instructors on gmatclub | 70 point improvement guarantee | www.e-gmat.com

Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 04 Dec 2011
Posts: 8
Re: A 1972 agreement between Canada and the United States reduce [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 16 Dec 2012, 05:26
Thank you so much Shraddha. I got it now. :)
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 26 Jan 2012
Posts: 60
Re: A 1972 agreement between Canada and the United States reduce [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 30 Dec 2012, 10:03
A – No necessity to change the tense. Eliminate.
B – Amount of phosphate is better than phosphate amount. Eliminate
C – Same as B
D – Same tense. Keep
E – “that are” allowed for dumping is better. Plus its passive. Eliminate
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 26 Jan 2012
Posts: 60
Re: A 1972 agreement between Canada and the United States reduce [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 30 Dec 2012, 10:04
A – No necessity to change the tense. Eliminate.
B – Amount of phosphate is better than phosphate amount. Eliminate
C – Same as B
D – Same tense. Keep
E – “that are” allowed for dumping is better. Plus its passive. Eliminate
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 26 Jan 2012
Posts: 60
Re: A 1972 agreement between Canada and the United States reduce [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 30 Dec 2012, 10:05
A – No necessity to change the tense. Eliminate.
B – Amount of phosphate is better than phosphate amount. Eliminate
C – Same as B
D – Same tense. Keep
E – “that are” allowed for dumping is better. Plus its passive. Eliminate
2 KUDOS received
Intern
Intern
User avatar
Status: Tougher times ...
Joined: 04 Nov 2012
Posts: 47
Location: India
GMAT 1: 480 Q32 V25
WE: General Management (Manufacturing)
Re: A 1972 agreement between Canada and the United States reduce [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 16 Mar 2013, 08:50
2
1. A 1972 agreement between Canada and the United States reduced the amount of phosphates that municipalities had been allowed to dump into the Great Lakes.

(A) reduced the amount of phosphates that municipalities had been allowed to dump
(B) reduced the phosphate amount that municipalities had been dumping
(C) reduces the phosphate amount municipalities have been allowed to dump
(D) reduced the amount of phosphates that municipalities are allowed to dump
(E) reduces the amount of phosphates allowed for dumping by municipalities

The correct answer is A. Why not B or D ?
_________________

Kabilan.K
Kudos is a boost to participate actively and contribute more to the forum :)

Board of Directors
User avatar
P
Joined: 01 Sep 2010
Posts: 3428
Re: A 1972 agreement between Canada and the United States reduce [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 16 Mar 2013, 13:49
Hi

first of all the part of the sentence must be always underlined. Thanks

Secondly: 1000 series is not a good resource to study at all.

B is wron because the right verbe tense is had been allowed to dump not dumping

D is wrong because it seems to suggest that the permission to municipalities is given by itself and not by an agreement. The verb must point out to the real subject of the sentece: the agreement NOT municipalities

regards
_________________

COLLECTION OF QUESTIONS AND RESOURCES
Quant: 1. ALL GMATPrep questions Quant/Verbal 2. Bunuel Signature Collection - The Next Generation 3. Bunuel Signature Collection ALL-IN-ONE WITH SOLUTIONS 4. Veritas Prep Blog PDF Version 5. MGMAT Study Hall Thursdays with Ron Quant Videos
Verbal:1. Verbal question bank and directories by Carcass 2. MGMAT Study Hall Thursdays with Ron Verbal Videos 3. Critical Reasoning_Oldy but goldy question banks 4. Sentence Correction_Oldy but goldy question banks 5. Reading-comprehension_Oldy but goldy question banks

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 10 Mar 2013
Posts: 130
Premium Member
Re: A 1972 agreement between Canada and the United States reduce [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 16 Mar 2013, 18:28
i strongly feel that D sud be the answer . in fact A is wrong !!
A gives a nonsensical meaning that the agreement of 1972 reduced some thing that these countries had dumped in the past !! u can reduce the amount of something that these countries are dumping at the moment and not of something that they had dumped

Quote:
carcass wrote:D is wrong because it seems to suggest that the permission to municipalities is given by itself and not by an agreement. The verb must point out to the real subject of the sentece: the agreement NOT municipalities


no where it is suggesting such a meaning !! in fact all that D means is that some agreement reduced the amount of some blah blah thing that these municipalities are allowed to dump
1 KUDOS received
Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 29 Jun 2011
Posts: 135
WE 1: Information Technology(Retail)
Re: A 1972 agreement between Canada and the United States reduce [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 16 Mar 2013, 21:41
1
D should be the ans.

(A) reduced the amount of phosphates that municipalities had been allowed to dump
(B) reduced the phosphate amount that municipalities had been dumping
(C) reduces the phosphate amount municipalities have been allowed to dump
(D) reduced the amount of phosphates that municipalities are allowed to dump
(E) reduces the amount of phosphates allowed for dumping by municipalities
1 KUDOS received
Intern
Intern
User avatar
Status: Tougher times ...
Joined: 04 Nov 2012
Posts: 47
Location: India
GMAT 1: 480 Q32 V25
WE: General Management (Manufacturing)
Re: A 1972 agreement between Canada and the United States reduce [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 16 Mar 2013, 23:09
1
neha24 wrote:
i strongly feel that D sud be the answer . in fact A is wrong !!
A gives a nonsensical meaning that the agreement of 1972 reduced some thing that these countries had dumped in the past !! u can reduce the amount of something that these countries are dumping at the moment and not of something that they had dumped

Quote:
carcass wrote:D is wrong because it seems to suggest that the permission to municipalities is given by itself and not by an agreement. The verb must point out to the real subject of the sentece: the agreement NOT municipalities


no where it is suggesting such a meaning !! in fact all that D means is that some agreement reduced the amount of some blah blah thing that these municipalities are allowed to dump


In "D" can we use the present tense " are " ? Since the entire argument is in past, why can't we use "were" , instead of "are".
_________________

Kabilan.K
Kudos is a boost to participate actively and contribute more to the forum :)

1 KUDOS received
Intern
Intern
User avatar
Status: Tougher times ...
Joined: 04 Nov 2012
Posts: 47
Location: India
GMAT 1: 480 Q32 V25
WE: General Management (Manufacturing)
Re: A 1972 agreement between Canada and the United States reduce [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 16 Mar 2013, 23:15
1
kabilank87 wrote:
1. A 1972 agreement between Canada and the United States reduced the amount of phosphates that municipalities had been allowed to dump into the Great Lakes.

(A) reduced the amount of phosphates that municipalities had been allowed to dump
(B) reduced the phosphate amount that municipalities had been dumping
(C) reduces the phosphate amount municipalities have been allowed to dump
(D) reduced the amount of phosphates that municipalities are allowed to dump
(E) reduces the amount of phosphates allowed for dumping by municipalities

The correct answer is A. Why not B or D ?


Guys , i am very uncertain about basics and usage of

1. Present perfect
2. Past perfect
3. Present progressive
4. Past progressive

i am referring Manhattan SC guide for basic. When i am raeding the theory it sounds good, but i often confuses myself while seeing such questions in tests.

will you suggest how can i strengthen these areas. Any materials or guides ..?
_________________

Kabilan.K
Kudos is a boost to participate actively and contribute more to the forum :)

1 KUDOS received
Intern
Intern
User avatar
Status: Tougher times ...
Joined: 04 Nov 2012
Posts: 47
Location: India
GMAT 1: 480 Q32 V25
WE: General Management (Manufacturing)
Re: A 1972 agreement between Canada and the United States reduce [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 17 Mar 2013, 06:26
1
Phoenix72 wrote:
D should be the ans.

(A) reduced the amount of phosphates that municipalities had been allowed to dump
(B) reduced the phosphate amount that municipalities had been dumping
(C) reduces the phosphate amount municipalities have been allowed to dump
(D) reduced the amount of phosphates that municipalities are allowed to dump
(E) reduces the amount of phosphates allowed for dumping by municipalities


Hi phoenix,

I am ok with your explanation for "C" and "E". I haven't noticed the use of present tense before.

But will you please explain what's wrong with "A" and "B".
_________________

Kabilan.K
Kudos is a boost to participate actively and contribute more to the forum :)

Intern
Intern
User avatar
Status: Tougher times ...
Joined: 04 Nov 2012
Posts: 47
Location: India
GMAT 1: 480 Q32 V25
WE: General Management (Manufacturing)
Re: A 1972 agreement between Canada and the United States reduce [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 17 Mar 2013, 06:38
kabilank87 wrote:
neha24 wrote:
i strongly feel that D sud be the answer . in fact A is wrong !!
A gives a nonsensical meaning that the agreement of 1972 reduced some thing that these countries had dumped in the past !! u can reduce the amount of something that these countries are dumping at the moment and not of something that they had dumped

Quote:
carcass wrote:D is wrong because it seems to suggest that the permission to municipalities is given by itself and not by an agreement. The verb must point out to the real subject of the sentece: the agreement NOT municipalities


no where it is suggesting such a meaning !! in fact all that D means is that some agreement reduced the amount of some blah blah thing that these municipalities are allowed to dump


In "D" can we use the present tense " are " ? Since the entire argument is in past, why can't we use "were" , instead of "are".


in your explanation of "A", since there are 2 actions happened in the past ( the agreement reduced ... and the countries dumped ), and the action dumped occurs earlier , what's wrong in using " past perfect - had dumped " ? - It is according to the definition of usage of past perfect in manhattan SC.

Similarly in "B" .. the background event is " countries dumping " and the interrupting foreground event is " the agreement reducing what the countries dumping " .. i feel this is also correct according to the usage of past progressive in manhattan SC.

Will you please clarify ..?
_________________

Kabilan.K
Kudos is a boost to participate actively and contribute more to the forum :)

1 KUDOS received
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 10 Mar 2013
Posts: 130
Premium Member
Re: A 1972 agreement between Canada and the United States reduce [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 17 Mar 2013, 06:56
1
to kabilank87
A says: A 1972 agreement between Canada and the United States reduced the amount of phosphates that municipalities had been allowed to dump into the Great Lakes.

see the fact that some rule is to be applied cannot overtake the fact that meaning of the sentence should come out good !!
think for a moment what past perfect is doing here? its like u are asking some country to reduce the amount of something that they had dumped in the past (lets say 100 years ago !!)
can u do that ? obviously no !!
u can only reduce the amount that this country is dumpling at the moment !!
hence A is wrong
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 25 Mar 2012
Posts: 19
Location: India
Concentration: Strategy, General Management
GMAT 1: 710 Q50 V36
GPA: 3.04
WE: Consulting (Computer Software)
Re: A 1972 agreement between Canada and the United States reduce [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 17 Mar 2013, 08:59
kabilank87 wrote:
1. A 1972 agreement between Canada and the United States reduced the amount of phosphates that municipalities had been allowed to dump into the Great Lakes.

(A) reduced the amount of phosphates that municipalities had been allowed to dump
(B) reduced the phosphate amount that municipalities had been dumping
(C) reduces the phosphate amount municipalities have been allowed to dump
(D) reduced the amount of phosphates that municipalities are allowed to dump
(E) reduces the amount of phosphates allowed for dumping by municipalities

The correct answer is A. Why not B or D ?


IMO, D is the answer.
A used past perfect "had been". This is not needed as no 2 past events are chronologically arranged. Likewise, the usage of past perfect continuous is also not needed in option B.
1 KUDOS received
Intern
Intern
User avatar
Status: Tougher times ...
Joined: 04 Nov 2012
Posts: 47
Location: India
GMAT 1: 480 Q32 V25
WE: General Management (Manufacturing)
Re: A 1972 agreement between Canada and the United States reduce [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 18 Mar 2013, 09:58
1
anandrajakrishnan wrote:
kabilank87 wrote:
1. A 1972 agreement between Canada and the United States reduced the amount of phosphates that municipalities had been allowed to dump into the Great Lakes.

(A) reduced the amount of phosphates that municipalities had been allowed to dump
(B) reduced the phosphate amount that municipalities had been dumping
(C) reduces the phosphate amount municipalities have been allowed to dump
(D) reduced the amount of phosphates that municipalities are allowed to dump
(E) reduces the amount of phosphates allowed for dumping by municipalities

The correct answer is A. Why not B or D ?


IMO, D is the answer.
A used past perfect "had been". This is not needed as no 2 past events are chronologically arranged. Likewise, the usage of past perfect continuous is also not needed in option B.


Hi anandrajakrishnan / Neha

In " A " i see the 2 events are chronologically arranged .

By assuming we are in 1972 when the agreement have just passed, we would have told that " The countries have been dumping it for some years blah blanh blah .. and the agreement reduced that( Dumping). The " dumping" started in the past and continues till the agreement came into effect and reduced it. Since it involves 2 different time complex time periods. So i think past perfect / perfect continuous should be used here. But i am not certain about it.
_________________

Kabilan.K
Kudos is a boost to participate actively and contribute more to the forum :)

Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 25 Mar 2012
Posts: 19
Location: India
Concentration: Strategy, General Management
GMAT 1: 710 Q50 V36
GPA: 3.04
WE: Consulting (Computer Software)
Re: A 1972 agreement between Canada and the United States reduce [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 18 Mar 2013, 20:04
kabilank87 wrote:
anandrajakrishnan wrote:
kabilank87 wrote:
1. A 1972 agreement between Canada and the United States reduced the amount of phosphates that municipalities had been allowed to dump into the Great Lakes.

(A) reduced the amount of phosphates that municipalities had been allowed to dump
(B) reduced the phosphate amount that municipalities had been dumping
(C) reduces the phosphate amount municipalities have been allowed to dump
(D) reduced the amount of phosphates that municipalities are allowed to dump
(E) reduces the amount of phosphates allowed for dumping by municipalities

The correct answer is A. Why not B or D ?


IMO, D is the answer.
A used past perfect "had been". This is not needed as no 2 past events are chronologically arranged. Likewise, the usage of past perfect continuous is also not needed in option B.


Hi anandrajakrishnan / Neha

In " A " i see the 2 events are chronologically arranged .

By assuming we are in 1972 when the agreement have just passed, we would have told that " The countries have been dumping it for some years blah blanh blah .. and the agreement reduced that( Dumping). The " dumping" started in the past and continues till the agreement came into effect and reduced it. Since it involves 2 different time complex time periods. So i think past perfect / perfect continuous should be used here. But i am not certain about it.


There is a subtle difference in meaning here. Option A changes the meaning to "the agreement reduced the amount of phosphates that munipality has dumped so far". How can the agreement reduce the amount of already dumped phosphate?
Option D gives the meaning outright that "the amount of phosphates that the municipalities were allowed to dump is reduced after the agreement"
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 27 Oct 2009
Posts: 66
Location: India
Re: A 1972 agreement between Canada and the United States reduce [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 19 Mar 2013, 00:05
kabilank87 wrote:
1. A 1972 agreement between Canada and the United States reduced the amount of phosphates that municipalities had been allowed to dump into the Great Lakes.

(A) reduced the amount of phosphates that municipalities had been allowed to dump
(B) reduced the phosphate amount that municipalities had been dumping
(C) reduces the phosphate amount municipalities have been allowed to dump
(D) reduced the amount of phosphates that municipalities are allowed to dump
(E) reduces the amount of phosphates allowed for dumping by municipalities

The correct answer is A. Why not B or D ?



anandrajakrishnan,

You are right - How can the agreement reduce the amount of already dumped phosphate?
But the agreement can put a restriction on the amount of phosphate to be dumped.

Moreover, D changes the tense flow of the sentence by the usage of 'are'.
Hope this clarifies.

Regds
Sony
_________________

A bend in the road is not the end of the road unless you fail to take a turn.....

Re: A 1972 agreement between Canada and the United States reduce   [#permalink] 19 Mar 2013, 00:05

Go to page   Previous    1  ...  11   12   13   14   15   16   17   18   19   20  ...  22    Next  [ 427 posts ] 

Display posts from previous: Sort by

A 1972 agreement between Canada and the United States reduce

  post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  

Events & Promotions

PREV
NEXT


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.