It is currently 16 Dec 2017, 05:15

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# A calendar stick

Author Message
Intern
Joined: 05 Sep 2006
Posts: 39

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

11 Sep 2006, 00:49
00:00

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

0% (00:00) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 0 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

A â€œcalendar stickâ€

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 0

Director
Joined: 28 Dec 2005
Posts: 748

Kudos [?]: 18 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

11 Sep 2006, 00:53

Also I think both forms of usage "evidence that" and "evidence of" may be correct. Sorry did not see this part of your question before.

Last edited by Futuristic on 11 Sep 2006, 10:50, edited 1 time in total.

Kudos [?]: 18 [0], given: 0

VP
Joined: 21 Mar 2006
Posts: 1124

Kudos [?]: 56 [0], given: 0

Location: Bangalore

### Show Tags

11 Sep 2006, 02:02
(A) that the North American Indians have developed advanced full-year calendars basing them - 'them' is ambiguos
(B) of the North American Indians who have developed advanced full-year calendars and based them - 'them' is ambiguos , evidence of North American Indians?? - doesnt make sense.
(C) of the development of advanced full-year calendars by North American Indians, basing them - 'them' is ambiguos
(D) of the North American Indians and their development of advanced full-year calendars based - evidence of North American Indians?? - doesnt make sense.
(E) that the North American Indians developed advanced full-year calendars based - CORRECT

Kudos [?]: 56 [0], given: 0

VP
Joined: 21 Aug 2006
Posts: 1011

Kudos [?]: 39 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

11 Sep 2006, 05:57
question based on "modifier"..only E has right modifier.
_________________

The path is long, but self-surrender makes it short;
the way is difficult, but perfect trust makes it easy.

Kudos [?]: 39 [0], given: 0

VP
Joined: 28 Mar 2006
Posts: 1367

Kudos [?]: 38 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

11 Sep 2006, 14:26
That introduces the clause and A and E are the ones

HEre we need a simple past as this was done centuries ago.

So E it is

Kudos [?]: 38 [0], given: 0

Manager
Joined: 15 Aug 2006
Posts: 95

Kudos [?]: 6 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

11 Sep 2006, 15:18
E.

(A) that the North American Indians have developed advanced full-year calendars basing them

basing them - them refers to what? Indians? calendars?

(B) of the North American Indians who have developed advanced full-year calendars and based them

changes the meaning of the sentence, it says calendar stick is evidence for the North American Indians.

(C) of the development of advanced full-year calendars by North American Indians, basing them

same reason as that for A

(D) of the North American Indians and their development of advanced full-year calendars based

same reason as that for C

(E) that the North American Indians developed advanced full-year
calendars based

Clear and concise
_________________

http://gmatstuff.blogspot.com

Kudos [?]: 6 [0], given: 0

VP
Joined: 07 Nov 2005
Posts: 1115

Kudos [?]: 54 [0], given: 1

Location: India

### Show Tags

11 Sep 2006, 22:14
Should be E.
In addition to the above reasons, E is concise
"that the North American Indians developed advanced ".
It doesnt use "who have developed " or " have developed"
_________________

Trying hard to conquer Quant.

Kudos [?]: 54 [0], given: 1

CEO
Joined: 21 Jan 2007
Posts: 2734

Kudos [?]: 1091 [0], given: 4

Location: New York City

### Show Tags

30 Jun 2007, 17:17
Futuristic wrote:

Also I think both forms of usage "evidence that" and "evidence of" may be correct. Sorry did not see this part of your question before.

i do not think evidence that or evidence of is tested here. that is used to start a restrictive clause.

Kudos [?]: 1091 [0], given: 4

Manager
Joined: 17 May 2007
Posts: 169

Kudos [?]: 14 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

01 Jul 2007, 03:17

I don't think there is any general rule as such.

Kudos [?]: 14 [0], given: 0

Director
Joined: 14 Jan 2007
Posts: 775

Kudos [?]: 183 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

01 Jul 2007, 07:23
'E'

Here the emphasis is on the evidence of the incident (Indians developing the calendars) rather than on the Indian's existence.

Kudos [?]: 183 [0], given: 0

01 Jul 2007, 07:23
Display posts from previous: Sort by

# A calendar stick

Moderators: GMATNinjaTwo, GMATNinja

 Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.