It is currently 18 Nov 2017, 18:42

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# A careful review of hospital fatalities due to anesthesia

Author Message
Director
Joined: 29 Jul 2006
Posts: 851

Kudos [?]: 143 [0], given: 0

A careful review of hospital fatalities due to anesthesia [#permalink]

### Show Tags

23 Mar 2007, 10:52
00:00

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

100% (01:23) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 1 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

A careful review of hospital fatalities due to anesthesia during the last 20 years indicates that the most significant safety improvements resulted from better training of anesthetists. Equipment that monitors a patientâ€™s oxygen and carbon dioxide levels was not available in most operating rooms during the period under review. Therefore, the increased use of such monitoring equipment in operating rooms will not significantly cut fatalities due to anesthesia.
A flaw in the argument is that
(A) the evidence cited to show that one factor led to a certain result is not sufficient to show that a second factor will not also lead to that result
(B) the reasons given in support of the conclusion presuppose the truth of that conclusion
(C) the evidence cited to show that a certain factor was absent when a certain result occurred does not show that the absence of that factor caused that result
(D) the evidence cited in support of the conclusion is inconsistent with other information that is provided
(E) the reason indicated for the claim that one event caused a second more strongly supports the claim that both events were independent effects of a third event

Confused b/w A or B...Please explain

Kudos [?]: 143 [0], given: 0

Manager
Joined: 25 May 2006
Posts: 226

Kudos [?]: 75 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

23 Mar 2007, 11:32
Going with A.

We have Equipment, Safety and Training.
More training of anesthetists = more safety. However, more equipment not necessary gives more safety. In other words, having more equipment does not mean a cut of fatalities.
_________________

Who is John Galt?

Kudos [?]: 75 [0], given: 0

23 Mar 2007, 11:32
Display posts from previous: Sort by

# A careful review of hospital fatalities due to anesthesia

Moderators: GMATNinjaTwo, GMATNinja

 Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.