A certain eye infection has been linked to exposure to a : GMAT Critical Reasoning (CR)
Check GMAT Club Decision Tracker for the Latest School Decision Releases https://gmatclub.com/AppTrack

 It is currently 24 Feb 2017, 20:01

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# A certain eye infection has been linked to exposure to a

 new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics
Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

Senior Manager
Status: Making every effort to create original content for you!!
Joined: 23 Dec 2010
Posts: 490
Location: United States
Concentration: Healthcare, Social Entrepreneurship
GMAT 1: 660 Q48 V34
GMAT 2: 750 Q49 V42
Followers: 351

Kudos [?]: 1953 [5] , given: 82

A certain eye infection has been linked to exposure to a [#permalink]

### Show Tags

25 Jun 2013, 21:52
5
KUDOS
Expert's post
1
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

87% (02:07) correct 13% (01:28) wrong based on 259 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

A certain eye infection has been linked to exposure to a certain type of high-salinity sea water. While not dangerous, these infections are painful and often unnoticeable, at least to those who contract them. Over 80% of children ages 4-14 who bathed in a particular sea called "The White Sea" have contracted the infection in varying levels of severity. Although bathing in "The White Sea" does not always lead to a contraction of the infection, the only way to completely avoid the infection is to refrain from bathing in "The White Sea" and other Sea waters altogether.

Which of the following indicates a flaw in the author’s reasoning?

A) It relies on evidence about a specific place to make a recommendation about an entire class of such places.

B) It assumes that one possible cause of a condition is the only cause of that condition.

C) It assumes to be true what it sets out to prove.

D) It makes a generalization based on one segment of the population.

E) It contradicts itself by proclaiming a condition to be not dangerous and then offering a recommendation to avoid that condition.

OA after discussions; Good explanations will receive Kudos !! Try to explain why an answer choice is correct/ incorrect.
_________________

Please Read and Follow the 9 Rules of Posting in Verbal Forum

If you have any questions
you can ask an expert
New!
VP
Status: Far, far away!
Joined: 02 Sep 2012
Posts: 1123
Location: Italy
Concentration: Finance, Entrepreneurship
GPA: 3.8
Followers: 184

Kudos [?]: 1998 [2] , given: 219

Re: A certain eye infection has been linked to exposure to [#permalink]

### Show Tags

25 Jun 2013, 23:32
2
KUDOS
2
This post was
BOOKMARKED
This is tough as almost all options reflect part of the reasoning, however only one is flawed.

Which of the following indicates a flaw in the author’s reasoning?

A) It relies on evidence about a specific place to make a recommendation about an entire class of such places.
This reflect the reasoning "Over 80% of children ages 4-14 who bathed in a particular sea called "The White Sea""=>avoid all Sea waters.
This is a legit reasoning, as the infection is linked with high-salinity sea water, so this recommendation makes sense.

B) It assumes that one possible cause of a condition is the only cause of that condition.
IMO CORRECT. The first line states: "A certain eye infection has been linked to exposure to a certain type of high-salinity sea water" => "the only way to completely avoid the infection is to refrain from bathing in "The White Sea" and other Sea waters altogether.".
We know that the infection has been linked to water, but could be linked to other factors as well, we don't know. But the passage excludes this possibility by stating that the ONLY way to avoid the infection is to refrain from sea water. This is a flawed reasoning.

C) It assumes to be true what it sets out to prove.
This is simply not the case.

D) It makes a generalization based on one segment of the population.
This reflects the line "Over 80% of children ages 4-14 who bathed in a particular sea called "The White Sea" have contracted the infection in varying levels of severity.". However the text does not say "because the children have contracted the infection everybody should avoid the sea water". The text does not generalize in such way.

E) It contradicts itself by proclaiming a condition to be not dangerous and then offering a recommendation to avoid that condition.
It's true that the passage says that the infection is not dangerous, but it says that is painful; so offering a recommendation to avoid it is not a flawed reasoning.
_________________

It is beyond a doubt that all our knowledge that begins with experience.

Kant , Critique of Pure Reason

Tips and tricks: Inequalities , Mixture | Review: MGMAT workshop
Strategy: SmartGMAT v1.0 | Questions: Verbal challenge SC I-II- CR New SC set out !! , My Quant

Rules for Posting in the Verbal Forum - Rules for Posting in the Quant Forum[/size][/color][/b]

Director
Joined: 24 Aug 2009
Posts: 507
Schools: Harvard, Columbia, Stern, Booth, LSB,
Followers: 17

Kudos [?]: 693 [0], given: 276

Re: A certain eye infection has been linked to exposure to [#permalink]

### Show Tags

26 Jun 2013, 00:09
A certain eye infection has been linked to exposure to a certain type of high-salinity sea water. While not dangerous, these infections are painful and often unnoticeable, at least to those who contract them. Over 80% of children ages 4-14 who bathed in a particular sea called "The White Sea" have contracted the infection in varying levels of severity. Although bathing in "The White Sea" does not always lead to a contraction of the infection, the only way to completely avoid the infection is to refrain from bathing in "The White Sea" and other Sea waters altogether.
Premise- Infection is linked to bathing in high-salinity sea water
Premise- Infection is also seen in case of bathing in White Sea
Assumption- (As per 1st premise, we can safely assume that the WHITE SEA water is Highly saline)
Conclusion - The only way to avoid the infection is to refrain from bathing in "The White Sea" and other Sea waters altogether.
Flaw- Not all the sea waters are SALINE.

Which of the following indicates a flaw in the author’s reasoning?
A) It relies on evidence about a specific place to make a recommendation about an entire class of such places. - Absolutely Correct
B) It assumes that one possible cause of a condition is the only cause of that condition. - The conclusion does not discusses about the different cause of a condition. Incorrect
C) It assumes to be true what it sets out to prove. - Absolute incorrect
D) It makes a generalization based on one segment of the population. - very close but Incorrect
E) It contradicts itself by proclaiming a condition to be not dangerous and then offering a recommendation to avoid that condition. - Straight Incorrect
_________________

If you like my Question/Explanation or the contribution, Kindly appreciate by pressing KUDOS.
Kudos always maximizes GMATCLUB worth
-Game Theory

If you have any question regarding my post, kindly pm me or else I won't be able to reply

Intern
Joined: 12 May 2013
Posts: 19
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 5 [0], given: 0

Re: A certain eye infection has been linked to exposure to [#permalink]

### Show Tags

26 Jun 2013, 00:16
Its A.

Sent from my GT-N7105 using Tapatalk 2
Director
Joined: 14 Dec 2012
Posts: 842
Location: India
Concentration: General Management, Operations
GMAT 1: 700 Q50 V34
GPA: 3.6
Followers: 60

Kudos [?]: 1312 [1] , given: 197

Re: A certain eye infection has been linked to exposure to [#permalink]

### Show Tags

26 Jun 2013, 00:20
1
KUDOS
Vercules wrote:
A certain eye infection has been linked to exposure to a certain type of high-salinity sea water. While not dangerous, these infections are painful and often unnoticeable, at least to those who contract them. Over 80% of children ages 4-14 who bathed in a particular sea called "The White Sea" have contracted the infection in varying levels of severity. Although bathing in "The White Sea" does not always lead to a contraction of the infection, the only way to completely avoid the infection is to refrain from bathing in "The White Sea" and other Sea waters altogether.

Which of the following indicates a flaw in the author’s reasoning?

A) It relies on evidence about a specific place to make a recommendation about an entire class of such places.

B) It assumes that one possible cause of a condition is the only cause of that condition.

C) It assumes to be true what it sets out to prove.

D) It makes a generalization based on one segment of the population.

E) It contradicts itself by proclaiming a condition to be not dangerous and then offering a recommendation to avoid that condition.

OA after discussions; Good explanations will receive Kudos !! Try to explain why an answer choice is correct/ incorrect.

hi,

IMO B.

PREMISE: A certain eye infection has been linked to exposure to a certain type of high-salinity sea water.
PREMISE:Over 80% of children ages 4-14 who bathed in a particular sea called "The White Sea" have contracted the infection in varying levels of severity

CONCLUSION:the only way to completely avoid the infection is to refrain from bathing in "The White Sea" and other Sea waters altogether.
MEANS THE ONLY WAY TO AVOID THE INFECTION IS TO AVOID SEA BATHING

It is also stated that: Although bathing in "The White Sea" does not always lead to a contraction of the infection===>but still the author is concluding that the only cause of infection is sea bathing.

Authors flawed assumption is exposure to certain type of sea water can be avoided....by ONLY avoiding sea bathing in any sea.
but there may be other possibility that people might get exposed to that sea water in cases [color=#2e3192]such as BOATING in sea
.....
so author is actually assuming one of the possible cause to be the only cause.
hence B.[/color]
_________________

When you want to succeed as bad as you want to breathe ...then you will be successfull....

GIVE VALUE TO OFFICIAL QUESTIONS...

GMAT RCs VOCABULARY LIST: http://gmatclub.com/forum/vocabulary-list-for-gmat-reading-comprehension-155228.html
learn AWA writing techniques while watching video : http://www.gmatprepnow.com/module/gmat-analytical-writing-assessment

Manager
Status: Got Bling! Joined Phd Finance at IIML
Affiliations: IIMB, advantages.us, IIML
Joined: 03 Jul 2013
Posts: 99
Location: India
Concentration: Finance, Economics
Schools: iim-bangalore - Class of 1994
GMAT 1: 750 Q59 V43
GPA: 3.12
WE: Research (Investment Banking)
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 18 [0], given: 39

Re: A certain eye infection has been linked to exposure to [#permalink]

### Show Tags

05 Jul 2013, 22:34
Zarrolou wrote:
This is tough as almost all options reflect part of the reasoning, however only one is flawed.

Which of the following indicates a flaw in the author’s reasoning?

A) It relies on evidence about a specific place to make a recommendation about an entire class of such places.
This reflect the reasoning "Over 80% of children ages 4-14 who bathed in a particular sea called "The White Sea""=>avoid all Sea waters.
This is a legit reasoning, as the infection is linked with high-salinity sea water, so this recommendation makes sense.

B) It assumes that one possible cause of a condition is the only cause of that condition.
IMO CORRECT. The first line states: "A certain eye infection has been linked to exposure to a certain type of high-salinity sea water" => "the only way to completely avoid the infection is to refrain from bathing in "The White Sea" and other Sea waters altogether.".
We know that the infection has been linked to water, but could be linked to other factors as well, we don't know. But the passage excludes this possibility by stating that the ONLY way to avoid the infection is to refrain from sea water. This is a flawed reasoning.

C) It assumes to be true what it sets out to prove.
This is simply not the case.

D) It makes a generalization based on one segment of the population.
This reflects the line "Over 80% of children ages 4-14 who bathed in a particular sea called "The White Sea" have contracted the infection in varying levels of severity.". However the text does not say "because the children have contracted the infection everybody should avoid the sea water". The text does not generalize in such way.

E) It contradicts itself by proclaiming a condition to be not dangerous and then offering a recommendation to avoid that condition.
It's true that the passage says that the infection is not dangerous, but it says that is painful; so offering a recommendation to avoid it is not a flawed reasoning.

However Cicero, Option D points out that the only conlusion offeered in the argument is based on a fact of onlye children for which data is available while option B is weaker as the link to only cause is equally undiagnosed and loop not closed..i would say bad question because D makes me skip the right answer likely B (:D thru no flaw of D :X)
Manager
Status: Persevering
Joined: 15 May 2013
Posts: 225
Location: India
GMAT Date: 08-02-2013
GPA: 3.7
WE: Consulting (Consulting)
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 87 [0], given: 34

Re: A certain eye infection has been linked to exposure to [#permalink]

### Show Tags

10 Aug 2013, 05:07
docdrizzeally wrote:
Zarrolou wrote:
This is tough as almost all options reflect part of the reasoning, however only one is flawed.

Which of the following indicates a flaw in the author’s reasoning?

A) It relies on evidence about a specific place to make a recommendation about an entire class of such places.
This reflect the reasoning "Over 80% of children ages 4-14 who bathed in a particular sea called "The White Sea""=>avoid all Sea waters.
This is a legit reasoning, as the infection is linked with high-salinity sea water, so this recommendation makes sense.

B) It assumes that one possible cause of a condition is the only cause of that condition.
IMO CORRECT. The first line states: "A certain eye infection has been linked to exposure to a certain type of high-salinity sea water" => "the only way to completely avoid the infection is to refrain from bathing in "The White Sea" and other Sea waters altogether.".
We know that the infection has been linked to water, but could be linked to other factors as well, we don't know. But the passage excludes this possibility by stating that the ONLY way to avoid the infection is to refrain from sea water. This is a flawed reasoning.

C) It assumes to be true what it sets out to prove.
This is simply not the case.

D) It makes a generalization based on one segment of the population.
This reflects the line "Over 80% of children ages 4-14 who bathed in a particular sea called "The White Sea" have contracted the infection in varying levels of severity.". However the text does not say "because the children have contracted the infection everybody should avoid the sea water". The text does not generalize in such way.

E) It contradicts itself by proclaiming a condition to be not dangerous and then offering a recommendation to avoid that condition.
It's true that the passage says that the infection is not dangerous, but it says that is painful; so offering a recommendation to avoid it is not a flawed reasoning.

However Cicero, Option D points out that the only conlusion offeered in the argument is based on a fact of onlye children for which data is available while option B is weaker as the link to only cause is equally undiagnosed and loop not closed..i would say bad question because D makes me skip the right answer likely B (:D thru no flaw of D :X)

I would still prefer option B, as the conclusion says that to completely avoid x infection, therefore b directly attacks the conclusion by saying that it might not be the only cause
_________________

--It's one thing to get defeated, but another to accept it.

Intern
Joined: 30 Mar 2013
Posts: 30
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 7 [0], given: 22

Re: A certain eye infection has been linked to exposure to a [#permalink]

### Show Tags

10 Aug 2013, 08:28
Please ADD OA with explanation too !
Intern
Status: Bring it on.....!
Joined: 11 Jul 2013
Posts: 31
Location: India
Concentration: Technology
GMAT 1: 660 Q49 V31
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 11 [0], given: 9

Re: A certain eye infection has been linked to exposure to a [#permalink]

### Show Tags

10 Aug 2013, 08:28
In my opinion answer would be A .

Here this paragraph is somehow forcing us to make the general assumption of real world that Sea water is highly saline and hence bathing in one would increase the probability of catching the infection, but this point is never reflected via the given information.

And by mentioning "avoid the infection is to refrain from bathing in "The White Sea" and other Sea waters altogether" , the author is somehow bringing that real world assumption into play without ever correctly indicating the same and making a recommendation about the entire class of such place. Thus the conclusion is flawed.

Please provide the OA and an official explanation if there is one.

Thanks.
_________________

Live as if your were to die tomorrow. Learn as if you were to live forever - Gandhi

Manager
Joined: 21 Aug 2012
Posts: 210
Concentration: General Management, Operations
Schools: HBS '19 (S)
GMAT 1: 740 Q49 V42
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 30 [1] , given: 349

Re: A certain eye infection has been linked to exposure to [#permalink]

### Show Tags

10 Aug 2013, 11:24
1
KUDOS
Zarrolou wrote:
This is tough as almost all options reflect part of the reasoning, however only one is flawed.

Which of the following indicates a flaw in the author’s reasoning?

A) It relies on evidence about a specific place to make a recommendation about an entire class of such places.
This reflect the reasoning "Over 80% of children ages 4-14 who bathed in a particular sea called "The White Sea""=>avoid all Sea waters.
This is a legit reasoning, as the infection is linked with high-salinity sea water, so this recommendation makes sense.

B) It assumes that one possible cause of a condition is the only cause of that condition.
IMO CORRECT. The first line states: "A certain eye infection has been linked to exposure to a certain type of high-salinity sea water" => "the only way to completely avoid the infection is to refrain from bathing in "The White Sea" and other Sea waters altogether.".
We know that the infection has been linked to water, but could be linked to other factors as well, we don't know. But the passage excludes this possibility by stating that the ONLY way to avoid the infection is to refrain from sea water. This is a flawed reasoning.

C) It assumes to be true what it sets out to prove.
This is simply not the case.

D) It makes a generalization based on one segment of the population.
This reflects the line "Over 80% of children ages 4-14 who bathed in a particular sea called "The White Sea" have contracted the infection in varying levels of severity.". However the text does not say "because the children have contracted the infection everybody should avoid the sea water". The text does not generalize in such way.

E) It contradicts itself by proclaiming a condition to be not dangerous and then offering a recommendation to avoid that condition.
It's true that the passage says that the infection is not dangerous, but it says that is painful; so offering a recommendation to avoid it is not a flawed reasoning.

Agreed ... I go with B ... gr8 explanantion ..
Senior Manager
Joined: 03 Dec 2012
Posts: 367
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 124 [0], given: 291

Re: A certain eye infection has been linked to exposure to a [#permalink]

### Show Tags

15 Oct 2013, 19:05
This question is not not as easy as it looks. You almost predetermine the answer by the end of the passage but when you start reading the answers, the only word that comes out is Whoa!!! IMO B.
Current Student
Status: Everyone is a leader. Just stop listening to others.
Joined: 22 Mar 2013
Posts: 991
Location: India
GPA: 3.51
WE: Information Technology (Computer Software)
Followers: 166

Kudos [?]: 1502 [0], given: 227

Re: A certain eye infection has been linked to exposure to a [#permalink]

### Show Tags

31 Mar 2014, 06:46
Question stem says infection is linked to "a particular type of water " and further evidences cites that 80% children reported infection from "White sea" in the end author is concluding that in order to avoid the infection one should avoid taking bath in
in "The White Sea" and other Sea waters altogether.

How come author can put emphasis on other Sea waters altogether as fact (A certain eye infection has been linked to exposure to a certain type of high-salinity sea water.") has linked this infection to a particular type of water.

What if I take bath in Indian ocean and do not get any such infection. Author has not provided any evidence based on world wide research.
How he can bolster his claim that one should avoid taking bath in on other Sea waters altogether ?

Thus, I think option A is correct.
_________________

Piyush K
-----------------------
Our greatest weakness lies in giving up. The most certain way to succeed is to try just one more time. ― Thomas A. Edison
Don't forget to press--> Kudos
My Articles: 1. WOULD: when to use? | 2. All GMATPrep RCs (New)
Tip: Before exam a week earlier don't forget to exhaust all gmatprep problems specially for "sentence correction".

Intern
Joined: 31 Jan 2014
Posts: 20
Schools: NTU '17, AGSM '16
GMAT 1: 720 Q49 V40
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 5 [0], given: 1

Re: A certain eye infection has been linked to exposure to a [#permalink]

### Show Tags

31 Mar 2014, 08:03
I too thought the answer would be A, after narrowing down between A & B. But after a closer inspection i believe "B" is a better answer.

The author does not generalize that the cause of the infection is "The white Sea"; he in fact says that "Bathing in the white sea will not ...... infection"

His last statement is just a precaution because he has instilled his belief in the fact that "only and only saline water" causes this condition.
This assumption of saline water is causing the fallacy and not the palce.
Manager
Status: suffer now and live forever as a champion!!!
Joined: 01 Sep 2013
Posts: 149
Location: India
GPA: 3.5
WE: Information Technology (Computer Software)
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 57 [0], given: 75

Re: A certain eye infection has been linked to exposure to a [#permalink]

### Show Tags

10 Apr 2014, 20:27
The argument says " the only way to completely avoid the infection is to refrain from bathing in "The White Sea" and other Sea waters altogether".

Therefore to flaw the argument , choice B says "It assumes that one possible cause of a condition is the only cause of that condition."

please refer to the highlighted words, they are the connectors .

Kudos if you like the post
Manager
Joined: 25 Apr 2014
Posts: 154
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 52 [0], given: 1474

A certain eye infection has been linked to exposure to a [#permalink]

### Show Tags

22 Jul 2014, 12:17
+1 for A
Can somebody provide the OA please?
Manager
Joined: 10 Feb 2015
Posts: 122
GMAT 1: 710 Q48 V38
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 15 [0], given: 70

Re: A certain eye infection has been linked to exposure to a [#permalink]

### Show Tags

20 Oct 2015, 05:37
As requested , the OA is :-

The question stem asks us to find a flaw in reasoning. In this question the first step is to identify the conclusion and determine whether we can find a recognizable flaw. The arguments conclusion is that “the only way to avoid contracting the eye infection is to stay away from all the sea waters including “The White Sea”. The type of reasoning discussed in the passage is a cause and effect reasoning. The author is assuming that the cause for contracting eye infection is only bathing in sea waters; this is exactly the flaw in the argument. If we do the POE then it becomes really difficult to prove that an answer choice is incorrect. In such question we should be beware of answer choice that just discusses only a part of the argument or just state what the author is doing, but the answer is not telling us what the flaw is. To test whether a choice is incorrect we can try to change the argument so that it addresses the flaw mentioned in a choice. If the conclusion still remains flawed the answer choice is incorrect. However, it is much easier in this case to find out which answer choice is correct.
This choice is just telling what the author is doing to prove his/ her point.
Correct. This is the correct answer choice that states the flaw in the cause and effect reasoning.
The author is not assuming what he sets out to prove. As with answer choice (A) the argument does this but this is not a flaw in the reasoning.
As with (A) this choice is also just telling what the author is doing to prove his/ her point. Hence, this is not a flaw.
Same as other incorrect answer choices, this is not the flaw in the argument.
Senior Manager
Joined: 07 Sep 2014
Posts: 368
Concentration: Finance, Marketing
Followers: 5

Kudos [?]: 41 [0], given: 244

Re: A certain eye infection has been linked to exposure to a [#permalink]

### Show Tags

07 Aug 2016, 00:05
I thought A, B, D all are flows in the reasoning.

A certain eye infection has been linked to exposure to a certain type of high-salinity sea water. While not dangerous, these infections are painful and often unnoticeable, at least to those who contract them. Over 80% of children ages 4-14 who bathed in a particular sea called "The White Sea" have contracted the infection in varying levels of severity. Although bathing in "The White Sea" does not always lead to a contraction of the infection, the only way to completely avoid the infection is to refrain from bathing in "The White Sea" and other Sea waters altogether.

Which of the following indicates a flaw in the author’s reasoning?

A) It relies on evidence about a specific place to make a recommendation about an entire class of such places.

: author collects evidence from "the white sea" and make a generalised statement about all seas so this presents a flaw in this part of the sentence: he only way to completely avoid the infection is to refrain from bathing in "The White Sea" and other Sea waters altogether.

B) It assumes that one possible cause of a condition is the only cause of that condition.

This option point a flaw in this part of the senetence :
the only way to completely avoid the infection is to refrain from bathing in "The White Sea" and other Sea waters altogether.

D) It makes a generalization based on one segment of the population.

: Author has collected only evidence of "Over 80% of children ages 4-14 who bathed in a particular sea called "The White Sea" have contracted the infection in varying levels of severity" what about adult group, old age group. the only way to completely avoid the infection is to refrain from bathing in "The White Sea" and other Sea waters altogether. => this will fall apart then.

logicguru pl weigh in :
Re: A certain eye infection has been linked to exposure to a   [#permalink] 07 Aug 2016, 00:05
Similar topics Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
20 A specific skin rash has been linked to exposure to certain 13 16 Feb 2013, 06:06
A specific skin rash has been linked to exposure to certain 12 12 Dec 2010, 12:00
29 The traditional treatment of strep infections has been a 29 27 Oct 2010, 10:39
The traditional treatment of strep infections has been a 7 29 May 2008, 06:56
60 The traditional treatment of strep infections has been a 48 27 Apr 2008, 10:51
Display posts from previous: Sort by

# A certain eye infection has been linked to exposure to a

 new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics

 Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.