Check GMAT Club Decision Tracker for the Latest School Decision Releases https://gmatclub.com/AppTrack

 It is currently 24 May 2017, 17:33

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# A chemical company claims that, since only one of 520 rats

Author Message
Director
Joined: 21 Sep 2004
Posts: 608
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 35 [0], given: 0

A chemical company claims that, since only one of 520 rats [#permalink]

### Show Tags

19 Jan 2005, 19:49
A chemical company claims that, since only one of 520 rats that were given high doses of a new artificial sweetener developed cancer while all the others remained healthy, the sweetener is not carcinogenic for human beings and ought to be approved for human consumption.
Which of the following, if true, most strongly supports the chemical companyâ€™s claim?
(A) Chemicals that are carcinogenic for rats are usually also carcinogenic for other animals, such as guinea pigs, used in experiments.
(B) The spontaneous incidence of cancer in this particular strain of rat is approximately one in 540.
(C) Tests conducted on a certain strain of mouse show that, of 500 mice given a dose of sweetener similar to that given the rats, 53 developed cancer.
(D) Certain chemicals that are carcinogenic for human beings have been shown not to be carcinogenic for rats.
(E) The average lifespan of the strain of rat used in the experiment is 2 years; the chemical company terminated the experiment when the rats were 13 months old.
Manager
Joined: 14 Nov 2004
Posts: 54
Location: Seattle, WA
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

19 Jan 2005, 21:49
I will take B
Director
Joined: 21 Sep 2004
Posts: 608
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 35 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

19 Jan 2005, 22:10
talk2sunder@gmail.com wrote:
I will take B

can you please explain why B?
Director
Joined: 03 Nov 2004
Posts: 858
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 54 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

20 Jan 2005, 07:48
A - Irrelevant to the discussion
B - Supports the claim becos it now shows only 1 in 540 is affected instead of the 1 in 520
C - Weakens
D - Weakens
E - Irrelevant
Director
Joined: 21 Sep 2004
Posts: 608
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 35 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

20 Jan 2005, 09:31
OA is B.
20 Jan 2005, 09:31
Similar topics Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
Only one day care facility in this city bases its fees on a 0 01 Aug 2011, 17:19
Opponents of compulsory national service claim that such a 5 15 Apr 2009, 08:30
======== Since 1953, many experimental attempts to 9 22 May 2009, 01:39
RC Naked mole rat 3 23 Sep 2008, 01:29
1 Since the early 1970's, historians have begun to devote 6 18 Jul 2008, 18:13
Display posts from previous: Sort by