It is currently 17 Oct 2017, 12:06

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

A chemical company claims that, since only one of 520 rats

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
Director
Director
User avatar
Joined: 21 Sep 2004
Posts: 604

Kudos [?]: 35 [0], given: 0

A chemical company claims that, since only one of 520 rats [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 19 Jan 2005, 19:49
A chemical company claims that, since only one of 520 rats that were given high doses of a new artificial sweetener developed cancer while all the others remained healthy, the sweetener is not carcinogenic for human beings and ought to be approved for human consumption.
Which of the following, if true, most strongly supports the chemical company’s claim?
(A) Chemicals that are carcinogenic for rats are usually also carcinogenic for other animals, such as guinea pigs, used in experiments.
(B) The spontaneous incidence of cancer in this particular strain of rat is approximately one in 540.
(C) Tests conducted on a certain strain of mouse show that, of 500 mice given a dose of sweetener similar to that given the rats, 53 developed cancer.
(D) Certain chemicals that are carcinogenic for human beings have been shown not to be carcinogenic for rats.
(E) The average lifespan of the strain of rat used in the experiment is 2 years; the chemical company terminated the experiment when the rats were 13 months old.

Kudos [?]: 35 [0], given: 0

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 14 Nov 2004
Posts: 54

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 0

Location: Seattle, WA
 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 19 Jan 2005, 21:49
I will take B

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 0

Director
Director
User avatar
Joined: 21 Sep 2004
Posts: 604

Kudos [?]: 35 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 19 Jan 2005, 22:10
talk2sunder@gmail.com wrote:
I will take B

can you please explain why B?

Kudos [?]: 35 [0], given: 0

Director
Director
avatar
Joined: 03 Nov 2004
Posts: 850

Kudos [?]: 57 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 20 Jan 2005, 07:48
A - Irrelevant to the discussion
B - Supports the claim becos it now shows only 1 in 540 is affected instead of the 1 in 520
C - Weakens
D - Weakens
E - Irrelevant

Kudos [?]: 57 [0], given: 0

Director
Director
User avatar
Joined: 21 Sep 2004
Posts: 604

Kudos [?]: 35 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 20 Jan 2005, 09:31
OA is B.

Kudos [?]: 35 [0], given: 0

  [#permalink] 20 Jan 2005, 09:31
Display posts from previous: Sort by

A chemical company claims that, since only one of 520 rats

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.